NASA’s new chief of human spaceflight has a commercial background

“I’m a big fan of Kathy Lueders!”

NASA's Kathy Lueders celebrates Crew Dragon's hatch opening on May 31.

Enlarge / NASA's Kathy Lueders celebrates Crew Dragon's hatch opening on May 31. (credit: NASA)

On Friday morning, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine announced that he had selected Kathy Lueders to serve as the space agency's new chief of human spaceflight. In this position, she will help set human spaceflight policy and implement it across the agency. Her top mandate will be getting humans to the Moon by 2024, or soon thereafter.

“Kathy gives us the extraordinary experience and passion we need to continue to move forward with Artemis and our goal of landing the first woman and the next man on the Moon by 2024,” Bridenstine said. "Kathy’s the right person to extend the space economy to the lunar vicinity and achieve the ambitious goals we’ve been given.”

As program manager for Commercial Crew—which recently saw SpaceX launch NASA astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken to the International Space Station—Lueders has led the one big-ticket program for the space agency that has delivered for Bridenstine. Other high-profile programs, including the Space Launch System rocket and James Webb Space Telescope, have continued to experience delays.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

New Google rule bans discriminatory targeting for housing ads

Google said it’s “working closely” with regulators who sued Facebook over same.

A sign on the street is visible to anyone who walks or drives by. A sign online can be strategically, and illegally, targeted away from people against whom you may have a bias.

Enlarge / A sign on the street is visible to anyone who walks or drives by. A sign online can be strategically, and illegally, targeted away from people against whom you may have a bias. (credit: Getty Images)

Google is taking action to reduce unlawful discrimination on its advertising platform a year after the federal government sued its largest competitor, Facebook, over the same thing.

The company is "introducing a new personalized advertising policy for certain types of ads," a Google executive shared in a company blog post today. The policy prohibits entities placing ads for employment, housing, or credit services from targeting or excluding ads "based on gender, age, parental status, marital status, or ZIP Code."

The federal Fair Housing Act explicitly prohibits landlords and sellers from discriminating against potential renters or buyers on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability. ("Family status" includes a ban on discriminating against someone who is pregnant or families with children.) That applies to the advertising of units as well as who actually gets to sign the lease or the mortgage and what they have to pay.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Now you can buy laptops with elementary OS pre-installed (GNU/Linux distribution)

Elementary OS is an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution with an emphasis on speed, privacy, and ease-of-use. It also happens to have a user interface that’s reminiscent of macOS and a slightly controversial history of  trying to guilt people into pay…

Elementary OS is an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution with an emphasis on speed, privacy, and ease-of-use. It also happens to have a user interface that’s reminiscent of macOS and a slightly controversial history of  trying to guilt people into paying for free software. Like most GNU/Linux distributions, you can download elementary OS for free (or make […]

Internet Backbone Provider Hurricane Electric Sues Movie Companies Over ‘Ridiculous’ Piracy Allegations

Silicon Valley company Hurricane Electric offers Internet backbone access to many large organizations as well as the US Government. The company sees itself as a neutral network provider but a group of movie studios is accusing the Internet provider of facilitating piracy. To get rid of these “ridiculous” claims, Hurricane Electric is suing the movie outfits, requesting a declaratory judgment of non-infringement from federal courts.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

he logo hurricane electricHurricane Electric (HE) is one of the major network providers on the global Internet. The company operates the largest IPv6 backbone which facilitates Internet connectivity to people all over the world.

Unlike consumer ISPs, HE mainly provides its services to large organizations – some of which are ISPs themselves – that have thousands of customers, or are customers of customers.

Somewhere down this line, there may be people who abuse their Internet connections by using them to download pirated content. While HE has no direct control over these end-users, a group of movie companies claims that it is responsible for their actions.

Movie companies demand action from Hurricane Electric

The companies, which are connected to familiar movies such as Rambo: Last Blood, London Has Fallen, Dallas Buyers Club, The Hitman’s Bodyguard and many others, are no newcomers to piracy claims. In recent years they have sued many individual downloaders, cases that often end up in private settlements.

Behind the scenes, however, the companies are also putting pressure on third-party intermediaries including Hurricane Electric. Through their lawyer, Kerry Culpepper, who’s also known for targeting pirate sites and apps, they argue that HE is liable for piracy activity that takes place on its network.

Movie companies requesting action

cease and desit letter

These accusations were not made in court. The movie companies simply reached out to HE directly after obtaining a subpoena which required the backbone provider to share the personal details of pirating subscribers. The movie companies seized this opportunity to demand more information and action from the company, or else.

Hurricane Electric Goes to Court

These requests have now reached a point where HE feels it has to take action. The company has filed two lawsuits, one in California and one in Nevada, hoping to put an end to these claims. Specifically, the ISP requests a Declaratory Judgment stating that it’s not responsible for copyright infringements that take place through its customers.

“Defendants’ cease and desist letters are demanding that upstream service providers like HE simply shut down entire Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that provide Internet access to thousands and sometimes tens of thousands of people, based solely on allegations of infringement by even a single unidentified end-user subscriber to an ISP,” HE explains.

“Defendants are thus putting HE in an impossible situation, all based on an improper and unlawful overextension of Defendants’ alleged copyright rights,” the company adds.

According to HE, the movie companies repeatedly asked the upstream provider to terminate customers. This includes some who are ISPs themselves, as well as the U.S. Navy’s Naval Research Labs. In addition, the movie outfits have also demanded damages in excess of $500,000.

HE highlights “ridiculousness

screenshot from the complaint

The backbone provider notes that if these movie companies want to enforce their rights, they should go to their respective customers directly. That’s a much better option than disconnecting entire cities or schools from the Internet, it argues.

“It is simply not appropriate to shut down an entire city, a school system, rural area with subscribers covering a 5-state region, or an airport internet provider at such airports as LAX because defendants do not want to bother contacting the ISP providing service from HE’s backbone so that Defendants can obtain the information identifying the specific infringer.”

HE characterizes the movie companies’ demands as “ridiculous” and stresses that it merely acts as a passive “highway” that allows its customers to connect to the Internet at large. It can’t control or stop individual pirates who are customers of customers.

Copyright Misuse

In addition to a declaratory judgment of no copyright infringement, the backbone provider also accuses the movie outfits of abusive and tortious acts that equate to copyright misuse.

“Defendants are thus putting HE in an impossible situation, all based on an improper and unlawful overextension of Defendants’ alleged copyright rights. Defendants’ letters and demands to HE are abusive, tortious, and otherwise wrongful,” HE claims.

The complaint mentions that the same movie companies have used the court system to bully unsophisticated Internet users in order to collect settlements. These often start by threatening hundreds of thousands in potential damages but end up being settled for a fraction.

HE also points to the settlements some of the movie companies signed with the popular torrent site YTS, which agreed to pay over a million dollars, but was allowed to continue operating as long as their own films were removed.

“Notwithstanding the settlement, there are still hundreds of pirated movies on that piratical site,” HE writes in its complaint.

The backbone provider adds that these movie companies are more interested in collecting cash than stopping copyright infringements.

“Defendants do not actually care about stopping the ongoing infringements of their copyrights; they just want large immediate one-time payments from each service provider they can associate with the still-allegedly infringing IP addresses,” the company adds.

With this complaint, HE hopes to put an end to the repeated threats from the movie companies. In addition to the requests for declaratory judgments in its favor and the copyright misuse claim, it wants the defendants to pay their legal costs, to deter others from abusing the system in a similar manner.

Needless to say, the outcome of this case will be crucial to how the entire Internet operates. We have previously seen other ISPs being held liable for pirating subscribers. If this liability expands to backbone providers, things will get even more problematic.

TorrentFreak obtained copies of of Hurricane Electric’s complaints against the movie companies, filed in a California (pdf) and Nevada (pdf) federal courts.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

Most COVID cases don’t spread virus—it’s the superspreaders we need to stop

Mounting evidence on superspreaders suggests a shift in thinking about social distancing.

Crowds of people walk along the Ocean City Boardwalk during Memorial Day weekend on Sunday, May 24, 2020.

Enlarge / Crowds of people walk along the Ocean City Boardwalk during Memorial Day weekend on Sunday, May 24, 2020. (credit: Getty | Caroline Brehman)

Much about how the new coronavirus spreads from one victim to the next remains a maddening mystery. But amid all the frantic efforts to understand transmission, there is one finding that appears consistent: that it is inconsistent.

Some people—most, even—don’t spread the virus to anyone in the course of their infection. Others infect dozens at a time.

It’s a phenomenon that looked, at first, like anomalous anecdotes—a large outbreak from a Washington choir practice, a South Korean megachurch, a wedding in Jordan—but it has become a fixed feature of the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. And researchers have started to settle on numbers for it.

Read 17 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Computex 2020 is cancelled due to COVID-19 concerns

The world’s largest computer show won’t take place at all this year. In March, the organizers of the annual Computex trade show announced that this year’s event would be postponed from June until September in response to the COVID-19 …

The world’s largest computer show won’t take place at all this year. In March, the organizers of the annual Computex trade show announced that this year’s event would be postponed from June until September in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Now TAITRA has announced that the show won’t go on at all in 2020. Computex […]