
My journey from small-town hick to Mac user
A Mac user confesses that it was not the computer that he fell in love with.

(credit: Kris Connor/ Getty Images)
I grew up in a low-tech household. My dad only replaced something if it caught fire. We owned about 15 cars (mostly Humber 80s), and 13 of them were used to keep the other two running. Same story for tractors and any other farm equipment you care to name. Dad’s basic rule was that if he couldn't repair it, we didn't need it. We weren't anti-technology, but technology had to serve a purpose. It had to work reliably or at least be fun to repair.
Then I decided I wanted a computer. Much saving ensued, and after a while I was the proud owner of a secondhand Commodore VIC-20, with an expanded memory system, advanced BASIC, and a wonky tape drive... and no TV to plug it into. After begging an old black-and-white television from family friends, I was set for my computing adventures. But they didn't turn out as planned.
Yes, I loved the games, and I tried programming. I even enjoyed attempting to make games involving weird lumpy things colliding with other weird lumpy things. But I never really understood how to program. I could do simple things, but I didn't have the dedication or background to go further. There was no one around to guide me into programming, and, even worse, I couldn't imagine doing anything useful with my VIC-20. After a couple of years, the VIC-20 got packed away and forgotten.
Keine externen Monitore mehr: Apple schafft Thunderbolt-Display ersatzlos ab
Apple stellt das Thunderbolt-Display nicht mehr her und verkauft nur noch Restmengen. Das 27 Zoll große Display wurde schon 2011 vorgestellt und bleibt vorerst ohne Nachfolger. Damit gibt es von Apple keine externen Monitore mehr. (Retina-Display, Display)

Browser: Safari 10 soll auch auf älteren OS-X-Versionen laufen
Researchers Crack ‘Social DRM’ EBook Watermarks
Researchers have released a report dissecting the BooXtream ‘Social DRM’ eBook watermarking system. Inspired by publisher Verso who refused to remove the DRM from an Aaron Swartz book, the Institute for Biblio-Immunology responded by tearing down the privacy-busting system.
Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.
The unauthorized copying and distribution of copyrighted content is a multi-billion dollar puzzle that entertainment industry companies are desperate to solve.
As such, anti-piracy companies are always trying to come up with new ways to stop people from sharing that material online. With that an almost impossible task, some have taken to watermarking instead, with the aim of tracking content and providing a trail back to the source.
What watermarking (so-called ‘Social DRM’) offers over more traditional DRM mechanisms is that it limits inconvenience to the end user and doesn’t hinder file compatibility across devices. However, it does have serious privacy implications for those using ‘infected’ files.
This problem has become a thorn in the side of a group of researchers calling themselves the Institute for Biblio-Immunology. In an email sent to TorrentFreak this week, the group detailed its work against the BooXtream watermarking system offered by Dutch company Icontact.
It all began when publisher Verso Books published an eBook version of Aaron Swartz’s ‘The Boy Who Could Change the World’. This edition of the book prompted an angry response from some quarters and the addition of BooXtream watermarks only made matters worse.
The problem is that BooXtream embeds the personal details of the eBook buyer into the book itself, and this stays with the file forever. If that book turns up anywhere where it shouldn’t, that purchaser can be held responsible.
Sean B. Palmer, the “virtual executor” of Aaron Swartz, subsequently asked Verso to remove the watermarks. They refused and it lit a fire under the Institute for Biblio-Immunology (IBI).
After a long process dissecting BooXtream’s ‘Social DRM’ the researchers have now published a lengthy communique which reveals how the watermarking system works and can be defeated.
Speaking with TorrentFreak, IBI says its motivation is clear. Books should inform buyers, not breach their privacy.
“Books should be used as tools for disseminating knowledge and information. What ‘social DRM’ watermarking systems do instead is turn books into tools of surveillance and oppression by monitoring who shares what knowledge, where,” IBI explain.
“We don’t like this, and because the publisher Verso has refused to remove the watermarks themselves, we decided to do it for them, and to show everyone how these systems work.”
But there are bigger issues at stake. While people in the West take the freedom to read books of their choosing for granted, not everyone has that luxury.
“Imagine if a watermarked ebook contains someone’s name (as many do). Suppose that someone is reading that watermarked ebook under a regime that bans the particular kind of material covered in that book,” IBI add.
“If the operatives of the regime see the watermark, they would then be able to arrest and perhaps even execute the purchaser of the ebook if they too are living under the same regime.”
But matters of life and death aside, IBI say they believe that people should not only be able to read whatever they want, they should also be able to share that knowledge with others.
“That’s how information spreads across cultures, through unrestrained, free propagation of knowledge. Watermarking systems attempt to corrupt these vectors of knowledge transmission by identifying and then filing legal action against some readers,” they conclude.
The lengthy report can be found here. Much of it is fairly technical but in a follow-up email, IBI pointed TF to a Github page containing a script to automate the processes detailed in their communique.
It’s likely that BooXtream will respond to this provocation so the war for free access to information and privacy isn’t over just yet.
Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.
MPAAExit: MPAA Warns EU over Ban on Geo-Blocking
Hollywood’s main copyright lobby has warned the EU not to adopt new laws which could ban the use of geo-blocking in EU countries.The EU is aiming to remove geographical restrictions when it comes to accessing audio and visual programming, such as strea…

Hollywood's main copyright lobby has warned the EU not to adopt new laws which could ban the use of geo-blocking in EU countries.
The EU is aiming to remove geographical restrictions when it comes to accessing audio and visual programming, such as streaming Spotify or Netflix, within member countries as part of its Digital Single Market reform.
But addressing the CineEurope convention this week, MPAA Chairman and CEO Chris Dodd urged the EU to reconsider their actions, and warned that these changes could mean fewer movies, and higher prices for consumers.
"While the stated goals of these proposals are laudable – offering greater choice to European consumers and strengthening cultural diversity – in reality, these ideas could actually cause great harm to Europe’s film industries and its consumers," said Dodd.
"The European Union is made up of 28 different nations with different cultures, different languages, and different tastes. Forcing every film to be marketed and released the same way everywhere, at the same time, is a recipe for failure," he added.
"The ability of filmmakers and distributors to market and release their films where, how, and when they think best gives them the greatest chance to succeed."
Dodd urged the industry insiders attending the convention to put pressure on their elected representatives.
The European Commission will unveil their detailed plans for the audio-visual sector later this year.
Dota: Athleten müssen im E-Sport mehr als nur gut spielen
Die Woche im Video: Superschnelle Rechner, smarte Zähler und sicherer Spam
China hat den schnellsten Computer der Welt, deutsche Haushalte werden auf Smart Meter umgerüstet und die EU-Kommission fürchtet sich vor verschlüsseltem Spam. Sieben Tage und viele Meldungen im Überblick. (Golem-Wochenrückblick, Spam)

Independence Day: Resurgence: Like a high-budget porno, minus sex and fun
Stinky returning actors, criminally bad SFX round out summer’s latest Hollywood turd.
Heaven help us that we've reached this point: one where the legacy of a blatant B-movie retread like 1996's Independence Day can be looked upon fondly, especially in light of a sequel. I have no interest in holding the original film up to some American Film Institute-level standard; the campy Roland Emmerich original is a classic because it knew its place as a piece of hyperbolic, chest-thumping sci-fi fun.
But what happens when the original film's creator doesn't know how to make the "fun" happen anymore? Well, that's when you get Independence Day: Resurgence, the long-teased, finally-here sequel that suffers from the odd issue of hewing too closely to its predictable source material and yet not repeating a single good note. Abandon any hopes for the last film's cheesy-yet-inspiring President Bill Pullman. Don't get your hopes up for a comedically cocky fighter pilot or an abrasive and darkly funny super-nerd. And prepare yourself for such underwhelming action set pieces and phoned-in dialogue that you'll swear you've tuned into a high-budget porno film--or, at least, one that distinctly lacks anything in the way of sex. Or fun.
No two actors can replace Will Smith, apparently
It's 2016 in America, and our country is kickin' it with a female President, a smattering of low-flying transportational and surveillance aircraft, a stronger international alliance with the world's greatest leaders (even Russia!), and a fully operational moon base. Life's pretty sweet these days, so long as you don't have a chip on your shoulder about your parents dying when a bunch of aliens messed your planet up in 1996 (which, conveniently enough, most of this film's heroes have in common).
Following a period of turmoil, Wikimedia Foundation appoints new director
Tension over a “Knowledge Engine” led to previous director’s resignation.

Earlier today, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales announced that the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees has appointed Katherine Maher as its new executive director.
Maher formerly served as communications officer for Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that governs the massive online encyclopedia. She became interim director in March following a period of turmoil during which a board member and former Executive Director Lila Tretikov both resigned. Those resignations came after an unprecedented "no-confidence" vote by the site's editors.
"Our mission is vast, diverse, and inclusive, where everyone can find a home and purpose," said Maher in a statement. "We are driven by an insatiable curiosity for the world around us, and a fundamental belief in the power of collaboration and cooperation. I'm honored by this opportunity to serve this remarkable organization and movement, and I look forward to building our future together."