"Bundesregierung sollte diesen gefährlichen Präzedenzfall verhindern"
CCC-Sprecher Dirk Engling über die US-Anklage gegen Julian Assange, Beobachtung von Events in Berlin und die Verantwortung der Bundesregierung
Just another news site
CCC-Sprecher Dirk Engling über die US-Anklage gegen Julian Assange, Beobachtung von Events in Berlin und die Verantwortung der Bundesregierung
Zum Abschluss der großen Militärübung Kavkaz-2020 und unter dem Druck der Nawalny-Vergiftung sowie der anstehenden US-Präsidentschaftswahl wirbt Putin für ein Friedensabkommen im Cyberspace
Company claims Trevor Milton personally developed vehicle images “in his basement.”
The original design for Nikola’s flagship truck was purchased by founder Trevor Milton from a designer in Croatia, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, despite company claims in a 2018 lawsuit that the vehicle was initially designed by Mr. Milton “in his basement..”
The truck, the Nikola One, is at the centre of a $2 billion lawsuit with Tesla, in which Nikola alleges its rival infringed on its patents. Nikola claims in that lawsuit that Mr. Milton began designing the model in 2013, with other company staff later working on it.
In a rebuttal to the lawsuit filed last week, Tesla alleged that Nikola could not protect the designs because they did not originate from the company itself, but from Adriano Mudri, a designer based in Croatia.
The ruling will come before the app metaphorically turns into a pumpkin at 12.
TikTok will be gone from app stores tomorrow morning unless a federal judge acts to block the Trump administration's ban on the app before midnight tonight.
Judge Carl Nichols of the US District Court for DC said today that he will determine whether to grant or reject TikTok's request for an injunction on the ban before the deadline hits at the stroke of 12.
In a hearing on Thursday, Nichols gave the administration until Friday afternoon either to delay or defend the ban. The administration chose to file a response defending the ban but did so under seal, so the filings are not available to the public.
Entschädigungszahlungen des US-Militärs: Eine weitere Verhöhnung der Kriegsopfer – und des gesamten Landes. Kommentar
Exhaustively researched and reported, doc stays riveting no matter your Pepe familiarity.
There’s no shortage of documentaries about our current political climate or the fact that the Internet might be bad, but Feels Good Man focuses on the craziest intersection of these two modern realities: Pepe, the cartoon frog.
If you’re aware of Pepe already, chances are it’s because the character has become synonymous with the alt-right, that extreme online demographic tied to modern white supremacists and Nazi movements. Or perhaps you heard of Pepe before that, during the time this frog had become the meme du jour of 4chan, the anonymous message board associated with all sorts of nefarious real world behavior. Though Pepe's most high profile 15 minutes of fame were inarguably an infamous cameo on then candidate Donald Trump’s Twitter feed, leading to the character’s adoption by some of his most extreme supporters like conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.
Feels Good Man will get to all that, of course, but this documentary starts with the now toxic toad’s tadpole days. By doing so, the film will likely show viewers something they didn’t know or hadn’t previously considered regardless of prior familiarity with Pepe and the insanity swirling around him. And through tracing Pepe’s evolution, Feels Good Man manages to remind everyone of a fundamental truth of communication, particularly in the Internet age. Once you click send on something, things like original intent and context might become as ephemeral as a single tweet.
Gateway’s GWTN141-2 is the best under-$400 laptop we’ve seen so far.
We've been on the lookout for good but seriously cheap laptops for a while now. Acer's $650 Swift 3 is an excellent choice for budget laptops in the under-$700 range, but we've been really itching to find one in the almost nonexistent sub-$400 category. To that end, today we're looking at two of Walmart's finest—a $378 Acer Swift 1 and a $350 Gateway GWTN141-2.
Both of these are serviceable if cheap laptops, but the Gateway, despite being the less expensive model, will be the clear winner for most people. It's more powerful, more repairable, more upgrade-able, and in our testing, a bit more reliable as well.
Specs at a glance: as reviewed | |||
---|---|---|---|
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32 | Gateway GWTN141-2 | ||
OS | Windows 10 Home (S mode) | Windows 10 Home (S mode) | |
Screen | 14 inch IPS FHD (1920×1080, 250nits) | 14.1 inch IPS FHD (1920×1080, 190nits) | |
CPU | Pentium Silver N5000 | Ryzen 3 3200U | |
GPU | Intel UHD 605 | AMD Vega 3 | |
RAM | 4GiB DDR4 (soldered, non expandable) | 4GiB DDR4 (soldered, with one empty DIMM slot) | |
HDD | 64GB eMMC (SanDisk DF4064) |
128GB NVMe M.2 (Netac S539N) |
|
Networking | Intel 9560 2x2 Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0 |
Realtek 8821CE 1x1 Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 4.2 |
|
Ports |
|
|
|
Size | 12.7" x 9" x 0.6" (323 x 229 x 15mm) |
13.1" x 8.9" x 0.8" (333 x 226 x 21mm) |
|
Weight | 2.9 pounds (1.3kg) | 3.5 pounds (1.6kg) | |
Warranty | 1 year limited | 1 year limited | |
Extras | Fingerprint reader, 720P camera |
Fingerprint reader (in touchpad), 720P camera |
|
Price as tested | $378 at Amazon and Walmart | $350 at Walmart |
Thankfully, the off-putting dingy yellow POST logo isn't in your face for long—the Swift 1 cold boots to the desktop in about 11 seconds. [credit: Jim Salter ]
We didn't actually intend to test or review the Swift 1—we ordered a Walmart Motile 14, with a Ryzen 5 processor for only $350. But Walmart has an unfortunate tendency to just throw in any similar product when it runs low on stock, and the Swift 1 is what got sent in its place—with no notification, either by email or in our account at Walmart.com, and no paperwork in the box either.
A man arrested in 2015 for running a site that provided information about the Popcorn Time piracy app has been sentenced in Denmark. The 38-year-old received 20 days probation and was subjected to a financial confiscation order after he admitted being criminally complicit in the infringements carried out by ordinary Popcorn Time users.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
Popcorn Time, the application that became known as the ‘Netflix for Pirates’, first appeared in 2014. It was a massive success and arguably paved the way for the dozens of similar piracy apps currently available on the Android and iOS platforms.
In its various guises, Popcorn Time itself managed to attract the negative attention of copyright holders who were determined to reduce the availability and visibility of the popular piracy tool. At the same time, others worked counter to these goals, either by creating their own forks of the software, distributing them, or producing guides and tutorials.
Following a court order in June 2015, police in Denmark arrested two men in their thirties for operating two sites – Popcorntime.dk and Popcorn-time.dk. Neither linked to pirated content but instead provided guides on how to use Popcorn Time while providing information on where the software could be downloaded.
In 2018, the operator of Popcorntime.dk was handed a conditional six-month prison sentence after court ruled that by spreading information about Popcorn Time, he played a part in the infringements carried out by users of the software.
The defendant appealed the decision to the High Court but without success. The case was subsequently heard by the Supreme Court but that was no more effective, with the now 41-year-old man held liable for contributory copyright infringement last January. He was handed a six-month conditional sentence, 120 hours of community service, and a confiscation order for around $67,000 in advertising revenue.
Given the outcome in the earlier prosecution of the Popcorntime.dk operator, the man behind Popcorn-time.dk was left with few options to effectively fight his corner. According to a new announcement by anti-piracy group Rights Alliance, which was deeply involved in both cases, the man eventually took the decision to plead guilty.
The case was heard at the court in Odense, which ruled that in common with the operator of Popcorntime.dk, the person behind Popcorn-time.dk also contributed to the copyright infringements carried out by regular users of Popcorn Time.
“From August 2014 to August 2015, the 38-year-old on the website popcorn-time.dk recommended and guided users to download and use the illegal streaming service Popcorn Time. Defendants have also received about 10,000 kroner (US$1,565) in advertising revenue from Google for ads on the site,” Rights Alliance reports.
“Defendant confessed his complicity in the dissemination of the illegal streaming service and was thus convicted of complicity in the copyright infringements that occur using Popcorn Time.”
As a result of the confession, the 38-year-old was handed a conditional sentence of 20 days probation and subjected to a confiscation order to seize the advertising revenue generated by the site. The domain name popcorn-time.dk was also forfeited.
Rights Alliance says the differences in the sentences between this and the earlier case can be put down to the more detailed coverage of the Popcorntime.dk platform and the scale of the revenues it generated. Courts also tend to look more favorably on defendants who admit guilt rather than those who defend a case only to be found guilty.
From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.
Fakt oder Fiktion?
Angesichts der späten und völlig unzureichenden Maßnahmen der Regionalregierung spricht auch Gesundheitsminister Illa jetzt von einer “Gefahr” für ganz Spanien