
Rocket Lake S: Intels letzte 14-nm-Desktop-CPU erreicht über 5 GHz
Dank Cypress-Cove-Architektur soll Rocket Lake zudem mehr Leistung pro Takt aufweisen. (Intel Rocket Lake, Prozessor)

Just another news site
Dank Cypress-Cove-Architektur soll Rocket Lake zudem mehr Leistung pro Takt aufweisen. (Intel Rocket Lake, Prozessor)
The Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment, the global anti-piracy alliance featuring the studios of the MPA, Netflix and Amazon, has taken control of at least 10 domains previously connected to anime piracy. The seizures are the latest in a long line of actions that ACE and the MPA have chosen not to publicize.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
The Alliance For Creativity and Entertainment is a massive global anti-piracy coalition featuring dozens of global content companies including the MPA, Netflix and Amazon.
The aim of ACE is to tackle infringement of its members’ rights in a centralized fashion by pooling resources and sharing the costs of enforcement actions. While the group publicizes some of its lawsuits and settlements, a significant number fly under the radar for reasons that are never made clear.
It’s believed that at least in some cases, lawyers acting for ACE discover the identities of pirate site operators and app developers in order to pressure them to quietly shut down and settle. In some cases this involves signing over domain names to ACE or, more accurately, placing them into the hands of the MPA.
Today we reveal that at least 10 additional domains have recently been commandeered by the Hollywood group. Information is scarce on some of the platforms but given their names, they were most likely involved in anime piracy.
In recent weeks, animemovil.com and animemovil.net and animemovil.tv were all taken over the MPA and redirected to the ACE anti-piracy portal. A check of WHOIS records shows that the domains are now registered to the Hollywood group and secured, as always, by brand protection and anti-piracy partner MarkMonitor.
According to an article published last October, Animemovil and AnimeYT (more on that in a moment) were among the most popular sites for obtaining Spanish-subtitled versions of Japanese anime.
They were reportedly forced to close down early 2019 but even a cursory Google search reveals a large range of sites trading on the same branding so whether they actually closed or simply switched domains isn’t immediately obvious.
As mentioned above, when it came to subbed versions of Japanese anime, AnimeYT was reportedly popular in Spanish-speaking regions but now several domains linked to the platform are in the hands of the MPA.
During the past few weeks, animeyt.tv, animeyt.video, animeyt.link, and animeyt.online all fell into the hands of the Hollywood group and currently redirect users to the ACE anti-piracy portal.
In common with many domains seized by ACE/MPA, it can be difficult to find out what the underlying sites were up to. By the time seizures go through, sites are often disappeared from search engines and in many cases, even the Wayback Machine struggles to come up with evidence of the activities.
However, Google’s transparency report is more comprehensive so we can see that animesonehd.com and animesonehd.net, another pair of seized domains, have attracted the attention of anime rightsholders over the years including Toei Animation, FUNimation Entertainment, and VIZ Media.
However, none of these companies are listed as members of ACE so in the absence of any comment by the anti-piracy group, we can only wonder whether the takedown notices previously sent by Warner Bros. were part of the problem.
Finally, Skanime.net completes the list of seizures. In addition to various blogs making references to the site in respect of offering free anime, we can confirm that in common with animesonehd, the site attracted the negative attention of many anime companies and ACE member Netflix.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
Microsoft will die Xbox Series X kurz vor dem Weihnachtsgeschäft in den Handel bringen. (Xbox Series X, Microsoft)
Das autarke VR-Headset soll bequemer werden und eine höhere Frequenz aufweisen. (Oculus Rift, OLED)
Die Mär von der Unbezahlbarkeit regenerativer Energien
Ausgerechnet an Punkten, an denen es besonders im EU-Gebälk knirscht, wurden die Weichen eher für weitere sieben Jahre in die völlig falsche Richtung gestellt
70 Jahre Korea-Krieg: Verlauf, Hintergründe, Interpretation – Teil 3: Interpretation
Seedboxes are quite popular among a subset of avid torrent users. They allow people to outsource the seeding process to an external service, ensuring high download and upload speeds. This also prevents users’ private IP-addresses from showing up in torrent swarms. However, that doesn’t mean they’re always anonymous.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
BitTorrent is a public file-sharing protocol, which broadcasts IP-addresses of up- and downloaders to the public at large.
For some, this is a problem, so to prevent this from happening, people turn to third-party services such as VPNs, proxies, or cloud torrent downloaders.
While these services add an extra layer of protection, not all are anonymous. Many cloud torrent downloaders, for example, can still connect an IP-address and timestamp to a specific user or their service.
With this in mind, we wondered how this applies to seedboxes. While these services are not predominantly used as an anonymity tool, some believe that they are.
To find out whether this is indeed the case, we reached out to several of the largest seedbox providers with a set of relevant questions. The questions cover logging practices, responses to DMCA notices, and legal requests, among other things. The full set of questions is as follows:
1. Does your service collect any temporary or permanent data that can link a seedbox IP-address to a specific user on your service? If so, what information do you collect and how long is that stored?
2. Does your service store any personally identifiable information of users (including IP-addresses)? If so, what information do you store, and for how long?
3. Does your service store the names/hashes or other identifying information of (previously) downloaded content (stored on your servers) that can be connected with a specific user? If so, for how long?
4. Do you offer dedicated and/or shared IP addresses? When IP addresses are shared and you get a ‘live’ complaint from a third-party, is it possible for you to link an IP address to a ‘live’ torrent and related user account?
5. How does your service respond to DMCA notices or similar takedown requests?
6. Do you have a repeat infringer policy? If so, what does it entail?
7. Have you ever had a request to provide information on a specific user from a third-party and been able to do so?
8. In what circumstances do you comply with legal requests and what are you able to hand over?
While we contacted nearly a dozen seedbox providers, only two replied. This is rather disappointing, especially from companies that sometimes serve tens of thousands of customers.
Below are the responses from the two providers who were kind enough to answer: SonicBit and Rapidseedbox.
1. We do store user IP addresses for any user using our seedbox to keep our service clean from dupe/ fake email accounts, invalid referral activity, etc. Information will be removed when a user requests to remove their account.
2. We do store user IPs when a user logs in and logs out, for user account security to check any invalid activity in their account. Information will be removed when a user requests to remove their account.
3. We do not store downloaded hashes.
4. We only offer shared seedbox IP address, but different seedbox instances. We can check the specific user for any torrent downloaded in their account even with a shared seedbox IP address.
5. We will respond to it promptly and seriously, check if the takedown request is valid, and then forward the DMCA notice to the user. If there is no response in three days, we will remove the content manually.
6. No.
7. Never.
8. We do comply with the legal requests and do our best to resolve any legal requests to keep our service clean.
1. A user is linked to a seedbox IP, at the time of usage. When the subscription is terminated, the whole seedbox is terminated as well.
2. We store the email, transaction history, last logged time and IP address in the client area. Users can request account/data deletion at any time. At times, we clear up dormant accounts to save resources.
3. No. On five out of six plans, the user gets a VPS with root access and has full control over the seedbox.
4. Each seedbox has a dedicated IP address. “Live” complaints are linked to an IP address/user.
5. Locating and deleting the data proactively, informing the user, and asking to not repeat.
6. Repeat infringers will get their services suspended and eventually terminated.
7. We refer people to our Terms of Service and encourage them to take responsibility for the activity and the content on their allocated seedbox.
8. See the answer to question 7.
—-
As the answers above show, seedboxes can be very useful. However, they are certainly not (always) anonymous.
If your seedbox provider isn’t listed here we would encourage you to reach out to support, asking these same questions. We are happy to add responses to this article going forward if any more come in.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
F5 flaw allows complete network takeover; Cisco bug discloses sensitive info.
Enlarge (credit: Marco Verch Professional Photographer and Speaker)
Hackers are actively exploiting two unrelated high-severity vulnerabilities that allow unauthenticated access or even a complete takeover of networks run by Fortune 500 companies and government organizations.
The most serious exploits are targeting a critical vulnerability in F5’s Big-IP advanced delivery controler, a device that’s typically placed between a perimeter firewall and a Web application to handle load balancing and other tasks. The vulnerability, which F5 patched three weeks ago, allows unauthenticated attackers to remotely run commands or code of their choice. Attackers can then use their control of the device to hijack the internal network it’s connected to.
The presence of a remote code execution flaw in a device located in such a sensitive part of a network gave the vulnerability a maximum severity rating of 10. Immediately after F5 released a patch on June 30, security practitioners predicted that the flaw—which is tracked as CVE-2020-5902—would be exploited against any vulnerable networks that didn’t quickly install the update. On Friday, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued an advisory that proved those warnings prescient.
Die Klimabewegung bewegt sich auf der gleichen Diskursebene wie die Vertreter der Corona-Notstandsmaßnahmen. Ihnen ist gemein, dass sie eine Katastrophe beschwören, der nur mit starken Notstandsmaßnahmen begegnet werden kann
You must be logged in to post a comment.