
Corona-Pandemie: Apple verschiebt Pläne für Rückkehr ins Büro
Apple-Mitarbeiter müssen vorerst nicht drei Tage in der Woche ins Büro kommen. Steigende Covid-19-Fallzahlen lassen Apple vorsichtig werden. (Apple, Maschinelles Lernen)

Just another news site
Apple-Mitarbeiter müssen vorerst nicht drei Tage in der Woche ins Büro kommen. Steigende Covid-19-Fallzahlen lassen Apple vorsichtig werden. (Apple, Maschinelles Lernen)
Eine Welt in 3D, schnelle Android-Apps in allen möglichen Formen und sehr viel Technik für plattformübergreifende Entwicklung. Google will wirklich allen Entwicklern etwas anbieten. (Google I/O 2022, Google)
Debatte über “das Elend der Medien” und über “alternative Medienkritik”. Können Medienschaffende und -forschende auch anders? (Teil 2 und Schluss)
“There is a primal urge in all of us to explore.”
The space race shifts to Mars in For All Mankind S3.
The fictional battle for the domination of space between the US and Russia shifts its focus from the Moon to Mars for the third season of For All Mankind. Ars staffers have dubbed this relatively underappreciated gem "Moon Show," and Apple TV+ has now released the official trailer for the show's third outing on the streaming platform.
(Some spoilers for the prior two seasons.)
Dem israelischen Militär wird vorgeworfen, die Journalistin Shireen Abu Akleh exekutiert zu haben. Die Empörung in westlichen Medien bleibt aus
Proposed consent decree with FDA will require Abbott to take corrective actions.
Enlarge / The Abbott manufacturing facility in Sturgis, Michigan, on May 13, 2022. (credit: Getty | Jeff Kowalsky)
Formula maker Abbott continues to firmly deny that its infant formulas sickened four babies, killing two. The denial is despite the same dangerous bacteria that sickened the infants—Cronobacter sakazakii—being found at the company's formula factory in Sturgis, Michigan, which the Food and Drug Administration alleges was producing formula "under insanitary conditions." And at least one container of Abbott's formula tested positive for the same Cronobacter sakazakii strain found infecting one of the infants.
Still, Abbott argues that the link hasn't been confirmed, and its formula isn't to blame. In a lengthy Twitter thread on May 13, the company made the blunt assertion: "The formula from this plant did not cause these infant illnesses."
But that is a brazen and misleading claim, according to the Food and Drug Administration. In a press briefing Monday evening, agency officials thoroughly dismantled Abbott's defense.
Intel may have recently launched a line of 55-watt Alder Lake-HX series processors designed to give laptops some of the power of a desktop PC. But PC maker XMG went ahead and put an actual desktop processor in its Apex 15 Max laptop, which can be conf…
Intel may have recently launched a line of 55-watt Alder Lake-HX series processors designed to give laptops some of the power of a desktop PC. But PC maker XMG went ahead and put an actual desktop processor in its Apex 15 Max laptop, which can be configured with up to an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core, […]
The post Lilbits: A laptop with Ryzen 9 5950X, Kodi 20 Alpha 1, and an iPhone with an E Ink display appeared first on Liliputing.
tvOS, watchOS, HomePod, Studio Display, and Swift Playgrounds also got updates.
Enlarge / Apple's Studio Display received a firmware update today to improve its webcam performance. (credit: Andrew Cunningham)
Apple released new software updates for all of its platforms on Tuesday. That includes the following:
These are almost certainly the last updates before the company's annual developer conference, which is scheduled to kick off on June 6. Among other things, Apple will announce iOS and iPadOS 16, macOS 13, and watchOS 9 at the conference, but those updates won't arrive until later this year.
Today's iOS update offers just enough new user-facing features to earn that 15.x label instead of 15.x.x, which is usually reserved for bug fixes and the like.
The developers of Manjaro Linux began partnering with PC makers earlier this year to offer mini PCs that come with the open source operating system pre-installed. So far we’ve seen Manjaro versions of the MINISFORUM UM700 and Beelink SER 4 4800U…
The developers of Manjaro Linux began partnering with PC makers earlier this year to offer mini PCs that come with the open source operating system pre-installed. So far we’ve seen Manjaro versions of the MINISFORUM UM700 and Beelink SER 4 4800U. Now Manjaro and MINISFORUM have unveiled the most affordable option to date: the MINISFORUM […]
The post MINISFORUM DeskMini UM350 mini PC now available with Manjaro Linux for $299 and up appeared first on Liliputing.
Downloading pirated movies and TV shows is against the law in the United States. The same is true for those who operate a pirate streaming site. However, people who use these streaming sites to consume pirated content may not be copyright infringers. Law professor James Gibson explains why.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
There are many options for people to enjoy movies and TV shows legally but millions still choose to pirate content instead.
Up until a decade ago, this piracy landscape was dominated by torrent sites and direct download portals. Today, the vast majority of pirates use streaming sites.
The entertainment industries have swiftly adapted to this shift. At the moment, most anti-piracy initiatives are streaming-related, spearheaded by the Alliance of Creativity and Entertainment (ACE). These efforts have resulted in the shutdown of hundreds of sites already.
Despite the successes, many challenges remain as well. In a recent appearance on Reuters, MPA’s Senior Executive Vice President Karyn Temple points out that pirates can be pretty creative too. Especially when it comes to evading law enforcement.
“The illegal pirates that we deal with and have to go after are almost as creative, in some sense, as our own creators,” Temple says. “They try to take advantage of new technology and new tools as soon as they are developed. We have to continually develop tools to stay out ahead.”
The MPA and ACE have learned that DMCA subpoenas targeted at third-party services such as Cloudflare can be quite effective. While most site operators use fake information to sign up, some of the information is actionable.
It’s clear that rightsholders have the tools and legal backing to go after operators of streaming sites but going after the end-users of these sites is a challenge, for a variety of reasons.
The first and most obvious problem is that rightsholders have no easy way to find out who the consumers of pirated streams are. Unlike BitTorrent transfers, the IP addresses of people who watch centrally hosted streams are not publicly available, so can’t be easily tracked.
In theory, the site operators could monitor the people who use their platforms to watch videos but getting site owners to hand over user data would generally only happen if a site or service is compromised. That’s not impossible, but far from straightforward.
There’s another more fundamental problem as well. Even if rightsholders could obtain the IP address or even a name of an alleged streaming pirate, they would have to prove that the person in question is actually engaged in copyright infringement. That’s easier said than done.
This is also what James Gibson, Professor of Law at Richmond University, hinted at. Unlike downloading pirated movies, consuming pirated streams isn’t a clear violation of copyright law.
“It’s not at all clear that if you merely consume pirated streaming content that you’re actually engaging in copyright infringement,” Gibson says.
As a result, rightsholders may not be eager to file complaints against consumers who stream pirated content. After all, if they lose one of these cases, it may empower streaming pirates instead of deterring them, which could only make the problem worse.
“So it could be that the media companies do not want to set a bad precedent by claiming that it’s an infringement and then finding out that it’s not. That might embolden end users rather than make them more attentive to the legal aspects of streaming,” Gibson notes.
The fact that downloading and streaming are handled differently under US copyright law boils down to the definition of copyright infringement. These infringements always require the distribution, reproduction, or public performance of copyrighted content.
When someone downloads a pirated file a full and lasting copy is created, which fits the definition of reproduction. However, when someone watches a pirated stream this is typically not the case.
Speaking with TorrentFreak, Professor Gibson explains the difference in a clear and concise manner.
“In streaming, there’s no lasting copy made; the content disappears as soon as the stream ends. That means the copyright owner’s exclusive control over reproduction and distribution rights is irrelevant, because reproduction and distribution require the creation of a lasting copy.
“Therefore, the only liability hook is the copyright owner’s exclusive control over public performance of the content. The piracy platforms are definitely engaging in public performance by providing the streams, but the end user is simply watching the streams, not performing them — let alone doing so publicly,” Gibson adds.
Whether streaming can or can’t be classified as copyright infringement is ultimately up to the courts to decide. It is definitely less straightforward than downloading, but it might not be impossible. For now, however, Gibson is not aware of any cases where this has been put to the test.
For the operators of pirate streaming sites, the situation is quite different. They offer pirated content to a broader audience, which is a “public performance” and can therefore be seen as copyright infringement.
Historically, these “public performance” infringements were seen as misdemeanors under criminal law but, with the Protecting Lawful Streaming Act, performances were updated to a felony, putting them on par with the penalties available against operators of traditional download and torrent sites.
With all the hurdles involved, it’s not likely that the major Hollywood studios will crack down on users of pirate streaming sites. But that’s not really a surprise, as these companies are not involved in lawsuits against individual downloaders either.
The lawsuits against BitTorrent users that are currently being filed are all coming from adult content producers or smaller independent film companies, in the US at least.
Finally, we would like to stress that this article is obviously not meant to encourage or justify the use of pirate streaming sites. However, it is worth highlighting that not all forms of piracy are treated equally under current copyright laws.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
You must be logged in to post a comment.