Lilbits: Samsung may be throttling Android app performance, Intel Core i7-12650HX leaked, Valve issues fix for Steam Deck stick drift

Every few years one or more phone makers seems to be caught throttling performance of certain Android apps and games, often to help phones get high scores in benchmarks even when they’re not representative of real-world performance. This time it’s Samsung’s turn. The company’s Game Optimizing Service has been discovered on recent Samsung phones, and […]

The post Lilbits: Samsung may be throttling Android app performance, Intel Core i7-12650HX leaked, Valve issues fix for Steam Deck stick drift appeared first on Liliputing.

Every few years one or more phone makers seems to be caught throttling performance of certain Android apps and games, often to help phones get high scores in benchmarks even when they’re not representative of real-world performance. This time it’s Samsung’s turn.

The company’s Game Optimizing Service has been discovered on recent Samsung phones, and it appears to throttle performance for thousands of apps and games in an effort to help extend battery life. But it doesn’t throttle performance in benchmarks, which means those apps spit out high scores even though most apps won’t perform as well as the benchmarks would seem to indicate.

Here’s a roundup of recent tech news from around the web.

Keep up on the latest headlines by following Liliputing on Twitter and Facebook and follow @LinuxSmartphone on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news on open source mobile phones.

The post Lilbits: Samsung may be throttling Android app performance, Intel Core i7-12650HX leaked, Valve issues fix for Steam Deck stick drift appeared first on Liliputing.

Google Meet now shares detailed bandwidth information with your employer

Administrators can see the precise second your call quality dropped.

Google Meet pinpoints the exact moment someone started sounding like a robot.

Enlarge / Google Meet pinpoints the exact moment someone started sounding like a robot. (credit: Google)

The latest update for Google Meet is a new feature that lets Google Workspace administrators see employee bandwidth during a call.

The revamped "Meet Quality Tool" will show inbound and outbound bandwidth information, pitting a user's "estimated available bandwidth" against how much bandwidth Google Meet needed for each moment of the call. Google Meet used to log average numbers for each person over the length of the call, but the new tool now shows each person's bandwidth in a second-by-second line graph. Google says that "We hope by surfacing this detailed information, Admins can easily troubleshoot or improve call quality for their users."

The full list of everything Google Meet logs and shares with your employer or school is lengthy. It includes network statistics like jitter, packet loss, congestion, and ping times as well as whether you were on a wired, Wi-Fi, or cellular connection, microphone and speaker levels, CPU usage and FPS, and any moderation actions. There's also the Google Meet Audit log, which gives Workspace administrators access to a log of every meeting, including the names and descriptions of each meeting and all the participants.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Chuwi UBook XPro is a new tablet with an old processor

The latest Windows tablet from Chuwi has a built-in kickstand, support for a detachable keyboard and for pen input, and some decent specs for a mid-range device, including a 13 inch, 2160 x 1440 pixel display with a 3:2 aspect ratio, 8GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. But there’s one spec that makes the […]

The post Chuwi UBook XPro is a new tablet with an old processor appeared first on Liliputing.

The latest Windows tablet from Chuwi has a built-in kickstand, support for a detachable keyboard and for pen input, and some decent specs for a mid-range device, including a 13 inch, 2160 x 1440 pixel display with a 3:2 aspect ratio, 8GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage.

But there’s one spec that makes the Chuwi UBook XPro feel very dated for a tablet released in 2022: its powered by an Intel Core i7-7Y75 processor, a chip that was released nearly six years ago.

The processor is a 7th-gen Intel Core chip designed for thin, light and fanless devices. It’s a 4.5 watt processor with 2 cores, 4 threads and Intel HD 615 graphics. At the time it was a step above Intel Atom-based Celeron and Pentium processors, but it’s an aging processor based on older technologies.

That said, the chip is a little faster than the Intel Celeron N4100 chip that powers the Chuwi UBook X tablet that launched last summer, particularly when it comes to single-core performance.

But it seems odd to slap the “Pro” name on a new device shipping with such an old processor.

Other features of the UBook XPro include a 38 Wh battery, 5MP rear camera, 2MP front-facing camera, support for WiFi 5 and Bluetooth 4.2, a USB Type-C port, two USB 3.0 ports, a headset jack, micro HDMI port, and microSD card reader.

The tablet measures 0.36 inches thick and weighs just over 2 pounds.

The Chuwi UBook XPro is available from Banggood for $490. That price is just for the tablet though. You’ll have to pay extra for a keyboard and Chuwi’s H7 pressure-sensitive stylus.

The post Chuwi UBook XPro is a new tablet with an old processor appeared first on Liliputing.

Interop 2022 initiative aims to make sure web sites work the same in all browsers

The companies behind the rendering engines that power all of the biggest web browsers have announced a new initiative called Interop 2022 that’s designed to ensure that websites will look and function the same way no matter what browser you’re using to access them. Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla are all onboard, which means that other […]

The post Interop 2022 initiative aims to make sure web sites work the same in all browsers appeared first on Liliputing.

The companies behind the rendering engines that power all of the biggest web browsers have announced a new initiative called Interop 2022 that’s designed to ensure that websites will look and function the same way no matter what browser you’re using to access them.

Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla are all onboard, which means that other browsers that use the Webkit, Blink/Chromium, or Gecko rendering engines should all benefit.

As Mozilla points out, the web is already defined by a set of standards that browser makers can use to ensure their apps can render web pages properly. But that doesn’t mean they’ll all do so in the same way… unless there’s some cooperation.

So Interop 2022 brings the folks behind those browsers together in an effort to focus on 15 areas:

  • Cascade Layers
  • Color Spaces and Functions
  • Containment
  • Dialog Element
  • Forms
  • Scrolling
  • Subgrid
  • Typography and Encodings
  • Viewport Units
  • Web Compat
  • Aspect Ratio
  • Flexbox
  • Grid
  • Sticky Positioning
  • Transforms

The last five in that list are carry-overs from an earlier initiative called Compat 2021 that was a partnership between Microsoft and Google.

The new initiative involves a set of automated tests that can tell you how well each browser meets the interoperability standards overall (or just on a specific focus area). You can see the latest scores at wpt.fyi/interop-2022. Right now no browser gets a perfect score, but you can see how things have already improved significantly since the start of the year, especially when looking at scores for experimental versions of the browsers rather than stable builds.

via Google, WebKit, Mozilla, Microsoft, and Bocoup

The post Interop 2022 initiative aims to make sure web sites work the same in all browsers appeared first on Liliputing.

FCC considers crackdown on bad wireless receivers after 5G/altimeter debacle

Receivers that ignore spectrum boundaries are a problem for new wireless services.

An airplane cockpit seen during flight.

Enlarge / Airbus 320 cockpit. (credit: Getty Images | Skyhobo)

The Federal Communications Commission will consider issuing new rules for wireless receivers that could prevent future conflicts like the ongoing battle between the aviation and cellular industries.

There are strict rules requiring wireless devices to transmit only in their licensed frequencies. That means, for example, that AT&T and Verizon's 5G transmissions in C-band spectrum (3.7 to 3.98 GHz) have to stay within the C-band.

But there isn't much to prevent devices from receiving transmissions from outside their allotted frequencies. The altimeters used in airplanes to measure altitude officially rely on spectrum from 4.2 GHz to 4.4 GHz, but the Federal Aviation Administration has said that 5G transmissions in the C-band could interfere with the operation of some of those altimeters.

Read 21 remaining paragraphs | Comments

With new hardware, company wants to rethink quantum computing benchmarks

How do you compare the performance of systems based on very different technologies?

Image of a gold rectangle on a black background.

Enlarge / A cartoon diagram of the trapped ion system. (credit: IonQ)

Back in 2020, we talked to the CEO of a quantum computing startup called IonQ that uses trapped ions for its qubits. At the time, the company had just introduced a quantum processor that could host 32 qubits that had impressive fidelity, meaning they were much less likely to produce an error when being manipulated or read out. Best yet, the CEO suggested there was an obvious path to doubling the qubit count every eight months for the next few years.

By that metric, we should be seeing a high-fidelity, 128-qubit machine from the company about now. Instead, it chose to make a significant change to the underlying technology and rethought how it viewed scaling its processors. To find out what motivated the changes, we talked with the company's CTO, Duke University's Jungsang Kim, about the decision and where IonQ's hardware stands in the larger landscape.

If you're interested in IonQ's hardware in particular, the next two sections are for you; if you care about the state of the quantum computing landscape more generally, you can skip ahead past those sections.

Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments

With new hardware, company wants to rethink quantum computing benchmarks

How do you compare the performance of systems based on very different technologies?

Image of a gold rectangle on a black background.

Enlarge / A cartoon diagram of the trapped ion system. (credit: IonQ)

Back in 2020, we talked to the CEO of a quantum computing startup called IonQ that uses trapped ions for its qubits. At the time, the company had just introduced a quantum processor that could host 32 qubits that had impressive fidelity, meaning they were much less likely to produce an error when being manipulated or read out. Best yet, the CEO suggested there was an obvious path to doubling the qubit count every eight months for the next few years.

By that metric, we should be seeing a high-fidelity, 128-qubit machine from the company about now. Instead, it chose to make a significant change to the underlying technology and rethought how it viewed scaling its processors. To find out what motivated the changes, we talked with the company's CTO, Duke University's Jungsang Kim, about the decision and where IonQ's hardware stands in the larger landscape.

If you're interested in IonQ's hardware in particular, the next two sections are for you; if you care about the state of the quantum computing landscape more generally, you can skip ahead past those sections.

Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Honey, I shrunk the Mac: Enthusiast makes the Mac mini more mini

Mac mini mod trims the fat for a reduced footprint.

mac mini mod on top of the original mac miin

Enlarge / Mac Mini mod on top of the original Mac Mini. (credit: Snazzy Labs/YouTube)

At 7.7×7.7×1.4 inches, the Mac mini is a tiny desktop. When the form factor debuted in 2010, it was pretty impressive. But 12 years later, with mini PCs like the Intel NUC measuring 4.6×4.4×1.5 inches, the Mac mini doesn't feel all that mini anymore.

As it turns out, the PC is packing some extra baggage, and by getting rid of some of those parts—like an overly powerful internal power supply unit (PSU)—an enthusiast has been able to rebuild the system with a 28 percent reduction in volume while allegedly keeping the same performance as the original machine.

YouTube channel Snazzy Labs shared its miniature Mac mini mod in a video called "We made the Mac mini ACTUALLY mini!" on Tuesday. The idea stemmed from the M1-based Mac mini's reliance on a dated design built around more power-hungry Intel chips. Part of that design included a large fan. Snazzy Labs removed the blower fan, certain that a fanless Mac mini would work because of the M1's performance in the fanless Macbook Air laptop.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Here’s how kids’ COVID vaccines are holding up in the real world amid omicron

As in adults, omicron and time lower effectiveness, but shots protect from severe COVID.

A nurse gives a 16-year-old a COVID-19 vaccine.

Enlarge / A nurse gives a 16-year-old a COVID-19 vaccine. (credit: Getty | Sopa images)

New data on the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in children and teens largely mirrors what we've seen in adults so far: vaccine effectiveness is strong against the delta coronavirus variant but takes a significant hit when up against omicron. Time also erodes protection. But overall, the shots—particularly boosters—offer valuable protection against severe outcomes.

The data, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention this week, drew on medical records from 10 states and only focused on vaccinations with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Researchers examined records of nearly 40,000 visits of non-immunocompromised children and teens to emergency departments and urgent care centers (ED and UC), as well as about 1,700 hospitalizations, all of which occurred between April 9, 2021, and January 29, 2022.

Expected waning

Across the delta and omicron eras, vaccine effectiveness of two doses against ED/UC visits was 83 percent in children 12 to 15, and 76 percent in teens 16 to 17. But those estimates only go up to five months after the two doses, and we know vaccine effectiveness wanes over time. After the five-month mark, those effectiveness estimates fell to 38 percent and 46 percent for ages 12 to 15 and 16 to 17, respectively.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments