US lawmakers propose Australia-style bill for media, tech negotiations

Both Democrats and Republicans want to do something. Maybe not the same something.

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Co.) and Microsoft president Brad Smith at a House hearing on regulation and competition in the news media industry on March 12, 2021.

Enlarge / Rep. Ken Buck (R-Co.) and Microsoft president Brad Smith at a House hearing on regulation and competition in the news media industry on March 12, 2021. (credit: Drew Angerer | Getty Images)

A group of US lawmakers is proposing new legislation that would allow media organizations to set terms with social media platforms for sharing their content, reminiscent of a controversial measure recently adopted in Australia.

The Journalism Competition and Preservation Act of 2021 basically creates a temporary 48-month carve-out to existing antitrust and competition law that would allow small news outlets to join forces to negotiate as a collective bloc with "online content distributors" such as Facebook and Google for favorable terms.

"A strong, diverse, free press is critical for any successful democracy. Access to trustworthy local journalism helps inform the public, hold powerful people accountable, and root out corruption," said Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), when introducing the proposal. "This bill will give hardworking local reporters and publishers the helping hand they need right now, so they can continue to do their important work."

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Scientists solve another piece of the puzzling Antikythera mechanism

“Our reconstruction fits all the evidence… gleaned from the extant remains to date.”

"Exploded" view of the new computer model of the Antikythera mechanism, showing how it might have worked.

Enlarge / "Exploded" view of the new computer model of the Antikythera mechanism, showing how it might have worked. (credit: Tony Freeth)

Scientists have long struggled to solve the puzzle of the gearing system on the front of the so-called Antikythera mechanism—a fragmentary ancient Greek astronomical calculator, perhaps the earliest example of a geared device. Now, an interdisciplinary team at University College London (UCL) has come up with a computational model that reveals a dazzling display of the ancient Greek cosmos, according to a new paper published in the journal Scientific Reports. The team is currently building a replica mechanism, moving gears and all, using modern machinery. You can watch an extensive 11-minute video about the project here (embedding currently disabled).

"Ours is the first model that conforms to all the physical evidence and matches the descriptions in the scientific inscriptions engraved on the mechanism itself," said lead author Tony Freeth, a mechanical engineer at UCL. "The Sun, Moon, and planets are displayed in an impressive tour de force of ancient Greek brilliance."

“We believe that our reconstruction fits all the evidence that scientists have gleaned from the extant remains to date,” co-author Adam Wojcik, a materials scientist at UCL, told the Guardian.

Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments

One Mix 4 mini-laptop review: 10 inch convertible with Intel Tiger Lake

Laptop computers have gotten thinner and lighter in recent years, with a handful of major PC makers releasing models that weigh around 2 pounds or less. But the One Netbook One Mix 4 may be in a category of its own. It’s a 1.7 pound notebook wit…

Laptop computers have gotten thinner and lighter in recent years, with a handful of major PC makers releasing models that weigh around 2 pounds or less. But the One Netbook One Mix 4 may be in a category of its own. It’s a 1.7 pound notebook with a 10.1 inch, 2560 x 1600 pixel touchscreen […]

The post One Mix 4 mini-laptop review: 10 inch convertible with Intel Tiger Lake appeared first on Liliputing.

AT&T promises fiber for 3 million more homes and businesses this year

Tens of millions in AT&T territory lack fiber—3 million should get it in 2021.

AT&T technician working with cables on a utility pole.

Enlarge / An AT&T technician working on a fiber project. (credit: AT&T)

AT&T today said it will bring fiber Internet to a few million more homes and businesses by the end of this year. "In 2021, AT&T plans to increase its fiber footprint by an additional 3 million customer locations across more than 90 metro areas," AT&T said. This would raise AT&T's fiber deployment to about 18 million homes and businesses.

AT&T provided a list of the 90 metro areas here. The vast majority of them already have AT&T fiber access, as seen in this AT&T fiber map.

This likely means the 3 million new locations will primarily consist of homes and businesses close to AT&T's existing fiber installations instead of homes and businesses in entirely unserved areas. We asked AT&T for more details on the planned fiber deployment and will update this article if we get more information.

Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments

HBO Max will get a cheaper, ad-supported tier in June

HBO Max will also launch in 21 new territories in Europe by the end of 2021.

A shot from the upcoming <em>Dune</em> adaptation, which will hit theaters and HBO Max this summer.

Enlarge / A shot from the upcoming Dune adaptation, which will hit theaters and HBO Max this summer. (credit: Chiabella James/Warner Bros.)

This June, HBO Max will get a cheaper, ad-supported subscription plan, parent company AT&T told investors today. However, a specific price and launch date have not been announced. Right now, an ad-free subscription to HBO Max costs $14.99 monthly in the United States.

There is one major catch, though: the ad-supported version of the service will not stream the much-hyped Warner Bros theatrical releases. Those films include Wonder Woman 1984, which showed simultaneously on HBO Max and in theaters in December of 2020, and Dune, which is expected to premiere this summer.

HBO will join Paramount+, Hulu, and some other streaming services in offering (at least) two tiers—one relatively low-cost one that involves pre-roll or mid-roll advertising, and one with a higher monthly fee that involves no ads. Still, some of HBO Max's competitors, like Disney+ or Netflix, do not do sold advertising at all.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Short-selling firm accuses Lordstown of exaggerating truck pre-orders

Lordstown CEO claimed to have 50,000 “very serious orders.”

Short-selling firm accuses Lordstown of exaggerating truck pre-orders

Enlarge (credit: Aurich Lawson / Getty Images)

The short-selling firm Hindenburg Research has published a new report alleging that startup electric truckmaker Lordstown Motors has been exaggerating customer demand to aid in fundraising. CEO Steve Burns has claimed that Lordstown already has more than 100,000 pre-orders—enough to keep its Ohio factory busy for more than a year once the company starts production. In reality, these pre-orders are non-binding. And Hindenburg claims that some of the supposed customers don't seem to have the financial resources to make good on their multi-million dollar orders even if they wanted to.

Hindenburg is in the business of selling a company's stock short and then publishing damaging research about the firm. If the stock falls, the company makes a profit. That strategy seems to be working with Lordstown. As I write this, Lordstown's stock is down about 15 percent for the day.

The company made its name with a September exposé of another electric truckmaker, Nikola. Hindenburg's report revealed that a promotional video of the Nikola One truck "in motion" actually showed it rolling down a hill, with the camera tilted slightly so it appeared to be driving on level ground. Nikola's stock has fallen about 60 percent since Hindenburg published its initial report.

Read 18 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Adaptive cruise control users more likely to speed, study finds

IIHS studied 40 Boston-area drivers to characterize speeding behavior.

Before anyone else runs to the comments to point it out, almost no adaptive cruise control systems will engage at speeds above 95mph.

Enlarge / Before anyone else runs to the comments to point it out, almost no adaptive cruise control systems will engage at speeds above 95mph. (credit: Peter Dazeley/Getty Images)

Another day, another Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study looking at how people are using advanced driver assistance systems. Like the study we covered on Wednesday, this one also concerns adaptive cruise control (ACC), which uses forward-looking radar to control the distance to a vehicle in front (unlike old-fashioned cruise control, which will happily rear-end someone if you don't turn it off). Sadly, the findings are not encouraging. In its study, the IIHS found that drivers were much more likely to speed while using ACC.

Back in the mid-'90s, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration evaluated the then-new technology (PDF), logging 35,000 test miles (56,000 km). The NHTSA found that "ACC is remarkably attractive to most drivers. The research indicates that, because ACC is so pleasing, people tend to utilize it over a broad range of conditions and to adopt tactics that prolong the time span of each continuous engagement." However, the agency's results also suggested "that ACC usage has induced some elevation in the speeds that would otherwise prevail in conventional (i.e., manual and [conventional cruise control]) driving."

The IIHS notes that ACC is marketed as a convenience feature, not a safety feature, but also notes that some studies have linked it to a decrease in crashes and insurance claims. However, this link may be muddied by the fact that the system is usually used in combination with forward collision warning or automatic emergency braking. For example, the claims that Tesla Autopilot reduced crashes by 40 percent actually turned into a finding that it increased crash rates by 59 percent once properly analyzed.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ballsy vasectomy ads get foul call from NCAA

Though urologists aim to get patients shooting blanks, NCAA is still playing zone.

Virginia urologists with a slam-dunk vasectomy campaign.

Enlarge / Virginia urologists with a slam-dunk vasectomy campaign. (credit: Youtube | Virginia Urology)

For one shining moment, urologists in Virginia were hoping to have patients icing on the bench as they watched this year’s NCAA basketball tournament. But the college athletics association has called a foul.

In a February filing with the US Patent and Trademark Office, the NCAA claims that a trademarked advertising campaign by Virginia Urology Center called “Vasectomy Mayhem” is “confusingly similar” to the association’s trademarked “March Madness.”

The continued use of “Vasectomy Mayhem” is “likely to result in confusion, mistake, or deception” that the campaign and/or the urologists are “in some way legitimately connected with, or sponsored, licensed, or approved by” the NCAA, the association claimed.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

GitHub Wants to Get Rid Of the DMCA’s Anti-Circumvention FUD

GitHub is urging the US Copyright Office to expand the DMCA anti-circumvention exemptions to eliminate FUD. The developer platform backs a proposal from Professor Halderman which opts to broaden exemptions for security researchers. GitHub is not the only party that backs elements of this proposal, the US Department of Justice does too.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

DangerUS copyright law places broad restrictions on what people are allowed do with copyrighted content.

The U.S. Copyright Office regularly reviews these exemptions to Section 1201 of the DMCA, which generally prevents the public from ‘tinkering’ with DRM-protected software and devices.

These provisions are renewed every three years after the Office hears input from stakeholders and the general public. This process also allows interested parties to suggest new exemptions.

Exemptions For Good Faith Security Research

In recent years we have covered exemptions for game archivists but there are many more on the table. This includes the ability for experts to bypass copyright restrictions to conduct good-faith security research.

This exemption already exists but many people believe that it’s rather limited in its current form, which reads as follows:

Computer programs, where the circumvention is undertaken on a lawfully acquired device or machine on which the computer program operates, or is undertaken on a computer, computer system, or computer network on which the computer program operates with the authorization of the owner or operator of such computer, computer system, or computer network, solely for the purpose of good-faith security research and does not violate any applicable law, including without limitation the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986.

This text used to be more restrictive and was adjusted three years ago, following a proposal from Computer Science & Engineering Professor Alex Halderman. This year, Halderman submitted a new proposal, trying to expand this exemption further and reduce the risk for security researchers.

Among other things, the professor would like the word “solely” removed from the text, as well as the requirement that a device has to be “lawfully acquired” and that circumvention does “not violate any applicable law.”

GitHub Backs Halderman Proposal

This proposal is currently being considered and this week various parties offered their support in letters submitted to the US Copyright Office. This includes developer platform GitHub which, following the RIAA/youtube-dl debacle, said it would get more involved in this process.

According to GitHub, developers are often facing fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) with regard to legal issues. This may lead them not to start a project that could have benefited society as a whole.

Source of FUD

“Section 1201 is a source of FUD as applied to good faith security research. It can be asserted even when a court has decided that there is no copyright infringement of the underlying work,” GitHub writes.

“It’s a reason why a developer can’t be confident that there won’t be repercussions for engaging in legitimate, non-infringing security research and related development activities. It’s a reason why they might decide to do a different project, with less impact, that doesn’t help make us all safer to the same extent.”

GitHub urges the US Copyright Office to focus the exemptions on eliminating FUD. Removing the requirement that all actions are “solely” for the purpose of good-faith security research is crucial. GitHub argues that as long as an activity is consistent with conducting good-faith security research, it should not matter if all steps are “solely” focused on security.

“The Halderman et al. proposal draws clearer lines out of fuzzy lines in the current exemption, giving more certainty to researchers, academics, and enterprises conducting security research. It should be taken seriously,” Github adds.

Department of Justice Support

The Halderman proposal is widely supported by developers and researchers, but there’s also backing from less expected parties, such as the US Department of Justice.

In a comment to the Copyright Office, the Department of Justice’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section agrees that it’s a good idea to drop the requirement that circumvention does “not violate any applicable law”.

The DoJ argued against this three years ago, but it now agrees that this language is troublesome.

“[W]e are now persuaded that replacing the existing requirement that research not violate ‘any applicable law’ with alternative explanatory language would provide equally sufficient notice of the need to comply with applicable law.

“This change would also reduce the chance that potentially valuable research projects may be discouraged by fears by fears that inadvertent or minor violations of an unrelated law could result in substantial liability under the DMCA,” the DoJ writes.

Not a Free Pass to Violate Laws

The DoJ still believes that researchers who intentionally violate the law should be held accountable. However, the current language is too broad and subjects researchers to all sorts of liabilities.

“It thus may discourage valuable research projects that would otherwise be undertaken if researchers could be more certain the exemption would apply,” the DoJ writes.

These are strong words coming from the Department of Justice which will likely weigh strongly. However, the DoJ doesn’t support the Halderman proposal in full.

For example, the DoJ doesn’t agree that the word “solely” should be removed from the exemption, nor does it see the need to strip the condition that a device has to be “lawfully acquired.”

GitHub’s comments to the Copyright Office can be found here (pdf) and the comments from the Department of Justice’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) are available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Apple sues ex-employee, alleging leaks of secret product info to reporter

Apple: Ex-employee leaked future hardware products, sought favors from reporter.

A MacBook Pro keyboard

Enlarge / The keyboard on the 2016 Touch Bar MacBook Pro. (credit: Andrew Cunningham)

Apple sued a former employee on Thursday, alleging that he leaked trade secrets to a reporter and sought favors from the reporter in exchange.

The lawsuit was filed against Simon Lancaster in US District Court for the Northern District of California. Lancaster spent 11 years at Apple before taking a job as head of consumer products at Arris Composites in late 2019. Lancaster was advanced materials lead and product design architect at Apple, where he "was instrumental in the development of the 13"/15" MacBook Pro with the touch bar, and the design of unreleased Apple products," an Arris Composites press release said at the time.

Apple's lawsuit alleged:

Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments