news.buyenne.com

(credit: Aurich Lawson)

A copyright dispute between Oracle and Google was resolved in May by a federal jury, which found that Google's Android operating system didn't infringe copyrighted code owned by Oracle. A post-trial skirmish over once-confidential Google information is heating up, though, with Google asking for sanctions against one of Oracle's lead attorneys.

Now, Google says (PDF) it should get additional fees because Oracle attorney Annette Hurst disclosed Android revenue and profit figures in open court. She also revealed that Google paid $1 billion to be the default search bar on Apple's iPhone. Those figures should have stayed confidential, say Google lawyers, but once a Bloomberg reporter got hold of a transcript of the hearing, they became headline news.

Yesterday, Oracle filed court papers (PDF) responding to the accusations. Oracle points out that Hurst's statements were made "in response to probing questions from Magistrate Judge Ryu," and were an "on-the-fly rebuttal of mischaracterizations made by Google's counsel." The statements didn't violate the protective order, Oracle argues, and they fall short of the legal requirements for contempt.

(credit: green kozi)

OAKLAND, Calif.—At a Monday hearing in federal court, US Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu had strong words for prosecutors in an attempted murder and gang case that has dragged on for nearly three years.

"It is stunning to me that at this point in the case, the government cannot tell me very clearly what search has been done and what exists or does not exist, relevant to a stingray," she said with exasperation.

As Ars reported over a year ago, the case of United States v. Ellis et al involves four men are charged the 2013 attempted murder of local police officer Eric Karsseboom. The men are also charged with running an alleged East Oakland gang centered around Seminary Avenue (known as "SemCity").

(credit: Valentina Palladino)

Name a home appliance or product, and there's probably a smart version of it today. But for the renters among us, it can be tricky to navigate the aisles of smart light bulbs, thermostats, air conditioners, and vacuums to pick out devices that won't jeopardize your security deposit. When you don't own your home, there’s different set of rules dictating modifications, and some smart home products don't take that into account.

Luckily, these days an increasing number of smart home devices can cater to apartment dwellers that want to avoid ripping open walls and trussing up wires. And as an NYC-based Ars staffer, I had a particularly perfect rental laboratory to recently test and explore what kinds of smart home devices fit renters' needs.