Enlarge (credit: Getty Images)
When you read a sentence like this one, your past experience tells you that it’s written by a thinking, feeling human. And, in this case, there is indeed a human typing these words: [Hi, there!] But these days, some sentences that appear remarkably humanlike are actually generated by artificial intelligence systems trained on massive amounts of human text.
People are so accustomed to assuming that fluent language comes from a thinking, feeling human that evidence to the contrary can be difficult to wrap your head around. How are people likely to navigate this relatively uncharted territory? Because of a persistent tendency to associate fluent expression with fluent thought, it is natural—but potentially misleading—to think that if an AI model can express itself fluently, that means it thinks and feels just like humans do.
Thus, it is perhaps unsurprising that a former Google engineer recently claimed that Google’s AI system LaMDA has a sense of self because it can eloquently generate text about its purported feelings. This event and the subsequent media coverage led to a number of rightly skeptical articles and posts about the claim that computational models of human language are sentient, meaning capable of thinking and feeling and experiencing.
Read 17 remaining paragraphs | Comments
Feuerwehrleute in Hessen hatten Probleme, einen Elektroauto-Brand, der auf ein Wohngebäude übergriff, zu löschen. Auf dem Dach befand sich Photovoltaik. (
Vitronet soll bundesweit den Glasfaserausbau für die United-Internet-Tochter übernehmen. (
Das EU-Klimapaket wird vor dem Hintergrund des Ukraine-Kriegs konkreter. Die Vorschläge der EU-Kommission werden aber nicht erreicht. (
Was am 27. Juni 2022 neben den großen Meldungen sonst noch passiert ist, in aller Kürze. (
Das Neun-Euro-Ticket könnte als Klimaticket weiterlaufen. Das geht aus einem Vorschlag für ein neues Klimaschutzsofortprogramm hervor. (
