One of the biggest movies ever released, perhaps the biggest, is coming to Disney’s upcoming streaming platform Disney+.’Avengers: Endgame’ will be arriving on Disney+ on December 11, Disney announced, and it will very likely be a streaming exclusive f…
One of the biggest movies ever released, perhaps the biggest, is coming to Disney's upcoming streaming platform Disney+.
'Avengers: Endgame' will be arriving on Disney+ on December 11, Disney announced, and it will very likely be a streaming exclusive for the platform.
The movie, which has grossed more than $2.3 billion worldwide at the time of publishing, will be a major draw for those still undecided on whether to $6.99 per month fee to access the service.
This is in addition to Marvel's 'Captain Marvel', which Disney has said in the past will be the major title to launch Disney+, when the service goes live in November.
Based on the release schedule for the previous Avengers movie, 'Avengers: Infinity War', the Blu-ray and DVD home release for 'Avengers: Endgame' will occur some time in late August or early September, leaving a three month home video window for the hit movie before it hits Disney+.
In related news, Disney CEO Bog Iger has hinted that Disney will consider purchasing Comcast's stake in streaming service Hulu. Disney now owns 66% of Hulu after its acquisition of 20th Century Fox and the acquisition of WarnerMedia's 10% stake in the streaming platform.
The operator of a Tor exit-node, who stands accused of downloading a pirated copy of the movie Dallas Buyers Club, has dodged a bullet. District Court Judge Michael Simon decided not to adopt a magistrate judge’s recommendation that the man committed willful copyright infringement. As such, the accused pirate still has a chance to win the case.
Tor is an anonymity tool and operating a relay or exit point basically means that the traffic of hundreds or thousands of users hit the Internet from your IP-address.
When pirates use Tor, it will then appear as if the traffic comes from this connection. This can lead to liability issues as Oregon resident John Huszar found out the hard way.
Back in 2015, the company behind the movie Dallas Buyers Club, which is known for its vigorous pursuit of online pirates, filed a federal lawsuit against the IP-address 173.11.1.241.
A few months later, this complaint was amended to list “Integrity Computer Services” as the defendant. As part of the proceedings, the filmmakers served a request for admissions, asking the defendant to respond to several statements.
This request remained unanswered, which turned out to be a crucial mistake. Not responding typically means that the court can assume the statements are true. In this case, it included an admission that Huszar unlawfully distributed a copy of Dallas Buyers Club, which seemingly opened the door to a substantial financial claim.
That John Huszar later repeatedly denied that he personally downloaded a pirated copy of the film in follow-up proceedings was irrelevant, according to the filmmakers.
Backed by the admission, Dallas Buyers Club proceeded to file a motion for summary judgment, asking the court to confirm that Huszar did indeed willfully commit copyright infringement.
This issue went to U.S. Magistrate Judge John Acosta earlier this year who, in his report and recommendation, sided with the movie company.
“The court finds the admissions resulting from Huszar’s failure to deny allegations in the operative complaint or respond to requests for admissions clearly establish Huszar willfully infringed on Dallas’s copyrighted material in violation of the Act,” Acosta wrote.
In most cases, these recommendations are accepted by the district court judge. That was bad news for Huszar, as it would make him liable for thousands of dollars in potential damages.
However, the order that came out this week shows that a previously overlooked issue turned the tables in favor of Huszar.
United States District Judge Michael Simon reviewed the objections that were pointed out by the defense, which highlight a crucial issue. When the request for admissions was served back in 2016, Huszar was not named as a defendant.
At the time the complaint listed his company Integrity Computer Services as the defendant. This was replaced by Huszar in an amended complaint a few months later. However, that meant that the request for admission (RFA) wasn’t directed at Huszar personally.
“The only defendant in the case at that time was simply “Integrity Computer Services,” (no ‘a/k/a’) and that is the only defendant named in the First Amended Complaint,” Judge Simon writes in his order.
“Huszar, therefore, was not the party served with the April 12, 2016 RFAs. The facts sought in those requests thus cannot be deemed admitted by Huszar for failure to respond, and the Court’s order finding such admission is withdrawn.”
As such, the court decided not to adopt the report and recommendation.
The order
The procedural issue was missed by the defense initially, likely because Huszar was defending himself at the time, but the oversight has saved him for now.
“It is a technical issue that no ‘pro-se’ would likely catch. But RFA’s can affect a case significantly as was clear from the Magistrate’s decision. This is the error we brought up to the District Court’s attention that led to the ruling in our favor,” Huszar’s attorney J. Curtis Edmondson informs TorrentFreak.
While Huszar escapes a ruling of willful copyright infringement based on the admissions, the case is not over yet. The motion for summary judgment is now reverted back to Judge Acosta for consideration on the merits.
Huszar’s cross-motion of non-infringement is still on the table. Among other things, Huszar has argued that the evidence gathering software used in this case is flawed and unreliable.
Both sides are now allowed to submit supplement pleadings. Huszar ultimately hopes to prove that he is not guilty and have his legal bills paid. The filmmakers, on the other hand, plan to prove that the Tor exit node operator is guilty and demand damages.
—
A copy of United States District Judge Michael Simon’s order is available here (pdf).
Die Polizei in Bayern hat offenbar nicht nur KFZ-Kennzeichen mit Listen abgeglichen, sondern die Kennzeichen-Scans auch gespeichert und ausgewertet. Das Verfassungsgericht hatte den Abgleich und die Überwachung gestoppt. (Datenschutz, Internet)
Die Polizei in Bayern hat offenbar nicht nur KFZ-Kennzeichen mit Listen abgeglichen, sondern die Kennzeichen-Scans auch gespeichert und ausgewertet. Das Verfassungsgericht hatte den Abgleich und die Überwachung gestoppt. (Datenschutz, Internet)
Nach ersten Vorermittlungen starten die Wettbewerbshüter Indiens nun offiziell ein Verfahren gegen Google wegen dessen Marktmacht mit Android. Die Vorwürfe ähneln denen in Europa, wonach Google seine Konkurrenz blockieren soll. (Android, Google)
Nach ersten Vorermittlungen starten die Wettbewerbshüter Indiens nun offiziell ein Verfahren gegen Google wegen dessen Marktmacht mit Android. Die Vorwürfe ähneln denen in Europa, wonach Google seine Konkurrenz blockieren soll. (Android, Google)
Lego-version of the US’s second largest church has some clever sci-fi references.
The inside of the Bethlehem Chapel replica, which is a small chapel in the basement of the cathedral. It is nearly complete except for the vaulted ceilings.
WASHINGTON, DC—As millions of dollars in donations stacked up for the Notre-Dame following the horrific fire last month, the Washington National Cathedral was quietly building its own restoration fund—brick-by-plastic brick.
Together with the Lego-building company Bright Bricks, officials at the cathedral have embarked on a project to build a massive replica of the cathedral out of Lego bricks. The project will raise money for much needed earthquake repairs. When complete, the towering yet detailed 1:40-scaled replica will be the largest Lego cathedral in the world. It’ll contain an estimated 500,000 bricks, weighing 612 kilograms, measuring nearly 4-meters long, 2.5-meters wide, and rising 3.35-meters from its elevated platform. It may also be the largest Lego structure ever built from instructions—officials at the cathedral are in talks with Guinness World Records.
Those instructions—created by the designers and professional Lego aficionados at Bright Bricks—are used by volunteers and kind donors who buy individual bricks and place them on the growing replica by hand. The bricks go for $2 each and all the money goes toward the $19 million needed to repair damage from a 5.8-magnitude earthquake in 2011.
Einem Medienbericht zufolge soll Windows 10 nun auf mehr als 800 Millionen Geräten laufen. Hersteller Microsoft hatte ursprünglich als Ziel 1 Milliarde Geräte bis 2018 ausgegeben. Windows 10 hat erst vor kurzem die Verbreitung von Windows 7 überholt. (…
Einem Medienbericht zufolge soll Windows 10 nun auf mehr als 800 Millionen Geräten laufen. Hersteller Microsoft hatte ursprünglich als Ziel 1 Milliarde Geräte bis 2018 ausgegeben. Windows 10 hat erst vor kurzem die Verbreitung von Windows 7 überholt. (Windows 10, Microsoft)
Neither requires external sensors—but does either live up to its price point?
Enlarge/ The $600 HP Reverb (left) and $400 Oculus Rift S (right).
By the end of 2019, many major VR headset manufacturers seem poised to launch a new "statement" product for PCs. This month sees two such headsets reach store shelves: the Oculus Rift S (coming May 21, priced at $400) and the HP Reverb (out now, starting at $600).
In both companies' cases, the statement from each headset is a mix of upgrade and compromise. Rift S sees Oculus take two steps forward, two steps back, from its three-year-old Rift headset to establish a new "baseline" PC-VR experience, particularly with active hand tracking in mind. Meanwhile, Reverb aims to deliver the most affordable "high-res" VR headset ever made—which, as you might expect, includes a few imperfections, ranging from the obvious to the surprising.
After living with both headsets, I can report that each headset's sales pitch is totally fine, not game-changing, and both are worth scrutinizing—because neither is currently a slam-dunk recommendation.
Mit den Iframes können Web-Inhalte in andere Teile einer Webseite eingebettet werden. Google möchte mit den Portals einen Ersatz dafür schaffen. Sie sollen zudem “aktiviert” werden können, um einfachere Übergänge zu gestalten. (Chrome, Google)
Mit den Iframes können Web-Inhalte in andere Teile einer Webseite eingebettet werden. Google möchte mit den Portals einen Ersatz dafür schaffen. Sie sollen zudem "aktiviert" werden können, um einfachere Übergänge zu gestalten. (Chrome, Google)
Der Code-Hoster Github bietet Open-Source-Projekten und Kunden künftig eigene Paketquellen für Sprachen und Programmierumgebungen. Diese Registrys werden für viele übliche Clients wie NPM, Maven und andere angeboten. (Github, Ruby)
Der Code-Hoster Github bietet Open-Source-Projekten und Kunden künftig eigene Paketquellen für Sprachen und Programmierumgebungen. Diese Registrys werden für viele übliche Clients wie NPM, Maven und andere angeboten. (Github, Ruby)
Maserati takes aim at the Porsche Cayenne Turbo with the $120,000 Levante GTS.
The Levante in Sport Mode, low to the ground. [credit:
BradleyWarren Photography ]
When we last checked in with Maserati, the Italian luxury carmaker had unleashed the Levante on the North American car-buying public. Starting at around $75,000, the Levante is a striking, six-cylinder SUV that ticked all the boxes when it comes to riding in comfort and style. With corporate sibling Alfa Romeo and VW-owned Lamborghini building some ridiculously fast SUVs, the otherwise-impressive stats—424hp (316kW), a top speed of 164mph (264km/h), and a 0-60mph time of 5.0 seconds—on the V6 Levante S looked less so.
Enter the Levante GTS and Levante Trofeo. Both models swap out the six-cylinder engine for a V8. The Trofeo starts at $169,980. And with 590hp (440kW) at its disposal, it is capable of making zero to 60 in 3.7 seconds on its way to a top speed of 187mph (300km/h). Impressive, but that price tag definitely isn't for the faint of heart. If you love fast and stylish Italian crossovers and are OK with spending, say $120,000 instead of $170,000 on one, keep reading. And if you're thinking about the Porsche Cayenne, take note of the GTS and Trofeo's price points—they're almost identical to the Cayenne.
When I reviewed the Levante S last year, I called it a "stunner." A year later, the Levante is still easily the most beautiful SUV or crossover on the market (which for some may be akin to calling someone the best-looking forward in a scrum). The Levante GTS has some subtle tweaks to the exterior to differentiate it from the V6 models, primarily to the rear bumper and front fascia. On the interior, the GTS has premium leather seats, Alcantara headliners, a tweaked gearshift lever, and an upgraded MTS+ infotainment system.
You must be logged in to post a comment.