Kitchen sponges are festering germ dens—and sanitizing them doesn’t help

The old ‘pop it in the microwave/dishwasher’ trick is worthless, new study shows.

Enlarge / Some germy places in the house include the kitchen faucet and sponges. Typically people wash their hands after handling raw meat in the kitchen and frequently use sponges or cloths to wipe germs from surfaces in the kitchen. (Photo by Zbigniew Bzdak/Chicago Tribune/MCT via Getty Images) (credit: Getty | MCT)

Scientists have long thrown shade at the unassuming kitchen sponge. The household staple skulks in sinks amid dirty dishes and soggy food scraps, sopping up and amplifying microbial forces capable of invading clean food spaces. The savvy kitchen-goer may think they have this situation locked down—a simple toss through a sanitizing dishwasher cycle or a sizzling swirl in the microwave... and done. Sudsy germsplosion averted.

Nice try, says science.

In a comprehensive study of 14 household sponges and their microbial inhabitants published in Scientific Reports, researchers confirmed that kitchen sponges are indeed domestic abominations. Moreover, any sterilizing attempts only seem to temporarily free up sponge-space for potential pathogens, which rapidly recolonize the festering scrubber.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Apple can’t end lawsuit over “breaking” FaceTime on iPhone 4, judge rules

“FaceTime is a ‘feature’ of the iPhone and thus a component of the iPhone’s cost.”

Enlarge / The iPhone 4S. (credit: Andrew Cunningham)

Back in February 2017, two Californians sued Apple in a proposed class-action lawsuit over the fact that the company disabled an older version of iOS. Disabling the outdated iOS had the effect of making FaceTime stop working on their respective iPhone 4 devices.

According to a ruling issued last Friday by a federal judge in San Jose, California, Apple cannot get the case dismissed. US District Court Judge Lucy Koh brushed aside Apple's response to the case, including dismissing an argument the case could not proceed on the grounds that the plaintiffs were not injured because FaceTime is a free app that comes with iPhones.

"Plaintiffs paid for their iPhones, and FaceTime is a 'feature' of the iPhone and thus a component of the iPhone’s cost," Judge Koh wrote.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

All the things the Internet hates about the Tesla Model 3 have me excited

The screen doesn’t bother me, and if it’s fun to drive, they deserve to sell millions.

Enlarge / The first batch of production Tesla Model 3s, ready to be handed over to their new owners. (credit: Tesla)

Last Friday, Tesla's new Model 3 electric vehicle finally hit the streets. At an event in California, the company handed over the first few production vehicles, a process that will continue for quite some time as Tesla fills what could be half-a-million prospective orders on its books.

Tesla made its reputation—and rebuilt that of the EV—on the backs of the Model S sedan and Model X SUV, high-end vehicles that have done a lot to dispel the idea that an EV has to be a hair-shirt experience. But it has a very different task at hand with the Model 3, which must sell at a far lower price and in much greater volume. That has meant an obsessive approach to cost reduction, requiring some design choices that have not gone down well with everyone. But the more I consider what the company has done, the more impressed I am. Assuming the early takes and my gut instinct are accurate, Tesla deserves to sell them in the millions.

What kilowatts?

While I have your attention, I do have one gripe about the Model 3 I would like to get on the record, and it concerns how we talk about batteries. As expected, the Model 3 is available with a choice of two different battery packs, and I was wrong—the bigger battery isn't just a software-unlock away. Unlike the Model S and Model X, the 3 will use Tesla's 2170 cells. The 2170s are larger than the 18650 cells even though they cost less to produce and have almost double the energy density (6,000mA compared to 3,000mA, according to InsideEVs). But just what the battery specs are for the Model 3 variants remains unknown. The event and Tesla's press kit simply describe them by range: 220 miles or 310 miles.

Read 17 remaining paragraphs | Comments

BitTorrent Users Form The World’s Largest Criminal Enterprise, Lawyer Says

When someone uses a BitTorrent client to download content, it might seem like a small and insignificant act. However, according to a law firm trying to extract payment from five alleged infringers, every single one is engaged in the largest criminal enterprise ever witnessed on planet earth, one that threatens to tear down intellectual property itself.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

As the sharing of copyrighted material on the Internet continues, so do the waves of lawsuits which claim compensation for alleged damage caused.

Run by so-called ‘copyright trolls’, these legal efforts are often painted as the only way for rightsholders to send a tough message to deter infringement. In reality, however, these schemes are often the basis for a separate revenue stream, one in which file-sharers are forced to pay large cash sums to make supposed jury trials disappear.

Courts around the United States are becoming familiar with these ‘settlement factories’ and sometimes choose to make life more difficult for the trolls. With this potential for friction, the language deployed in lawsuits is often amped up to paint copyright holders as fighting for their very existence. Meanwhile, alleged infringers are described as hardened criminals intent on wreaking havoc on the entertainment industries.

While this polarization is nothing new, a court filing spotted by the troll-fighters over at Fight Copyright Trolls sees the demonization of file-sharers amped up to eleven – and then some.

The case, which is being heard in a district court in Nevada, features LHF Productions, the outfit behind action movie London Has Fallen. It targets five people who allegedly shared the work using BitTorrent and failed to respond to the company’s requests to settle.

“[N]one of the Defendants referenced herein have made any effort to answer or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff’s allegations. In light of the Defendants’ apparent failure to take any action with respect to the present lawsuit, the Plaintiff is left with no choice but to seek a default judgment,” the motion reads.

In the absence of any defense, LHF Productions asks the court to grant default judgments of $15,000 per defendant, which amounts to $75,000 overall, a decent sum for what amounts to five downloads. LHF Productions notes that it could’ve demanded $150,000 from each individual but feels that a more modest sum would be sufficient to “deter future infringement.”

However, when reading the description of the defendants provided by LHF, one could be forgiven for thinking that they’re actually heinous criminals hell-bent on worldwide destruction.

“The Defendants are participants in a global piracy ring composed of one hundred fifty million members – a ring that threatens to tear down fundamental structures of intellectual property,” the lawsuit reads.

While there are indeed 150 million users of BitTorrent, this characterization that they’re all involved in a single “piracy ring” is both misleading and inaccurate.

BitTorrent swarms are separate entities, so the correct way of describing the defendants would be limited to their action for the movie London Has Fallen. Instead, they’re painted as being involved in a global conspiracy with more members than the populations of the United Kingdom, Canada, and Spain combined.

It seems that the introduction of more drama into these infringement lawsuits is becoming necessary as more courts become wise to the activities of trolls, not least organizations being branded criminal themselves, such as the now defunct Prenda Law.

Perhaps with this in mind, LHF Productions tries to convince the court that far from being small-time file-sharers, people downloading their movie online are actually part of something extremely big, a crime wave so huge that nothing like it has ever been witnessed.

“While the actions of each individual participant may seem innocuous, their collective action amounts to one of the largest criminal enterprises ever seen on earth,” LHF says of the defendants.

“[I]f this pervasive culture of piracy is allowed to continue undeterred, it threatens to undo centuries of intellectual property law and unravel a core pillar of our economy. After all, the right to intellectual property was something so fundamental, so essential, to our nation’s founding, that our founding father’s found it necessary to include in the first article of the Constitution.”

If the apocalyptic scenario painted by LHF in its lawsuit (pdf) is to be believed, recouping a mere $15,000 from each defendant begins to sound like a bargain. Certainly, the movie outfit will be hoping the judge sees it that way too.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Android’s Nearby Connections goes 2.0, connects your things to… other things

Android’s Nearby Connections goes 2.0, connects your things to… other things

Google Android’s “Nearby Connections” feature lets your phone to interact with other devices specifically when they’re within range of one another. Now Google is updating the Nearby Connections API to version 2.0, and the company says it provides a fast, secure, peer-to-peer protocol that doesn’t require an internet connection. Among other things, that means your TV […]

Android’s Nearby Connections goes 2.0, connects your things to… other things is a post from: Liliputing

Android’s Nearby Connections goes 2.0, connects your things to… other things

Google Android’s “Nearby Connections” feature lets your phone to interact with other devices specifically when they’re within range of one another. Now Google is updating the Nearby Connections API to version 2.0, and the company says it provides a fast, secure, peer-to-peer protocol that doesn’t require an internet connection. Among other things, that means your TV […]

Android’s Nearby Connections goes 2.0, connects your things to… other things is a post from: Liliputing

HBO confirms hack that reportedly included script to upcoming GoT episode

Video for episodes of Ballers and Room 104 also reportedly stolen.

Enlarge (credit: HBO)

HBO said it was the victim of a hack that may have leaked as much as 1.5 terabytes of show data, including a script to an upcoming episode of Game of Thrones.

"HBO recently experienced a cyber incident, which resulted in the compromise of proprietary information," the network said in a statement sent to Entertainment Weekly, which broke the news of the breach. "We immediately began investigating the incident and are working with law enforcement and outside cybersecurity firms. Data protection is a top priority at HBO, and we take seriously our responsibility to protect the data we hold."

EW said unidentified hackers claimed to have obtained one upcoming episode each of Ballers and Room 104. The videos "have apparently been put online," the publication said, without elaborating. According to EW, the leaked contents also include a script for next week's fourth episode of Game of Thrones. So far, Ars is unable to confirm any of the leaked material. The HBO statement didn't detail any of the proprietary information that was taken.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Hack: Game-of-Thrones-Skript von HBO geleakt

Angreifern ist es offenbar gelungen, in die Systeme von HBO einzudringen. Sie wollen 1,5 Terabyte an Material haben und bereits Episoden verschiedener Serien sowie ein Skript von Game of Thrones veröffentlicht haben. (Game of Thrones, Applikationen)

Angreifern ist es offenbar gelungen, in die Systeme von HBO einzudringen. Sie wollen 1,5 Terabyte an Material haben und bereits Episoden verschiedener Serien sowie ein Skript von Game of Thrones veröffentlicht haben. (Game of Thrones, Applikationen)

Google’s new scheme to connect online to offline shopping scrutinized

“Consumers cannot easily avoid Google’s tracking of their in-store purchase behavior.”

Enlarge / Physical home button surrounded by typical Android capacitive buttons.

A privacy advocacy group has filed a formal legal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, asking the agency to begin an investigation "into Google’s in-store tracking algorithm to determine whether it adequately protects the privacy of millions of American consumers."

In the Monday filing, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said it is concerned with Google’s new Store Sales Management program, which debuted in May. The system allows the company to extend its online tracking capabilities into the physical world. The idea is to combine credit card and other financial data acquired from data brokers to create a singular profile as a way to illustrate to companies what goods and services are being searched for online, which result in actual in-person sales.

Because the algorithm that Google uses is secret, EPIC says, there is no way to determine how well Google’s claimed anonymization feature—to mask names, credit card numbers, location, and other potentially private data—actually works. While Google has been cagey about exactly how it does this, the company has previously revealed that the technique is based on CryptDB.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Deals of the Day (7-31-2017)

Deals of the Day (7-31-2017)

The Samsung Galaxy S8 carried a list price of $720 and up (for a carrier unlocked model) when it launched earlier this year. But now you can score one for as little as $550. That’s the price Samsung is charging for an unlocked (GSM + CDMA) midnight black Galaxy S8 with 64GB of storage when […]

Deals of the Day (7-31-2017) is a post from: Liliputing

Deals of the Day (7-31-2017)

The Samsung Galaxy S8 carried a list price of $720 and up (for a carrier unlocked model) when it launched earlier this year. But now you can score one for as little as $550. That’s the price Samsung is charging for an unlocked (GSM + CDMA) midnight black Galaxy S8 with 64GB of storage when […]

Deals of the Day (7-31-2017) is a post from: Liliputing

Kepler data may hold a Neptune-sized surprise, our first exomoon

Super-Jupiter shows hints that something big is orbiting it.

Enlarge (credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

One of the most important things we've learned from the Kepler mission is that, in many ways, our Solar System isn't unique. Lots of stars have planets, many have multiple planets, and the list of planets includes many with sizes and densities similar to our eight planets. But there are lots of details of our own planets, like the composition and presence of atmospheres, that are much harder to examine at these distances.

One of the features we've not gotten a grip on is the presence of moons. Most of our Solar System's planets have them, and they seem to form by a variety of mechanisms. We'd expect them to be common in exosolar systems, too, but so far we haven't yet spotted any.

A new paper, which goes into extensive detail about the calculations needed to look for an exomoon, makes it clear why: we simply don't have enough observation time to pick one up in most cases. But it also suggests there may be an exception, as the data hints at a Neptune-sized exomoon, though the statistics aren't yet conclusive.

Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments