Month: December 2023

The exact nature of ‘Partners Against Piracy’ (PAP) can be a little disorientating at times.

In March 2020, the Kenya Copyright Board announced that it had launched the ‘Partners Against Piracy Campaign’ describing it as a “multi-stakeholder” awareness program.

The Copyright Board said that pirates “don’t pay for the goods or services that they utilize” and “hardly pay taxes and/or employ staff.” Broadly speaking, pirates were having a detrimental effect on the economy and that needed to change.

With legislation being tightened up, the campaign’s initial goal was to “sensitize the public on the changes in the law that support enforcement in the online environment.”

The sensitization program was supported by several PSA-style videos, including the one embedded directly below. “This is a collaboration of like minded corporate Industry associations and individual right holders to help fight piracy,” the Copyright Board added.

In 2022, after fighting unfavorable amendments to copyright law, then introducing site-blocking to Kenya to protect MultiChoice and indirectly the Premier League, some elements of Kenyan media were calling PAP a “lobby group” instead.

Given the alleged multi-billion annual losses to piracy, it’s hardly surprising that every possible tool was on the table.

PAP Targets Local ISP

PAP describes itself on social media platforms as a “multi-sectoral Coalition, of local and international Associations, Societies & Companies, representing Thousands of Creatives in Kenya and the World.” In common with its international counterparts – other anti-piracy groups fighting the same enemy – physically cracking down on illegal content suppliers is part of the overall strategy in Kenya.

According to local media reports, this week an operation headed by PAP, with assistance from the Kenya Police Cybercrime and Crime Scene Forensic Units, targeted a local internet service provider.

“This intervention has disrupted the illegal services provided to approximately 3,000 subscribers in the Kasarani-Mwiki- Santon areas, who were illegally accessing premium content, such as English Premier League (EPL), WWC and La Liga live sports through the WeCast App,” PAP said in a statement.

“The investigations revealed that the WeCast App is installed on the client’s mobile phone or digital television upon subscription to Lime Fiber internet, where login details are provided by the perpetrators.”

What’s the WeCast App and What Does it Do?

The term ‘WeCast’ is often associated with Chromecast/Miracast-style HDMI dongles, which allow users to cast images and videos from phones and tablets to bigger screens. Media statements and reports this week offer no further detail beyond ‘WeCast App’ but a WeCast-branded product does exist that could be an ideal fit for the described scenario.

WeCast for Android is described as a companion app for the WeCast Media content server API and on Google Play is helpfully named WeCastKe, KE being the country code for Kenya. On its own the app is legal but useless; couple it with a remote server configured to provide content, it’s ideal for receiving IPTV streams and VOD library playback.

This WeCast product was marketed towards the hotel market at some point but regardless of location or content, functionality doesn’t change. Whether it’s the product referenced in the Lime Fiber case remains to be seen, but software isn’t the key issue. Copyrighted content being distributed without a license appears to be the root of the allegations facing Lime Fiber.

Two People Arrested

According to a statement released to the media, two people “linked” to Lime Fiber were arrested at its Nairobi County office on suspicion of providing illicit streams.

Citing Kenya’s Copyright Act, one publication notes that copyright infringement can be a criminal offense punishable by a fine of up to 800,000 Kenyan Shillings (around US$5,100) and up to 10 years in prison.

In a statement published Thursday, Lime Fiber said there had been “some confusion” regarding its association with the WeCast App. The ISP said it is “not directly involved in providing content through the WeCast App” and it does not “control or manage” content available on third-party applications.

Coincidences

A company called Lime Emerging Solutions operates Lime Fiber and public records (including domain name records) link a person called Kahenya Kamunyu to both.

Whether there are one, two, or more people who share the same name in Kenya’s developing internet space, a specific Kahenya Kamunyu stands out as particularly interesting.

A publicly identifiable figure for over a decade, his internet development work – and what can only be described as a mission to disrupt the pay-TV market – has resulted in one Kahenya Kamunyu attracting a lot of attention.

In 2022, an article described him as a techpreneur who had successfully carved out a niche in the pay-TV sector. CNN listed him as one of Africa’s ’15 tech entrepreneurs to watch in 2014′ for his internet-based content streaming startup, Able Wireless.

Described as a “home-grown Netflix” it’s reported that the service was accessed via a Raspberry Pi-powered TV box. That’s a little different from the system allegedly offered by Lime Fiber but nevertheless, it appears that the Mr. Kamunya at Able Wireless wanted to bring a streaming service to Kenya a little more quickly than some had anticipated.

While a few years old by now, an interview with Mr. Kamunya about his Able Wireless business plan is available on YouTube. In brief, the idea was to go ahead with the streaming service regardless of content licensing, to prove to the content companies that a market they didn’t believe existed, actually did exist.

“We are already putting money aside for content so if anybody wants to come suing us we’ll tell them that their money is sitting in an account somewhere. We have an open platform for open statistics, they can come get the money,” he said.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Familien- und Festkompatibles für mobile Plattformen, aber nicht nur: Golem.de stellt tolle Games wie Pocket City 2 und Kingdom Eighties vor. Von Rainer Sigl (Mobile Games, Spieletest)

There’s little doubt that many entertainment industry insiders see online piracy as an existential threat.

The film business has been hit particularly hard, with movies still the most pirated entertainment category.

Several anti-piracy forces are working hard to address the challenge. This involves concrete actions to shut down piracy sites and services, for example, while stakeholders lobby for stricter legislation and harsher enforcement.

Luckily, some progress is being made as well. For example, earlier this year the UK-based Film Content Protection Agency (FCPA) handed out 25 awards to people who helped prevent film piracy incidents in movie theaters.

90% Pirated in Movie Theaters

According to FCPA Director Simon Brown, the sharp eyes of cinema staff prevented several piracy incidents. In fact, not a single leaked film could be traced back to UK or Irish movie theaters.

This makes UK cinemas a relative safe haven when compared to the rest of the world, where piracy is reportedly rampant. “90% of films pirated worldwide are sourced from cinemas,” FCPA reported.

It’s easy to gloss over these kinds of statistics but, in this instance, a few alarm bells could be heard. With a streaming-dominated movie industry, only a fraction of new films are shown on the silver screen. So how could it possibly be true that 90% of all pirated films come from theaters?

A short review of several pirate sites reveals that camcorded films are relatively rare today. The 90% figure is therefore grossly inaccurate, with the real number probably (just a guess) closer to 9%. That applies both to the number of releases and the volume of pirated downloads and streams.

To understand where this mistake originated we asked FCPA’s parent organization, FDA, for their source. Unfortunately, the group didn’t respond and another UK-based anti-piracy group was not able to provide more context either.

The MPA, meanwhile, said that it’s keeping an eye on the camcording problem but doesn’t have any recent data on the percentage of pirated films recorded in movie theaters.

Not a New Claim

Without an official response, we searched for other clues that might signal the origins of the claim. Luckily we didn’t have to look far to find relevant references as the “90%” statistic is regularly cited by rightsholders.

For example, UK anti-piracy group FACT mentioned it in a news release in 2016.

“With 90% of pirated films sourced directly from cinemas around the world, the Fight Film Theft programme is a vital element in protecting the UK film industry,” the group wrote.

That press release didn’t mention a source either. FACT’s statement was made in conjunction with the FDA, which frequently repeats the same statistic without further context.

2023, 2020, 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004…

The 90% figure didn’t suddenly appear in 2016 either. Follow-up searches took us back much further, including this reference from two years prior, where The Hollywood Reporter noted that, “MPAA president Bob Pisano said 90% of pirated films worldwide are the result of camcording.”

Again, it’s not clear where this number originates, but we’re getting closer. Back in 2004, the Motion Picture Association’s Regional Director, Dara MacGreevy, reportedly said that 90% of online films come from camcorder copies.

MacGreevy headed the European branch of the MPA and most 90% of references seem to point to the UK, which may be where the fire is. While we can’t reveal a specific source, it’s clear that statistics from two decades ago are no longer relevant today.

Chinese Whispers

And it gets more confusing too….

One of the earlier reports from 2004 is more specific than others. That statement, which comes from UK anti-piracy group FACT, doesn’t reference the 90% figure in the context of online piracy. It mentions it as a percentage of seized counterfeit DVDs instead.

“According to the Federation Against Copyright Theft, 90% of all pirate pre-release DVDs seized this year were filmed with a camcorder from the back of a cinema,” The Guardian reported.

Needless to say, “seized DVDs” is entirely different from “all pirated movies online”. Yet, both versions appeared in the media two decades ago, and the second one is still cited as an accurate statistic today.

Chinese whispers anyone?

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Read 29 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Boeing hat sein erstes vollautonomes Unterwasserfahrzeug (Extra Large Uncrewed Undersea Vehicle) an die U.S. Navy ausgeliefert. (Schifffahrt, Boeing)

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Apple führt angeblich Gespräche mit großen Nachrichtenverlagen über die Lizenzierung ihrer Archive, um seine KI zu trainieren. Dafür will Apple viel Geld investieren. (Chatbots, Apple)

Seine Elektroautos für den europäischen Markt will BYD in Szeged bauen. Das Unternehmen plant, mehrere tausend Arbeitsplätze zu schaffen. (BYD, Elektroauto)

Der schwedische Fahrrad-Airbag-Hersteller Hövding hat Insolvenz angemeldet. Er beschuldigt die Behörden, am Untergang Schuld zu sein. (Mobilität, Smart Bike)