
Elektroautos: Tesla schließt Autofabrik
Die Elektroautofabrik in Kalifornien wird nach tagelangen Diskussionen geschlossen, Teslas Gigafactory in Nevada bleibt geöffnet. (Tesla, Technologie)

Just another news site
Die Elektroautofabrik in Kalifornien wird nach tagelangen Diskussionen geschlossen, Teslas Gigafactory in Nevada bleibt geöffnet. (Tesla, Technologie)
Wir haben Disney+ vor dem Deutschlandstart getestet und sind begeistert. Das Abo ist perfekt für Familien mit Schulkindern. Filmfans können sich über Bonusmaterial freuen, das Amazon Prime Video, Netflix und Sky gar nicht kennen. Ein Test von Ingo Paka…
“Danger of panic far exceeds danger of corona,” Elon Musk tweeted on Monday.
Enlarge / Elon Musk. (credit: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Since Monday, Tesla has been under pressure from officials in Alameda County to shut down operations of its car factory in Fremont, California, to fight the spread of the coronavirus. On Thursday, Tesla finally announced it would halt vehicle manufacturing in Fremont.
"We have decided to temporarily suspend production at our factory in Fremont, from end of day March 23, which will allow an orderly shutdown," Tesla said in a post on its website.
March 23 is next Monday—a full week after officials in seven Bay Area counties ordered non-essential businesses to close down. To make sure there was no confusion about Tesla's status, Alameda County tweeted on Tuesday that Tesla was not an essential business.
It’s hard to like most of the new layout—but having a dark mode is nice.
Enlarge / The new design does at least include a dark mode. I generally prefer bright layouts, but if you have a bad habit of Facebooking in bed late at night, this is less likely to prevent sleepiness. (credit: Jim Salter)
Sometime last night, Facebook's new design layout rolled out to my personal account. It assured me that I could switch back if I didn't like it, so I immediately tried it out. I just as immediately switched it off and never looked back. At least, I never looked back until this afternoon, when the powers that be at Ars said—and I quote—"feel free to hate review it, if you want."
I am a professional if nothing else, so this is not a hate review. But I must admit it's a "visceral dislike" review, and perhaps some readers will appreciate—or at least not mind—the things that turn me off so strongly about the new layout.
This is the current "old" Facebook design, which has been in place largely unchanged for a few years now. It's reasonably information-dense and—apart from the giant Story header—usually fits several posts per page. Personally identifying information (and the odd profanity) are blurred out. [credit: Jim Salter ]
I do the majority of my Facebook browsing on a desktop PC—a serious desktop PC, for serious people, with dual 24" monitors in 1080P. I strongly dislike layouts that present me with less information and waste a ton of real estate, and Facebook's new layout does exactly that, in spades.
“Good people at a bad company”: employees describe breeding ground for germs.
Enlarge (credit: Thomas Trutschel | Getty Images)
Charter employees are angry at the cable company for refusing requests to work from home during the coronavirus pandemic and have been reaching out to Ars this week to complain about their employer.
One Charter employee who works in a 24-hour call center in a suburb of Orlando, Florida, said the facility has anywhere between 400 and 700 employees working in one large room at any given time. The call center has 1,200 agents in total, the employee told us yesterday. Instead of letting call-center agents work from home, Charter is advising employees to work at every other desk, leaving a buffer of one empty desk between employees. But there isn't enough space or enough desks to do that, the employee said.
"This is the rough part: we sit at a different desk every day," the employee said. "We don't have our own desks. It's an absolute nightmare breeding ground for germs on a normal basis." The employee shared this graphic from an email that was sent to the call-center workers:
Congressional leaders have resisted calls to allow remote voting.
Enlarge / Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). (credit: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Two senior senators—Republican Rob Portman of Ohio and Democrat Dick Durbin of Illinois—are introducing legislation to allow Senate votes to be held remotely.
"In times of extraordinary national crisis, the Senate must be able to convene and act expeditiously even if we can't be together in person," Portman said in a press statement.
Some members in the House of Representatives have also been pushing to allow remote voting in the House. A bipartisan group of lawmakers wrote a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Wednesday urging her to allow remote voting.
Internet provider Charter Communications has submitted its answer to the piracy liability lawsuit filed by major record labels. The ISP denies many of the allegations and also strikes back. In a recent filing, it accuses the music companies of violating copyright law by sending DMCA notices for content they don’t own.
Drom: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also have an annual VPN review.
Last year, several major music companies sued Charter Communications, one of the largest Internet providers in the US with 22 million subscribers.
Helped by the RIAA, Capitol Records, Warner Bros, Sony Music, and others accused Charter of deliberately turning a blind eye to its pirating subscribers.
Under US law, providers must terminate the accounts of repeat infringers “in appropriate circumstances” and Charter failed to do so, according to the music labels. Specifically, the ISP is accused of ignoring repeat infringers on its network, which it continued to serve as customers.
This week Charter replied to the complaint, which was amended in February, denying most of these allegations. In addition, the ISP is countersuing the music companies on two issues.
Firstly, Charter requests a declaratory judgment from the court, ruling that it’s not contributorily liable for the alleged infringements of its customers. Among other things, it points out that it doesn’t host or promote any infringing activity, nor can it detect piracy on its network.
Other ISPs have issued similar counterclaims in the past. However, Charter goes a step further by also countersuing the music companies for violating copyright law themselves.
The ISP’s claim follows a decision by the music companies to remove 272 sound recordings and 183 music compositions from their initial complaint. These were dropped after the record labels were ordered to produce further evidence that they indeed owned the rights.
This doesn’t sit well with Charter, which believes that the record companies, through the RIAA, have sent inaccurate DMCA notices for these works.
“Upon information and belief, the Record Company Plaintiffs did not own the Dropped Works when they sent notices for them,” Charter writes, adding that “…the Record Company Plaintiffs did not have the right to send notices to Charter for the Dropped Works.”
The notices in question contained “inaccurate information,” which includes the “misrepresentation” that the RIAA was authorized on behalf of the record companies to send these, the ISP adds.
According to the court documents, some of these works were also part of the lawsuit against fellow ISP Cox, where a jury recently awarded a damages amount of nearly $100,000 per work.
Charter itself argues that it was also directly harmed. The notices were processed in its CATS anti-piracy system, through which they were forwarded to subscribers. This obviously costs money.
“Charter incurs costs in implementing its CATS, including when processing Plaintiffs’ inaccurate notices,” the ISP notes, adding that the inaccurate notices also resulted in reputational damage.
“Charter is injured when it processes inaccurate notices, causing it to forward false accusations to its subscribers, to the extent this creates tension with the impacted subscribers, negatively affects goodwill, and causes reputational harm to Charter,” the counterclaim reads.
The ISP demands a jury trial on these issues and wants to be compensated for all damages suffered. In addition, it asks the court to declare that it is not contributorily liable for the alleged copyright infringements of its subscribers.
—
A copy of Charter’s response to the amended complaint, including the affirmative defenses and the counterclaims, is available here (pdf).
Drom: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, torrent sites and more. We also have an annual VPN review.
One side effect of the coronavirus pandemic is that a lot of people across the world are staying home… and getting online. In Europe, that’s led to increased network usage… and congestion. So EU officials reached out to Netflix, and a…
Um die Netze nicht zu sehr belasten, will Netflix seinen Dienst in Europa drosseln. So sollen rund 25 Prozent Traffic eingespart werden. (Netflix, DE-CIX)
The Essential PH-1 smartphone first shipped in 2017 and… it was the only phone the company ever shipped before shutting down earlier this year. But the company did have dreams of expanding its lineup. The planned Essential Home line of smart home…
You must be logged in to post a comment.