Dealmaster: Get a Dell laptop with 16GB RAM and a GTX 1060 Max-Q for $880

Plus a Razer gaming mouse for $45, 64GB Samsung microSD cards for $16, and more.

Today's tech dealmaster

Enlarge (credit: TechBargains)

Greetings, Arsians! Courtesy of our friends at TechBargains, we have another round of deals to share. Today's list is headlined by a deal for those in urgent need of a budget gaming laptop: a configuration of Dell's G5 15 notebook with 16GB of RAM and a Nvidia GTX 1060 Max-Q GPU is down to $880 at Walmart. (Ignore the "GTX 1060Ti" bit in Walmart's listing; there's no such thing.) Normally, Dell sells this config closer to $1,100.

The G Series launched earlier this year as the successor to Dell's Inspiron Gaming line. This particular model runs on an Intel Core i5-8300H processor and uses dual storage in the form of a 256GB SSD and 1TB HDD. There's a USB-C port (albeit of the slower Gen 1 variety), along with an HDMI port, Ethernet jack, SD card slot, and three USB 3.1 ports. The keyboard is backlit, and the 15.6-inch IPS display has a 1080p resolution.

Full disclosure: the Dealmaster has not personally tested this notebook, but given that this is a relatively affordable gaming laptop, expect a few compromises. The Max-Q version of the GTX 1060 is strong enough to get through most modern games, but it'll be a hair weaker than the desktop-class card, which itself isn't the highest on Nvidia's totem pole. Reviews around the Web suggest the whole thing is made of a cheapish plastic and that the display is far from special. At close to six pounds, it's not the most portable device either.

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Limo firm to Uber: You misclassify your drivers as contractors, which is unfair

Diva Limousine sues Uber, claims its reliance on contractors is illegal.

Close-up image of a smartphone using Uber app.

Enlarge (credit: Ted Soqui/Corbis via Getty Images)

A Southern California limousine company sued Uber in federal court earlier this week, alleging violations of state unfair-competition laws.

While a company suing Uber is not new, the proposed class-action lawsuit appears to rely on a recently decided California Supreme Court decision that makes it more difficult for companies to unilaterally declare their workers as contractors, which effectively deprives them of benefits that they would otherwise receive as employees.

In that case, known as Dynamex, the court came up with a three-part test to figure out whether companies can assert contractor status or not. The new case is called Diva Limousine v. Uber.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

A quick simulation of Hurricane Florence done without climate change

Simple analysis suggests global warming boosts Florence’s rain by 50 percent.

Article intro image

Enlarge / Hurricane Florence as captured from the International Space Station by astronaut Alex Gerst. (credit: Alex Gerst/NASA/ESA)

In the last few years, teams of scientists have developed a consistent protocol for rapidly analyzing the influence of climate change on extreme weather events. Within a week of the disaster, reports have been available to inform the conversation about whether we can expect more events like it in the future.

But on Wednesday, we saw the first example of something new—an analysis published before the event even happened. A group led by Stony Brook University’s Kevin Reed ran a very simple computer model experiment on Hurricane Florence—which isn’t due to make landfall until Friday—and quickly released the top-line results.

The rapid studies we’ve been seeing are done by examining the historical weather record to estimate how rare and extreme a given storm or heat event would be in that area of the globe. From there, climate model simulations are used to see if climate change is expected to change the frequency of that type of event.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

This nifty flying robot can hover, bank, and turn as deftly as a fruit fly

Dutch scientists built the robot to shed light on aerodynamics of insect flight.

Article intro image

Enlarge / The Delfly Nimble robot hovers in front of its creator, Matej Karasek of Delft University Technology. (credit: Henri Werij, TU Delft)

Flying insects like bees, dragonflies, and fruit flies can perform impressive aerodynamic feats, particularly when seeking to evade predators or the swatting motion of a human hand. Now Dutch scientists have built a flying robot capable of executing similar maneuvers—despite being much larger than the average insects—that could shed light on how these creatures achieve those feats. The scientists described their work in a new paper in Science.

There was a time when scientists believed that insect wings worked a lot like airplane wings. The up and down motion of their wings would generate lift because air flowing over the wing follows its slightly tilted surface, while the downward flow lowers the air pressure above the wing, lifting it just enough to keep the body aloft. (This is a simplified, and therefore incomplete, explanation for the complicated aerodynamics of airplane lift based on Bernoulli's principle, but it will suffice for the purposes of this post.) But in the 1990s, a zoologist named Charles Ellington decided to test this theory by putting various insects in actual wind tunnels. The conventional lift they measured simply wasn't sufficient to account for their ability to fly.

Ellington's subsequent research showed that a stable leading-edge vortex is the most likely explanation for how insects stay aloft. Once the vortex forms, it spirals out along the wing toward the tip, drawing air outward so as to avoid a stall. That explains how insects generate lift to hover, but not how they manage to execute complicated maneuvers like making rapid banked turns. That's possibly due to how an insect wing can rotate to slightly get rid of the vortex for an extra bit of lift, enabling the insect to change direction. But there is still plenty of mystery remaining for scientists to explore. And that's where this new flying robot comes in.

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Daily Deals (9-13-2018)

Amazon is running a 1-day sale on networking gear from TP-Link, which means you can score deep discounts on routers, range extenders, WiFi adapters, Powerline Ethernet kits, and modems, as well as some smart home gadgets. I’ve rounded up a few of…

Amazon is running a 1-day sale on networking gear from TP-Link, which means you can score deep discounts on routers, range extenders, WiFi adapters, Powerline Ethernet kits, and modems, as well as some smart home gadgets. I’ve rounded up a few of my favorites in the list below, but make sure to check out Amazon […]

The post Daily Deals (9-13-2018) appeared first on Liliputing.

Copyright Cop? ISP Willingly Kept Pirates On Board, Labels Say

The legal battle between Texas-based Internet provider Grande Communications and the major record labels is heating up again. After Grande discredited the labels’ lawsuit as an attempt to turn ISPs into their private copyright police, the music companies now fire back with several damning allegations.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Last year several major record labels, helped by the RIAA, filed a lawsuit against ISP Grande Communications, accusing it of turning a blind eye to pirating subscribers.

According to the labels, the Internet provider knew that some of its subscribers were frequently distributing copyrighted material, but failed to take any meaningful action in response.

The ISP refuted these claims and in August it submitted a motion for summary judgment in its favor. Grande argued that the labels are trying to expand copyright liability for Internet services, largely based on flawed evidence.

“Having given up on actually pursuing direct infringers due to bad publicity, and having decided not to target the software and websites that make online file-sharing possible, the recording industry has shifted its focus to fashioning new forms of copyright liability that would require ISPs to act as the copyright police,” Grande wrote.

“Plaintiffs’ legal theories represent an absurd expansion of copyright liability. In essence, Plaintiffs want to require ISPs to terminate the accounts of subscribers based on nothing more than unsubstantiated and unverifiable allegations of copyright infringement.”

The strongly worded motion triggered a response from the labels this week. Their reply doesn’t respond directly to the ‘copyright cop’ comments, but the record labels argue that Grande was more than a passive bystander.

The labels oppose many of Grande’s claims and also submit a motion for summary judgment themselves, relying on testimony from various experts, as well as the ISP’s own documents and witnesses.

“The record evidence and relevant law conclusively establish Plaintiffs’ entitlement to summary judgment that Grande is liable for contributory copyright infringement,” the labels write, stressing that the ISP knowingly facilitated and greatly profited from pirating subscribers.

In its motion, Grande raised serious doubts over the accuracy of the Rightcorp infringement notices being used as evidence. However, the labels counter that this isn’t reflected in the company’s actions.

Before the lawsuit was filed, Grande forwarded Rightcorp notices to its customers, they argue, and more recently the company terminated several accounts. These “repeat infringer” terminations relied in part on Rightscorp notices.

It’s worth noting that these terminations only happened after the lawsuit started. Perhaps triggered by the legal trouble, Grande changed its policy which meant that subscribers could lose their Internet access following Rightscorp notifications.

“Grande’s general manager admitted that subscribers who had engaged in similar conduct in the past would have been terminated had Grande’s current policy been in place prior to 2017,” the labels argue.

Without spelling it out, the labels use Grande’s new termination policy against the company. How can Rightscorp’s notices be inaccurate and flawed, if they are good enough to terminate subscribers now? And why change the earlier policy?

Rightscorp’s notices aside, the record companies argue that Grande was well aware of the large number of pirating subscribers on its network. In addition, there is abundant evidence that Grande acted intentionally, or at the very least recklessly, they argue.

For example, Grande’s employees internally discussed that repeat infringers would not be terminated, no matter how many notices were received against them.

Also, following the Cox verdict in (a similar case), a senior manager at the ISP repeatedly suggested that the company should delete emails to avoid having the sort of incriminating evidence which made Cox liable for pirating subscribers.

Recklessly?

It’s clear that Grande and the record labels differ in their view on whether the ISP is liable or not.

Is the lawsuit a push to expand liability and turn ISPs into copyright cops based on shoddy evidence? Or was Grande willingly ignoring all copyright infringement notices so it could continue to profit from pirating subscribers?

These questions are now up to the court to answer after which the case will likely proceed to trial, currently scheduled for early next year.

The labels’ opposition to Grande’s motion for summary judgment is available here (pdf). The same document also includes a cross-motion for summary judgment from the record companies. Grande asked the court to strike this from the record (pdf) as it constitutes a second motion for summary judgment.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Leaked 2016 video will fuel conservative worries about Google bias

Video shows Google’s first all-hands meeting following the 2016 vote.

Article intro image

Enlarge (credit: Google / Breitbart)

Breitbart News, a conservative news site known for its incestuous relationship with the Trump administration, has leaked an hour-long video showing Google's first all-hands meeting following the November 2016 presidential election in the United States. The video shows Google executives making little effort to strike a neutral tone about the election results.

"As an immigrant, a refugee, I certainly find this election deeply offensive, and I know many of you do too," said Sergey Brin, Google's cofounder and now president of parent company Alphabet. He said that the election result shows that "so many people apparently don't share many of the values that we have."

Google Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat, an avowed Hillary Clinton supporter, described the result as a "massive kick in the gut." She vowed that Google would "use the great strength and resources and reach we have to continue to advance really important values"—values, presumably, that were not shared by Donald Trump.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Video: UX expert helps explain why Fortnite is such a success

There’s a lot more going on with this battle royale shooter than you might realize.

Video shot and edited by Justin Wolfson and CNE. Click here for transcript.

In the world of user experience (UX) design, no challenge is bigger than the one presented by a complex, action-loaded video game. And that goes triple for a game like Fortnite.

This online-gaming sensation combines three very complex ideas—high-speed combat, incessant equipment upgrades, and a make-your-own-buildings system—into one experience. How do you make it easy for gamers to juggle so much, all while they're battling 99 other people at once? For developer Epic Games, the answer lies with a carefully designed user experience full of secrets and subtleties.

Although Fortnite gets something of a bad rap from the "curmudgeonly gamers" demographic ("The kids play it on their iPhones, so I automatically hate it!"), the game's popularity is impossible to argue with. We are firmly in the era of the battle royale, and with Fortnite currently riding high at that genre's apex, it's worth looking at how the game does what it does so successfully.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Android 9 Pie, thoroughly reviewed

The time has come for our annual deep dive (~19,000 words) into the latest Android release.

It's time for another big Android release—and another big review to go along with it. The latest update for the world's most popular operating system is Android 9 (not 9.0) Pie. While last year's Android 8.0 Oreo release focused on under-the-hood changes, Android 9 Pie ships a ton of user-facing features and UI changes, making it feel like the "tock" to Oreo's "tick."

Android 9 Pie brings Google's updated Material Design spec (don't call it "Material Design 2") to Android OS, and it begins a wave of UI updates that will spread across Google's entire portfolio. In Android, that means revamped interfaces for the notification panel, Recent Apps, settings, and various bits of system UI. For future smartphone designs (like, say, the Pixel 3), Android 9 includes an experimental gesture navigation system and built-in notch support. There's also a new screenshot editor, lots of improvements for text selection, and changes to the way rotation works.

Read 227 remaining paragraphs | Comments

GCHQ: Geheimdienstliche Massenüberwachung verletzt Menschenrechte

Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte urteilt über die Massenüberwachungsprogramme des britischen Geheimdienstes GCHQ. Die durch Snowden bekanntgewordene Internetüberwachung verletzt die Internetnutzer in ihren Rechten. (Geheimdienste, Datensc…

Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte urteilt über die Massenüberwachungsprogramme des britischen Geheimdienstes GCHQ. Die durch Snowden bekanntgewordene Internetüberwachung verletzt die Internetnutzer in ihren Rechten. (Geheimdienste, Datenschutz)