Die Masse denkt wild

Verschwörungstheorien als Symptom eines theoretischen Vakuums der Kritik?

Verschwörungstheorien als Symptom eines theoretischen Vakuums der Kritik?

PS5 TV Requirements Cause Confusion, ‘Ready for PS5’ TVs Not Quite Ready

Sony’s eagerly anticipated PlayStation 5 introduces a suite of new display features that, in order to get the best out of what the game console can offer, may require a TV upgrade. Unfortunately, Sony has not made it easy with its own range of “Ready f…



Sony's eagerly anticipated PlayStation 5 introduces a suite of new display features that, in order to get the best out of what the game console can offer, may require a TV upgrade. Unfortunately, Sony has not made it easy with its own range of "Ready for PS5" TVs not quite ready for all of PS5's new features.

Sony's PS5, along with the rival Xbox Series X console from Microsoft, will take gamers firmly into the world of 4K with super smooth 120 frames per second gaming. Along with the high resolution and refresh rate, gamers can also expect low latency gaming (under 7.2ms), Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) and Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) support. All of these features require a TV fitted with the new HDMI 2.1 port and to also specifically support these features via the on-board processor (as well as a dedicated game mode to reduce post-processing, which can add 10's of microseconds to the display lag).

Gamers wanting to get the best out of their PS5, or Xbox Series X, will most likely need a TV upgrade as HDMI 2.1 has only become common in this year's range of TVs. Sony has tried to make the upgrade process easier by introducing a "Ready for PS5" label for its new range of TVs, but it appears that even Sony's TVs with this label may in fact be missing some key features, at least at launch.

So while Sony's XH90/X900H has the "Ready for PS5" label, it won't have these advanced HDMI 2.1 features until some time later via a firmware update. Another "Ready for PS5" TV, the 8K Sony ZH8/Z8H, will not even include ALLM and VRR support.

Gamers might have better luck with non-Sony products from LG and Samsung, with the companies promising all of these features on some of their top-end TVs.

The PS5 is expected to launch in time for the Christmas shopping season, while the Xbox Series X will launch at roughly the same time.

Zero Terminal 3 is a modular handheld PC with a Raspberry Pi Zero and a touchscreen display

The Zero Terminal 3 is a little computer that looks like a chunky smartphone. But it’s a full-fledged Linux PC with a touchscreen display, a built-in battery, a full-sized USB port, and a microSD card reader. It’s also a modular device tha…

NODE Zero Terminal 3

The Zero Terminal 3 is a little computer that looks like a chunky smartphone. But it’s a full-fledged Linux PC with a touchscreen display, a built-in battery, a full-sized USB port, and a microSD card reader. It’s also a modular device that can support add-ons including keyboards, game controllers, radio transceivers, network interfaces, solar panels, […]

The post Zero Terminal 3 is a modular handheld PC with a Raspberry Pi Zero and a touchscreen display appeared first on Liliputing.

In a consequential decision, Air Force picks its rockets for mid-2020s launches

“I am very confident with the selection that we have made today.”

White rocket lifts off amidst flames and smoke.

Enlarge / Artist's rendering of a Vulcan-Centaur rocket launch. (credit: United Launch Alliance)

On Friday afternoon, the US Air Force answered one of the big questions that had been hanging over the US launch industry for more than a year—which two companies will be selected to compete for national security launch contracts from 2022 to 2026?

During a video call with reporters, William Roper, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, said that United Launch Alliance will receive approximately 60 percent of the launch orders and SpaceX will receive the other 40 percent. Two other bidders, Northrop Grumman with its Omega rocket, and Blue Origin with its New Glenn vehicle, will not receive awards.

"The ability to meet our technical factors to do the mission is the most important thing," Roper said, in response to a question on the Air Force criteria. Secondary factors included past performance, the ability to work with small businesses, and total evaluated price. The military has nine reference orbits for large and complex payloads that these rockets must meet.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Pandemie und Unwetter: Multiple Katastrophen

Unwetter in vielen Teilen der Welt zeigen einmal mehr, dass vor allem die ärmeren Teile der Bevölkerung unter Katastrophen und Pandemie zu leiden haben

Unwetter in vielen Teilen der Welt zeigen einmal mehr, dass vor allem die ärmeren Teile der Bevölkerung unter Katastrophen und Pandemie zu leiden haben

Covid-19 und Lockdown: Was war Regierungen die Rettung von Menschenleben wert?

Wissenschaftler haben versucht, die frühe oder späte Entscheidung zum Lockdown mit den wirtschaftlichen Verlusten (BIP) und der Mortalität als ökonomisches Kalkül zu quantifizieren

Wissenschaftler haben versucht, die frühe oder späte Entscheidung zum Lockdown mit den wirtschaftlichen Verlusten (BIP) und der Mortalität als ökonomisches Kalkül zu quantifizieren

Gesundmachende Corona-Maßnahmen

Welche politischen und ökonomischen Maßnahmen würden uns langfristig gesünder und widerstandsfähiger machen?

Welche politischen und ökonomischen Maßnahmen würden uns langfristig gesünder und widerstandsfähiger machen?

Appeals court rules 10¢-a-page charge for court documents is too high

Appeals court charts a middle course between the plaintiffs and the government.

Appeals court rules 10¢-a-page charge for court documents is too high

Enlarge (credit: Aurich Lawson / Getty Images)

A federal appeals court has ruled that the federal judiciary has been overcharging thousands of users for access to public court records. PACER, short for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, is an online system that allows members of the public (including Ars Technica reporters) to download documents related to almost any federal court case. For PDF documents, the site charges 10 cents per page—a figure far above the costs of running the system.

In 2016, three nonprofit organizations sued the judiciary itself over the issue. The class action lawsuit, filed on behalf of almost everyone who pays PACER fees, argued that the courts were only allowed to charge enough to offset the costs of running PACER. Over the last 15 years, as storage and bandwidth costs fell, the courts actually raised PACER fees from 7 cents to 10 cents. The courts used the extra profits to pay for other projects, like installing speakers and displays in courtrooms.

The plaintiffs argued that the courts were only allowed to charge the marginal cost of running PACER—which would be a fraction of the current fees. The government claimed that the law gave the courts broad discretion to decide how much to charge and how to use the money. In a 2018 ruling, a trial court judge charted a middle course. She ruled that some uses of PACER fees had exceeded Congress's mandates. But she didn't go as far as plaintiffs wanted by limiting spending to the operation of the PACER system itself.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

ISP Cox Asks Court to Reduce Piracy Damages By $243 Million

Cox Communications is requesting a reduction of the piracy damages awarded by a Virginia jury last year in favor of a group of prominent music companies. The ISP argues that 2,438 duplicate or overlapping works should be scrapped, which translates to a massive $243 million in damages, roughly a quarter of the total.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Last year, Internet provider Cox Communications lost its legal battle against a group of major record labels.

Following a two-week trial, a Virginia jury held Cox liable for its pirating subscribers, ordering the company to pay $1 billion in damages.

Heavily disappointed by the decision, Cox later asked the court to set the jury verdict aside and decide the issue directly. In addition, the ISP argued that the “shockingly excessive” damages should be lowered. If that wasn’t an option, Cox wanted a new trial.

No Miscarriage of Justice

In June the court denied Cox’s request for a new trial and the damages amount per work wasn’t seen as excessive either. The jury set this amount at $99,830 per work. Cox summed up a list of arguments why this is “historic” amount is “shockingly” excessive. However, unlike Cox, the court saw no “miscarriage of justice.”

“In sum, Plaintiffs were well within their rights to elect both a jury trial and statutory damages. After significant deliberation, the jury awarded $99,830.29 per work, well within the Act’s statutory range of $750.00-$150,000.00,” Judge O’Grady wrote.

These conclusions were a major disappointment for Cox, but there was also a positive note. The court agreed with the ISP that damages should be issued per ‘work’ and not for each ‘copyright,’ as was the case in the original verdict.

Overlapping Works Shouldn’t Count

The $1 billion in damages is based on 10,017 copyrights, multiplied by $99,3830 in damages. However, the court said that infringers shouldn’t be punished multiple times for one pirated track simply because there are more copyrights related to it. After all, some tracks can easily have 20 different copyright holders.

Over the past few weeks, the ISP went over all the works that were listed by the music companies. According to its analysis, this includes thousands of overlapping copyrights.

This careful examination of the evidence didn’t just reveal derivative tracks. As it turns out, the original list of tracks also included the musical composition “Shine” twice. A small mistake, but one that cost nearly $100,000.

$243 Million Reduction

After going over all the provided evidence, Cox argues that 2,438 works should be removed. This represents a total damages value of $243,386.25.

“The total number of works to be removed from the damages award under the Court’s order is thus 2,438, leaving 7,579 works in suit that are eligible for statutory damages,” Cox writes.

“Applying the per-work award of $99,830.29 to the 7,579 remaining works in suit, the statutory damages award should be reduced from $1 billion to $756,613,767.91,” the Internet provider adds.

While this is still a historically high damages award, shaving off nearly a quarter-billion from the original sum is certainly significant. That said, this is all based on Cox’s calculations and has yet to be formally approved by the court.

A copy of Cox’s post-trial response brief, detailing its calculations, is available here (pdf)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.