Don’t Terrorize The Public Over Piracy, Putin’s Adviser Says

The man just appointed as Vladimir Putin’s key adviser on Internet related affairs has suggested that copyright holders should consider the state of the economy before being aggressive with the public. Speaking on local TV, Herman Klimenko says the time is not right for “terrorizing” citizens over piracy.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

The Institute for Development of the Internet is an entity created to promote discussion between representatives of the Russian government and Internet-focused companies. Typically the platform is used to iron out differences on contentious issues.

In February 2015 Herman Klimenko became chairman of the Institute but last December was called upon by Russian president Vladimir Putin to become his personal adviser on the development of the Internet. After consulting with his family on what he described as a “big decision”, the 49-year-old accepted Putin’s offer.

This week Putin signed a decree that officially enlisted Klimenko as his
Presidential Adviser on the Internet. It’s a big position for the expert who now has the ear of one of the world’s most powerful men on all Internet related matters from trade through to education and finance.

Not unexpectedly the Internet piracy controversy also falls within Klimenko’s remit and it didn’t take long for the newly-crowned heavyweight to weigh in with his opinions. Surprisingly, those opinions include pouring cold water on aggressive measures for dealing with piracy, website blockades for example.

Speaking with local TV channel Russia 24, Klimenko said that when copyright holders demanded that ‘pirate’ websites should be blocked on a permanent basis, none considered whether it would actually be possible.

“When rights holders pressed for measures such as eternal blocking, I think they did not consider that it would be unfeasible for technical reasons,” he said.

“If a method to carry out such blocking did exist, it’s another question whether it is necessary to use it or not.”

But while website blocking is a controversial issue that even some copyright holders don’t believe in, it’s likely that a few eyebrows would’ve been raised at Klimenko’s suggestion that aggressive anti-piracy measures should be aligned with the state of the economy.

While acknowledging that creators should be able to get a return on their products, Putin’s adviser said now might not be the right time to send in the heavies to “terrorize” the public on the matter.

“There is always the relevance of this issue,” he said.

“In fact, consumption of copyright content increases with economic growth, and when the situation is very serious, I think people do not have to unnecessarily terrorize these issues,” said the presidential adviser.

Turning to copyright holders, Klimenko said that he believes they should consider the economic conditions before demanding more action.

“Pushing hard now on this topic, I think, is not worth it. When the economy improves, you should return to this issue,” he said.

But with relations with the West still strained over Ukraine and all the financial pressures that brings, how long will copyright holders have to wait? According to Deputy Minister of Economic Development Oleg Fomichev, perhaps some time yet.

“The current economic situation is definitely not that good. The Russian economy is not in the best shape, but it is not as bad as it was expected one year ago,” he revealed this week.

“We are now relatively optimistic about economic dynamics for the next several months and the next year because we see from June, and more positively from September, we see an upturn in the Russian economy.”

So everyone will stop complaining about piracy until the fall then? Not a chance…..

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Die Woche im Video: Autonome Autos brauchen Nachhilfe, Windows 10 ein Update

Lenovo gibt Microsoft die Schuld daran, dass 2015 so wenige Leute PCs gekauft haben. Private Nachrichten während der Arbeitszeit können zur Kündigung führen. Und Googles autonome Autos brauchen doch noch ihre Fahrer. Sieben Tage und viele Meldungen im Überblick. (Golem-Wochenrückblick, Instant Messenger)

Lenovo gibt Microsoft die Schuld daran, dass 2015 so wenige Leute PCs gekauft haben. Private Nachrichten während der Arbeitszeit können zur Kündigung führen. Und Googles autonome Autos brauchen doch noch ihre Fahrer. Sieben Tage und viele Meldungen im Überblick. (Golem-Wochenrückblick, Instant Messenger)

Music Labels Earning More Thanks to Spotify

Despite many complaints from some in the music industry about Spotify’s low royalty payments, music labels are actually coming out ahead thanks to free music streaming, a study has found.The paper, which was presented at the annual general meeting…



Despite many complaints from some in the music industry about Spotify's low royalty payments, music labels are actually coming out ahead thanks to free music streaming, a study has found.

The paper, which was presented at the annual general meeting of the American Economic Association last week, is written by the EU's Joint Research Centre (JRC), specifically looking at the effect that music streaming has had on music industry. The paper examines the effect streaming has had on music revenue, focusing in particular on Spotify and Pandora, and its conclusions are very different from the ones espoused by some in the music industry.

Far from the low royalty rates from Spotify cannibalising music sales and reducing the revenue for labels and artists a like, the study found that at its worst, Spotify appears to be a revenue-neutral prospect for the music industry.

Instead of killing music sales on a large scale thanks to ad-supported free streaming, only one sale is affected for every 137 listens of the free streamed track, at an estimated loss of USD $0.82. But each of these 137 streams also earns the music industry 0.7 cents (for a total of $0.96), meaning the music industry actually comes out ahead.

This is because Spotify, as the researchers found, did not affect the habits of those who buy music, and instead, offers those that don't buy music (for example, music pirates) a way to contribute without having to spend their own money.

And all of this is not including the indirect promotional effect Spotify and Pandora has, with research suggesting songs played or streamed via these services have better sales than songs that don't get "airtime".

So it appears Spotify not only does not compete directly with music sales, it supplements sales and gives the music industry with another way to "sell" its music.

Music Labels Earning More Thanks to Spotify

Despite many complaints from some in the music industry about Spotify’s low royalty payments, music labels are actually coming out ahead thanks to free music streaming, a study has found.The paper, which was presented at the annual general meeting…



Despite many complaints from some in the music industry about Spotify's low royalty payments, music labels are actually coming out ahead thanks to free music streaming, a study has found.

The paper, which was presented at the annual general meeting of the American Economic Association last week, is written by the EU's Joint Research Centre (JRC), specifically looking at the effect that music streaming has had on music industry. The paper examines the effect streaming has had on music revenue, focusing in particular on Spotify and Pandora, and its conclusions are very different from the ones espoused by some in the music industry.

Far from the low royalty rates from Spotify cannibalising music sales and reducing the revenue for labels and artists a like, the study found that at its worst, Spotify appears to be a revenue-neutral prospect for the music industry.

Instead of killing music sales on a large scale thanks to ad-supported free streaming, only one sale is affected for every 137 listens of the free streamed track, at an estimated loss of USD $0.82. But each of these 137 streams also earns the music industry 0.7 cents (for a total of $0.96), meaning the music industry actually comes out ahead.

This is because Spotify, as the researchers found, did not affect the habits of those who buy music, and instead, offers those that don't buy music (for example, music pirates) a way to contribute without having to spend their own money.

And all of this is not including the indirect promotional effect Spotify and Pandora has, with research suggesting songs played or streamed via these services have better sales than songs that don't get "airtime".

So it appears Spotify not only does not compete directly with music sales, it supplements sales and gives the music industry with another way to "sell" its music.

Skylake users given 18 months to upgrade to Windows 10

And next generation processors, including Intel’s Kaby Lake, won’t be supported in old Windows.

Intel Skylake die shot. (credit: Intel)

If you own a system with an Intel 6th generation Core processor—more memorably known as Skylake—and run Windows 7 or Windows 8.1, you'll have to think about upgrading to Windows 10 within the next 18 months. Microsoft announced today that after July 17, 2017, only the "most critical" security fixes will be released for those platforms and those fixes will only be made available if they don't "risk the reliability or compatibility" of Windows 7 and 8.1 on other (non-Skylake) systems.

The full range of compatibility and security fixes will be published for non-Skylake machines for Windows 7 until January 14 2020, and for Windows 8.1 until January 10 2023.

Next generation processors, including Intel's "Kaby Lake", Qualcomm's 8996 (branded as Snapdragon 820), and AMD's "Bristol Ridge" APUs (which will use the company's Excavator architecture, not its brand new Zen arch) will only be supported on Windows 10. Going forward, the company says that using the latest generation processors will always require the latest generation operating system.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Low-fiber diets mess up gut microbes—and changes can become heritable

In mice, high-fiber diets couldn’t reverse the damage in descendants.

(credit: whologwhy)

“Think of the children!” may one day be a slogan for a health campaign imploring people to eat more fiber.

Doctors and nutrition experts have been harping on the importance of fiber for years, particularly how most people in industrialized countries eat less than the recommended daily dose of 25 to 38 grams. After all, the nutrient, a diverse group of molecules that includes complex carbohydrates, helps keep you “regular.” Perhaps less well-known, fiber helps maintain a healthy, diverse population of gut microbes.

But eating fiber may not just benefit the microbial balance of the eater—it may also benefit that of the eater’s progeny, according to a new study in Nature.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Bernie Sanders lawyers to Wikipedia: Take down our logo, you’re violating DMCA

In today’s political DMCA spat, $10 sticker sales are pitted against fair use.

(credit: berniesanders.com)

A lawyer representing Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has demanded that several of the campaign's logos be removed from Wikipedia, saying that reproducing the logos violates copyright law. The Wikimedia Foundation has complied with the DMCA takedown notice and removed the notices.

It's fairly surprising that the campaign would seek to ban wide distribution of its logos, which are clearly positive advertising for the campaign. It's even more surprising that after getting a call from the Wikimedia Foundation, the Sanders campaign didn't back down or blame an overzealous volunteer attorney—the campaign confirmed it wants Wikipedia to comply with the notice and not publish its logos.

"We also contacted the attorneys representing the Bernie Sanders campaign to discuss the issue, and they asked that WMF carry out a takedown in compliance with the DMCA rather than work with the community to update the licensing information or allow the images," wrote Wikimedia community manager James Alexander on a discussion page about the Sanders DMCA notices.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ocean is a smartphone-sized, battery-powered server for $149 and up

Ocean is a smartphone-sized, battery-powered server for $149 and up

Smartphone and tablets are basically small computers that run mobile, touch-friendly operating systems. But if you take the guts of a phone, strip away the screen and replace the operating system with something a little different, you’ve got yourself a desktop computer… or a server. The Ocean is a pocket-sized server with a 1 GHz […]

Ocean is a smartphone-sized, battery-powered server for $149 and up is a post from: Liliputing

Ocean is a smartphone-sized, battery-powered server for $149 and up

Smartphone and tablets are basically small computers that run mobile, touch-friendly operating systems. But if you take the guts of a phone, strip away the screen and replace the operating system with something a little different, you’ve got yourself a desktop computer… or a server. The Ocean is a pocket-sized server with a 1 GHz […]

Ocean is a smartphone-sized, battery-powered server for $149 and up is a post from: Liliputing

Dealmaster: Get one year of Amazon Prime for only $73

Plus $10 off PS Plus and Xbox Live Gold one-year memberships.

Greetings, Arsians! Courtesy of our partners at TechBargains, we have a great deal on Amazon Prime to share. In honor of Amazon's series Mozart in the Jungle winning a Golden Globe, the company has discounted its one-year Prime memberships by 26 percent for new users. That means anyone signing up for Amazon Prime for the first time can do so for just $73, down from the service's normal $99 price. In addition to free two-day shipping, Amazon Prime gives you access to all of the website's streamed shows, ad-free music screaming, special sales and deals, and more. So if you've been thinking about jumping on the Prime bandwagon, now's the time to do so.

In addition to savings on Amazon Prime, we have a number of gaming, laptop, and tablet deals below as well.

Featured

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Security firm sued for filing “woefully inadequate” forensics report

Hacked casino operator alleges breach continued while Trustwave was investigating.

(credit: ErrantX)

A Las Vegas-based casino operator has sued security firm Trustwave for conducting an allegedly "woefully inadequate" forensics investigation that missed key details of a network breach and allowed credit card thieves to maintain their foothold during the course of the two-and-a-half month investigation.

In a legal complaint filed in federal court in Las Vegas, Affinity Gaming said it hired Trustwave in October 2013 to investigate and contain a network breach that allowed attackers to obtain customers' credit card data. In mid January 2014, Trustwave submitted a report required under payment card industry security rules on all merchants who accept major credit cards. In the PCI forensics report, Trustwave said it had identified the source of the data breach and had contained the malware responsible for it. More than a year later after Affinity was hit by a second credit card breach, the casino operator allegedly learned from Trustwave competitor Mandiant that the malware had never been fully removed.

According to the December, 2015 complaint:

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments