
Wasserstoff: GM plant Stromgeneratoren mit Brennstoffzellen
General Motors will mobile und stationäre Stromgeneratoren anbieten, die mit Brennstoffzellen ausgestattet sind. (Brennstoffzelle, Technologie)

Just another news site
General Motors will mobile und stationäre Stromgeneratoren anbieten, die mit Brennstoffzellen ausgestattet sind. (Brennstoffzelle, Technologie)
Die russische Zentralbank hat vorgeschlagen, sowohl die Nutzung von Kryptowährungen als auch das Schürfen zu verbieten. (Kryptomining, Internet)
One gas bubble lasted for a whopping 465 days, a world record for this type of object.
The shell of a water/glycerol gas marble (bubble) remains liquid and spherical even after 101 days, and it reacts as a liquid film when punctured. These human-made bubbles could be used to create stable foams. (credit: A. Roux et al., 2022)
Blowing soap bubbles never fails to delight one's inner child, perhaps because they are intrinsically ephemeral, bursting after just a few minutes. Now, French physicists have succeeded in creating "everlasting bubbles" out of plastic particles, glycerol, and water, according to a new paper published in the journal Physical Review Fluids. The longest bubble they built survived for a whopping 465 days.
Bubbles have long fascinated physicists. For instance, French physicists in 2016 worked out a theoretical model for the exact mechanism for how soap bubbles form when jets of air hit a soapy film. The researchers found that bubbles only formed above a certain speed, which in turn depends on the width of the jet of air.
In 2018, we reported on how mathematicians at New York University's Applied Math Lab had fine-tuned the method for blowing the perfect bubble based on a series of experiments with thin, soapy films. The mathematicians concluded that it's best to use a circular wand with a 1.5-inch (3.8 cm) perimeter and gently blow at a consistent 2.7 inches per second (6.9 cm/s). Blow at higher speeds and the bubble will burst. If you use a smaller or larger wand, the same thing will happen.
Irreverence, whimsy, radishes: series’ return includes Muppet-teering at its best.
Enlarge / The Fraggles are back, clap, clap. And they're a blast to watch again, clap, clap. (credit: Jim Henson Company / Apple TV+)
The video-streaming world has long suffered from content fragmentation, and modern-day Muppet access is no exception. If you want to revel in all things Jim Henson, you'll need subscriptions to no less than three streamers: Disney+ (which has the most Henson films and series), HBO Max (which has a lock on Sesame Street), and Apple TV+. In a fairer cosmos, a unified Henson+ service would let fans feast upon the entire Muppet-verse like giddy Cookie Monsters. Alas.
Those streaming services don't just divvy up classic Muppet content, either. They each feature brand-new series from the Jim Henson Company, either with newly invented characters or old favorites reliving their glory days. Keeping up with all that content has been tricky, but we at Ars have done our best, always with the hope that one of the new properties will deliver a good-enough mix of nostalgia, production values, and freshness.
This week, Fraggle Rock: Back to the Rock nails that exact combination and breathes new life into the formerly HBO-exclusive universe.
Was die Pandemie-Aufregung mit der Fußball-WM gemein hat. Und warum die Linke die Gefahr suchen sollte, statt sie zu meiden. (Teil 2 und Schluss)
The ski-goggles-like product is targeting a 2024 launch window.
Enlarge / Product photography of the Google Glass wearable. Project Iris won't look like this; it is said to more closely resemble ski goggles than casual glasses. (credit: Google)
Google engineers are developing a new augmented reality (AR) headset, according to a report by The Verge citing two people familiar with the project.
Google hopes to ship the product—codenamed "Project Iris"—sometime in 2024, but that date is likely not set in stone.
Like Apple's rumored mixed reality glasses, Project Iris would be wireless and use external cameras to send an augmented image of the real world to you. And like one of the devices Apple has reportedly worked on, the glasses would leave the heavy-duty graphics processing to an external computer. In Google's case, the device will rely on cloud computing instead of nearby hardware.
Bipartisan vote suggests the legislation could make it to the president’s desk.
Enlarge / The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, DC. (credit: Getty Images | Phil Roeder)
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 16-6 today to advance an antitrust bill that would prevent Big Tech firms from giving their own services preferential treatment.
The bill attempts to limit the ability of dominant firms to “unfairly preference” their own products or services in a way that would harm competition. For example, Apple and Google could not rank their own apps higher than competitors’ on app stores or in searches. With five Republican senators voting alongside Democrats, the bill has a reasonable chance of passing once it hits the Senate floor. A similar bill has been introduced in the House.
“We haven’t meaningfully updated our antitrust laws since the birth of the Internet,” said Senate co-sponsor Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) in a committee hearing today. “We have to look at this differently than just startup companies in a garage. That’s not what they are anymore.”
A paper on a transplant to a brain-dead recipient provides details on the donor.
Enlarge / Cloned piglets that are engineered to be useful for organ transplants to humans. (credit: Getty Images / Staff)
Last week, when we reported on the first pig-to-human heart transplant, we complained that the commercial company behind the transplant wasn't more forthcoming about the genetic engineering that had converted the pig into a viable donor.
However, we know now much more about porcine genetic engineering thanks to a new paper on a different, more cautious test procedure. The work described in the paper is a transplant of pig kidneys into a brain-dead recipient, meant to pave the way for trials in viable humans. The publication that describes the work contains extensive details on the genetic engineering used to ensure that the pig tissue would survive in a human host.
According to The New York Times, the recipient was rendered brain-dead by a motorcycle accident. He had signed up as an organ donor and was kept alive while his organs were screened; his next of kin gave informed consent to his body's use in the experimental procedure.
Internet provider Bright House has asked a Florida federal court to sanction several record labels for ‘destroying’ evidence that it says is crucial to the ongoing piracy liability lawsuit. In addition to sanctions, the ISP also wants the option to inform the jury about the missing evidence, while testimony based on that information should be precluded from trial.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
Under US copyright law, Internet providers must terminate the accounts of repeat infringers “in appropriate circumstances.”
In the past such drastic action was rare, but with the backing of legal pressure, ISPs are increasingly being held to this standard.
Several major music industry companies including Artista Records, Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music, and Warner Records, have filed lawsuits against some of the largest U.S. Internet providers. This also includes Bright House, which is owned by Charter.
Through legal action, the music companies hope to win hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. These are not just theoretical claims as a federal jury handed down a billion-dollar award in a lawsuit against Cox Communications two years ago.
Bright House would like to avoid this fate at all costs. The ISP previously hit back accusing the record labels, the RIAA, and their anti-piracy partner MarkMonitor of sending inaccurate and deceptive takedown notices. This is in violation of the DMCA, the ISP argued.
A few months ago the Florida federal court dismissed this counterclaim. While the court didn’t rule on the alleged evidence shortcomings, it pointed out that Bright House didn’t terminate any subscribers as a result, so no real harm was done.
This dismissal came as a disappointment to Bright House, which hopes to have some leverage when the case goes to trial. However, the ISP is not giving up on contesting the evidence just yet. In a new filing submitted a few days ago, the company asks the court to sanction the record labels for allegedly destroying piracy evidence.
The motion for sanctions and curative measures is heavily redacted but it’s clear that Bright House believes that crucial evidence was destroyed. This information was central to (part of) the piracy notifications on which the repeat infringer claims are based.
“While 110,000 of these notices provide the foundation for Plaintiffs’ $1 billion damages claims against Bright House under Plaintiffs’ theory of the case, [REDACTED],” Bright House writes.
Most exhibits are redacted as well, which makes it hard to grasp exactly what was deleted. The readable parts suggest that evidence related to the reliability and accuracy of notices that were sent out between 2012-2015 is no longer available.
This information applies to MarkMonotor’s piracy tracking system as well as Audible Magic’s services, which are used to verify that shared files are indeed copyright infringing.
“Bright House sought this information from Plaintiffs, RIAA, MarkMonitor, and Audible Magic during fact discovery. But it is no longer available, in material part, because [REDACTED],” Bright House writes.
The record labels previously argued that takedown notices themselves are sufficient to prove direct infringement, but the ISP clearly disagrees.
“Plaintiffs’ destruction of evidence has unduly prejudiced Bright House’s ability to challenge Plaintiffs’ direct infringement case — the bedrock of the entire lawsuit. In these circumstances, curative measures and sanctions are warranted.”
If the court agrees that sanctions are appropriate, it doesn’t automatically mean that the missing evidence can’t be cited during an eventual trial. This also became apparent when record labels were previously sanctioned in the Cox case.
However, in addition to sanctions, Bright House also requests curative measures, which could be more helpful if they’re granted.
The ISP specifically calls for the exclusion of evidence, special jury instructions that highlight the alleged errors, as well as permission to present information and raise arguments regarding the loss of evidence during trial.
—
A copy of Bright House’s motion for sanctions and curative measures is available here (pdf)
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
After a botched app rollout, employee exodus, and canceled banking plans, now what?
Enlarge / Google Pay continues to circle the drain. (credit: Aurich Lawson / Ars Technica)
Google Pay is bringing on a new executive who it hopes will turn the beleaguered division around. Bloomberg reports that Arnold Goldberg, PayPal's chief product architect, will now run Google Pay after the former payments chief, Caesar Sengupta, left in April.
Of the Google services that survived 2021, Google Pay had one of the most brutal years of any product. In March, Google Pay rolled out a completely new app in the US, replacing the old Google Pay app that had existed for years.
This new app was originally developed for India and is dramatically different from the old Google Pay app used in the US. For starters, the new app switched to using a phone number for your identity instead of a Google account, which meant that a ton of features US users were accustomed to were no longer supported. Indian consumers are used to phone number identity thanks to apps like WhatsApp, and the limitations are not a big deal for them thanks to smartphones being many consumers' only device.
You must be logged in to post a comment.