Raw milk drinkers in 19 states at risk of rare, dangerous infectious disease

Without pasteurization, scary, elusive bacteria are on the loose.

Raw milk drinkers in 19 states at risk of rare, dangerous infectious disease

Enlarge (credit: Getty | Thomas Trutschel )

If the explosion of measles cases hasn’t made you question what year it is, this health alert from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may inspire a double-take at the calendar: Unpasteurized milk may have sickened people in 19 states.

Yes, as the country grapples with five—count’em, five—outbreaks of a vaccine-preventable disease, the CDC is warning that another infectious disease of yore poses a risk to widespread dairy drinkers—at least the ones who soured on the standard, decades-old process to remove deadly pathogens from their milk.

The infectious disease is Brucellosis. It’s a hard-to-define febrile illness caused by Gram-negative Brucella bacterial species that infect a variety of animals and the occasional unlucky human. There are four species that pose particular risks to humans: Brucella suis, found in pigs; Brucella melitensis, found in sheep and goats; Brucella canis, from dogs; and—the one at the center of this current health alert—Brucella abortus, which is carried by cattle. Usually, the disease pops up in developing countries. But in the US, meatpackers, hunters, veterinarians, farmers, and careless microbiologists are at risk—as well as those who consume unpasteurized dairy.

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Aluminum may be key to making exosolar systems with water worlds

Radioactive aluminum could control water content of planetary building blocks.

Should we expect all the planets of an exosolar system to have similar levels of water?

Enlarge / Should we expect all the planets of an exosolar system to have similar levels of water? (credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

Mini-Neptunes. Super-Earths. There's a huge diversity of exoplanets out there, many of them unlike anything we have in our Solar System. So how does a single physical process—the aggregation of bodies within a disk of gas and dust—produce so many different outcomes?

That's a question tackled by a paper in this week's Nature Astronomy. An international team of researchers has modeled the formation of planets early in the history of exosolar systems. And they find it's possible to radically change the water content of planets based on the amount of a radioactive element present in the material forming the exosolar system. The difference, they suggest, can determine whether a system is filled with ocean worlds or whether it winds up looking more like our own Solar System.

Wet or dry?

We already have some idea of what sets the level of water on a planet. The material in a planet-forming disk is heated both by collisions among its material and from the inside-out by the star once it ignites. Different materials will freeze out at specific distances from the star, creating multiple snow lines for water, carbon dioxide, methane, and more. Depending on which side of the snow lines an exoplanet forms, it will have more or less of these materials.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Selling 911 location data is illegal—US carriers reportedly did it anyway

AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint sale of GPS data called “unquestionably illegal.”

A person's hand holding a smartphone that is displaying a map.

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | skaman306)

Three of the four major wireless carriers have been accused of breaking US law by selling 911 location data to third parties.

"Telecom giants broke the law by selling detailed location data" that was "meant for use only by emergency services," consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge said last week in a blog post that urged the Federal Communications Commission to punish the carriers.

Public Knowledge's statement came in response to a Motherboard article last week that provided new details about how carriers collect location data from customers and sell it to third parties.

Read 26 remaining paragraphs | Comments

EU Reaches Deal on Article 13 and Other Copyright Reform Plans

The European Parliament and Council agreed on the final text of the EU Copyright Directive. This includes the controversial Article 13, which opponents fear will lead to broad upload filters. The full package will now go to the European Parliament for a final vote, which is expected to take place in March or April.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Last September the European Parliament backed the controversial Article 13 plans, which are part of the EU’s broader copyright reform plans.

This was followed by several rounds of trilogue negotiations, during which the final text would be drawn up. This process was completed today.

The European Parliament and Council have finally agreed on a final text of the EU copyright reforms. This includes Article 13, which was highly debated and criticized over the past several months.

Despite the protests and objections, which also came from rightsholders in recent weeks, lawmakers didn’t slow down.

The final version of Article 13 is based on the compromise deal France and Germany struck last week.

In short, it requires for-profit Internet platforms to license content from copyright holders. If that is not possible, they should ensure that infringing content is taken down and not re-uploaded to their services.

This will essentially mandate “upload filters,” opponents have warned, but that wasn’t much of a stumbling block during the negotiations. The main point of contention was which services should adhere to the new rules.

Last September’s version of Article 13 excluded small businesses, but that’s no longer the case.

If a service is publicly available for less than three years, with fewer than five million unique visitors per month, and an annual turnover of less than €10 million, only then it is excluded.

This means that only small startups will not be bound by the new rules. These companies will still have to do their best to obtain licenses from rightsholders. However, they will not be forced to prevent infringing content from being re-uploaded.

According to Pirate Party MEP Julia Reda, who has been highly critical of the plans, the current version of Article 13 is even worse than before.

“This deal is a threat to small publishers, authors and internet users alike and risks putting the internet as we know it solely in the hands of the tech and media giants,” Reda comments.

“Even the most sophisticated upload filters routinely block perfectly legal content. Requiring platforms to use upload filters would not just lead to more frequent blocking of legal uploads, it would also make life difficult for smaller platforms that cannot afford filtering software,” she adds.

Today’s deal follows months of protests, mostly from people who fear that upload filters will decrease freedom of speech. This includes #SaveYourInternet, as well as a widely shared petition that was signed by more than 4.7 million people.

Various major copyright industry groups also voiced concerns, but not about filters. They feared that a watered down version of Article 13 would do more harm than good so suggested that it might be better to scrap it entirely.

Not all artists appreciated this stance, but it might very well have been a negotiating tactic.

EU copyright rapporteur Axel Voss, who’s one of the driving forces behind the plans, nonetheless found plenty of support in the creative community. He repeatedly argued that Article 13 and other proposals are needed to make sure that copyright holders get the money they deserve.

The deal that was just reached doesn’t come as a complete surprise and it’s not the end of the road just yet. The European Parliament still has the final vote, which is expected to take place in March or April, before the EU elections.

Julia Reda and other opponents hope that a final push can convince the various representatives to reject Article 13 and well as Article 11, which is known for the ‘link tax.’

“Today’s news is a backwards step for freedom of expression online, but it’s not the end of the road, we can still fight against damaging upload filters and a link tax. We need to send a clear message that we want to protect authors’ rights as well as users and small publishers,” Reda notes.

Those who support the proposals will continue their campaigns as well, so expect to see more new about it leading up to the final vote.

Breaking news, more updates may follow. 

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

EU Reaches Deal on Article 13 and Other Copyright Reform Plans

The European Parliament and Council agreed on the final text of the EU Copyright Directive. This includes the controversial Article 13, which opponents fear will lead to broad upload filters. The full package will now go to the European Parliament for a final vote, which is expected to take place in March or April.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Last September the European Parliament backed the controversial Article 13 plans, which are part of the EU’s broader copyright reform plans.

This was followed by several rounds of trilogue negotiations, during which the final text would be drawn up. This process was completed today.

The European Parliament and Council have finally agreed on a final text of the EU copyright reforms. This includes Article 13, which was highly debated and criticized over the past several months.

Despite the protests and objections, which also came from rightsholders in recent weeks, lawmakers didn’t slow down.

The final version of Article 13 is based on the compromise deal France and Germany struck last week.

In short, it requires for-profit Internet platforms to license content from copyright holders. If that is not possible, they should ensure that infringing content is taken down and not re-uploaded to their services.

This will essentially mandate “upload filters,” opponents have warned, but that wasn’t much of a stumbling block during the negotiations. The main point of contention was which services should adhere to the new rules.

Last September’s version of Article 13 excluded small businesses, but that’s no longer the case.

If a service is publicly available for less than three years, with fewer than five million unique visitors per month, and an annual turnover of less than €10 million, only then it is excluded.

This means that only small startups will not be bound by the new rules. These companies will still have to do their best to obtain licenses from rightsholders. However, they will not be forced to prevent infringing content from being re-uploaded.

According to Pirate Party MEP Julia Reda, who has been highly critical of the plans, the current version of Article 13 is even worse than before.

“This deal is a threat to small publishers, authors and internet users alike and risks putting the internet as we know it solely in the hands of the tech and media giants,” Reda comments.

“Even the most sophisticated upload filters routinely block perfectly legal content. Requiring platforms to use upload filters would not just lead to more frequent blocking of legal uploads, it would also make life difficult for smaller platforms that cannot afford filtering software,” she adds.

Today’s deal follows months of protests, mostly from people who fear that upload filters will decrease freedom of speech. This includes #SaveYourInternet, as well as a widely shared petition that was signed by more than 4.7 million people.

Various major copyright industry groups also voiced concerns, but not about filters. They feared that a watered down version of Article 13 would do more harm than good so suggested that it might be better to scrap it entirely.

Not all artists appreciated this stance, but it might very well have been a negotiating tactic.

EU copyright rapporteur Axel Voss, who’s one of the driving forces behind the plans, nonetheless found plenty of support in the creative community. He repeatedly argued that Article 13 and other proposals are needed to make sure that copyright holders get the money they deserve.

The deal that was just reached doesn’t come as a complete surprise and it’s not the end of the road just yet. The European Parliament still has the final vote, which is expected to take place in March or April, before the EU elections.

Julia Reda and other opponents hope that a final push can convince the various representatives to reject Article 13 and well as Article 11, which is known for the ‘link tax.’

“Today’s news is a backwards step for freedom of expression online, but it’s not the end of the road, we can still fight against damaging upload filters and a link tax. We need to send a clear message that we want to protect authors’ rights as well as users and small publishers,” Reda notes.

Those who support the proposals will continue their campaigns as well, so expect to see more new about it leading up to the final vote.

Breaking news, more updates may follow. 

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Leistungsschutzrecht und Uploadfilter: EU-Unterhändler einigen sich auf Urheberrechtsreform

Nach zähen Verhandlungen haben sich Parlament, Kommission und Mitgliedstaaten der EU auf eine Reform des Urheberrechts geeinigt. Doch der Streit über das Leistungsschutzrecht und Uploadfilter ist noch nicht zu Ende, weil die umstrittene Richtlinie noch…

Nach zähen Verhandlungen haben sich Parlament, Kommission und Mitgliedstaaten der EU auf eine Reform des Urheberrechts geeinigt. Doch der Streit über das Leistungsschutzrecht und Uploadfilter ist noch nicht zu Ende, weil die umstrittene Richtlinie noch zwei wichtige Hürden nehmen muss. (Leistungsschutzrecht, Urheberrecht)

Google Chrome is getting virtual desktops (probably)

If you’re the sort of person who regularly runs a bunch of programs on your computer at once, you may already be a fan of using multiple monitors. You can put one set of apps on one screen and a different set on another and tilt your head a bit t…

If you’re the sort of person who regularly runs a bunch of programs on your computer at once, you may already be a fan of using multiple monitors. You can put one set of apps on one screen and a different set on another and tilt your head a bit to switch your focus from […]

The post Google Chrome is getting virtual desktops (probably) appeared first on Liliputing.

This could be the LG G8 ThinQ smartphone (leaks)

LG has already told us that its next flagship smartphone will have a 3D depth-sensing camera that uses Time of Flight technology. Now we have a pretty good idea of what that camera will look like, thanks to a set of pictures leaked by Evan Blass. They …

LG has already told us that its next flagship smartphone will have a 3D depth-sensing camera that uses Time of Flight technology. Now we have a pretty good idea of what that camera will look like, thanks to a set of pictures leaked by Evan Blass. They also give us a good look at the […]

The post This could be the LG G8 ThinQ smartphone (leaks) appeared first on Liliputing.

Android Things is no longer for “Things,” focuses on smart speakers and displays

The good news is that Google still has, like, three other IoT OS projects.

This Lenovo Google Assistant Smart Display is one of the first devices to ship with Android Things.

Enlarge / This Lenovo Google Assistant Smart Display is one of the first devices to ship with Android Things.

Android Things, Google's stripped-down version of Android named for its focus on the "Internet of Things" (IoT), is now no longer focused on IoT. A post on the Android Developers Blog announced the pivot, saying, "Given the successes we have seen with our partners in smart speakers and smart displays, we are refocusing Android Things as a platform for OEM partners to build devices in those categories moving forward."

Originally, Android Things was Google's stripped-down version of Android for everything smaller than a smartphone or smartwatch. The goal was to have the OS be the IoT version of Android, but rather than the skinnable, open source version of Android that exists on phones, Android Things is a "managed platform"—a hands-off OS with a centralized, Google-managed update system. Just like Windows, manufacturers would load an untouched version of the OS and be restricted to the app layer of the software package. Today, legions of IoT devices are out there running random operating systems with basically no plan to keep up with security vulnerabilities, and the result is a security nightmare. The wider Android ecosystem doesn't have a great reputation when it comes to security, but Android Things updates are completely managed by Google via a centralized update system, and just like a Pixel phone, devices running Things would have been some of the most up-to-date and secure devices available.

Seeing Android Things undergo a major pivot now is pretty strange. The OS has just survived a lengthy initial development cycle (originally, Android Things started out as a rebrand of "Project Brillo"), and it only hit version 1.0 nine months ago. The first consumer products with Android Things, third-party smart displays like the Lenovo Smart Display, only launched in July.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Daily Deals (2-13-2019)

Tomorrow is Valentine’s Day and Monday is Presidents’ Day, and for some reason retailers love to use those holidays as excuses for sales. I’m not complaining… I just don’t see the connection. Anyway, if you’re in the…

Tomorrow is Valentine’s Day and Monday is Presidents’ Day, and for some reason retailers love to use those holidays as excuses for sales. I’m not complaining… I just don’t see the connection. Anyway, if you’re in the market for a new laptop, there are probably worse times to shop. Right now Asus, Dell, and Lenovo […]

The post Daily Deals (2-13-2019) appeared first on Liliputing.