Projekt Jedi: Microsoft will weiter mit US-Militär zusammenarbeiten

In einem Blogbeitrag hat sich Microsoft-Präsident Brad Smith zur Zusammenarbeit mit dem US-Verteidigungsministerium bekannt. Mitarbeiter, die nicht an derartigen Projekten arbeiten wollen, sollen in andere Bereiche des Unternehmens wechseln können. (Mi…

In einem Blogbeitrag hat sich Microsoft-Präsident Brad Smith zur Zusammenarbeit mit dem US-Verteidigungsministerium bekannt. Mitarbeiter, die nicht an derartigen Projekten arbeiten wollen, sollen in andere Bereiche des Unternehmens wechseln können. (Microsoft, Google)

Garmin Vivosmart 4 review: The attractive new face of the Vivosmart line

The $129 band looks better and tracks more than any previous Vivosmart device.

Garmin Vivosmart 4 review: The attractive new face of the Vivosmart line

Enlarge (credit: Valentina Palladino)

Fitness tech companies, particularly Fitbit and Garmin, want to monitor the level of oxygen in your blood. It's a metric that could help spot signs of sleep apnea and other breathing-related problems, so companies have been scrambling to perfect their SpO2 sensors and incorporate this data into their ecosystems in a meaningful way.

Fitbit still hasn't activated its SpO2 monitors in its wearables (although that feature should roll out in beta in November), but Garmin has. Its newest fitness tracker, the $129 Vivosmart 4, includes an SpO2 monitor and measures Body Battery, which lets you know when you should plan your next intense workout session and when you should take a rest day.

Those two features, in addition to an all-new design and an affordable price, attempt to push the Vivosmart 4 above the rest of the fitness tracker crowd. As we saw with Fitbit's Charge 3, trackers have fallen into a boredom trap as of late, so companies are trying to find unique ways to capture the attention of potential customers who aren't fully sold on smartwatches. While Garmin achieves a certain level of differentiation with the Vivosmart 4, it's unlikely that everyone who prefers fitness bands to smartwatches will gravitate toward this device.

Read 37 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Star Wars: Boba-Fett-Film ist “zu 100 Prozent tot”

Es wird wohl doch keinen dritten Star-Wars-Ableger geben, der sich um den kultigen Kopfgeldjäger Boba Fett dreht. Das wird laut einem Medienbericht teils auf den geringen Erfolg des Han-Solo-Films zurückgeführt. Stattdessen soll ein bisher unbekannter …

Es wird wohl doch keinen dritten Star-Wars-Ableger geben, der sich um den kultigen Kopfgeldjäger Boba Fett dreht. Das wird laut einem Medienbericht teils auf den geringen Erfolg des Han-Solo-Films zurückgeführt. Stattdessen soll ein bisher unbekannter Charakter in einer Serie die mandalorianische Rüstung anziehen. (Star Wars, Film)

SickRage Rebrands to SickChill to Avoid Trademark War

SickRage, a piece of software designed to monitor torrent and Usenet platforms for the latest TV shows, download them, and add them to a user’s library, is undergoing a rebranding exercise. After a former developer applied to trademark the term ‘SickRage’, the team decided that a war would be overly draining. Moving forward, it will now be known as ‘SickChill’.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Earlier this month we reported on problems facing SickRage, a successful ‘fork’ of the Sick Beard PVR-like software that utilizes Usenet, torrent indexers, and TheTVDB to identify airing dates for TV shows and automatically download them whenever they became available.

SickRage is a GNU General Public Licensed tool that improved on Sick Beard to gain an impressive following. However, a growing dispute with a former developer known as Echel0n has proven a distraction for the past year, with Echel0n launching his own SickRage variant (SickRageTV) at SickRage.ca and filing complaints with Github to have SickRage taken down.

Unfortunately, the problems haven’t stopped there. In addition to the DMCA notices filed against his former project, Echel0n filed a trademark application in September in an effort to prevent his old team from using the term ‘SickRage’.

SickRage trademark filing

Brandishing this application, Echel0n (real name Justin Tabish) fired off a complaint to developer Dustyn Gibson (aka ‘Miigotu‘) of the SickRage project, warning him to cease and desist using the SickRage trademark.

The application and subsequent threats haven’t been particularly well-received by many in the SickRage community. Tabish, however, won’t have a fight on his hands. The SickRage team informs TorrentFreak that they will “totally wipe their hands of this Echel0n nonsense” by undergoing a rebranding exercise. Moving forward, the old SickRage project will now be known as SickChill.

“Even though it was giving [Echel0n] what he wanted, it was in the best interest of the users to distance themselves from the copyright infringement issues he has opened for anything related to his (yet to be granted) trademarked work ‘Sickrage’,” SickChill developer Miigotu informs TF.

Indeed, a timeline reviewed by TorrentFreak reveals that while Echel0n was involved in the project as early as March 2014, the years that followed were peppered by friction and multiple disputes, reaching peaks in July 2017 with multiple DMCA notices filed by Echel0n, with further attempts at taking over the project on Github this October.

Miigotu also reveals that on October 5, 2018, Echel0n attempted to starve the project of its income.

“Echel0n filed an IP infringement with PayPal and had my PayPal locked, claiming I was stealing and selling his product because I had a donation button on our wiki. It was restored about a week later,” Miigotu explains.

In addition to reports that Echel0n previously added bitcoin-mining software to his SickRage variant at SickRage.ca, a report on Github just over a week ago revealed more issues, with a trojan reportedly being served from the .ca domain.

While Google’s malware scanner currently reports no issues with the domain, TorrentFreak’s attempts to reach SickRage.ca were prevented by a trojan warning generated by MalwareBytes.

“We found proof that his software is malicious and using his personal computer as a requests auth adapter for all providers, so all of the users’ logins for private trackers pass through his gateway, and scanners actually pick this traffic up,” Miigotu claims.

For his part, Echel0n says that the bitcoin mining was quickly discontinued and he denies that tracker logins were ever stored.

“[T]he bitcoin mining was publicly announced on my forums as a means to help pay for the project servers, shortly it was stopped/removed as it caused more issues than good,” he said in a response to Miigotu.

“Never has SiCKRAGE stored private torrent tracker login details, you’re a coder you should know this as the app doesn’t transmit any of that data!”

It’s unclear whether the warring factions will now be able to go in their own directions in peace, or whether the problems will persist moving forward. It’s probably safe to say, however, that both projects will benefit when less time is taken up by fighting.

The rebranded SickChill project can be found here, with all references to SickRage now removed. The domain SickRage.tv is also for sale, with all proceeds going to the EFF.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Lenovo: Fehlerhafte Bios-Einstellung macht Thinkpads unbrauchbar

Die Bios-Unterstützung für Thunderbolt bei Thinkpads zu aktivieren, ist derzeit keine gute Idee: Mehrere Nutzer berichten von nicht mehr startenden Notebooks, nachdem sie diese Funktion aktiviert haben. Das konnte auf diversen Linux-Distributionen, abe…

Die Bios-Unterstützung für Thunderbolt bei Thinkpads zu aktivieren, ist derzeit keine gute Idee: Mehrere Nutzer berichten von nicht mehr startenden Notebooks, nachdem sie diese Funktion aktiviert haben. Das konnte auf diversen Linux-Distributionen, aber auch mit Windows 10 repliziert werden. (Lenovo, Business-Notebooks)

New Hope for Abandoned Online Games: Copyright Office Adds Exemption

The US Copyright Office has added an exemption for abandoned online games that will give hope to efforts to archive and preserve these games.The US Copyright Office routinely adds (prevents the addition of, and removes) exemptions to existing copyright…



The US Copyright Office has added an exemption for abandoned online games that will give hope to efforts to archive and preserve these games.

The US Copyright Office routinely adds (prevents the addition of, and removes) exemptions to existing copyright law based on submissions from rights-holders, digital rights groups and other interested parties. 

In the latest round of exemptions, the Copyright Office will now give consumers back the "right to repair", meaning they are now allowed to break copyright laws, including circumventing DRM and other copy-protection schemes, in order to fix the devices they own.

The Copyright Office also added exemptions for filmmakers, not just documentary makers, to rip DVDs and Blu-ray to extract clips and footage to use in their own creations.

But perhaps the most interesting new exemption made relates to abandoned online games. While offline games have already received an exemption in the past, the same was not afforded to online games. Those that tried to preserve abandoned online games where unable to do so legally, if they tried to recreate the online servers needed for the game and to bypass any copyright control measure that may be present.

Under this new exemption, this now possible, and organisations such as San Francisco’s Museum of Art and Digital Entertainment (MADE) can start their efforts to archive these games for posterity.

"We've gained a small victory that will help us save dead MMOs, provided, of course, we have been given the original server code by the owning entity. The exemption allows us to circumvent any DRM or other restrictions included in the game, or around it," MADE founder Alex Handy told TorrentFreak.

[via TorrentFreak]

What Apple might announce at its October 30 “special event” in Brooklyn

Apple will unveil new iPads, but the Mac prospects are even more intriguing.

The 10.5-inch (left) and 9.7-inch iPad Pros.

Enlarge / The 10.5-inch (left) and 9.7-inch iPad Pros. (credit: Andrew Cunningham)

This coming Tuesday, Apple will host its second live product announcement even of the fall. While September's event focused on three new iPhone models and an updated Apple Watch, we expect this event to include updates to the iPad Pro that would add new power user features and bring the device closer in design to the company's latest iPhones. We wouldn't be surprised to see some new Macs, too.

The event will take place at the Howard Gilman Opera House and Brooklyn Academy of Music. The last event was at Apple's headquarters in Cupertino, but it's not unusual for the company to branch out to new locations that fit the theme of the products being introduced. For example, the company introduced its education-targeted iPads at a school in Chicago earlier this year.

To that point, creative work seems to be the implied focus of the products coming this week. There's the venue, yes, but Apple also accompanied members of the press' invitation with the words "there's more in the making" and a series of artists' renditions of its logos in various styles, pictured here.

Read 24 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Mail bombing suspect repeatedly threatened Democrats on Twitter

Social media site removes account only after it comes under intense scrutiny.

The images accompanying a tweet authorities believe was sent by the recently alleged package bomber, Cesar Altieri Sayoc.

Enlarge / The images accompanying a tweet authorities believe was sent by the recently alleged package bomber, Cesar Altieri Sayoc. (credit: Twitter)

Cesar Altieri Sayoc, the suspect in the nationwide bombing campaign against critics of President Trump, regularly took to Twitter to make thinly veiled death threats against other users and peppered some of the targets with abuse, according to a quick review of an account authorities believe belongs to Sayoc. Twitter initially allowed the posts to remain despite its stated policy barring threats.

Former Vice President Joe Biden, actor Jim Carrey, director and former actor Ron Howard, and the TMZ celebrity news service all received tweets from someone using the handle @hardrock2016 that made thinly veiled threats against their lives. Rochelle Ritchie, a political commentator who tweets under the @RochelleRitchie handle, received a similar tweet warning her that “We have nice silent air boat ride for u here on Everglades swamp. We will see you 4 sure. Hug your loved ones real close every time you leave home.” Similar to the tweets sent to others, the message directed at Ritchie included an image of her and accompanying images of the tarot card for death and TV news coverage purporting to report on a body being recovered from the Everglades.

Five hours, later, Ritchie tweeted that Twitter asked her to disregard the earlier refusal. "We've investigated and suspended the account you reported as it was found to be participating in abusive behavior," company representatives wrote.

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments

JustWatch Video Search Engine Calls For MPAA ‘Pirate’ Blacklist

JustWatch, a search engine that directs consumers to legal movie and TV streaming options, has aired a rather controversial opinion on how to reduce piracy. The service believes the MPAA and Google should maintain a ‘pirate blacklist’ to ensure that infringing websites are removed from search results.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

For those unfamiliar with the service, JustWatch is a search engine that aims to direct consumers to legal options for TV shows and movies.

“We show you where you can legally watch movies and TV shows that you love. You are kept up to date with what is new on Netflix, Amazon Prime, iTunes and many other streaming platforms,” the company explains.

“Our simple filter system allows you to see only what is important to you. We also tell you where and when to watch movies on the big screen so you never miss when a movie is running in cinema again.”

TF covered JustWatch back in 2015 after the company acknowledged the negative effect Google’s “Pirate Update” had on torrent sites but somehow left streaming sites relatively unscathed.

Speaking with JustWatch this week, we asked the company if anything had changed over the past three years. Noting that a dedicated report will be out in the coming months, JustWatch says that it’s still unhappy with the situation at Google.

“We can already tell you that the situation (obviously) hasn’t changed much,” JustWatch Head of Growth Lise Le Petit told us.

“Google takes those illegal sites down regularly, but new ones pop up really fast and climb up in rankings pretty quick. In the end, there are as many pirate sites as 4 years ago swarming the Google search – they are just different ones.”

The big question, then, is what can be done? JustWatch says that instead of tackling problems once they’ve appeared in search results, Google should prevent sites from being indexed in the first place. And this where the controversy begins.

“Google could build up a Domain-Blacklist, which is owned/maintained by the MPAA in the US and Google, and would filter websites infringing on copyright,” Le Petit says.

“A company files against a whole domain and within a certain timeframe (2-3 weeks) all results of this website get deleted. We guess illegal sites won’t officially reply. The idea would be that instead of cleaning out single URLs, spammy domains would get flagged instantly as a whole.”

JustWatch doesn’t really believe such a thing will be implemented since Google “will never give away power over what they decide to show or not in their search result pages.” That being said, Google isn’t the only problem here.

A couple of weeks ago we reported how another search engine for legal content had experienced problems with wrongful DMCA notices targeting its domain. So, we wondered, might JustWatch be suffering the same issues?

A swift look at Google’s Transparency Report reveals that JustWatch, despite being entirely legal, is regularly targeted by anti-piracy companies. They write to Google claiming JustWatch is a pirate site and demanding that links are taken down from its indexes.

JustWatch – regularly and wrongfully targeted

The great irony here is that these companies end up taking down links to their own legal content, if Google lets their erroneous claims slip through. Worse still, even though Hollywood is being touted as a possible “blacklist” maintainer, plenty of movie companies and their business partners are wrongfully taking down links to a perfectly legal platform.

In a notice from March 2018, Disney demands that a JustWatch link to Zootopia should be removed. In fact, JustWatch was simply promoting legal platforms where people can buy the movie.

In another, Sony Pictures Worldwide attempted to take down a JustWatch link to the movie No Way Jose, which was advising people to buy the movie from Apple, Google Play, and Amazon, among others.

Amazon itself can’t escape criticism either. In a notice sent by its anti-piracy company to ‘protect’ the TV show Inside Edge on Prime Video, the company tried to take down a JustWatch page which was actually trying to drive sales to Amazon.

Is driving Amazon sales a crime? Apparently…

While JustWatch would like to see some kind of blacklist, the company understands the pitfalls. It believes that transparency could be part of the solution, in much the same way that Google’s Transparency report shines light on the often-messy DMCA takedown process.

“The major drawback we see is the risk of censorship for websites that do not suit the MPAA – which is why this is a pretty controversial topic – and it should be,” Le Petit says.

“Although, if there is the will to change, one could make such a list accessible and transparent (including its criteria) to the public – plus the option for everyone to file against entries, for example.

“In the end, the real question is whether leaving full control to the black hole that is Google is better than creating a blacklist that might be seen as censorship,” she concludes.

Just like rightsholders, JustWatch has a vested interest in seeing ‘pirate’ links disappear from search results since that elevates its own links towards Google’s front page.

That said, Google doesn’t seem keen to censor sites voluntarily but the world could get a glimpse of what that looks like fairly soon regardless, with Australia edging closer to approving legislation to remove blocked pirate sites from search results.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.