Pirate Bay Crew Removes Thousands of Torrents, Just Not ‘Those’

The Pirate Bay is known for its refusal to accept takedown requests from copyright holders. However, that doesn’t mean that the site keeps all files that are uploaded, quite the contrary. Week in and week out a dedicated team of moderators removes thousands of torrents to keep the site from turning into a The Spam Bay. Today we talk to a few of them.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

pirate bayAt TorrentFreak we regularly receive concerned emails from Pirate Bay users who have spotted an influx of suspicious torrents on the popular torrent site.

These torrents usually carry the name of popular new TV-shows or movies, and appear to be shared by thousands of people.

However, those who download the torrents will soon notice that the video files won’t playing. Instead, they urge downloaders to install suspicious software, or worse.

This spam phenomenon is not new and neither is it limited to The Pirate Bay. However, it does appear to have gotten worse in recent years, something several of the site’s moderators confirm today.

Most regular users of the site are probably unaware of the efforts ‘invisible’ moderators have to put into the site to keep it clean day in and day out.

To lift a corner of the veil we reached out to a few crew members to ask about the influx of spam, torrent removals, and their motivations to contribute to the site for free.

First up: who are these moderators and why do they volunteer to keep the site clean?

“We’re all ordinary downloaders at heart who share a love for TPB with millions of others. We put in the hours because we love helping others and we love TPB,” Spud17 tells us.

“I believe in the ideals TPB represents, that sharing is a fundamental human right,” veteran crew member Xe adds.

The overarching theme is that the moderators identify with The Pirate Bay’s ideal to share everything freely, without restrictions. Ironically, however, a large part of their job involves removing torrents, mostly fakes and spam.

“The Crew remove hundreds of thousands of fakes and torrents infested with malware, spyware etcetera. Spam and child porn are also removed,” Spud17 says.

While spam has always been an issue, it’s sometimes hard to contain. At some hours of the day there are no mods available to deal with it, which may result in batches of suspicious content getting through.

“The Crew volunteer their time as and when they can, so it’s inevitable that there’ll be periods where the fakes have piled up for a few hours. Users are welcome to report bad torrents and uploaders on our forum, and on our IRC channel,” Spud17 says.

“I should also mention that sometimes we delete legitimate torrents by mistake. We’re human. We have a forum where people can appeal such calls,” Xe adds.

The Pirate Bay crew recommends downloaders to use common sense, and educate themselves on how fake files and spam can be detected. And in case of doubt, it’s best to avoid newly uploaded content, they say.

“The best defense for TPB users against the fakers is knowledge. Read the FAQ on our forum and pay particular attention to the section on finding torrents – if you read and understand that, you should be able to spot the fakes easily,” Spud17 says.

In any case, fake files and spam never stay on the site for long.

“The important thing for downloaders to know is that the vast majority of crap is dealt with by staff within a day, but often much quicker,” Xe adds.

All moderators we talked to embrace TPB’s decision not to comply with copyright holder’s takedown requests. However, they do respect sites that do. Running a torrent site can be quite tricky, and if they feel it’s safer to adhere to the DMCA then that’s their choice.

However, the removal policies at some other sites also means that The Pirate Bay remains relevant today, as the true haven for ‘uncensored’ sharing.

“It is the only site I’m aware of which doesn’t delete content following DMCA requests,” Xe says.

“It is THE place to upload to avoid the disappointment of having your torrents deleted and THE place to download from when what you want has been deleted from elsewhere. It is the standard by which all other sites are judged.”

As the media industry keeps throwing up artificial barriers to prevent people from enjoying their content, people will keep flocking to The Pirate Bay.

“The Pirate Bay will always be relevant as long as money and location are barriers to accessing culture and educational media,” Spud17 says.

All in all, The Pirate Bay Crew take a lot of pride in what they do. The moderation team is not involved in keeping the site up and running technically, but they are vital to its survival.

Like last year’s temporary rift has shown, without moderators to remove the thousands of fake files TPB would soon turn into a spammer heaven. So, in a way, removing torrents is central to the site’s survival. As long as the pirated stuff stays up…

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Illinois residents can sue Facebook for photo tagging, judge says

Northern California District Judge not swayed by Facebook’s Terms of Service arguments.

Last week, a Northern California District Judge ruled that Facebook will have to face a class action lawsuit (PDF) from Illinois Facebook users who are unnerved by the site’s photo-tagging feature that relies on facial recognition to suggest people to tag.

The plaintiffs argue that the feature runs afoul of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which was passed in 2008 and restricts how private companies are allowed to collect biometric data.

The lawsuit had been transferred from an Illinois court to one in California at Facebook’s request. The social media company then asked the judge to dismiss the case, saying that the plaintiffs had no grounds to sue given that Facebook’s Terms and Conditions have stipulated since 2015 that claims against the company must be litigated according to California law, where no such provision against biometric tagging exists.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Are smartphones “de-evolutionizing” humanity?

Video: the conflicted lives of cell phone owners.

Produced by Nathan Fitch. (video link)

On any given day in New York City, you can see people using their cell phones to take selfies on the Staten Island Ferry, read books on the L train, or hail an Uber car. Like everywhere else in the world, everyone in New York's got a phone.

But when we spent a recent afternoon in Washington Square Park, asking people about their cell phone use, they all had critical things to say. People mediate their lives through Instagram; there's too much texting instead of real talking; sidewalk denizens routinely crash into scaffolding and other pedestrians when staring at their screens.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

The internet of flying, floating, and rolling things takes center ring at “unmanned” expo

At the “drone prom,” robots that fly, roll, and swim get a chance to dance.

NEW ORLEANS—If you need evidence that drones are big business, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) XPonential conference is a good start. The event, in its previous incarnation, filled a much more modest space in Washington DC three years ago, and was much more defense-focused. But this week's event, filling four of the vast halls of the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center here on the bank of the Mississippi River, had the trappings of a big tech conference. Keynotes were supplied by Amazon vice president Gur Kimchi and Cisco's retired CEO John Chambers (complete with the requisite "hockey stick" growth slides), while vendors hawked cloud platforms and professional services alongside the expected collection of flying, swimming, rolling, and crawling robots.

The cloud connection to drones is gaining increasing attention because of the massive amount of data that uncrewed vehicles collect. Optical and multi-spectral imagery, 3D laser mapping, and any number of other geospatial datapoints acquired in ever-increasing resolution have to be stored, processed, and routed to the people who need them. Representatives from oil and gas companies, utilities, insurers, civil engineers, and a host of other industries stalked the floor at Xponential in search of systems that would let them inspect assets from a distance.

But because of current Federal Aviation Administration regulations, only a few of those industries have begun using uncrewed vehicles. One of the most well-established applications of drones outside the military is "precision agriculture," in which UAVs equipped with near-infrared and other sensors detect problems with crop health in high resolution. This data is subsequently used by automated, GPS-controlled chemical applicators. But while drones have been used in precision agriculture in Japan and other countries for over a decade, many US farmers who currently use drones to pinpoint where crops need to be fed or sprayed are "cowboys," as one drone manufacturer described them—not because they raise cattle, but because they flaunt the FAA's rules.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Amazon’s beautiful, functional, impractical Kindle Oasis reviewed

$290 Oasis doesn’t do anything Paperwhite doesn’t do, it just does it better.

Amazon’s Kindle has gone through roughly two different design phases. The first began with the original Kindle in 2007 and ended, roughly, with the Kindle DX and Kindle Keyboard in 2010 and 2011. The second phase began with the fourth-generation Kindle and the Kindle Touch in 2011, which got rid of the keyboard and remodeled the devices in the vein of smartphones and tablets.

Amazon has built a bunch of features on top of the foundation laid by the Kindle Touch, but everything up to and including last year’s $200 Kindle Voyage has been a riff on the same basic idea. The Kindle Paperwhite added a backlight, and the Voyage was the first with a super-sharp 300 PPI screen (which the latest Paperwhite later inherited). So what comes next?

The Kindle Oasis is a major departure. It’s an asymmetrical design that’s dramatically thinner and lighter than the Touch design, but with one wider, thicker edge that contains the battery and doubles as a handle. The device itself sacrifices battery life, but it comes with a leather battery case that effectively doubles your reading time.

Read 17 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Android: Remix OS muss ohne Google-Dienste auskommen

Nutzer von Remix OS müssen künftig auf die Google Mobile Services (GMS) auf den ARM-basierten Remix-Mini-PCs verzichten – oder sie selbst installieren. Der Grund: Google hat um die Entfernung der Komponenten von der für Desktop-Computer angepassten Android-Version gebeten. (Android, Google)

Nutzer von Remix OS müssen künftig auf die Google Mobile Services (GMS) auf den ARM-basierten Remix-Mini-PCs verzichten - oder sie selbst installieren. Der Grund: Google hat um die Entfernung der Komponenten von der für Desktop-Computer angepassten Android-Version gebeten. (Android, Google)

Second Oracle v. Google trial could lead to huge headaches for developers

Oracle bought Java and now wants a staggering $9 billion from Google.

A San Francisco jury will decide: Did Google build Android the right way? (credit: Illustration by Aurich Lawson)

Two of the world's biggest software companies face off in court this week for the second time, even though the most important issue of their dispute has already been resolved.

The high-profile trial that begins Monday will again include celebrity CEOs on the stand, dense expert testimony, and an utterly unpredictable outcome decided by a jury. But what's truly at stake in Oracle v. Google, round two?

For those who work with code for a living, a lot. The case revolves around how Application Programming Interfaces, or APIs, can and cannot be used. Boiled down, APIs define how different types of code communicate to each other. If owners of those APIs can use copyright law to control how programming is done, there will be a sea change in industry practices. For many developers, especially of open source software, this will be a change for the worse.

Read 19 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Fahrdienst: UberX kommt nach Berlin

Der Fahrdienst Uber will in Berlin seinen Dienst X starten. Gleichzeitig baut die Firma ihr politisches Lobbying aus – und hat dafür eine prominente, gut vernetzte ehemalige EU-Politikerin angeheuert. (Uber, Politik/Recht)

Der Fahrdienst Uber will in Berlin seinen Dienst X starten. Gleichzeitig baut die Firma ihr politisches Lobbying aus - und hat dafür eine prominente, gut vernetzte ehemalige EU-Politikerin angeheuert. (Uber, Politik/Recht)

I Just Watched an Infringing Video and It Felt Pretty Bad

There are possibly millions of infringing videos on YouTube and for the most part users see it as a bonus. This week, however, I stumbled across a suspect video on the site and the resulting cascade of emotions made me wonder: Don’t we all appreciate copyrights and get annoyed by piracy when conditions are just right?

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

youtubefaceLike everyone reading this piece I have often seen pirated content on YouTube. The site is littered with hundreds maybe thousands of movies and TV shows, none of them uploaded by copyright holders.

Equally, if one wants to listen to just about any rare song, no matter how old, a YouTube search will uncover it. In most cases those songs haven’t been uploaded by their owners but when looking for any kind of desirable content, you have to have massive self-control to immediately click off.

Well this week, I did. And I was pretty infuriated while doing so.

While browsing one evening I noticed what I believed to be a new video from the Hydraulic Press Channel (HPC). For those who aren’t familiar with HPC it’s a channel, on YouTube, dedicated to crushing things in a hydraulic press. It’s almost as simple as that. It’s basic. It’s fun. And in a few months it has amassed a huge following.

What I clicked on was a video compilation of the top 10 things crushed by the channel, but something was wrong. The massively entertaining voice of channel host and resident crusher Lauri Vuohensilta was entirely missing. His wife wasn’t giggling in the background as she usually is either.

In fact, all I was witnessing was items getting crushed, one after the other and it left me cold. Then it dawned on me. I looked at the uploader name expecting the worst. I didn’t recognize it. Yep, this was an imposter. A freebooter.

hpc-fury

This was definitely not the Hydraulic Press Channel and a quick look at the video notes confirmed it.

“A compilation of everything hydraulic press channel has crushed yet. None of it is mine, all belongs to hydraulic press channel.”

So why take it then? It’s already available for free on the official channel, I found myself shouting.

Worse still, this “stolen” video had amassed more than 400,000 views and i’d contributed to that not just once but twice when I went back for the screenshot. Somehow I felt disproportionately annoyed that this stupid compilation was taking revenue away from the hugely funny Lauri and his giggling wife.

And in that i’m not alone. At the time of writing a third of the video’s votes are in the downward direction versus around one in 35 on the original channel. Furthermore, the comment section is littered with people angry that RandomStuff98 “stole” the content from Hydraulic Press Channel (HPC).

hpc-stolen

And here’s another interesting twist. I chatted with a couple of uploaders on a popular torrent site and although one didn’t express an opinion either way, the other said that he didn’t agree with people “stealing” YouTuber’s videos. This is coming from someone who uploads at least two dozen torrents a day.

With that in mind, one has to question how many of the outraged commenters on YouTube would also have concerns over the ethics of grabbing the latest leaked DVD screener from The Pirate Bay. My estimate is not very many of them.

I wasn’t sure why people “stealing” HPC’s content was so irritating but I presumed that it was partially down to the fact that the guy running the channel feels like “one of us”. He seems like an ordinary guy that you could go out and have a beer and a laugh with. That in itself makes it more personal, I suppose.

To get a bit more of an insight I shared my thoughts with musician and YouTube star Dan Bull who has tens of millions of hits under his belt. Did he have any idea why myself, a prolific torrent uploader, and plenty of YouTuber’s feel protective of more ‘amateur’ content?

“I think I can give you an explanation as to why mirroring a YouTube video is ethically different to sharing a Hollywood movie despite them being the same legally,” Dan told me.

“It’s a difficult topic as the same rationale that can be used for file-sharing, or abolition of copright, can be used to say that this kind of behavior is fine.
However, if you look a bit more closely, it’s really much more of a dick move than hosting a torrent file,” he continued.

“When you share a movie, you’re making something accessible to people who perhaps otherwise wouldn’t be able to see it. In contrast, when you simply mirror someone else’s YouTube video on your own channel, it’s not making the media any more accessible, it’s just redirecting traffic from the original uploader, who in most cases on YouTube is a small-time independent content creator.”

Dan notes that the DMCA and Content ID on YouTube allow original creators to takedown or monetize mirrored content, but he prefers not to use them.

“I am not a fan of either of those practices in any case as I don’t believe in the validity of intellectual property. But I do think that when uploading someone else’s content, you should always take a moment to consider whether it’s a dick move or not,” he concludes.

Of course, infringement is infringement, whether it’s ripping off the work of Hydraulic Press Channel or sharing the movies made by the studio members of the MPAA. Yet somehow it feels quite different. Few (if any) YouTube users complain about people uploading infringing blockbuster movies to the site yet HPC “pirates” get it with both barrels from commenters with no obvious respect for copyright law, only a sense of what is “right”.

If there was a way to bottle that kind of reaction and apply it to mainstream content, Hollywood might crack the piracy problem. But what aspect of this strange situation can they harness, what’s the secret recipe, and how can it be utilized? We’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments section below.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.