Verizon’s “supercookies” violated net neutrality transparency rule

Verizon agrees to $1.35M fine and will make it easier to avoid tracking cookies.

Zombie hand cookies. (credit: Rakka)

Verizon Wireless has agreed to pay a $1.35 million fine and give users more control over "supercookies" that identify customers in order to deliver targeted ads from Verizon and other companies. Verizon's use of the supercookies without properly notifying users violated a net neutrality rule that requires Internet providers to disclose accurate information about network management practices to consumers, the FCC said.

Verizon's settlement with the Federal Communications Commission, announced today, stems from an investigation into the carrier's "practice of inserting unique identifier headers [UIDH] or so-called 'supercookies' into its customers’ mobile Internet traffic without their knowledge or consent," the FCC said. Verizon began inserting the identifier—which could not be deleted by consumers—into its subscribers' HTTP Internet traffic in December 2012 and made some limited disclosures in its privacy policy. But the company "did not specifically disclose the presence of UIDH and its uses until October 2014," the FCC said.

ProPublica reported in January 2015 that an online advertising clearinghouse called Turn was taking advantage of the unique identifiers, also known as "zombie cookies," and using them "to respawn tracking cookies that users have deleted." Shortly after that, Verizon said it would offer customers a way to opt out.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Telefónica: Telefonie und SMS zwischen E-Plus und O2 wird netzintern

Die Telefónica führt in wenigen Tagen On-Net-Konditionen für E-Plus und O2 ein. Bei der Abrechnung von Telefonie und Messaging wird nicht länger zwischen den beiden Netzen unterschieden. (Telefónica, E-Plus)

Die Telefónica führt in wenigen Tagen On-Net-Konditionen für E-Plus und O2 ein. Bei der Abrechnung von Telefonie und Messaging wird nicht länger zwischen den beiden Netzen unterschieden. (Telefónica, E-Plus)

Shashlik lets you run Android apps in Linux desktop environments

Shashlik lets you run Android apps in Linux desktop environments

There are nearly two million apps available for Google’s Android operating system, and most are designed to run on smartphones or tablets. But operating systems like Remix OS and Phoenix OS make the case that you could run those apps in a desktop-like environment. Shashlik is an open source project that takes a slightly different approach. […]

Shashlik lets you run Android apps in Linux desktop environments is a post from: Liliputing

Shashlik lets you run Android apps in Linux desktop environments

There are nearly two million apps available for Google’s Android operating system, and most are designed to run on smartphones or tablets. But operating systems like Remix OS and Phoenix OS make the case that you could run those apps in a desktop-like environment. Shashlik is an open source project that takes a slightly different approach. […]

Shashlik lets you run Android apps in Linux desktop environments is a post from: Liliputing

Apple must pay $450 million as Supreme Court rejects e-book antitrust appeal

Appeals court ruled that Apple knowingly conspired with publishers to keep prices high.

On Monday, the US Supreme Court declined to hear Apple’s request for an appeal on a ruling that said the company was liable for violating antitrust laws and engaging in price-fixing by letting publishers set prices for e-books sold on Apple's iBooks platform. Now out of options, Apple will have to pay $400 million to e-book consumers and $50 million to plaintiff’s lawyers, as per a settlement that the company reached in 2014.

In 2012, Apple and five publishers (Penguin, HarperCollins, Hachette, Simon & Schuster, and Macmillan) were sued by the Department of Justice and 33 states’ attorney general offices for conspiring to offer e-books at a higher price than Amazon’s loss-leading $9.99. The publishers all eventually settled for a total of $166 million to states and consumers, but Apple held out and eventually lost a judgement in Manhattan district court.

The company then appealed to the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that it had actually boosted competition by offering new-release books for $12.99 to $14.99. "Antitrust laws are intended to foster competition, not keep prices down at any cost,” Apple wrote in a rebuttal to the district judge’s ruling in 2014.

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Spotify Threatens ‘Clone’ Music Service With Legal Action

A site that uses a mashup of Spotify and YouTube to offer free music to the public has received a legal threat from Spotify. ‘Syotify’ makes use of a script widely available online but Spotify is now demanding that the service hands over its domain name and stops offering services “impermissibly derived” from Spotify’s own services.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

spotifyLast month TorrentFreak reported on a script which mashes-up Spotify and YouTube and enables anyone to set up a decent free music service with a minimum of fuss.

“Youtubify allows you to create your own music streaming website in minutes with no coding knowledge,” the script’s sales pitch reads. “It has an impressive feature set that rivals and even surpasses other biggest streaming services on the market.”

At a cost of just $38 YouTubify has already been deployed on dozens of sites but it seems that the road ahead might not be as smooth as first anticipated.

TorrentFreak has learned that the operator of “Syotify“, a site using the YouTubify script, has just been contacted by Spotify’s legal team.

syotify

“Spotify has recently discovered that some of the things that you do violate Spotify’s intellectual property and other rights,” Spotify told the site.

“Spotify is all for you making a living and running a business, but when that business interferes with Spotify’s rights, we hope you understand that Spotify can’t just sit back and take no action.”

Spotify begins by making it clear that the domain name ‘Syotify’ is too close to its own trademark and as a result is likely to mislead Spotify’s customers.

“Your registration and use of the Infringing Domain Name and your unauthorized use of the Spotify Marks is likely to confuse people into thinking that your website (including its domain name) is somehow associated with or approved by Spotify,” the letter continues.

“Unfortunately, no reasonable explanation exists for your registration of the Infringing Domain Name and use of the Spotify Marks other than the bad-faith intent to profit from the goodwill associated with the Spotify Marks.”

While it initially appears that Spotify is mostly concerned about its trademarks, a closer examination of the cease-and-desist sent to Syotify reveals a fundamental problem with how third-party services leverage Spotify’s API.

“[Y]our website offers the service of converting Spotify’s streaming music service to create playlists on YouTube in violation of Spotify’s user agreement. Essentially you use the Spotify Marks to promote a competitive website that, at the least, appears to generate revenue from third-party advertising,” Spotify writes.

Noting that Syotify’s website breaches trademark, cybersquatting and copyright infringement laws, Spotify gives the site just ten days to comply with a list of demands including:

– Stop using the ‘Infringing Domain Name’
– Provide a list of any other “Spotify-related” domains also registered
– Transfer all “infringing domains” to Spotify
– Permanently stop using any marks “confusingly similar” to Spotify marks

But while most of the above relates to alleged trademark-style infringements, the final demand from Spotify indicates that the company will not allow the use of its API to power what amounts to a rival service.

“[Syotify is required to] permanently stop offering and providing services impermissibly derived from Spotify’s own services,” Spotify’s legal team writes.

Also of interest is that the cease and desist letter referenced above was actually sent to Cloudflare, who passed it on to Syotify as required. However, Spotify also calls on Cloudflare to take action against the music service.

“We assume that you respect the intellectual property rights of others and therefore request that CloudFare remove the infringing content,” Spotify writes.

There’s no indication that Cloudflare intends to do so but TF understands that the company has forwarded the details of Syotify’s hosting provider to Spotify and also forwarded the complaint, so dealing with the site at source is now an option.

Speaking with TorrentFreak, the owner of Syotify says that he was written to Spotify to acknowledge receipt of the company’s complaint but has not yet decided how to respond.

It’s possible that he may move to a new domain to stop infringing on Spotify’s trademarks but he’s not prepared to hand any domains over to Spotify. There is also the chance of him transitioning from a Spotify-powered site to one using Last FM, but nothing has been decided yet.

At the time of publication Spotify had not responded to our request for comment.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Hacker who exposed Bush family e-mails, photos will be extradited to US

“Guccifer” leaked George W. Bush’s amateur paintings, among other things.

George W. Bush stands next to a Frenchified cardboard version of himself. (credit: The Smoking Gun)

A year and a half after he was indicted, a Romanian man who broke into the e-mail of a family member of two former presidents is set to be extradited to the United States.

Romania's top court approved the temporary extradition of Marcel Lehel Lazăr, also known as "Guccifer" and "Micul Fum," according to a report by IDG News. Lazăr allegedly broke into the e-mail account of an unnamed family member of both former president George H. W. Bush as well as George W. Bush, intercepting images including family photos and self-portraits painted by George W. Bush. The hack exposed other deeply personal information about the family, including family e-mails planning a possible funeral for the older former president, written when he was hospitalized in late 2013.

The Romanian suspect, a former cab driver, will face charges of wire fraud, unauthorized access to a protected computer, aggravated identity theft, cyberstalking, and obstruction of justice. He has been charged in the Eastern District of Virginia. The Romanian court decision allows him to be extradited for up to 18 months to face the charges.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Seagate employees’ W-2 forms exposed in another payroll phish

A forged e-mail from CEO pays off again, may be tied to tax return fraud.

Storage device manufacturer Seagate's executives informed employees last week that their income tax data had been shared with an unknown outside party as the result of a targeted phishing attack. On March 1, a Seagate employee sent the data to an outside e-mail address after receiving an e-mail purportedly from Seagate's CEO Stephen Luczo requesting 2015 W-2 data for current and former Seagate employees. The employee, believing the request to be real, forwarded the W-2 reporting data—exposing everyone at Seagate to potential tax fraud and identity theft.

The Seagate breach comes less than a week after Snapchat employees' data was leaked in the same way. Security reporter Brian Krebs reported the breach after learning of it from a Seagate employee who had been given written notification of the breach.

Seagate's spokesperson Eric DeRitis confirmed the incident to Krebs: "On March 1, Seagate Technology learned that the 2015 W-2 tax form information for current and former US-based employees was sent to an unauthorized third party in response to the phishing e-mail scam. The information was sent by an employee who believed the phishing e-mail was a legitimate internal company request.” DeRitis told Krebs "several thousand" employees were affected, and that the company is working with federal law enforcement; employees will receive two years of credit protection from the company.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Meet the real ironman of spaceflight: Valery Polyakov

He spent 438 days in space and then stood up and walked away from his spacecraft.

Valery Polyakov looks out of Mir as space shuttle Discovery approaches the space station in 1995. (credit: NASA)

When Scott Kelly and Mikhail Kornienko returned from space last week after 340 days, they showed few outward signs of fatigue. Moreover, they had the self-satisfaction of putting in nearly a year of very hard work on the International Space Station. Their efforts, along with those of hundreds of scientists on Earth, will undoubtedly advance our knowledge of the effect of long-duration spaceflight on human health.

But to call Kelly and Kornienko pioneers in the truest sense of the word, as those who ventured into the truly unknown, would be a disservice to the Russian cosmonauts who did so much more than two decades ago in more cramped, less comfortable conditions aboard the Mir space station.

Before NASA’s one-year mission, four Russian cosmonauts had spent a year or more in space, beginning with Vladimir Titov and Musa Manarov in 1987. Russian and Kazakh space officials were quick to remind Kelly and Kornienko of this last week after they landed in a remote area of Kazakhstan.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Fable: Microsoft plant Schließung von Lionhead

Das Entwicklungsstudio Lionhead wird vermutlich geschlossen, die Arbeit an Fable Legends eingestellt. Die Gründung von Peter Molyneux gehört seit zehn Jahren zu Microsoft. Auch für ein kleineres dänisches Studio von Microsoft heißt es “Game Over”. (Microsoft, Peter Molyneux)

Das Entwicklungsstudio Lionhead wird vermutlich geschlossen, die Arbeit an Fable Legends eingestellt. Die Gründung von Peter Molyneux gehört seit zehn Jahren zu Microsoft. Auch für ein kleineres dänisches Studio von Microsoft heißt es "Game Over". (Microsoft, Peter Molyneux)

Reports: Windows 10 “Redstone 2” release coming in 2017

Reports: Windows 10 “Redstone 2” release coming in 2017

The next major update for Windows 10 is due this summer, but we may have to wait until early 2017 for the next big updated after that. According to ZDNet, Microsoft had planned to launched the “Redstone 2” update before the end of 2016, but the company has reportedly pushed back that date to coincide […]

Reports: Windows 10 “Redstone 2” release coming in 2017 is a post from: Liliputing

Reports: Windows 10 “Redstone 2” release coming in 2017

The next major update for Windows 10 is due this summer, but we may have to wait until early 2017 for the next big updated after that. According to ZDNet, Microsoft had planned to launched the “Redstone 2” update before the end of 2016, but the company has reportedly pushed back that date to coincide […]

Reports: Windows 10 “Redstone 2” release coming in 2017 is a post from: Liliputing