In recent years, music and movie companies have filed several lawsuits against U.S. Internet providers, for failing to take action against pirating subscribers.
One of the main allegations is that the ISPs failed to terminate the accounts of repeat infringers in ‘appropriate circumstances’, as the DMCA requires.
These lawsuits resulted in multi-million-dollar judgments against Cox and Grande. Meanwhile, other companies remained at risk, including Frontier Communications which emerged from bankruptcy three years ago.
Frontier Settles Twice
Frontier was fighting not one, but two legal battles. The troubled company faced a pair of similar piracy liability lawsuits filed by movie and music companies. Both cases were scheduled to go to trial this spring, but that didn’t happen.
Last month, we reported that the movie companies’ lawsuit had been settled on undisclosed terms. As a result, demands for pirate site blocking were also off the table.
This week, the music companies, including UMG, Sony Music and Warner Music, also reached a settlement with Frontier. In a notice submitted to the New York federal court, they informed the court that all claims are settled and can therefore be dismissed.
The case was settled “with prejudice” so the dismissed claims cannot be refiled in the future. It’s a final resolution of the dispute, preventing all parties from bringing the same claims against each other again.
The settlement terms are not mentioned, so it’s unknown whether there was any financial compensation; however, when it comes to the court proceedings, all parties agreed to bear their own costs.
Change Afoot?
The settlement arrives in the same week the U.S. Government took a position in a legal battle between Internet provider Cox and several record labels. The U.S. recommended the Supreme Court to hear Cox’s case, which seeks to overturn a liability ruling in favor of the music companies.
There is no reason to believe that the U.S. position impacted the Frontier lawsuit in any way. However, if the Supreme Court does indeed take on the matter, the eventual outcome will affect other piracy liability lawsuits against Internet providers.
Another recent development could also impact these cases. In the U.S., several lawmakers are working on site blocking legislation under which ISPs would be tasked with blocking access to pirate sites. According to recent information, some ISPs are open to this idea, provided they’re granted “retrospective immunity“.
The details of these background discussions are sparse, but ISPs may not see the benefit in voluntarily working towards a blocking plan if they’re dealing with piracy liability lawsuits at the same time.
—
A copy of the notice of settlement, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Wednesday, is available here (pdf).
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
Der von George Elwood Smith entwickelte CCD-Sensor wird in Kameras, Weltraumteleskopen, Scannern und vielen anderen bildgebenden Verfahren eingesetzt. Ein Nachruf von Martin Wolf (
An den Datenschutz- und Integritätsprüfungen für neue Instagram-, Whatsapp- und Facebook-Funktionen sollen künftig kaum noch Menschen beteiligt sein. (
Auch ohne Elon Musk prüft die US-Regierung weiterhin Verträge mit Unternehmen. Dieses Mal trifft es Dell und den IT-Dienstleister CDW. (
Der Onlinemarktplatz löscht inaktive oder sich schlecht verkaufende Produktangebote. Die Anzahl der bereinigten Artikel beträgt mehrere Milliarden. (
Ein Pilotprojekt soll es brasilianischen Bürgern ermöglichen, mit ihrem digitalen Fußabdruck Geld zu verdienen. (
Für Tests brauchen Entwickler beispielhafte Telefonnummern, Mails, Domains und IP-Adressen. Aber woher wissen sie, welche sicher nicht vergeben sind? Eine Anleitung von Florian Bottke (
You must be logged in to post a comment.