Car makers, California agree to emissions rules Trump admin is trying to kill

State throws a roadblock in the Trump administration’s plan to lower standards.

Car makers, California agree to emissions rules Trump admin is trying to kill

Enlarge (credit: Harvey Schwartz | Getty Images)

Four major automakers have reached an agreement with California to produce more fuel-efficient cars for the US market, despite efforts by the Trump administration to roll back emissions regulations.

Honda, Ford, Volkswagen, and BMW of North America all agreed to a voluntary framework that will reduce emissions through 2026, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) said Thursday.

The deal requires the automakers to improve their overall fleet's average fuel efficiency by 3.7 percent per year, starting with the 2022 model year. It also promotes a transition to electric vehicles by giving companies that produce and sell more electric cars credits toward meeting that emissions standard, and by providing incentives for installing more emissions-reducing technologies.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Safari tourist snaps could produce useful conservation data

Population estimates using photos were comparable to more traditional methods.

A pack of African wild dogs.

Enlarge / A pack of African wild dogs. (credit: Megan Claase)

Conservation efforts need data. To understand how a species is faring, it's essential to have information on roughly how many members of that species are living and where they're living.

But this kind of information is fiendishly tricky and expensive to get. Wilderness areas cover huge tracts of land, large segments of which can be difficult or impossible to access. Methods to estimate population densities rely on expensive equipment and staff time, and conservation is desperately underfunded.

A paper in Current Biology this week proposes a cheap alternative that could work in certain contexts: tourist photos. Researchers found that data gathered from tourist images in Botswana provided comparable results to more traditional survey methods—and at a much lower cost.

Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments

To protect its satellites, France outlines ambitious space-weapons program

“We have to face it, because it is our independence that is at stake.”

Florence Parly is the French defense minister.

Enlarge / Florence Parly is the French defense minister. (credit: SEBASTIEN BOZON/AFP/Getty Images)

After French President Emmanuel Macron called for a space high command to protect his nation's satellites earlier this month, military officials on Thursday released their plans in more detail.

As reported in the French financial newspaper Les Echos, the French Defense Minister, Florence Parly, outlined a new space weapons program that would allow the country to move from space surveillance to the active protection of its satellites.

"France is not embarking on a space arms race," Parly said, according to the publication. However, the projects outlined Thursday by French officials include swarms of nano-satellites that would patrol a few kilometers around French satellites, a ground-based laser system to blind snooping satellites, and perhaps even machine guns on board some satellites.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Sailfish OS 3.1 smartphone OS adds support for fingerprint sensors, file system encryption

Sailfish OS is a Linux-based operating system for smartphones… that continues to add some of the features you’d expect to find on a smartphone OS. The developers Jolla have announced that Sailfish OS 3.1 is now available and, among other th…

Sailfish OS is a Linux-based operating system for smartphones… that continues to add some of the features you’d expect to find on a smartphone OS. The developers Jolla have announced that Sailfish OS 3.1 is now available and, among other things, it adds support for file system encryption and fingerprint sensors. A bunch of key […]

The post Sailfish OS 3.1 smartphone OS adds support for fingerprint sensors, file system encryption appeared first on Liliputing.

Court Denies Abuse of Process Claim Against Copyright Troll

A federal court in the District of Washington has denied a counterclaim for abuse of process against a BitTorrent copyright troll. The claim in question was filed by a retired police officer. It’s clear, however, that the accused man is not the infringer and both parties are now instructed to reach an agreement to cover the defendant’s costs.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Every year, so-called ‘copyright trolls’ sue thousands of people in the United States for online file-sharing, mostly through BitTorrent.

These companies target people whose connections were allegedly used to download and share infringing videos, in the hope of obtaining a significant financial settlement.

While many of the defendants may indeed be guilty, a number of accused Internet subscribers have done nothing wrong. This is also what a John Doe, known by the IP-address 73.225.38.130, has repeatedly argued before a federal court in Seattle, Washington.

The defendant in question was sued by Strike 3 Holdings late 2017. In common with other defendants, the man was offered a settlement to let the case go, but instead, he went on the offensive.

When the man pushed back, Strike 3 Holdings was ready to let the case go. The company filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss all claims but the defendant, a 70+-year-old retired policeman, wasn’t willing to let them. At least not without getting paid.

The defendant submitted a counterclaim accusing Strike 3 of abuse of process and “extortion through sham litigation.” The man accused the rightsholder of going on a “fishing expedition,” while knowing that it couldn’t link the subscriber of the IP-address to any specific infringement.

As part of this fishing expedition, the rightsholder also allegedly misused the discovery process to explore whether the man’s son, other family members or friends engaged in any infringement activity.

Strike 3, for its part, moved for summary judgment asking the court to dismiss that counterclaim. The company stressed that it did nothing wrong and merely wanted to find out who the real infringer was.

After reviewing the positions from both sides, US District Judge Thomas Zilly decided to dismiss the abuse of process claim.

The defendant argued that an IP-address alone is not enough to identify an infringer. This is in part based on an Appeal Court ruling that came in after Strike 3 had voluntarily dismissed its infringement claim. As such, the company can’t be judged by this standard, Judge Zilly argues.

In addition, Strike 3’s efforts to go after the man’s son and other family members are no grounds for abuse of process either, the Court ruled.

“Strike 3 was entitled to pursue a theory of defense that another member of defendant’s household or someone with access to defendant’s IP address had infringed one or more of Strike 3’s motion pictures via the BitTorrent network, which would undermine defendant’s allegation that Strike 3’s copyright infringement claim was frivolous and asserted for purely extortionist or other improper purposes,” the Judge notes.

The ruling is a setback for the defendant, but it’s not the end of the case yet. The retired police officer has also requested a declaratory judgment that he has not himself infringed any of Strike 3’s copyrighted works. This request remains pending and the court has instructed both parties to reach an agreement.

Strike 3 previously said that it was willing to declare that the defendant didn’t infringe its works and Judge Zilly encouraged the parties to file a proposed judgment on what costs and fees the copyright holder must pay, if any.

“With respect to attorney’s fees and costs, the parties shall attempt to reach agreement concerning whether and, if so, how much defendant should receive, bearing in mind that, under the Copyright Act, attorney’s fees are discretionary, and the Court may decline to award them,” Judge Zilly writes.

At the time of writing a proposed judgment has yet to be submitted. Whether Strike 3 is willing to pay (part) of the fees and costs remains to be seen. If both parties can’t come together, the Judge will have the final say.

A copy of United States District Judge Thomas Zilly’s order is available here (pdf).

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

AT&T loses nearly 1 million TV customers after raising DirecTV prices

Price increases helped drive 946,000 customers away from AT&T.

A broken piggy bank covered with AT&T's logo.

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | Aurich)

AT&T lost 946,000 TV subscribers in Q2 2019, a loss that the company attributed to price increases, competition, and other factors.

AT&T reported a net loss of 778,000 subscribers in the "Premium TV" category, which includes its DirecTV satellite and U-verse wireline TV services. AT&T attributed this loss to "an increase in customers rolling off promotional discounts, competition, and lower gross adds due to a focus on the long-term value customer base."

AT&T also lost 168,000 subscribers of DirecTV Now, an online service with linear channels that's similar to traditional satellite and cable TV. AT&T said the DirecTV Now customer loss was "due to higher prices and less promotional activity," meaning that customers have balked at price increases and a refusal to extend discounts.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Daily Deals (7-25-2019)

Mesh WiFi routers are designed to help prevent you from getting wireless dead spots in your home. Rather than placing a single router in a central location and hoping for the best, the idea is to buy two or more routers and position them throughout the…

Mesh WiFi routers are designed to help prevent you from getting wireless dead spots in your home. Rather than placing a single router in a central location and hoping for the best, the idea is to buy two or more routers and position them throughout the house so that your wireless signal covers more ground. […]

The post Daily Deals (7-25-2019) appeared first on Liliputing.

Dealmaster: Prime members get 1-year Audible membership plus $20 credit for $119

Plus deals on video games, smart TVs, portable SSDs, laptops, and more.

Dealmaster: Prime members get 1-year Audible membership plus $20 credit for $119

Enlarge (credit: Valentina Palladino)

Greetings, Arsians! The Dealmaster is back with more deals to share. Prime Day 2019 may be behind us, but Amazon is still serving up deals on some of its services. Previously, Amazon offered a one-year subscription to Audible for $119.50, and you could add an Echo Dot to your order for just $0.99 extra. But not everyone wants or needs an Echo Dot—so instead, Amazon's now offering one year of Audible (12 credits upfront) plus a $20 Amazon credit for just $119.50 to Prime members who are not currently subscribed to Audible.

One year of Audible typically costs $149.50, so you're already saving $30 on an annual subscription. Prime members can use the $20 credit to buy anything on Amazon, making it a more versatile perk than a $0.99 Echo Dot. The only caveat is that the $20 credit will expire 30 days after you claim the offer. Also, as with most Audible offers we've seen as of late, only Prime members who don't currently pay for Audible can snag this offer.

If you don't want to spend that much or commit to a new service for a year, Prime members who are new Audible subscribers can get three months at the reduced monthly rate of $4.95—saving $10 off of Audible's regular $14.95-per-month cost.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

No climate event of the last 2,000 years looks like humanity’s

Warm or cool periods you may have heard of were regional affairs.

No climate event of the last 2,000 years looks like humanity’s

Enlarge (credit: dvdbramhall)

Some people who reject climate science seem to think climate scientists have never heard that the climate has changed in the past—as if scientists weren’t the ones who discovered those events in the first place. In reality, researchers are intensely interested in past climates because there is a lot to learn from them. You can see how sensitive Earth’s climate is to changes, for example, or how variable things can be even when the long-term average temperature is steady.

(“Climate has changed without humans before, so humans can’t be changing it now” is not a logically valid argument, FYI. It's the equivalent to arguing that we can't cause forest fires, since they occurred before we were around.)

Searching the past

Some historical records show evidence of a cooler period between the 1400s and early 1800s, which has come to be called the “Little Ice Age.” We know that glaciers from the Rockies to the Alps expanded during this time period, leaving piles of rocks behind when they eventually retreated. But was this really a global event? Or were there just regional downturns in temperatures that we erroneously connect out of a desire to make a simple story?

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

The FTC is investigating Facebook. Again.

No, not that investigation, the other one.

A Facebook logo and a phone running Facebook.

Enlarge / The company is not having its best-ever week. (credit: Getty Images | NurPhoto )

Facebook's legion of lawyers is certainly earning its keep this year: the company disclosed to investors Tuesday that it is under antitrust investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.

This is a completely different investigation than the $5 billion settlement, also made public yesterday, that Facebook and the FTC reached over Facebook's privacy practices. Nor is it the same antitrust probe of big tech the Justice Department launched earlier this week.

Why antitrust?

Antitrust investigations focus on behavior regulators deem anticompetitive. The best-known kind of example is when two companies that compete directly against each other want to merge, drastically reducing or eliminating competition in their market. If there are only two companies in the entire US that make a certain kind of nail, for example, the FTC or DOJ would likely sue to block an acquisition between them from happening, because it would pose harm to competition and likely raise prices for nail-buyers everywhere, also affecting suppliers that need nails to build things like houses.

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments