Quartalsbericht: Amazon verdoppelt Gewinn in der Coronakrise

Amazon macht mitten in der Weltwirtschaftskrise einen Rekordgewinn von 5,2 Milliarden US-Dollar. Die US-Wirtschaftsleistung (BIP) sank im zweiten Quartal um 32,9 Prozent. (Quartalsbericht, Onlineshop)

Amazon macht mitten in der Weltwirtschaftskrise einen Rekordgewinn von 5,2 Milliarden US-Dollar. Die US-Wirtschaftsleistung (BIP) sank im zweiten Quartal um 32,9 Prozent. (Quartalsbericht, Onlineshop)

Hackers broke into real news sites to plant fake stories

Infiltrated CMS of Eastern European media outlets to spread misinformation about NATO.

The propagandists have created and spread disinformation since at least March 2017, with a focus on undermining NATO and the US troops in Poland and the Baltics.

Enlarge / The propagandists have created and spread disinformation since at least March 2017, with a focus on undermining NATO and the US troops in Poland and the Baltics. (credit: Petras Malukas | Getty Images)

Over the past few years, online disinformation has taken evolutionary leaps forward, with the Internet Research Agency pumping out artificial outrage on social media and hackers leaking documents—both real and fabricated—to suit their narrative. More recently, Eastern Europe has faced a broad campaign that takes fake news ops to yet another level: hacking legitimate news sites to plant fake stories, then hurriedly amplifying them on social media before they're taken down.

On Wednesday, security firm FireEye released a report on a disinformation-focused group it's calling Ghostwriter. The propagandists have created and disseminated disinformation since at least March 2017, with a focus on undermining NATO and the US troops in Poland and the Baltics; they've posted fake content on everything from social media to pro-Russian news websites. In some cases, FireEye says, Ghostwriter has deployed a bolder tactic: hacking the content management systems of news websites to post their own stories. They then disseminate their literal fake news with spoofed emails, social media, and even op-eds the propagandists write on other sites that accept user-generated content.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

YouTube Rippers Eye Supreme Court After Appeals Court Denies Rehearing

The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has denied a request from YouTube rippers FLVTO.biz and 2conv.com for a full rehearing. The Russian owner of the sites warned of a dangerous precedent, but the Court’s judges disagreed. The sites’ legal team is now considering taking the case to the Supreme Court.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

4th circuit appeals courtYouTube rippers are seen as the largest piracy threat to the music industry, and record labels are doing their best to shut them down.

In 2017, YouTube-MP3, the world’s largest ripping site at the time, shut down after being sued, and several others followed voluntarily.

A group of music companies hoped to achieve the same with FLVTO.biz and 2conv.com. The sites’ Russian owner Tofig Kurbanov was taken to court in the United States last year, accused of facilitating mass copyright infringement.

No Easy Win for the Music Companies

The music companies were hoping for a quick win but they got the opposite. Kurbanov fought back immediately and before the copyright issues were discussed, the complaint was already dismissed.

A Virginia federal court ruled that the music companies lacked personal jurisdiction as the sites were operated from abroad and didn’t ‘purposefully’ target or interact with US users.

This finding was not without controversy. The music companies disagreed and appealed the matter at the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which sent the case back to the district court last month.

In a unanimous decision, the appeals court found that there are more than sufficient facts to conclude that Kurbanov purposefully conducted business in the US, specifically, the state of Virginia.

YouTube Rippers Request a Rehearing

The operator of the YouTube ripping sites was unhappy with the ruling so requested a rehearing of the matter before the full court. According to the defense team, the appeal court’s decision goes against previous rulings and warrants reconsideration.

The panel’s decision – specifically the finding that personal jurisdiction could be premised on the websites’ failure to geoblock visitors from the U.S. (and allowing advertising brokers to geotarget visitors) – is an issue of exceptional importance,” the petition read.

Rehearing Denied

The appeals court judges disagree, however. This week the petition for a rehearing was denied. In a short but clear order, the clerk writes that none of the judges took action.

“The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the full court. No judge requested a poll under Fed. R. App. P. 35. The court denies the petition for rehearing en banc,” the order (pdf) reads.

Supreme Court?

Previously, Kurbanov’s legal team warned that the appeals court set a dangerous precedent. Counsel Evan Fray-Witzer said that the ruling will have a broad impact on foreign site operators.

Speaking with TorrentFreak, the attorney now says that they are considering petitioning the Supreme Court. District court rulings on these personal jurisdiction issues have been mixed and a Supreme Court ruling could provide more clarity.

“The issue is important enough that we intend to file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court,” Fray-Witzer tells TorrentFreak.

“The Supreme Court has not yet decided a case concerning personal jurisdiction based on internet contacts and we think this case would be a good opportunity for the Court to address the issue head-on.”

If the matter doesn’t go to the Supreme Court, the case will go back to the district court for a review of the jurisdiction matter in full.

In its first decision on the motion to dismiss, the court chose not to conduct a “reasonability test” because the other arguments were sufficient to warrant a dismissal. This has now changed.

The district court can still dismiss the matter over a lack of jurisdiction if the complaint fails to pass the reasonability test. If the court does decide that it has jurisdiction, Kurbanov will have to defend himself and his sites against the record labels’ copyright infringement claims.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

“This is a very dangerous situation:” Big Tech’s day on the Hill

Marathon session was nearly two different hearings, depending on party of questioner.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos testifies (remotely) before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on "Online Platforms and Market Power" in the Rayburn House office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on July 29, 2020.

Enlarge / Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos testifies (remotely) before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on "Online Platforms and Market Power" in the Rayburn House office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on July 29, 2020. (credit: Graeme Jennings - Pool | AFP | Getty Images)

A bevy of tech's biggest titans—Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Apple CEO Tim Cook, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg—all took to their remote offices Wednesday to dial into a hotly anticipated Congressional hearing, the latest part of an in-depth investigation into their firms' behavior that began more than a year ago.

The almost six-hour hearing was nominally convened to talk about antitrust enforcement, and it had two core questions at its heart. First: do the biggest, globe-spanning US tech companies have too much power in the market? And second: did they come by the power they do have honestly, or did they somehow cheat to get it?

House Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) focused his opening remarks on how bipartisan the investigation process has been to date before sketching out his belief that all four companies present have behaved anticompetitively, become monopolies, and caused harm both to consumers and the entire democratic project writ large.

Read 68 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Daily Deals (7-30-2020)

The Epic Games Store is giving away three free PC games this week. Best Buy is offering a 3-month Tidal Premium music subscription for less than a buck. You can pick up a RAVPower 512GB portable SSD for $75. Or you can build your own with a $90 Wavlin…

The Epic Games Store is giving away three free PC games this week. Best Buy is offering a 3-month Tidal Premium music subscription for less than a buck. You can pick up a RAVPower 512GB portable SSD for $75. Or you can build your own with a $90 Wavlink Thunderbolt 3 to NVMe enclosure. Here […]

The post Daily Deals (7-30-2020) appeared first on Liliputing.

Emails detail Amazon’s plan to crush a startup rival with price cuts

Amazon allegedly took $200 million in losses to stop the growth of diapers.com.

A man on a TV addresses a room of legislators.

Enlarge / Jeff Bezos speaks via videoconference during a House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, July 29, 2020. (credit: Graeme Jennings/Washington Examiner/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Emails published by the House Judiciary Committee this week confirm an accusation that critics have long leveled against Amazon: that the company's aggressive price-cutting for diapers in 2009 and 2010 was designed to undercut an emerging rival.

That rival, Quidsi, had gained traction with a site called Diapers.com that sold baby supplies. Amazon had good reason to worry. As journalist Brad Stone wrote in his 2013 book about Amazon, Bezos' company didn't start selling diapers until a year after Diapers.com did. At the time, diapers were seen as too bulky and low-margin to be delivered profitably.

But Quidsi's founders figured out how to do it. They optimized their packaging for baby products and positioned warehouses close to metropolitan areas. That not only allowed them to get cheaper ground-shipping rates—it also allowed them to provide overnight shipping to most of their customers—in many cases, faster than Amazon's own shipping.

Read 22 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Comcast lost 477,000 cable-TV customers in Q2 amid 12% drop in revenue

Broadband is up but TV revenue dropped 3.2% and overall revenue is down 11.7%.

A Comcast sign at the Comcast offices in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Enlarge / A Comcast sign at the Comcast offices in Philadelphia. (credit: Getty Images | Cindy Ord )

Comcast lost 477,000 cable-TV subscribers in Q2 2020 amid a company-wide drop in revenue caused by the pandemic. The net-customer loss consists of 427,000 residential TV customers and 51,000 business TV customers, Comcast's earnings report today said. The customer losses are more than double the 224,000 net-customer loss in last year's second quarter.

Comcast's Q2 subscriber loss followed a Q1 loss of 409,000 TV customers, for a total of 886,000 video customers lost in the first six months of 2020. By contrast, Comcast lost 733,000 video customers in all of 2019, an average of 183,000 per quarter.

While Comcast's TV-customer losses accelerated this year, they're still only about half as large as the customer losses reported by DirecTV owner AT&T. Comcast is down to 20.4 million TV customers, which is higher than any other cable or satellite TV provider.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Qualcomm and Xiaomi develop Game Turbo graphics tuner for smartphones

It looks like GPU tweaking software is coming to smartphones. Xiaomi and Qualcomm appear to have developed an app called Game Turbo which will let users adjust GPU settings to optimize for performance, picture quality, or frame rates, among other thin…

Game Turbo

It looks like GPU tweaking software is coming to smartphones. Xiaomi and Qualcomm appear to have developed an app called Game Turbo which will let users adjust GPU settings to optimize for performance, picture quality, or frame rates, among other things. Neither company has made an official announcement yet, but Ice Universe has shared a few […]

The post Qualcomm and Xiaomi develop Game Turbo graphics tuner for smartphones appeared first on Liliputing.

Verbraucherzentrale: Dubiose Film-Streaming-Anbieter zocken Nutzer ab

Ein dubioses Netz von Streaming-Websites lockt wieder Nutzer in die Abofalle mit bis zu 359 Euro. Das geht bereits seit dem Jahr 2017, ohne dass die Strafverfolger etwas bewirkt hätten. (Abofallen, Video-Community)

Ein dubioses Netz von Streaming-Websites lockt wieder Nutzer in die Abofalle mit bis zu 359 Euro. Das geht bereits seit dem Jahr 2017, ohne dass die Strafverfolger etwas bewirkt hätten. (Abofallen, Video-Community)