Trollfabrik: Trump bestätigt Cyberangriff gegen Russland 2018

Der US-Präsent hat erstmals gesagt, dass es 2018 einen Cyberangriff gegen die russische Internet Forschungsagentur gegeben habe, der Einmischung in die US-Politik vorgeworfen wird. (Donald Trump, Cyberwar)

Der US-Präsent hat erstmals gesagt, dass es 2018 einen Cyberangriff gegen die russische Internet Forschungsagentur gegeben habe, der Einmischung in die US-Politik vorgeworfen wird. (Donald Trump, Cyberwar)

Hagia Sophia: Symbolik der Macht

Die Hagia Sophia, einst Kirche, dann Moschee und seit 1935 Museum, wird nach einem Gerichtsurteil wieder zur Moschee. Die Anhänger des türkischen Präsidenten jubeln, die UNESCO übt Kritik

Die Hagia Sophia, einst Kirche, dann Moschee und seit 1935 Museum, wird nach einem Gerichtsurteil wieder zur Moschee. Die Anhänger des türkischen Präsidenten jubeln, die UNESCO übt Kritik

Amazon Piracy Lawsuit: Court Restrains Assets & Domains of Pirate Sites

A lawsuit filed this week by Amazon Publishing, Penguin Random House and authors including Lee Child and John Grisham, has chalked up an early win. A Washington court has ordered that the assets and domains of Kiss Library, which is accused of massive copyright infringement, should be seized as part of a temporary restraining order.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

LawsuitEarlier this week, Amazon Content Services, publisher Penguin Random House and several authors including John Grisham and Lee Child, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against ‘pirate’ eBook sites operating under the Kiss Library brand.

Accusing the platforms of “rampant and willful infringement” due to their sales of pirated eBooks to the public, the plaintiffs alleged direct and secondary copyright infringement, while demanding the maximum statutory damages of $150,000 per infringed work. In addition, the architects of the lawsuit demanded urgent injunctive relief in an effort to bring the sites’ infringing activities to a swift halt.

After being filed on Tuesday and with the ink barely dry on the complaint, United States Senior District Judge Marsha J. Pechman responded immediately by handing down a temporary restraining order.

Comprehensive Temporary Restraining Order

“Plaintiffs have demonstrated they are entitled to immediate injunctive relief by establishing they are likely to succeed on the merits of their copyright claims,” the Judge wrote in her order.

“Defendants have gone to great lengths to conceal their identities, locations, and proceeds from Plaintiffs’ and this Court’s detection, including by using multiple false identities and addresses associated with their operations and purposely-deceptive contact information.”

The Judge found that given the above elusive behavior, it is likely that if any notice was given of an impending order, the defendants would likely destroy or hide evidence of their infringement and proceeds from the same, thus frustrating the relief sought by the plaintiffs.

The temporary restraining order is valid for 48 days but if the defendants don’t appear before August 25, 2020, to argue against it, a preliminary injunction will take its place. Whether the operators of Kiss Library will step forward remains a question but in the meantime, the Court has taken a pretty aggressive stance towards collapsing their business from every conceivable angle.

The list of targets is comprehensive, not only targeting the defendants themselves but also preventing anyone else from working or doing business with them, if that activity is connected to infringement of the plaintiffs’ rights. The companies include, but are not limited to, payment processors, domain registrars or hosts, Internet service providers, back-end service providers, affiliate program providers, web designers, and search engines.

Ex Parte Asset Restraint

Citing 17 U.S.C. § 502(a), the Judge also authorized a comprehensive restraining order against the financial mechanisms supporting the Kiss Library operation, requiring that banks, payment processors, merchant account providers and credit card companies to “immediately locate all accounts connected to Defendants or the Websites” and prevent them from transferring or disposing of any money or assets.

Judge Pechman also ordered domain registries and registrars, including Tucows Domains Inc., Whois Privacy Corp., and NameCheap, Inc., to take action against all of the defendants’ domains under their control, rendering them “inactive and non-transferable” pending further instruction from the Court.

Finally, a similar order was granted requiring email services, social media services, search engines and other online providers to disable service to all of the defendants’ websites.

The temporary restraining order obtained by Amazon Publishing, Penguin Random House, Lee Child, Sylvia Day, John Grisham, C.J. Lyons, Doug Preston, Jim Rasenberger, T.J. Stiles, R.L Stine, Monique Troung, Scott Turow, Nicholas Weinstock and Stuart Woods, can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Actionspiel: Ubisoft bestätigt Far Cry 6

Das nächste Far Cry schickt Spieler offenbar im Februar 2021 in den Kampf gegen den Herrscher eines abgelegenen tropischen Inselreichs. (Far Cry, Sony)

Das nächste Far Cry schickt Spieler offenbar im Februar 2021 in den Kampf gegen den Herrscher eines abgelegenen tropischen Inselreichs. (Far Cry, Sony)

Rückstau in der Schweinezucht

Nach dem Fleischskandal in den Schlachhöfen von Tönnies und anderen Fleischkonzernen kündigt die Politik Verbesserungen in der Tierhaltung an. Außerdem sollen Arbeiter künftig richtige Arbeitsverträge mit Sozialstandards erhalten.

Nach dem Fleischskandal in den Schlachhöfen von Tönnies und anderen Fleischkonzernen kündigt die Politik Verbesserungen in der Tierhaltung an. Außerdem sollen Arbeiter künftig richtige Arbeitsverträge mit Sozialstandards erhalten.

WHO still skeptical SARS-CoV-2 lingers in air—despite what the NYT says

The WHO has not released a new guidance on how to stay safe—or changed its stance.

A serious woman speaks into a microphone.

Enlarge / World Health Organization (WHO) Chief Scientist Soumya Swaminathan attends a press conference organized by the Geneva Association of United Nations Correspondents (ACANU) amid the COVID-19 outbreak, caused by the novel coronavirus, on July 3, 2020 at the WHO headquarters in Geneva. (credit: Getty | Fabrice Coffrini)

If you happened to read The New York Times this week, you may be under the false impression that the World Health Organization significantly changed its stance on whether the pandemic coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, spreads by lingering in the air.

Around midday Thursday, the paper declared: “W.H.O., in Reversal, Affirms Virus May Be Airborne Indoors.” The paper also called it an “admission” and, in a subsequent article, said the WHO had “conceded.” The articles both noted that a group of more than 200 researchers had also published a commentary piece this week urging the WHO and other public health bodies to acknowledge and address the potential for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

The problem: the WHO did not change its stance on airborne transmission. And, as such, it did not issue any new recommendations or guidance on how people can stay safe.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments