Microsoft games like Starfield will cost $70 starting next year

Company says new price ceiling reflects “technical complexity” of major games.

Blasting off to new frontiers of pricing.

Enlarge / Blasting off to new frontiers of pricing.

Microsoft has become the latest big-name publisher to jump to a $70 asking price for the launch of big-budget games. The company said in a statement to IGN that the new pricing will start in 2023 for games built for the Xbox Series X/S and will include titles like Starfield, Redfall, and the next Forza Motorsport.

A $70 MSRP "reflects the content, scale, and technical complexity of these titles," a Microsoft spokesperson told IGN.

Despite the price increase for a la carte purchases, Microsoft isn't currently raising the price of its Game Pass subscriptions, which include launch day access to all of Microsoft's first-party titles. Speaking at a WSJ Live event last month, though, Xbox chief Phil Spencer said he thought that "at some point we'll have to raise some prices on certain things..."

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Google brings more features to Pixel Phones (including VPN and AI-enhanced calls for the Pixel 7)

Google is rolling out updates for Pixel phones that bring both the latest security patches, but also a bunch of new features… although some of the most useful new features are limited to the latest Pixel phones. For example, the latest Google Pi…

Google is rolling out updates for Pixel phones that bring both the latest security patches, but also a bunch of new features… although some of the most useful new features are limited to the latest Pixel phones. For example, the latest Google Pixel Feature Drop allows Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro owners to use […]

The post Google brings more features to Pixel Phones (including VPN and AI-enhanced calls for the Pixel 7) appeared first on Liliputing.

Callisto Protocol devs say “damn clerical error” caused PC frame rate issues

New patch fixes widespread stuttering caused by “rushed” shader compilation update.

Artist's conception of PC players getting hit with stuttering frame rates on the launch version of <em>The Callisto Protocol</em>.

Enlarge / Artist's conception of PC players getting hit with stuttering frame rates on the launch version of The Callisto Protocol.

In Ars' review of The Callisto Protocol last week, our reviewer praised the 60 fps graphics of the game's Performance mode on the tested PlayStation 5 version. Since the game's release, though, online forums like Reddit and the game's Steam reviews have seen widespread complaints of stuttering frame rates and other poor performance on the PC version.

The developers at Striking Distance Studios acknowledged those stuttering problems for "some" PC users Friday afternoon. Later that night, the team released a PC patch "to improve gameplay stuttering issues due to shader compilation." Testing on the Ars gaming rig (currently sporting an Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 Ti) suggests that the patch was successful and that the latest version of the game can achieve smooth frame rates above 60 frames per second, even on "Ultra" graphics settings.

“Responsible and accountable”

In a post on his personal Twitter account, Striking Distance founder and CEO Glen Schofield attributed those widespread stuttering problems to the wrong file being patched for the launch version of the game, a "freaking error by someone rushing." In a separate tweet, he referred to the problem as a "damn clerical error."

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Filmmakers Want to Link ISP Subscriber Data to ‘Pirating’ YTS and Reddit Users

As part of an ongoing piracy liability lawsuit, Internet provider WOW! was ordered to hand over the personal details of hundreds of subscribers to a group of filmmakers. Among other things, rightsholders want to cross-reference the details with YTS and Reddit accounts. With backing from WOW!, several subscribers are refusing to have their identities exposed.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

pirate-flagWOW! is being sued by a group of smaller movie companies, including Millennium Media and Voltage Pictures.

The filmmakers accuse the ISP of failing to terminate the accounts of subscribers who were repeatedly flagged for sharing copyrighted material. They want to hold WOW! liable for these pirating activities, which could lead to millions of dollars in damages.

The ISP challenged the claims and filed a motion to dismiss the case. Among other things, it argued that an IP address is not sufficient to prove that subscribers downloaded or shared any infringing material. The filmmakers opposed this motion, which has yet to be decided on by the Colorado federal court.

Filmmakers Want Subscriber Details

In the meantime, another issue has raised its head. Both sides are gathering evidence to prepare for the case moving forward. As part of that process, the filmmakers have demanded the personal details of roughly 14,000 subscribers whose WOW! accounts were allegedly used to pirate content.

WOW! objected to this request, arguing that the names and addresses of its subscribers are irrelevant to the core question of whether it reasonably implemented a repeat infringer policy. The filmmakers disagreed, noting that the information can be cross-checked to determine whether the ISP notified its subscribers and terminated accounts in response to infringement notices.

After hearing both sides, the Court eventually came up with a compromise. The filmmakers offered to reduce the targeted IP-addresses to the 375 top pirating unique IP addresses. The Court saw this as a reasonable request, especially considering the damages at stake.

168 Objections

The Court said that objections from subscribers would be dealt with at a later stage. That time has come. Over the past several months, 168 subscribers filed objections and the filmmakers and WOW! disagree on how these should be handled.

The subscriber’s arguments are not available to the public, but the filmmakers suggest that aside from two subscribers who passed away, they boil down to straightforward denials.

The filmmakers are not convinced by the objections. They want WOW! to hand over the data nonetheless, as these will allow them to check whether the ‘repeat’ notices were sent to the same subscribers each time.

“[T]he subscriber names are relevant because they will show whether the IP address was assigned to the same subscriber during the duration of the notices,” the filmmakers informed the Court.

Links to YTS and Reddit Users?

The filmmakers also want to check if the subscribers had accounts with the popular torrent site YTS. The companies previously obtained data from the YTS user database as part of a settlement with the torrent site. Since then, this information has been used as evidence in several lawsuits.

On top of that, the movie companies argue that they may be able to link the publicly available data of two Reddit users. These anonymous Redditors claimed to use WOW!’s service to pirate content.

“Moreover, the subscriber names are relevant because Plaintiffs can compare the subscriber names to the email addresses of the users that registered for accounts with the piracy website YTS or to those that have boasted on social media how Defendant allows them to pirate content without any problems.”

If the filmmakers find any links to YTS or the two Reddit users, they may argue that the subscribers in question are deliberate and repeat infringers.

One of the Reddit comments

reddit comment

WOW! Can Help without Exposing Subscribers

WOW! doesn’t agree with the filmmakers’ reasoning. The ISP believes that it’s not necessary to share the personal details of subscribers, as there are alternative means available.

For example, the Internet provider says that it can check its own systems to establish whether a particular IP address was assigned to one subscriber or multiple subscribers over time.

Instead of handing over the names and contact information, WOW! can simply share the associated account number, which would suffice. The ISP can also help to determine whether any of the objecting subscribers were YTS users, by cross-referencing data on their end without exposing their personal information.

No Signs of YTS and Reddit Users

Thus far there are no signs of YTS users. The filmmakers previously shared an exhibit with nine IP-addresses and emails of YTS users, but none of these matched the objecting subscribers.

“None of those IP addresses corresponds to an Objector, and Plaintiffs do not suggest otherwise,” WOW! writes.

“Plaintiffs could obtain information concerning the alleged YTS users without involving Objectors or other third parties, for example by serving discovery on WOW regarding whether WOW’s subscriber records include any of the nine email addresses referenced in Plaintiffs’ exhibit.”

Similarly, the ISP argues that there’s no public information that suggests that the two Redditors are among the objecting subscribers.

“There is no reason to believe these two users are among the Objectors. In fact, from the objections the Court has received, it is apparent that none of Objectors’ names have any passing resemblance or connection to ‘Servalpur’ or ‘rickselest’.”

In addition to the arguments discussed above, the parties also disagree on the type of notice that’s required before any data is handed over.

After hearing all parties involved, the Court now has to decide how to move forward. Does WOW have to hand over all data, or are objections warranted?

A copy of the filmmakers’ motion to compel is available here (pdf) and WOW!’s objections can be found here (pdf) and here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

After more than 5 years, Nvidia’s GTX 1060 is no longer Steam’s most-used GPU

Shortages and price increases have given the GTX 1060 an unusually long life.

Nvidia's GTX 1060 is still one of the most-used GPUs on Steam, but its star continues to fade slowly.

Enlarge / Nvidia's GTX 1060 is still one of the most-used GPUs on Steam, but its star continues to fade slowly. (credit: Mark Walton)

Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1060 was exceptionally well-reviewed when it was released in 2016—offering performance a bit better than previous-generation flagships for a downright reasonable price of $250. PC gamers responded accordingly. Within a year of its release, the 1060 became the most-used GPU in Steam's Hardware and Software Survey, a position it occupied from June 2017 until October 2022.

The 1060 owes its longevity to a unique combination of factors—its original value, plus a years-long GPU shortage and inflated pricing for newer models like the RTX 3050 and 3060. But its long reign finally ended in November's data, where the midrange GeForce GTX 1650 finally unseated the 1060. (The same shortage and pricing issues that kept the 1060 on top for so long have also contributed to the 1650's continued availability and viability four years after its release.)

The nature of Steam's stat gathering makes its data inherently noisy; it can only capture data volunteered by users who happen to open and use Steam while the data is being collected. This makes it useful for identifying broad trends over time—CPU and GPU market share, the number of CPU cores in most systems, the rough adoption rate of new Windows versions—but not quite as good at measuring data points as specific as "which individual GPU is the most popular?" The GTX 1060 actually gained share in the Steam data for September and October, which strikes us as not particularly likely given the age of the 1060 and steadily improving availability and pricing for newer models.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

When HBO Max and Discovery+ merge, they’ll have a new name

The more neutral name is intended to protect the premium HBO brand.

Longtime AT&T executive John Stankey speaks on stage in front of a sign that says

Enlarge / Longtime AT&T executive John Stankey, who became CEO in July 2020, speaks onstage at the HBO Max WarnerMedia Investor Day on October 29, 2019, in Burbank, California. (credit: Getty Images | Presley Ann)

By now, you may have heard that the two major TV streaming services run by Warner Bros. Discovery (HBO Max and Discovery+) are set to merge soon. Thanks to a new report from CNBC, we now have a good inkling of what the new combined service will be called.

The historically reliable financial publication cites sources familiar with the matter who say Warner Bros. Discovery lawyers are vetting the name "Max," which the company's executives have chosen for the service.

It notes that the name could still change but that Max is "the likely choice" and that boots are on the proverbial ground trying to make it a reality. Until now, the company's leaders have called the new service by the temporary codename "BEAM" internally.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Cooler Master’s massive workstation pod is an extravagant alternative to desks

Cooler Master announces waitlist for long-awaited Orb X.

Cooler Master Orb X

Enlarge (credit: Cooler Master)

When is an office or gaming chair more than a seat? When it's an entire mechanical pod equipped with monitors, wireless charging, USB ports, and more RGB LEDs than our personal record (zero).

As of today, Cooler Master is letting people register for the waitlist of its Orb X "multi-purpose station." Waitlist registration is still steps away from preorders or even a release date for the chair Cooler Master first started teasing in 2021. However, it shows Cooler Master is still serious about releasing its workstation pod, which looks like it was plucked out of a science-fiction movie before passing through a gamer's den.

But Cooler Master isn't limiting the Orb X's potential reach to gamers alone. Its announcement today claims it designed the pod "for gamers and professionals" and that its isolating, spherical design can help people "stay productive."

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Cyberkriminalität: Jeder vierte Jugendliche ist ein Internettroll

Einer Umfrage zufolge ist bedenkliches bis illegales Verhalten von Jugendlichen im Internet zur Normalität geworden. In Deutschland ist der Anteil sehr hoch. (Internet, Instant Messenger)

Einer Umfrage zufolge ist bedenkliches bis illegales Verhalten von Jugendlichen im Internet zur Normalität geworden. In Deutschland ist der Anteil sehr hoch. (Internet, Instant Messenger)

Google kills “Duplex on the Web,” an automated website navigation feature

Google wanted to click through websites on your behalf, but did that solve a problem?

After you press the "buy tickets" button, the Google Assistant takes over.

Enlarge / After you press the "buy tickets" button, the Google Assistant takes over. (credit: Google)

Google is shutting down a rather obscure project: Google Duplex on the Web. "Duplex" is Google's branding for AI that does "simple but familiar tasks that saves you time." The branding exists on two products: this "web" feature and Google's human-impersonating voice AI, the latter of which is still running as far as we know. This version of Duplex—Duplex on the Web—was a Google Assistant feature that could autonomously navigate websites on your behalf and do things like buy items and check in to a flight. The feature couldn't have been very popular, and TechCrunch spotted a support page update that says Duplex on the Web will be dead by the end of the month.

Duplex on the Web launched in late 2019 and was announced earlier that year at Google I/O. The normal checkout process for an item involves a lot of navigating and pasting of saved data. You'll need to find the item and possibly the time slot you want if it's a reservation, enter in your billing info, and mash "next" a lot, and Duplex on the Web was supposed to be able to do all that autonomously. While it would probably be faster and more reliable if companies just made a voice API, Duplex on the Web was a hack. The Assistant would pop up its own web browser and individually click through checkout screens while you watched. Google's automated mouse clicker theoretically would have scaled well because it could bring voice support to a website without needing any work from the website owner.

Now, though, it's dead. Google's support page says that "Duplex on the Web is deprecated and will no longer be supported as of later this month. Any automation features enabled by Duplex on the Web will no longer be supported after this date." Google told TechCrunch, “By the end of this year, we’ll turn down Duplex on the Web and fully focus on making AI advancements to the Duplex voice technology that helps people most every day.”

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Epson pulls the plug on laser printers in the name of the environment

“You’re not still using a laser printer, are you?” Shaq asked back in a 2020 Epson EcoTank commercial. The company has been bullish on inkjets for some time, and now they’re going all in. Epson will stop making laser printers b…

“You’re not still using a laser printer, are you?” Shaq asked back in a 2020 Epson EcoTank commercial. The company has been bullish on inkjets for some time, and now they’re going all in. Epson will stop making laser printers by 2026, and the company is citing environmental reasons as the main reason. In a […]

The post Epson pulls the plug on laser printers in the name of the environment appeared first on Liliputing.