New Halo TV series trailer: The good, the bad, and the Cortana

First look at how TV series inserts familiar characters, events into “Silver” timeline.

Master Chief leads Silver Team through the series' new "Silver" timeline.

Enlarge / Master Chief leads Silver Team through the series' new "Silver" timeline. (credit: Paramount+)

After years of teases, announcements, and false starts, a Halo TV series starring Master Chief is finally on the verge of existing—and its first substantial, dialogue-filled trailer landed on Sunday with equal parts clarification and confusion.

The flashy, two-minute trailer arrived days after a major announcement last week from Halo's narrative handlers at 343 Industries: this new TV series, exclusive to Paramount+, will not be part of the game series' official canon. That might have been good information to flash on the trailer itself, as fans otherwise may have missed the memo and wondered why this trailer rewrites a couple of plot cornerstones.

Longtime series scribe Frank O'Connor described the creative decision behind moving the TV series forward with a mix of familiar and brand-new plot elements. "We want to use the existing Halo lore, history, canon, and characters wherever they make sense for a linear narrative but also separate the two distinctly so that we don’t invalidate the core canon or do unnatural things to force a first-person video game into an ensemble TV show," he wrote. O'Connor clarified that all things Halo up until this point, including games, comics, novels, and online errata, count as "core canon" for the series, while the TV show will exist as a "parallel, similar, but separate timeline," officially dubbed the "Silver timeline."

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Review: MNT Reform laptop has fully open hardware and software—for better or worse

Slow ARM CPU almost single-handedly derails an intriguing laptop experiment.

The MNT Reform, a boxy laptop built around maximally open-source hardware and software.

Enlarge / The MNT Reform, a boxy laptop built around maximally open-source hardware and software. (credit: Andrew Cunningham)

Specs at a glance: MNT Reform
Screen 1920×1080 12.5-inch (176PPI) IPS screen
OS Debian Linux
CPU NXP/Freescale i.MX8MQ (1.5GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A53)
RAM 4GB
GPU Vivante GC7000Lite
Storage 32GB SD card, NVMe SSD optional
Networking Optional 802.11n Wi-Fi, gigabit Ethernet
Ports 3x USB-A 3.0, HDMI (optional), SD card slot
Camera None
Size 11.42×8.07×1.57 inches (290×205×40 mm)
Weight 4.2 pounds (1.9 kg)
Battery 8x 18650 LiFePO4 battery cells
Starting price $1,358 (not assembled, with trackpad or trackball); $1,550 assembled with trackball

If you’re a Linux fan or open source advocate looking for a decent laptop, you actually have some solid options right now—much better, at least, than buying a Windows laptop, installing Linux on it, and hoping for the best.

Dell has offered Ubuntu editions of some of its XPS laptops and other PCs for years now, and Lenovo sells a respectable collection of desktops and laptops with Linux. System76 sells a selection of Linux-friendly laptops preloaded with Ubuntu or its own Pop!_OS distribution. The repair-friendly Framework Laptop doesn’t ship with Linux, but it can be configured without an OS, and Framework promises robust Linux support from multiple distributions.

But those laptops all have something in common with run-of-the-mill Windows PCs: a reliance on closed-source hardware and, often, the proprietary software and drivers needed to make it function. For some people, this is a tolerable trade-off. You put up with the closed hardware because it performs well, and it supports the standard software, development tools, and APIs that keep the computing world spinning. For others, it’s anathema—if you can’t see the source code for these “binary blobs,” they are inherently untrustworthy and should be used sparingly or not at all.

Read 45 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Linux: Treiberentwicklung fast ohne Hardware

Linux-Treiber sollten dann verfügbar sein, wenn Endkunden Geräte damit kaufen können. Die Entwicklung geht zunächst auch ohne Hardware zum Testen. (Linux, Linux-Kernel)

Linux-Treiber sollten dann verfügbar sein, wenn Endkunden Geräte damit kaufen können. Die Entwicklung geht zunächst auch ohne Hardware zum Testen. (Linux, Linux-Kernel)