Let the review begin—SpaceX takes another step toward launching Starship again

This milestone was on paper, not in the hustle and bustle of Starbase.

SpaceX's Starship rocket lost control a few minutes after launch from South Texas on April 20.

Enlarge / SpaceX's Starship rocket lost control a few minutes after launch from South Texas on April 20. (credit: Jonathan Newton/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

The Federal Aviation Administration is now reviewing a mishap investigation report submitted by SpaceX regarding the company's April test flight of its giant Starship rocket, a spokesperson for the regulatory agency said Tuesday.

The milestone is noteworthy because it signals SpaceX has completed its investigation into the Starship test launch on April 20, which ended about four minutes after liftoff following engine failures and other problems during ascent. Now comes the FAA's review of SpaceX's investigation, fulfilling the agency's role as the regulator charged with ensuring public safety during commercial launch operations.

"When a final mishap report is approved, it will identify the corrective actions SpaceX must make," an FAA spokesperson told Ars. "Separately, SpaceX must modify its license to incorporate those actions before receiving authorization to launch again.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

FDA issues safety alert on pregnancy tests after bust on illegal medical lab

Universal Meditech was behind an illegal lab discovered in Reedley, California.

A picture of containers taken from the illegal UMI lab in Reedley, California.

Enlarge / A picture of containers taken from the illegal UMI lab in Reedley, California. (credit: FCDPH)

The Food and Drug Administration is warning consumers not to use any at-home tests made by Universal Meditech, Inc. (UMI), the company behind an illegal medical lab hidden in a warehouse in the small city of Reedley, California. The lab was shut down earlier this year by local, state, and federal agencies, which are still working to clear the site, properly dispose of all its hazardous contents, and investigate those responsible.

"UMI has notified the FDA that it has stopped all operations and is no longer providing support for its tests," the FDA said in a safety communication Friday. "The FDA is not able to confirm the performance of UMI’s tests, raising concerns that the tests may not be safe and effective."

UMI manufactured a variety of strip-based tests, mostly pregnancy tests, but also tests for ovulation, ketones, and alcohol in breast milk. The tests were sold under several names—including DiagnosUS, HealthyWiser, DeTec, and PrestiBio. They were available online from at least four distributors, which may not have identified UMI as the manufacturer. The known distributors are: AC&C Distribution, LLC; HealthyWiser; Home Health US Inc.; and Prestige Biotech Inc. The FDA cautions that there may be other distributors that it doesn't know about.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Maui truthers are so dumb they’re using a Falcon 9 photo as wildfire evidence

You can always count on conspiracy theorists to make a tragedy worse.

Image of a SpaceX rocket launching from Vandenberg Air Force Base.

Enlarge / Typically a marine layer shrouds launches from here in fog or clouds. (credit: SpaceX)

I noticed an uptick in traffic to an old SpaceX news article a few days ago. First, a few dozen visitors. Then, a few hundred. And today, thousands. What the heck?

The article itself is extremely lackluster. It was an excuse to run a photo gallery depicting a Falcon 9 launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base, as it was then known, in May 2018. This Iridium NEXT-6 mission launched five communications satellites for the private company Iridium and a small NASA satellite. About the only thing notable about this mission is that the first-stage booster was reused from the mysteriously lost Zuma launch a few months earlier. Anyway, the California liftoff looked super cool because it was a rare launch from Vandenberg amid clear skies.

All told, the article was maybe 100 words and a dozen photos. However, one of them, the second photo in the gallery, was a long-exposure "streak shot" that showed the pillar of flame beneath the rocket's ascent. That photo appears at the top of this article. It's a beautiful picture. In casual conversation a few months later, the SpaceX photographer who took the shot thanked me for sharing it.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ongoing scam tricks kids playing Roblox and Fortnite

The scams are often disguised as promotions, and they can all be linked to one network.

Ongoing scam tricks kids playing Roblox and Fortnite

Enlarge (credit: Savusia Konstantin | Getty Images)

Thousands of websites belonging to US government agencies, leading universities, and professional organizations have been hijacked over the last half decade and used to push scammy offers and promotions, new research has found. Many of these scams are aimed at children and attempt to trick them into downloading apps, malware, or submitting personal details in exchange for nonexistent rewards in Fortnite and Roblox.

For more than three years, security researcher Zach Edwards has been tracking these website hijackings and scams. He says the activity can be linked back to the activities of affiliate users of one advertising company. The US-registered company acts as a service that sends web traffic to a range of online advertisers, allowing individuals to sign up and use its systems. However, on any given day, Edwards, a senior manager of threat insights at Human Security, uncovers scores of .gov, .org, and .edu domains being compromised.

“This group is what I would consider to be the number one group at bulk compromising infrastructure across the Internet and hosting scams on it and other types of exploits,” Edwards says. The scale of the website compromises—which are ongoing—and the public nature of the scams makes them stand out, the researcher says.

Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ongoing scam tricks kids playing Roblox and Fortnite

The scams are often disguised as promotions, and they can all be linked to one network.

Ongoing scam tricks kids playing Roblox and Fortnite

Enlarge (credit: Savusia Konstantin | Getty Images)

Thousands of websites belonging to US government agencies, leading universities, and professional organizations have been hijacked over the last half decade and used to push scammy offers and promotions, new research has found. Many of these scams are aimed at children and attempt to trick them into downloading apps, malware, or submitting personal details in exchange for nonexistent rewards in Fortnite and Roblox.

For more than three years, security researcher Zach Edwards has been tracking these website hijackings and scams. He says the activity can be linked back to the activities of affiliate users of one advertising company. The US-registered company acts as a service that sends web traffic to a range of online advertisers, allowing individuals to sign up and use its systems. However, on any given day, Edwards, a senior manager of threat insights at Human Security, uncovers scores of .gov, .org, and .edu domains being compromised.

“This group is what I would consider to be the number one group at bulk compromising infrastructure across the Internet and hosting scams on it and other types of exploits,” Edwards says. The scale of the website compromises—which are ongoing—and the public nature of the scams makes them stand out, the researcher says.

Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments

ISPs complain that listing every fee is too hard, urge FCC to scrap new rule

Broadband industry fights requirement to “list all recurring monthly fees.”

Dollar signs superimposed on a photo of a person's hands typing on a laptop keyboard.

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | anyaberkut)

The US broadband industry is united in opposition to a requirement that Internet service providers list all of their monthly fees. Five lobby groups representing cable companies, fiber and DSL providers, and mobile operators have repeatedly urged the Federal Communications Commission to eliminate the requirement before new broadband labeling rules take effect.

The trade associations petitioned the FCC in January to change the rules and renewed their call last week in a filing and in a meeting with FCC officials. The requirement that ISPs list all their monthly fees "would add unnecessary complexity and burdens to the label for consumers and providers and could result in some providers having to create many labels for any given plan," the groups said in the filing on Friday.

The trade groups said the FCC should instead "require providers to include an explanatory statement that such fees may apply and that they vary by jurisdiction, similar to the Commission's treatment of government-imposed taxes," or require "the display of the maximum level of government-imposed fees that might be passed through, so that consumers would not experience bill shock with respect to such fees."

Read 19 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Requiring ink to scan a document—yet another insult from the printer industry

How much ink does it take to scan a document?

HP ENVY 6455e printer

Enlarge / Don't bother hitting the scan button if you're out of ink.

How much ink does an all-in-one printer need in order to fax a document? Or to scan one to your computer? The obvious answer is "none." But if you own certain printers from companies like HP and Canon, you won't be able to use core features unless the device has ink—even if those features have nothing to do with ink. 

Unfortunately, all-in-one printers arbitrarily demanding ink to perform non-printing functions isn't a new frustration. And that's despite some companies having printers that can scan without ink. Clearly, scanning or faxing without requiring an ink cartridge would improve users' experience—and they've illustrated that through class-action lawsuits. But this hasn't stopped printer makers from fighting to keep the nettlesome practice.

No ink, no scan

Since mid-2022, HP has been fighting a class-action lawsuit alleging that certain all-in-one printer models won't scan or fax without ink and that HP doesn't properly disclose this to shoppers. On January 13, 2023, the complaint was dismissed but allowed to be amended (you can view the amended complaint here: [PDF]), and on August 10, a Northern District of California judge dismissed HP's motion to dismiss the amended complaint [PDF].

Read 23 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Court Orders SportsBay to Pay Almost Half a Billion Dollars For Violating DMCA

In the summer of 2021, DISH Network and Sling filed a copyright lawsuit against four unlicensed sports streaming sites, among them the popular SportsBay.org. After the plaintiffs named two alleged operators of the sites, this week a court in Texas held the pair liable for almost 2.5 million violations of the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provisions and almost half a billion dollars in damages.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

lockIn July 2021, U.S. broadcaster DISH Network and subsidiary Sling TV filed a copyright lawsuit in a Texas district court against the unknown operators of four websites – SportsBay.org, SportsBay.tv, Live-NBA.stream, and Freefeds.com.

The complaint alleged that the unknown defendants circumvented (and provided technologies and services that circumvented) security measures employed by Sling and thereby provided “DISH’s television programming” to users of their websites.

According to the complaint, the defendants circumvented technological measures contrary to 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1)(A), and trafficked in circumvention technology and services contrary to 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(2) through their operation of the websites. The plaintiffs requested a permanent injunction, control of the defendants’ domains, and damages of up to $2,500 for each violation of the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provisions.

Early September 2021, District Judge Charles Eskridge granted DISH’s request to start serving subpoenas on third-party service providers including Namecheap and WhoisGuard, Tucows, Cloudflare, Digital Ocean, Google, Facebook and Twitter, with the aim of identifying the still-unknown operators of the sites. In the same month, the sites listed in the complaint disappeared.

DISH Names Defendants in Argentina

According to DISH’s first amended complaint filed in January 2022, information obtained from the third-party service providers enabled the company to identify two men responsible for operating the SportsBay sites.

Juan Barcan, an individual residing in Buenos Aires, Argentina, used his PayPal account to make payments to Namecheap and GitHub. Juan Nahuel Pereyra, also of Buenos Aires, used his PayPal account to make payments to Namecheap.

On January 20, 2022, DISH sent a request to the Argentine Central Authority to serve Barcan and Pereyra under the Hague Convention.

On October 31, 2022, the Central Authority informed DISH that Pereyra was served in Buenos Aires on September 14, 2022. Barcan was not served so after obtaining permission from the court, DISH served Barcan via a Gmail address used to make payments to Namecheap for the Sportsbay.org, Live-nba.stream, and Freefeds.com domain names.

When the defendants failed to appear, DISH sought default judgment. As part of that process, the plaintiffs provided the following information to describe the functions of the four websites listed in the complaint.

When Defendants and users selected or clicked on a channel on Sportsbay.org or Sportsbay.tv, the websites connected to Defendants’ Freefeds.com website by embedding in an iframe content originating from a Freefeds.com Uniform Resource Locator. The Freefeds.com iframe then accessed the encrypted Sling programing originating from Sling’s computer server and delivered it to the embedded iframe on the Sportsbay.org and Sportsbay.tv websites.

The Freefeds.com iframe then connected to Defendants’ Live-nba.stream server in order to obtain the DRM keys necessary to decrypt the Sling programming so that it was displayed to Defendants and users on the Sportsbay.org and Sportsbay.tv websites

DISH informed the court that each time a user accessed Sling programming from the links on the websites, “a connection was made with Live-nba.stream to obtain encryption keys to decrypt Sling’s transmission.”

By framing each visit to the Live-nba.stream website as a circumvention violation under section 1201(a)(2) of the DMCA, and nominating a six-month period where that domain reportedly received 2,469,250 visits from users in the United States, DISH arrived at a “reasonable and conservative claim” based on minimum statutory damages of just $200 for each violation.

“The Court should grant Plaintiffs’ Motion, award statutory damages in the amount of $493,850,000 for Defendants’ 2,469,250 violations of section 1201(a)(2) of the DMCA, and enter a permanent injunction barring Defendants from further violations,” DISH informed the court.

DISH Awarded Nearly Half a Billion in Damages

In his order handed down yesterday, District Judge Charles Eskridge entered a default judgment against Juan Barcan and Juan Nahuel Pereyra for violations of the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provisions.

The defendants and anyone acting in concert with them are permanently enjoined from circumventing any technological protection measure that controls access to Sling or DISH programming, including through the use of websites or any similar internet streaming service. Then comes the award for damages.

“Plaintiffs are awarded $493,850,000 in statutory damages against Defendants, jointly and severally, for Defendants’ 2,469,250 violations of section 1201(a)(2) of the DMCA,” the order reads.

DISH-half a billion DMCA

The order can be found here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Internet Archive’s legal woes mount as record labels sue for $400M

The Internet Archive also reached a confidential settlement with book publishers.

Internet Archive’s legal woes mount as record labels sue for $400M

Enlarge (credit: Kinga Krzeminska | Moment)

Major record labels are suing the Internet Archive, accusing the nonprofit of "massive" and "blatant" copyright infringement "of works by some of the greatest artists of the Twentieth Century."

The lawsuit was filed Friday in a US district court in New York by UMG Recordings, Capitol Records, Concord Bicycle Assets, CMGI, Sony Music Entertainment, and Arista Music. It targets the Internet Archive's "Great 78 Project," which was launched in 2006.

For the Great 78 Project, the Internet Archive partners with recording engineer George Blood— who is also a defendant in the lawsuit—to digitize sound recordings on 78 revolutions-per-minute (RPM) records. These early sound recordings are typically of poor quality and were made between 1898 and the late 1950s by using very brittle materials. The goal of the Great 78 Project was to preserve these early recordings so they would not be lost as records break and could continue to be studied as originally recorded.

Read 27 remaining paragraphs | Comments