Google: Chrome testet HTTPS-Only-Modus

Das Erzwingen von HTTPS ging vor Jahren nur über Erweiterungen. Auf die Arbeiten von Mozilla im Firefox folgt nun aber auch Google in Chrome. (Chrome, Google)

Das Erzwingen von HTTPS ging vor Jahren nur über Erweiterungen. Auf die Arbeiten von Mozilla im Firefox folgt nun aber auch Google in Chrome. (Chrome, Google)

Rocket Report: Super Heavy rolls to launch site, Funk will get to fly

“I am not allowed to talk about that.”

A shockingly large rocket prepares to launch next to the coast.

Enlarge / A Super Heavy booster rolled out of SpaceX's production facilities in South Texas on Thursday. (credit: Elon Musk)

Welcome to Edition 4.05 of the Rocket Report! We have a really big week in small launch: Virgin Orbit confirmed the viability of its LauncherOne vehicle with a second consecutive successful flight. Congratulations to the engineers and technicians who strove to make that rocket a reality.

As always, we welcome reader submissions, and if you don't want to miss an issue, please subscribe using the box below (the form will not appear on AMP-enabled versions of the site). Each report will include information on small-, medium-, and heavy-lift rockets as well as a quick look ahead at the next three launches on the calendar.

Virgin Orbit does it again. Virgin Orbit demonstrated Wednesday morning that its first spaceflight in January was no fluke. The company's Cosmic Girl aircraft took off from Mojave Air & Space Port about an hour after sunrise Wednesday and flew about 200 km off the California coast. The 747 carrier aircraft then dropped the LauncherOne rocket, which proceeded to ignite, reorient itself upward, and blast into orbit. Eventually, the rocket deployed seven small satellites into an orbit about 500 km above the planet.

Read 24 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Pläne für 2-nm-Fabrik: Warum die Halbleiterstrategie der EU völlig verfehlt ist

Die EU will den Bau einer 2-nm-Chip-Fabrik fördern, um bei Halbleitern unabhängig von Asien und den USA zu werden – weshalb das nicht gelingen wird. Eine Analyse von Gerd Mischler (Halbleiterfertigung, Intel)

Die EU will den Bau einer 2-nm-Chip-Fabrik fördern, um bei Halbleitern unabhängig von Asien und den USA zu werden - weshalb das nicht gelingen wird. Eine Analyse von Gerd Mischler (Halbleiterfertigung, Intel)

ISP Doesn’t Have to Expose Alleged Movie Pirates, Dutch Supreme Court Rules

Internet provider Ziggo is not required to hand over the personal details of 377 alleged pirates, the Dutch Supreme Court has ruled. The personal information was requested by movie distributor Dutch FilmWorks. Its goal was to collect settlements from ‘pirating’ subscribers but instead, the movie company must now pay the ISP’s legal fees.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Piracy settlement letters have become a serious threat in countries all round the world.

Thus far, Dutch Internet users have been spared from this practice but local movie distributor Dutch Filmworks planned to change that.

Dutch FilmWorks’ Quest for Piracy Settlements

Four years ago the company received permission from the Dutch Data Protection Authority to monitor and store the IP-addresses of BitTorrent users who shared pirated movies.

However, that was only the first hurdle it had to overcome. The next step was to identify the subscribers behind the IP-addresses and Dutch Internet provider Ziggo didn’t want to share any customer data without a court order.

The case went to court, where the movie company requested the personal details of 377 account holders whose addresses were allegedly used to share a copy of “The Hitman’s Bodyguard”.

Courts Don’t Approve

This didn’t go as planned for Dutch FilmWorks. In the first instance, the Central Netherlands Court denied the company’s request for data and, after that, the Court of Appeal reached the same conclusion.

Both courts found that Dutch FilmWorks’ plans lacked transparency as it’s not clear what the movie company intended to do with the personal data. Dutch FilmWorks said that it could either warn subscribers or request damages, but the criteria for each step were unknown.

It was also unclear how large the proposed settlements would be. The film company mentioned an initial figure of €150 per infringement but this number could also be significantly higher.

Supreme Court Keeps Verdict Intact

In a final bid to expose the alleged pirates, Dutch FilmWorks took the case to the Supreme Court but this effort failed as well. The highest court in the Netherlands sees no reason to reach a different conclusion than that reached by the Court of Appeal.

“The Supreme Court has assessed the complaints about the Court of Appeal’s order. The outcome of this is that these complaints cannot lead to the annulment of that judgment,” the decision reads.

The Supreme Court’s judgment is brief and doesn’t come with a full opinion. The case didn’t present any questions that are crucial for the development of the law, the order explains, so the Court is not required to motivate its decision.

This means that, after half a decade, Dutch FilmWorks’ effort to identify the names linked to these pirating IP-addresses is now stranded. Instead of earning money through settlements, it’s the movie company that must now pay.

As in the earlier proceedings, Dutch FilmWorks is required to pay the legal fees incurred by Internet provider Ziggo, which adds up to thousands of euros.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.