Wozu Meditation und Achtsamkeit – und wozu nicht?
Über den Hype um Buddhabilder, Klangschalen und Achtsamkeits-Apps
Just another news site
Über den Hype um Buddhabilder, Klangschalen und Achtsamkeits-Apps
Zwischen Belarus und Polen kampieren Flüchtlinge, die zum geopolitischen Spielball geworden sind. Es gibt Berichte über Misshandlungen durch Grenzbeamte
Der Ausgang der Bundestagswahl am 26. September ist offen wie selten so kurz vor der Abstimmung
A coalition of Hollywood studios, with the addition of Amazon and Netflix, has obtained an injunction to restrain Jason Tusa, the alleged operator of Altered Carbon, Area 51, and several other pirate IPTV services. Tusa previously agreed not to operate unlicensed platforms but reportedly breached that agreement. A court has now agreed that the platforms should be shut down and their domain names disabled.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
Early July in a California court, Warner Bros., several Universal companies, Amazon, Columbia, Disney, Netflix, Paramount, Sony, and other content creators filed a lawsuit against Jason Tusa, the alleged operator of Altered Carbon, Area 51, and other pirate IPTV services.
According to the complaint, Tusa is a serial offender. Last year his Area 51 service was shut down following a cease-and-desist issued by the Alliance For Creativity and Entertainment (ACE). A pending settlement agreement included a clause that Tusa couldn’t launch or be involved with any similar services.
After the apparent demise of Area 51 but in advance of the settlement being finalized, it’s alleged that Tusa launched a close copy of Area 51 called SingularityMedia, which scooped up Area 51’s customers. In response, ACE contacted Tusa again and demanded that the new service was shut down. It later disappeared.
In October 2020, a confidential settlement was reached, which included a clause for Tusa not to create or be involved in any other similar services. However, it’s claimed that the defendant then launched Digital UniCorn Media and another service called Altered Carbon. It appears that at this point, ACE ran out of patience and responded with the current lawsuit.
Listing around 110 copyright works, the coalition of Hollywood studios, with the addition of Amazon and Netflix, allege direct and willful copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, and inducing copyright infringement. They also allege a breach of contract in respect of the settlement agreement while demanding an injunction to restrain Tusa moving forward.
On July 8, the plaintiffs submitted a proposed preliminary injunction to the court, a copy of which was personally served on Tusa two days later. He was required to respond to that motion by July 19 but he failed to respond or seek an extension.
“Plaintiffs are not aware of a legitimate reason why Tusa would be unable to fulfill his obligations to this Court. Tusa was personally served with the Motion. He is familiar with Plaintiffs and their counsel from their history of negotiating a settlement,” the plaintiffs wrote in a July 26 notice to the court.
In minutes dated July 28, United States District Court Judge Virginia A. Phillips references the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, noting that Tusa had failed to oppose the motion by the official deadline.
On August 18, the Judge dealt with the matter based on papers filed in a timely fashion by the plaintiffs, granting the requested preliminary injunction. This means that moving forward, Tusa and other business entities will be required to comply with a set of instructions tailored to prevent further infringement.
Noting that a preliminary injunction is an “extraordinary and drastic remedy”, the Court found that the movie studios have shown a likelihood of success in their action against Tusa, including their allegations of direct copyright infringement. The plaintiffs have also shown a need for emergency relief, with the Court finding that Tusa’s streaming platforms create financial losses to the plaintiffs and undermines their legitimate licenses.
“As Plaintiffs point out, Defendant’s activities also expand the market for infringing services, which causes further harm to Plaintiffs. This could lead to unquantifiable customer confusion and an overall diminution of value of the Copyrighted Works. Plaintiffs thus have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable injury,” the Judge writes.
Finally, since Tusa has failed to respond to the lawsuit, the Judge further found that an injunction against Altered Carbon would be in the public interest.
“For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have satisfied their heavy burden of establishing they are entitled to the extraordinary remedy of a preliminary injunction.”
The injunction restrains and enjoins Tusa (and all individuals acting in concert with him) from directly or secondarily infringing any of the studio’s copyright works through any means including public performance, reproduction, and/or materially contributing to or inducing infringement.
In addition, the Court has ordered action against several of Tusa’s domains by requiring Internet Domain Service BS Corp., Hostinger International, and Hosting Concepts B.V (plus any others that receive notice of the injunction) to prevent any of them from being modified, sold, transferred to another owner or deleted.
The domains are as follows: alteredcarbon.online, 2pmtoforever.com, catchingbutterflies.host, stealingkisses.me, dum.world, and twoavocados.us
All WHOIS and similar contact information at the time of receipt of the order must remain unchanged and all domain names must stay with their current registrar. Changes to domain registration records must be prevented and all must be disabled to prevent public access. All evidence that may allow the plaintiffs to identify the persons using the domains must be preserved.
Since Tusa has failed to defend the lawsuit, the clerk of the court has also entered a default against him. This means that a costly default judgment is now likely but the scale of the damages is yet to be determined.
The injunction and associated documents can be found here 1,2,3, (pdf)
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
Von den Verbrechen des Westens in Afghanistan und der Not, die bleibt
Recent studies have questioned blue hydrogen’s low-carbon bona fides.
A hydrogen filling station. (credit: Peter Gercke/picture alliance via Getty Images)
The head of a hydrogen lobbying group has stepped down amid concerns that blue hydrogen made from natural gas would serve as a “lock-in” for fossil fuels.
Oil and gas companies in recent years have been touting the purported advantages of hydrogen made from natural gas. Supporters admit that blue hydrogen is not zero carbon, but they argue that its use would help build demand and infrastructure while costs for green hydrogen, which is made from renewable power, are brought down.
At issue, though, is whether blue hydrogen is truly low carbon, as its boosters suggest. According to a recent study, blue hydrogen may be worse for the climate than coal. The low-carbon claims about blue hydrogen hinge on the fact that carbon dioxide needs to be captured at every step, from the steam reformation process that makes the gas from methane to the natural gas generators that provide heat and power for the reactions. Not every step is perfect, and between 10–40 percent of the carbon dioxide can evade capture depending on the system.
New report claims that the massive video game platform can exploit young developers.
Enlarge (credit: Roblox)
Roblox has become a video game titan, in recent years dominating the world of kids’ gaming and earning $454 million in revenue last quarter alone. A new report argues that success is built on exploiting young game developers, many of them children, who are making content for the game.
As a platform, Roblox provides gamers the tools to both create and play an almost unfathomable array of “experiences,” from climbing an enormous stairway to running a restaurant to escaping a prison. Tens of millions of these games live on Roblox’s browser—hundreds of times more titles than exist on Steam. Every day, 43 million people play those games, mostly kids. Some of the most popular experiences have received billions of visits and earn their developers millions annually.
Evergrande soll offenbar seine Elektroauto-Sparte verkaufen – das könnte Auswirkungen auf NEVS haben, wo der Sion von Sono Motors gefertigt werden soll. (Elektromobilität, Elektroauto)
Researchers see if they can remove sensitive data without retraining AI from scratch.
Enlarge (credit: Andriy Onufriyenko | Getty Images)
Companies of all kinds use machine learning to analyze people’s desires, dislikes, or faces. Some researchers are now asking a different question: How can we make machines forget?
A nascent area of computer science dubbed machine unlearning seeks ways to induce selective amnesia in artificial intelligence software. The goal is to remove all trace of a particular person or data point from a machine learning system, without affecting its performance.
If made practical, the concept could give people more control over their data and the value derived from it. Although users can already ask some companies to delete personal data, they are generally in the dark about what algorithms their information helped tune or train. Machine unlearning could make it possible for a person to withdraw both their data and a company’s ability to profit from it.
Infineon reagiert auf die aktuelle Knappheit an Chips in Autofabriken weltweit mit einer Preiserhöhung – die eigenen Kosten seien gestiegen. (Infineon, Auto)
You must be logged in to post a comment.