Google can already roll out some new features to Android devices through the Play Store, but updating apps like Google Keyboard, Search, Maps, or Play Services. But major security updates and new operating system features typically require an operating…
Google can already roll out some new features to Android devices through the Play Store, but updating apps like Google Keyboard, Search, Maps, or Play Services. But major security updates and new operating system features typically require an operating system update — and those are harder for Google to roll out on its own, since […]
Two major players in the US sports industries, the NBA and the UFC, have informed lawmakers that illicit online streaming hurts their business. Both urge Congress to criminalize streaming piracy, which is currently only punishable as a misdemeanor. The organizations stressed that casual users should be left alone, although a Game of Thrones-loving Senator feels that some penalties for users are warranted.
Under U.S. law, streaming and downloading piracy are seen as two different offenses. Not just from a technical point of view, but also in the way they are punished.
Unauthorized streaming is categorized as a public performance instead of distribution, which is punishable as a misdemeanor, not a felony.
Lawmakers tried to change this with the Commercial Felony Streaming Act in 2011, and later with the SOPA and PIPA bills. These bills were met with public outrage and didn’t pass.
As a result, the gap between streaming and traditional file-sharing still remains today. However, calls to change this continue to resurface, especially now that streaming piracy is much more prevalent than file-sharing and downloading.
During a hearing at the Senate Committee on the Judiciary last week, two major US sports organizations renewed their calls to criminalize streaming.
Among the speakers were Michael Potenza, vice president and intellectual property counsel for the NBA, as well as Riché McKnight, who’s the Global Head Of Litigation at the UFC’s parent company Endeavor. Both sounded the alarm bell about streaming piracy, live streaming in particular.
Potenza informed the subcommittee on Intellectual Property that his organization relies on streaming and that it has benefited from the technological advancements that were made in recent years. However, these same technologies are abused by pirates.
To fight streaming piracy, the NBA has implemented a multi-pronged approach, of which takedown notices are an important part. The sports league uses a combination of human reviewers and technology to spot illegal broadcasts and tries to shut these down as soon as possible. Unfortunately, many of these reappear soon after.
“Even when the NBA is successful in shutting down an illegal streaming website or social media accounts, continued vigilance during all livegames is important, as the illegal streams often reappear at a new domain extension or social media account,” Potenza said.
NBA’s Mr. Michael Potenza
In some cases, illegal streams are operated or promoted by criminal enterprises. These sell dedicated pirate streaming boxes, unauthorized subscriptions, or offer web-based streaming portals. These dedicated streams can be virtually impossible to shut down, as they are hosted by companies that ignore takedown notices.
“Some of these bad actors actively promote non-compliance with DMCA notices as a reason to sign-up for their ‘DMCA Ignored Hosting’ services. Platforms that utilize these services and fail to respond to take down notices in a timely manner do so intentionally,” Potenza noted.
McKnight shared many of the same concerns. He pointed out that UFC events are severely impacted by piracy and hinted that social media and other digital platforms should step up their game. This includes terminating accounts of known infringers, but these companies could do more.
“In addition, digital platforms should consider sending out piracy notices to their users before live events — or if that is not feasible, then at least periodically — reminding them that piracy is illegal. Much like the copyright notices at the start of a movie, these warnings can remind law-abiding viewers that unauthorized streaming is illegal,” McKnight said.
Another common theme was a renewed call to criminalize online streaming. Both witnesses said that this could help to deter people from getting involved in the pirate streaming business.
“Without a real fear of criminal prosecution, pirates are emboldened to continue engaging in illegal activity to distribute sports content – whether it is manufacturing and selling ISDs or operating an illegal streaming service,” NBA’s Potenza said.
“It is important to revise the criminal law to recognize illegal streaming of copyrighted content as a felony, which would provide a more effective way to deter illegal streaming,” he added.
This call was backed by Endeavor’s Global Head Of Litigation, who added that criminalizing streaming could motivate other countries to follow suit.
“Strengthening the penalties will deter illegal streaming and increase the likelihood of prosecutors bringing these cases to court. In addition, it will send a message to the rest of the world that the United States takes this issue seriously, and will provide other countries an incentive to take similar actions,” McKnight noted.
Endeavor’s (UFC) Mr. Riché McKnight
While the NBA and the UFC’s parent company agree that penalties for streaming should be similar to those of other forms of piracy, both witnesses stressed that this criminalization should target organized operations, not casual users.
“I would clarify that, in terms of proportionality, we’re not seeking these types of penalties for people who simply log onto a pirated stream. Or even just for people who upload a pirated stream or two onto a social media platform,” McKnight said.
“I think the casual viewer who’s streaming a game in his or her own home shouldn’t be subject to felony liability, or even misdemeanor liability,” Potenza added.
Interestingly, the subcommittee Chairman, Senator Thom Tillis, jumped in at this point noting that he believes some penalties are warranted. Just the other day, he was tempted to look for a pirated copy of Game of Thrones, and potential penalties could motivate people to turn to legal sources more often.
“I’m a Game of Thrones fan and I missed the Sunday night episode. Fortunately, I have HBO on demand, so I caught up last night, but there was a temptation for me to go out on the internet and see if I can find some way to get it. I didn’t do it, but if I had, I think it would have been fair if I had some minor penalty,” Tillis said.
“That may at least make the general public a little bit more mindful that if you get caught you’re going to pay for it. You need to be aware of that and make sure that you’re going to sites that are legally disseminating the information. I don’t want to completely let the consuming public off the hook,” the Senator added.
Based on this response, it seems that there is at least some support in Congress to criminalize unauthorized streaming. However, for now, there are no concrete proposals on the table yet.
Google on Tuesday debuted an updated version of its Google Assistant platform during the keynote of its Google I/O developers conference.
The company said it is internally calling this the "next-generation" Assistant and that it will first become available on Google's "new Pixel phones" later this year. (Not to be confused with the budget-friendly Pixel 3a phones Google also announced on Tuesday.)
Google is touting significant performance improvements with the updated Assistant, claiming that it can process and understand voice requests "in real time" and deliver results "up to 10 times faster" than its current iteration. The company says this is primarily due to it condensing the AI models used to interpret speech down to a half a gigabyte, which is small enough for them to process directly on a smartphone instead of requiring remote servers.
Google reduziert die Preise der smarten Lautsprecher Home und Home Max. Vor allem der Home Max wird drastisch günstiger. Keine Änderung gibt es beim Home Mini. (Google I/O 2019, Google)
Google reduziert die Preise der smarten Lautsprecher Home und Home Max. Vor allem der Home Max wird drastisch günstiger. Keine Änderung gibt es beim Home Mini. (Google I/O 2019, Google)
Aus Home Hub wird Nest Hub – Google hat sein erstes Smart Display für den deutschen Markt angekündigt und gleich mal umbenannt. Es läuft mit Google Assistant und hat einen 7 Zoll großen Touchscreen – zu einem attraktiven Preis. Ein Hands on von Ingo P…
Aus Home Hub wird Nest Hub - Google hat sein erstes Smart Display für den deutschen Markt angekündigt und gleich mal umbenannt. Es läuft mit Google Assistant und hat einen 7 Zoll großen Touchscreen - zu einem attraktiven Preis. Ein Hands on von Ingo Pakalski (Google I/O 2019, Google)
Die Gerüchte im Vorfeld der diesjährigen Google I/O waren zahlreich, jetzt hat Google das Pixel 3a und das Pixel 3a XL offiziell vorgestellt. Bei der Kamera müssen Käufer keinerlei Abstriche zum Pixel 3 machen – im Preisbereich von 400 Euro gibt es dem…
Die Gerüchte im Vorfeld der diesjährigen Google I/O waren zahlreich, jetzt hat Google das Pixel 3a und das Pixel 3a XL offiziell vorgestellt. Bei der Kamera müssen Käufer keinerlei Abstriche zum Pixel 3 machen - im Preisbereich von 400 Euro gibt es demnach kaum eine bessere Smartphone-Kamera, wie unser Test zeigt. (Google, Smartphone)
A plastic body, slower SoC, and other cuts get the Pixel down to a new low price.
The Pixel 3a. It looks just like a Pixel. [credit:
Google ]
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.—It's Google I/O keynote day, and as part of the slate of announcements, Google has taken the wraps off of the Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL. This device was heavily leaked in the runup to launch, and the past information has been pretty spot on: we have a cheaper version of the company's flagship Pixel 3 smartphone. The only big question not answered by the leaks was "How much cheaper?" and with the official announcement, we have our answer: the Pixel 3a is $399, and the Pixel 3a XL is $479.
As expected, the cheaper Pixels get cheaper thanks to the switch to a plastic back instead of glass, a cheaper SoC instead of the flagship Snapdragon 845, no water resistance, no wireless charging, and a downgrade to a single front camera instead of the normal + wide-angle dual front camera setup of the Pixel 3.
The smaller Pixel 3a has a 5.6-inch, 2220x1080 OLED display and a 3000mAh battery, while the bigger Pixel 3a XL gets a 6-inch, 2160x1080 OLED with a 3700mAh battery. Both devices have a 2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SoC, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, and a USB-C port. You still get NFC, stereo speakers, squeezable "Active Edge" sides that call up the Google Assistant, an eSIM chip, and an always-on ambient display mode.
Im Chrome-Browser können Nutzer schon seit Jahren im Inkognito-Modus surfen – besuchte Webseiten und Cookies werden dann nicht gespeichert. Die Funktion kommt nun auch für den Kartendienst Maps, später auch für die Suche. Außerdem können alle Nutzer je…
Im Chrome-Browser können Nutzer schon seit Jahren im Inkognito-Modus surfen - besuchte Webseiten und Cookies werden dann nicht gespeichert. Die Funktion kommt nun auch für den Kartendienst Maps, später auch für die Suche. Außerdem können alle Nutzer jetzt AR-Wegweiser verwenden. (Google I/O 2019, Google)
As expected, Google is launching a line of mid-range phones with many of the same features available on the company’s Pixel flagships. The Pixel 3a launches today for $399 and up. While the phones lack some of the premium design features of their…
As expected, Google is launching a line of mid-range phones with many of the same features available on the company’s Pixel flagships. The Pixel 3a launches today for $399 and up. While the phones lack some of the premium design features of their pricier siblings, they have the same high-quality cameras, unlimited Google Photos backup […]
Google is combining its Home and Nest brands and re-branding the Google Home Hub smart display as the Nest Hub. The company is also launching a new, larger model with additional features called the Nest Home Max. Nest Hub Max is coming this summer for …
Google is combining its Home and Nest brands and re-branding the Google Home Hub smart display as the Nest Hub. The company is also launching a new, larger model with additional features called the Nest Home Max. Nest Hub Max is coming this summer for $229 and it sports a 10 inch display, a camera […]
You must be logged in to post a comment.