SpaceX announces first “free flyer” human spaceflight

“This is an important milestone towards enabling access to space for everyone.”

A young man smiles while sitting amidst machinery.

Enlarge / Jared Isaacman at SpaceX Headquarters in Hawthorne, California. (credit: SpaceX)

SpaceX announced Monday that it will fly a space tourism flight as early as the fourth quarter of this year, billing it as the first "all-civilian" mission to space.

A tech entrepreneur named Jared Isaacman has financed the mission, named "Inspiration4," and will serve as commander aboard the autonomous Crew Dragon spacecraft. Isaacman, 37, is a pilot rated to fly commercial and military aircraft, but he has no formal astronaut training. He is founder and chief executive officer of Shift4 Payments, a digital payments company.

"My passion for aviation and the dream of going to space has really been lifelong," Isaacman said during a news conference.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

AT&T pays $12M for unlimited-data throttling, and it’s a good deal—for AT&T

Victims of deceptive “unlimited” plans paid hundreds, get just a fraction back.

A broken piggy bank covered with AT&T's logo.

Enlarge / Poor piggy. (credit: Getty Images | Aurich Lawson)

AT&T has agreed to a $12 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit over its throttling of "unlimited" mobile data plans. As usual, refunds to individual customers amount to a fraction of what the customers paid for the hobbled service.

The paltry nature of expected per-person payments was explained last week by plaintiffs in a filing that asked the US District Court for the Northern District of California to approve the settlement. After administrative costs and attorneys' fees, typical victims are expected to get $10 or $11 from the new settlement. Many of these same people previously received $12 each from a $60 million settlement between AT&T and the Federal Trade Commission, bringing the typical person's total payout to $22 or $23. (The FTC/AT&T settlement applied to customers in any state, but the newly announced settlement is only for California residents.)

Customers paid AT&T $30 a month for unlimited data at a time when AT&T automatically throttled "unlimited" plans for the rest of the month once subscribers hit thresholds of either 3GB or 5GB. This throttling was particularly severe because it was enforced 24 hours a day regardless of whether there was any network congestion, and downloads were throttled to speeds as low as 128kbps. AT&T eased up on the throttling in 2014 and 2015 and now throttles only when consumers are connected to congested cell sites.

Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Why Animal Crossing: New Horizons’ 31 million sales are so incredible

In 9.5 months, New Horizons makes up almost half of all Animal Crossing sales.

Nintendo's latest earnings report contained plenty of good news for the company, including the revelation that the Nintendo Switch has now sold nearly 80 million units worldwide. Even more eye-popping, though, is the news that Animal Crossing: New Horizons has surpassed 31 million sales as of December 31, less than 10 months after its release last March.

We've written a number of times about why Animal Crossing's chill, landscape-tending gameplay lends itself perfectly to our current stuck-inside-amid-a-pandemic moment. But these new sales numbers show just how much of a phenomenon the latest title has been in driving Nintendo's recent success.

To show just how incredible it is for an Animal Crossing game to sell 31 million copies, we've gathered some relevant statistics to help put that massive number into context:

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

70% of top “civic” Facebook groups are toxic or violent, report finds

Internal report found top civic groups “non-recommendable” due to hate, harassment.

A person in a Hazmat suit covers the Facebook logo with warning tape.

Enlarge (credit: Aurich Lawson / Getty Images)

As Facebook scrambles to deal with its most problematic groups in the wake of January's assault on the US Capitol, a new report finds that leaders inside the company knew as long ago as August that 70 percent of its top "civic" groups had too much hate speech, misinformation, violent rhetoric, or other toxic behavior to be recommended to other users.

Researchers inside the company warned executives months ago that top groups were plagued with misinformation and calls to violence, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday. "We need to do something to stop these conversations from happening and growing as quickly as they do," the researchers wrote in internal documents obtained by the WSJ.

Of the top 100 most-active US civic groups, 70 percent "are considered non-recommendable for issues such as hate, misinfo, bullying, and harassment," the presentation said. "Our existing integrity systems aren't addressing these issues."

Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Lilbits: Ubuntu, Plasma Mobile, Snapdragon 888 dev kit, and VLC’s birthday

The first smartphones powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888 processor are starting to arrive. And so are developer kits like the Lantronix Snapdragon 888 Mobile HDK. Meanwhile details about the next gaming smartphone from Asus continue to leak, t…

The first smartphones powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888 processor are starting to arrive. And so are developer kits like the Lantronix Snapdragon 888 Mobile HDK. Meanwhile details about the next gaming smartphone from Asus continue to leak, the creators of the popular VLC media player app celebrate the 20th anniversary of VideoLAN, and we’ve got […]

The post Lilbits: Ubuntu, Plasma Mobile, Snapdragon 888 dev kit, and VLC’s birthday appeared first on Liliputing.

New supply chain attack uses poisoned updates to infect gamers’ computers

If you’ve used NoxPlayer in the past 5 months, it’s time to check for malware.

Lines and colors look like the stargate sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Enlarge / Circuit board with speed motion and light. (credit: Getty Images)

Researchers have uncovered a software supply chain attack that is being used to install surveillance malware on the computers of online gamers.

The unknown attackers are targeting select users of NoxPlayer, a software package that emulates the Android operating system on PCs and Macs. People use it primarily for playing mobile Android games on these platforms. NoxPlayer-maker BigNox says the software has 150 million users in 150 countries.

Poisoning the well

Security firm Eset said on Monday that the BigNox software distribution system was hacked and used to deliver malicious updates to select users. The initial updates were delivered last September through the manipulation of two files: the main BigNox binary Nox.exe and NoxPack.exe, which downloads the update itself.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Google closes Stadia’s dedicated game studios after less than 2 years

Service isn’t changing, but path to streaming-exclusive games will clearly narrow.

Google's dedicated Stadia Games and Entertainment studios will soon shut down. Google has not confirmed whether former employees will be sent out while gliding on one of these Stadia-branded <em>PUBG</em> parachutes.

Enlarge / Google's dedicated Stadia Games and Entertainment studios will soon shut down. Google has not confirmed whether former employees will be sent out while gliding on one of these Stadia-branded PUBG parachutes. (credit: PUBG / Getty Images)

This isn't a typical entry in our long-running "Google kills product" series, but it's close enough: Google is shutting down its first-ever dedicated game studios, which had been founded as part of its beleaguered Google Stadia cloud-gaming service.

Kotaku editor Stephen Totilo confirmed the news on Monday ahead of Google posting its own formal statement on the matter, and it means Stadia Games and Entertainment will soon be no more, according to "one source familiar with Stadia operations." This move will impact the combined 150+ staffers for the endeavor, headquartered in both Montreal and Los Angeles. Google may rehire those staffers at other divisions.

One of those staffers, however, will not move to another Google division. Jade Raymond, the Assassin's Creed co-creator and Stadia's highest-profile hire who previously headed the studios, is no longer with Google.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Daily Deals (2-01-2021)

Amazon’s running sales on smart speakers, media streamers, mesh WiFi systems, and Bluetooth trackers. Meanwhile Lenovo is offering a sneak peek at its Presidents Day sale, which means you can save some money on a bunch of laptops and other produ…

Amazon’s running sales on smart speakers, media streamers, mesh WiFi systems, and Bluetooth trackers. Meanwhile Lenovo is offering a sneak peek at its Presidents Day sale, which means you can save some money on a bunch of laptops and other products. Here are some of the day’s best deals.   Laptops & tablets Microsoft Surface […]

The post Daily Deals (2-01-2021) appeared first on Liliputing.

Facebook makes the case for activity tracking to iOS 14 users in new pop-ups

In a new test, Facebook pre-empts Apple’s required prompt with its own.

The two messages Facebook users will see in this test. On the left, Facebook's prompt, and on the right, the one required by Apple.

Enlarge / The two messages Facebook users will see in this test. On the left, Facebook's prompt, and on the right, the one required by Apple. (credit: CNBC)

Today, Facebook began testing prompts to iPhone and iPad users championing the importance of being tracked by the social network for the benefit of small businesses that use its advertising tools.

The test is in response to Apple's plan to require user opt-in to IDFA (ID for advertisers) tracking across all iOS, iPadOS, and tvOS apps starting with new software updates expected in the spring.

According to CNBC, Facebook will pre-empt Apple's required pop-up with its own on affected devices. Facebook's message is meant to persuade users not to opt out of tracking.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

“Secret” Illegal Streaming Survey Carries Some Surprises

The Federation Against Copyright Theft recently published the results of a survey, concluding that after being warned of the “very real risks”, 62% of consumers are still unaware of the “hidden dangers” posed by illegal streaming. We obtained some of the data behind this conclusion, and all is not as it seems.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Top SecretFor many years, entertainment industry companies asked pirates “to do the right thing” after considering the effects of unlawful consumption on artists.

More recently, however, there has been a shift towards getting pirates to think of themselves, with stark warnings that piracy is bad for consumers since it exposes them to numerous risks. As a result, there are now many piracy=malware campaigns underway.

FACT Survey – Pirates Warn Friends Not To Pirate

Last week, the UK’s Federation Against Copyright Theft published the results of a new survey, finding that “three out of five people in the UK (62%) are unaware of the hidden dangers of piracy – fraud, identity theft and malware – or its links to criminal gangs.”

We’ll come back to this extremely important 62% later but first, let’s tackle a key finding from the study that piqued our interest.

“Once warned of the wider risks of fraud, identity theft and malware, as well as piracy’s links to criminal gangs, consumers admitted it changed their perceptions of piracy and those behind it. In fact, 39% said they would now advise friends and family against it,” FACT’s summary reads.

Why Did Respondents Change Their Minds So Quickly?

The study was carried out on January 4th and 5th among 1,003 consumers. What’s interesting is that the respondents were given extra information “warning” them of the risks of piracy after their initial answer, which caused some to change their minds when responding to a later question.

What TorrentFreak wanted to know was what those surveyed were told, especially in respect of the claim that pirate apps expose users to fraud and compromise their bank accounts. This claim gets repeated time and again so we have offered, privately and publicly, to name and shame the apps that do this in order to protect people. To date, no anti-piracy group has taken us up on the offer, so the claims persist unchallenged.

So, to get to the bottom of things, we initially approached FACT for information on which apps engage in this type of behavior. We were told that they “don’t have details on any specific software or apps” and this survey was about “behaviors and attitudes of consumers only.”

Initially Denied Access to Survey and Responses

We followed up by asking for a copy of the study questions and responses but were informed that FACT was “not able to share” either. At this point we turned to the company that conducted the survey, UK-based market research company Opinium, which states that it abides by the so-called ESOMAR principles.

“When publishing research findings, researchers must ensure that the public has access to sufficient basic information to assess the quality of the data used and the validity of the conclusions,” the ESOMAR International Code reads.

Via FACT, Opinium then supplied some data pertaining to the study and we were surprised by what we saw. At least in part and in order to influence, the survey put scenarios to respondents that to date have simply never happened in the UK.

The Questions

After those surveyed gave their initial responses, 333 users who had previously consumed pirated content were presented with a list of supposed risks related to the use of illicit streaming services in the UK, to see if they would change their opinion.

First of all they were asked to consider malware and cybersecurity threats, followed by the potential for fraud and putting bank details at risk. As previously mentioned, FACT nor any other anti-piracy group is prepared to explain when or even if this has ever happened. Including the possibility seems likely to have influenced the responses, however.

The respondents were then asked to consider whether illegal streaming would be funding organized crime, “including the Mafia.” The survey doesn’t indicate the ‘Mafia’ is involved in the illicit streaming market in the UK and we have seen no evidence elsewhere to support that. Nevertheless, the suggestion was presented in the survey.

Those surveyed were further asked if they consider getting a fine from “police/regulators” as a risk of illegal streaming. Again, the question is just put out there, despite not a single person in the UK ever having received a fine from either in respect of illegal streaming. People were also asked if receiving a criminal record might be a risk, even though the same applies.

Blacklisting By Internet Service Providers

One of the issues posed to the respondents as a risk of illegal streaming was the prospect of internet disconnections, specifically: “Having your internet connection terminated and being black-listed by internet providers.”

The problem here is that internet service providers in the UK do not disconnect customers based on allegations of illegal streaming and there is no ‘blacklist’ for copyright infringement. However, this statement was put out there to see if respondents would change their opinion and potentially advise friends and family to stay away.

Have You Changed Your Mind About Piracy?

“Does knowing these risks change your opinion of piracy and those who watch pirated content e.g sports matches or films?” all 1,003 respondents were asked. “I would now advise my friends and family against it,” 390 respondents (39%) said.

The notable result here is that a not-insignificant 62% of respondents presented with the list of “threats” disbelieved at least one of the risks presented to them. This was not mentioned by FACT, neither was the detail of any of the supposed threats, including ISP blacklisting.

What FACT did say, however, is that “three out of five people in the UK (62%) are unaware of the hidden dangers of piracy – fraud, identity theft and malware – or its links to criminal gangs.” This doesn’t appear to be true. The 62% figure according to the data obtained by TorrentFreak refers to respondents who “disbelieved at least one risk” out of those highlighted above. That doesn’t make them ignorant.

The statement is also confusing because the data suggest that the 62% only applies to people who previously consumed pirated content, not the entire UK population.

Another Request To Access the Data

It’s important to note that there is nothing inherently wrong with the questions asked in the survey. For example, knowing whether pirates would continue to pirate when faced with Internet disconnection could be valuable information. And, of course, there is always a risk that the police could carry out a prosecution or two.

However, what appears to have happened here is that those who didn’t agree with every scenario put to them were marked down as ill-informed in respect of the “very real risks” of illicit streaming. Given that UK ISPs do not disconnect people for alleged copyright infringement, that appears to be an inaccurate conclusion.

Finally, to be absolutely sure of every piece of data, we asked FACT in a joint email with Opinium to provide the details of the full study. We explained why we were concerned with the results as portrayed and explained why extra information would be useful.

We were informed that Opinium is happy with the way that the survey was conducted and reported. We were then denied access to the data.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.