Kim Dotcom Privacy Act Appeal Underway at the High Court

Back in March, the Human Rights Tribunal in New Zealand ruled that the Government violated the Privacy Act by withholding information from Kim Dotcom. The Megaupload founder was awarded NZ$60,000 in damages for “loss of dignity or injury to feelings” plus a further NZ$30,000. The Attorney-General appealed the decision and the hearing is now underway at the High Court.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Way back in 2012, Kim Dotcom’s cloud storage site Megaupload was shut down in a massively blaze of publicity. Ever since, Dotcom and several of his former colleagues have been fighting extradition to the United States.

Dotcom’s strategy in New Zealand has been to challenge all aspects of the case against him, something that has seen him burn through tens of millions of dollars in legal fees. He has sought every piece of available information to assist his defense, but that hasn’t always gone his way.

In 2015, Dotcom asked dozens of ministers and multiple government departments to disclose information they held on him. With Dotcom’s case rolling on, his requests were classified by his team as “urgent”. However, then-Attorney General Chris Finlayson denied the requests, describing them as vexatious and baseless.

Ever persistent, Dotcom filed a complaint with the Human Rights Tribunal, accusing the New Zealand Government of wrongfully withholding information from him.

Last March the Tribunal ruled in Dotcom’s favor, noting that the Crown was “in clear breach of its obligations under the Privacy Act” when it withheld the information. Dotcom was awarded NZ$60,000 in damages for “loss of dignity or injury to feelings” plus NZ$30,000 to compensate for the information not being handed over.

Dotcom was quick to celebrate, noting that the ruling from the Tribunal meant that his extradition case was effectively over, with the Attorney General having “perverted the course of Justice.”

While an end to the extradition process is still not in sight, the ruling from the Tribunal also compelled the authorities to comply with Dotcom’s original request. But with that still yet to happen, the show isn’t over yet.

The Crown subsequently appealed the decision of the Tribunal and yesterday the matter went before the High Court in Wellington.

Lawyer Victoria Casey, representing the Attorney General, said there was no evidence that the information was wrongly disclosed to cause injury to Dotcom’s feelings (as the NZ$60,000 award suggests) and there was no evidential basis for Dotcom to be awarded the NZ$30,000 either, RadioNZ reports.

Casey also argued that while Dotcom’s 52 requests to 28 ministers and government departments were marked as urgent due to his ongoing extradition battle, the information could not have been used because the window for submitting evidence had already closed. It was also a sizeable request, that could not have been fulfilled quickly, the lawyer said.

These factors meant that the allegedly unwieldy request for disclosure was considered vexatious by the then-Attorney General.

In Court yesterday, Casey said that Dotcom had demanded “every record mentioning him by name held by every government agency and every then-government minister, plus each agency contracted to work with any of those entities.”

Four days have been set aside for the hearing.

A copy of the original Human Rights Tribunal ruling is available here (pdf).

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Amazon-Filmeabend: Freitagsleihfilme für 99 Cent nur noch für Prime-Kunden

Amazon ändert die Bedingungen für den Freitag-Filmeabend. Bisher konnten alle Amazon-Kunden an ausgewählten Freitagen einige Filme zum Vorzugspreis von 99 Cent ausleihen. Dafür ist künftig ein Prime-Abo erforderlich. (Amazon, Onlineshop)

Amazon ändert die Bedingungen für den Freitag-Filmeabend. Bisher konnten alle Amazon-Kunden an ausgewählten Freitagen einige Filme zum Vorzugspreis von 99 Cent ausleihen. Dafür ist künftig ein Prime-Abo erforderlich. (Amazon, Onlineshop)

Vision Urbanetic: Daimler packt Menschen oder Waren auf autonome Fahrplattform

Daimler hat mit dem Vision Urbanetic ein Mobilitätskonzept vorgestellt, das an einen Science-Fiction-Film erinnert. Eine autonome Fahrplattform wird dabei mit einem Warencontainer oder einer Kabine für den Personentransport ausgerüstet. (Mercedes Benz,…

Daimler hat mit dem Vision Urbanetic ein Mobilitätskonzept vorgestellt, das an einen Science-Fiction-Film erinnert. Eine autonome Fahrplattform wird dabei mit einem Warencontainer oder einer Kabine für den Personentransport ausgerüstet. (Mercedes Benz, Technologie)

AMDs: Ryzen 5 2500X und Ryzen 3 2300X sind für Komplett-PCs

AMD hat zwei neue Ryzen-CPUs vorgestellt, die jedoch vorerst nur für OEM-Partner wie Acer verfügbar sind. Der Ryzen 5 2500X und der Ryzen 3 2300X haben einen anderen internen Aufbau als ihre Vorgänger, das macht sie je nach Anwendung oder Spiel noch ei…

AMD hat zwei neue Ryzen-CPUs vorgestellt, die jedoch vorerst nur für OEM-Partner wie Acer verfügbar sind. Der Ryzen 5 2500X und der Ryzen 3 2300X haben einen anderen internen Aufbau als ihre Vorgänger, das macht sie je nach Anwendung oder Spiel noch ein bisschen schneller. (AMD Zen, Prozessor)

300er-Serie: Intel könnte 14-nm-Chipsätze an die TSMC auslagern

Weil Intel immer noch keine ausreichende Ausbeute für den eigenen 10-nm-Node hat, werden die Kapazitäten für die 14-nm-Chips knapp. Um weiterhin genügend Prozessoren und Chipsätze liefern zu können, soll Intel überlegen, diese im Auftrag fertigen zu la…

Weil Intel immer noch keine ausreichende Ausbeute für den eigenen 10-nm-Node hat, werden die Kapazitäten für die 14-nm-Chips knapp. Um weiterhin genügend Prozessoren und Chipsätze liefern zu können, soll Intel überlegen, diese im Auftrag fertigen zu lassen. Das kommende Mittelklasse-Topmodell Core i9-9900K ist daher eventuell vorerst schlecht lieferbar. (Intel, Prozessor)

Geforce 399.24: Nvidia-Treiber verbessert Threadripper-32C-Leistung

Wer bisher eine Geforce-Grafikkarte mit einem Threadripper 2990WX mit 32 Kernen nutzte, musste in Spielen mit niedrigeren Bildraten leben als bei einem 16-Kern-Modell. Der neue Geforce-Treiber 399.24 behebt dieses Problem, der AMD-Chip wird nicht mehr …

Wer bisher eine Geforce-Grafikkarte mit einem Threadripper 2990WX mit 32 Kernen nutzte, musste in Spielen mit niedrigeren Bildraten leben als bei einem 16-Kern-Modell. Der neue Geforce-Treiber 399.24 behebt dieses Problem, der AMD-Chip wird nicht mehr ausgebremst. (AMD Zen, Prozessor)

Mega-rich family behind opioid crisis has second, secret opioid company

Family that runs Purdue also runs Rhodes Pharma—and patented an addiction drug.

Consumer-sized bottles of prescription drugs sit on a shelf.

Enlarge / Bottles of Purdue Pharma L.P. OxyContin medication sit on a pharmacy shelf in Provo, Utah, US, on Wednesday, Aug. 31, 2016. (credit: Getty | Bloomberg)

The Sackler family—the ultra-wealthy family that made billions from illegally marketed opioids and the group largely blamed for sparking and fueling the devastating, $504 billion-per-year epidemic of opioid addiction—has been making even more money off the country’s drug crisis than previously thought, according to a series of reports by the Financial Times.

The Sacklers own the infamous drug company Purdue Pharma, which in 2007 pleaded guilty to federal criminal charges for misleading doctors, regulators, and patients about the addictiveness of its branded oxycodone opioid drug, OxyContin. Yet the guilty plea seemed to do little to reform the company’s ethics or curb sales, according to a new report in the FT. Purdue continued to recklessly push the drugs on doctors, insiders told the outlet, and in 2010, it was raking in more than $3 billion in OxyContin sales.

In 2016, Forbes estimated the Sackler family’s collective wealth at $13 billion.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Ajit Pai helped Charter kill consumer-protection rules in Minnesota

State can’t regulate VoIP phones—Pai predicts same outcome with net neutrality.

A Charter Spectrum service vehicle.

Enlarge / A Charter Spectrum vehicle. (credit: Charter)

A court ruling that limits state regulation of cable company offerings was praised by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai, who says the ruling supports his contention that the FCC can preempt state-level net neutrality rules.

The new court ruling found that Minnesota's state government cannot regulate VoIP phone services offered by Charter and other cable companies because VoIP is an "information service" under federal law. Pai argues that the case is consistent with the FCC's attempt to preempt state-level net neutrality rules, in which the commission reclassified broadband as a Title I information service instead of a Title II telecommunications service.

The ruling was issued Friday by the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, following a lawsuit filed by Charter Communications against the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC). A three-judge panel ruled against Minnesota in a 2-1 vote—the FCC had filed a brief supporting Charter's position in the case.

Read 18 remaining paragraphs | Comments

CA Gov. says 100% clean electricity not enough, state must go carbon neutral

The move puts the most populous state on the most aggressive decarbonization path.

Article intro image

(credit: Reyner Media / Flickr)

On Monday, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill mandating that the state's utilities move to 100-percent zero-emission electricity generation by 2045. Brown also issued an executive order today requiring the state to become carbon neutral by 2045, that is, mandating that the state remove as much greenhouse gas from the atmosphere as it puts into the atmosphere.

California is the most populous state to agree to such aggressive decarbonization and only the second state to formalize such a pledge in legislation, after Hawaii. Although California has phased coal plants out of its state-wide energy mix, it still relies predominantly on natural gas for the bulk of its electricity.

The bill was passed by California's Assembly and Senate in August. The votes weren't a sure thing: some Republicans and Democrats worried that such an ambitious goal would lead to increased energy cost for their constituents.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Dozens of iOS apps surreptitiously share user location data with tracking firms

Applications don’t mention that they’re selling your precise location to third parties.

Article intro image

Enlarge (credit: Mongkol Chuewong, GettyImages)

During preparation for a workshop at DEF CON in August on locating privacy leaks in network traffic, we discovered a number of applications on both iOS and Android that were broadcasting precise location data back to the applications' developers—in some cases in unencrypted formats. Research released late Friday by Sudo Security's Guardian mobile firewall team provided some confirmation to our findings—and demonstrated that many apps are sharing location data with firms that market location data information without the users' knowledge.

In a blog post entitled "Location Monetization in iOS Apps," the Guardian team detailed 24 applications from the Apple iOS App Store that pushed data to 12 different "location-data monetization firms"—companies that collect precise location data from application users for profit. The 24 identified applications were found in a random sampling of the App Store's top free applications, so there are likely many more apps for iOS surreptitiously selling user location data. Additionally, the Guardian team confirmed that one data-mining service was connected with apps from over 100 local broadcasters owned by companies such as Sinclair, Tribune Broadcasting, Fox, and Nexstar Media.

While some of these applications use location data from various sources as part of their service—several were weather applications, and one was a fitness tracker—others use location mostly "for providing you more relevant ads." None explicitly stated that data was being shared with a third party.

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments