Report: Embracer’s ongoing layoffs kill a new Deus Ex game after 2 years’ work

Swedish firm’s acquisitions continue trend of layoffs and cancelled games.

Adam Jensen of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, having coffee on the couch in diffuse sunlight

Enlarge / Adam Jensen of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, taking in the news that no last-minute contrivance is going to save his series from what seemed like inevitable doom. (Pun credit to Andrew Cunningham). (credit: Eidos Interactive)

Embracer Group, the Swedish firm that bought up a number of known talents and gaming properties during the pandemic years, has canceled a Deus Ex game at its Eidos studio in Montreal, Canada, according to Bloomberg's Jason Schreier.

The game, while not officially announced, has been known about since May 2022. It was due to enter production later in 2024 and had seen two years of pre-production development, according to Schreier's sources. Many employees will be laid off as part of the cancellation.

Embracer Group acquired Eidos Montreal, along with Crystal Dynamics and Square Enix Montreal, for $300 million in mid-2022, buying up all of Japanese game publisher Square Enix's Western game studios. That gave Embracer the keys to several influential and popular series, including Tomb RaiderJust CauseLife Is Strange, and Deus Ex.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Wear OS’s most consistent OEM quits: Fossil stops making smartwatches

Despite years of loyalty, Google dropped Fossil like a rock once Samsung came back.

The Fossil Gen 6 smartwatch.

Enlarge / The Fossil Gen 6 smartwatch. (credit: Fossil)

Fossil was the only brand keeping Google's Wear OS alive for years, but now the fashion brand is quitting the smartwatch market. Just before the weekend, the company confirmed to The Verge: "We have made the strategic decision to exit the smartwatch business." The company says existing smartwatches will continue to get software updates "for the next few years" while it refocuses on traditional watches and jewelry.

Wear OS is out of the dark ages now, but for years Fossil was the OS's only lifeline. Back in the days when Qualcomm was strangling the OS with lackluster SoC updates, Fossil was the only company that kept the dream alive. Fossil jumped into the Android Wear/Wear OS market in 2015 and has been the only steady source of Android smartwatch hardware since then. All the big companies like Samsung, LG, Sony, Huawei, Motorola, and Asus made watches for only a year or two and quit.

In 2021, despite years of loyalty, Google dropped Fossil like a rock when Samsung offered to come back to the Wear OS ecosystem. Google lured Samsung away from its in-house Tizen OS with preferential treatment, including exclusive rights to the new "Wear OS 3" release and exclusive apps. That year, 2021, featured head-to-head August Wear OS releases of Samsung's Galaxy Watch 4 and Fossil's Gen 6 smartwatch. Samsung's watch had a faster, Samsung-made SoC, ran Wear OS 3, and cost $250, while Fossil was stuck with Wear OS 2, a slower Qualcomm chip, and a $300 price tag. Fossil would barely be able to compete with Samsung if the playing field were level; but add to that Samsung's exclusive chips and Google's preferential treatment, and Fossil's watches never stood a chance. The Gen 6 will be the company's last smartwatch release.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Wear OS’s most consistent OEM quits: Fossil stops making smartwatches

Despite years of loyalty, Google dropped Fossil like a rock once Samsung came back.

The Fossil Gen 6 smartwatch.

Enlarge / The Fossil Gen 6 smartwatch. (credit: Fossil)

Fossil was the only brand keeping Google's Wear OS alive for years, but now the fashion brand is quitting the smartwatch market. Just before the weekend, the company confirmed to The Verge: "We have made the strategic decision to exit the smartwatch business." The company says existing smartwatches will continue to get software updates "for the next few years" while it refocuses on traditional watches and jewelry.

Wear OS is out of the dark ages now, but for years Fossil was the OS's only lifeline. Back in the days when Qualcomm was strangling the OS with lackluster SoC updates, Fossil was the only company that kept the dream alive. Fossil jumped into the Android Wear/Wear OS market in 2015 and has been the only steady source of Android smartwatch hardware since then. All the big companies like Samsung, LG, Sony, Huawei, Motorola, and Asus made watches for only a year or two and quit.

In 2021, despite years of loyalty, Google dropped Fossil like a rock when Samsung offered to come back to the Wear OS ecosystem. Google lured Samsung away from its in-house Tizen OS with preferential treatment, including exclusive rights to the new "Wear OS 3" release and exclusive apps. That year, 2021, featured head-to-head August Wear OS releases of Samsung's Galaxy Watch 4 and Fossil's Gen 6 smartwatch. Samsung's watch had a faster, Samsung-made SoC, ran Wear OS 3, and cost $250, while Fossil was stuck with Wear OS 2, a slower Qualcomm chip, and a $300 price tag. Fossil would barely be able to compete with Samsung if the playing field were level; but add to that Samsung's exclusive chips and Google's preferential treatment, and Fossil's watches never stood a chance. The Gen 6 will be the company's last smartwatch release.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Masters of the Air: Imagine a bunch of people throwing up, including me

It’s a bad show. I wanted to love it, but it’s just not good.

Photograph showing two stars of the show standing in front of a B-17

Enlarge / Our two main heroes so far, Buck and Bucky. Or possibly Bucky and Buck. I forget which is which. (credit: Apple)

I'm writing this article under duress because it's not going to create anything new or try to make the world a better place—instead, I'm going to do the thing where a critic tears down the work of others rather than offering up their own creation to balance the scales. So here we go: I didn't like the first two episodes of Masters of the Air, and I don't think I'll be back for episode three.

The feeling that the show might not turn out to be what I was hoping for has been growing in my dark heart since catching the first trailer a month or so ago—it looked both distressingly digital and also maunderingly maudlin, with Austin Butler's color-graded babyface peering out through a hazy, desaturated cloud of cigarette smoke and 1940s World War II pilot tropes. Unfortunately, the show at release made me feel exactly how I feared it might—rather than recapturing the magic of Band of Brothers or the horror of The Pacific, Masters so far has the depth and maturity of a Call of Duty cutscene.

World War Blech

After two episodes, I feel I've seen everything Masters has to offer: a dead-serious window into the world of B-17 Flying Fortress pilots, wholly lacking any irony or sense of self-awareness. There's no winking and nodding to the audience, no joking around, no historic interviews with salt-and-pepper veterans to humanize the cast. The only thing allowed here is wall-to-wall jingoistic patriotism—the kind where there's no room for anything except God, the United States of America, and bombing the crap out of the enemy. And pining wistfully for that special girl waiting at home.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Masters of the Air: Imagine a bunch of people throwing up, including me

It’s a bad show. I wanted to love it, but it’s just not good.

Photograph showing two stars of the show standing in front of a B-17

Enlarge / Our two main heroes so far, Buck and Bucky. Or possibly Bucky and Buck. I forget which is which. (credit: Apple)

I'm writing this article under duress because it's not going to create anything new or try to make the world a better place—instead, I'm going to do the thing where a critic tears down the work of others rather than offering up their own creation to balance the scales. So here we go: I didn't like the first two episodes of Masters of the Air, and I don't think I'll be back for episode three.

The feeling that the show might not turn out to be what I was hoping for has been growing in my dark heart since catching the first trailer a month or so ago—it looked both distressingly digital and also maunderingly maudlin, with Austin Butler's color-graded babyface peering out through a hazy, desaturated cloud of cigarette smoke and 1940s World War II pilot tropes. Unfortunately, the show at release made me feel exactly how I feared it might—rather than recapturing the magic of Band of Brothers or the horror of The Pacific, Masters so far has the depth and maturity of a Call of Duty cutscene.

World War Blech

After two episodes, I feel I've seen everything Masters has to offer: a dead-serious window into the world of B-17 Flying Fortress pilots, wholly lacking any irony or sense of self-awareness. There's no winking and nodding to the audience, no joking around, no historic interviews with salt-and-pepper veterans to humanize the cast. The only thing allowed here is wall-to-wall jingoistic patriotism—the kind where there's no room for anything except God, the United States of America, and bombing the crap out of the enemy. And pining wistfully for that special girl waiting at home.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Sugar Cubes Jelly turns the Unihertz Jelly Star smartphone into a handheld game console with a 3 inch display

The Unihertz Jelly Star is a tiny smartphone with a 3 inch, 854 x 480 pixel display, a MediaTek Helio G99 processor, 8GB of RAM, 256GB of UFS 2.2 storage, and a 2,000 mAh battery. It sells for $210 and ships with Android 13 software. While the phone&#…

The Unihertz Jelly Star is a tiny smartphone with a 3 inch, 854 x 480 pixel display, a MediaTek Helio G99 processor, 8GB of RAM, 256GB of UFS 2.2 storage, and a 2,000 mAh battery. It sells for $210 and ships with Android 13 software. While the phone’s claim to fame is that it’s what Unihertz […]

The post Sugar Cubes Jelly turns the Unihertz Jelly Star smartphone into a handheld game console with a 3 inch display appeared first on Liliputing.

Amazon can’t hoover up Roomba after EU nixes $1.4B iRobot acquisition

Concerns over stifled competition, Alexa tie-ins reportedly sink deal in Europe.

Roomba models on display in a store

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images)

Amazon will no longer pursue a $1.4 billion acquisition of iRobot, maker of Roomba robot vacuums after the companies announced today that they have "no path to regulatory approval in the European Union."

On the same day, iRobot announced an "operational restructuring plan" in which 350 employees, or 31 percent of iRobot's workforce, will be laid off. CEO Colin Angle, one of the company's cofounders, will also step down, and the company has hired a chief restructuring officer for its "return to profitability." The company will refocus on its core cleaning product lineup, pausing efforts in air purification, robotic lawn mowing, and education.

As part of the deal's terms, Amazon will pay $94 million to iRobot, most of it earmarked for paying back a three-year, $200 million loan the company took out when the Amazon acquisition was announced in August 2022. iRobot stated in its release that it expected to report losses of "between $265 and $285 million" in the fourth quarter of 2023.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Xavier Niel: Ukrainischer Mobilfunkbetreiber “billig” verkauft

Turkcell gibt seine Unternehmen in der Ukraine für wenig Geld an Iliad ab. Xavier Niel freut sich über den günstigen Abschluss für ein Netz, Mobilfunktürme und Call Center. (Ukrainekrieg, Vodafone)

Turkcell gibt seine Unternehmen in der Ukraine für wenig Geld an Iliad ab. Xavier Niel freut sich über den günstigen Abschluss für ein Netz, Mobilfunktürme und Call Center. (Ukrainekrieg, Vodafone)

Drastic moves by X, Microsoft may not stop spread of fake Taylor Swift porn

X blocking searches for Taylor Swift isn’t a real solution to fake porn problem.

Drastic moves by X, Microsoft may not stop spread of fake Taylor Swift porn

Enlarge (credit: Gilbert Flores/Golden Globes 2024 / Contributor | Getty Images North America)

After explicit, fake AI images of Taylor Swift began spreading on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter has attempted to block all searches for the pop star.

"This is a temporary action and done with an abundance of caution as we prioritize safety on this issue," Joe Benarroch, X's head of business operations, said in a statement to Reuters.

However, even this drastic step does not seem to be an effective solution, as "Swift" was trending Monday morning on X. The temporary block also does nothing to stop searches using misspellings of the singer's name.

Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments