Random quantum circuit easiest way to beat classical computer

Researchers suggest modeling chaotic circuits to demonstrate quantum supremacy.

Enlarge / The evolution of a chaotic quantum system. (credit: Joint Quantum Institute)

One of the near-term (but somewhat irrelevant) goals of quantum computing is something called quantum supremacy. Quantum supremacy is not, sadly, a cage fight between proponents of competing interpretations of quantum mechanics. It is a demonstration of a quantum computer performing a computation, no matter how trivial, that cannot be performed on a classical computer.

The key question: what computation should be performed? A team of researchers is suggesting that computing the state of a random quantum circuit that exhibits chaotic behavior would be perfect for the task. Let’s delve into why that might be.

Getting all superior

The idea of quantum supremacy goes a bit like this. Yes, we have all of these different versions of quantum computing. And yes, they all seem to behave how we expect a quantum computer to behave. But they are all remarkably slow and can easily be beaten by classical computers.

Read 21 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Microsoft kills a few old features with Windows 10 April 2018 update

The Windows 10 April 2018 Update released this week includes a number of new features. But it also puts the nail in the coffin of a few older Windows features. Microsoft hast posted a web page where you can find a list of features that are being remove…

The Windows 10 April 2018 Update released this week includes a number of new features. But it also puts the nail in the coffin of a few older Windows features. Microsoft hast posted a web page where you can find a list of features that are being removed with Windows 10 version 1803 (the April […]

The post Microsoft kills a few old features with Windows 10 April 2018 update appeared first on Liliputing.

Cloudflare and RIAA Agree on Tailored Site Blocking Process

Cloudflare and the RIAA have agreed to a tailored process through which the music labels can expand their blocking efforts against the piracy site MP3Skull, if needed. The deal is part of a lengthy legal battle during which both sides dug in their heels, to secure their bottom lines.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Representing various major record labels, the RIAA filed a lawsuit against pirate site MP3Skull three years ago.

With millions of visitors per month, the MP3 download portal had been one of the prime sources of pirated music for a long time.

In 2016, the record labels won their case , but the site initially ignored the court order and continued to operate. This prompted the RIAA to go after third-party services including Cloudflare, demanding that they block associated domain names.

Cloudflare objected and argued that the DMCA shielded the company from the broad blocking requirements. However, the court ruled that the DMCA doesn’t apply in this case, opening the door to widespread anti-piracy filtering.

The court stressed that, before issuing an injunction against Cloudflare, it still had to be determined whether the CDN provider is “in active concert or participation” with the pirate site. This has yet to happen. Since MP3Skull has ceased its operations, the RIAA has shown little interest in pursuing the matter any further.

While there is no longer an immediate site blocking threat, the order opened the door to similar blocking requests in the future. Cloudflare, therefore, asked the court to throw the order out, arguing that since MP3Skull is no longer available the issue is moot.

A month ago, US District Court Judge Marcia Cooke denied that request, urging the parties to go back to the negotiating table and find a solution both sides can live with.

In short, the solution that Cloudflare and the RIAA agreed on is that the record labels can file an emergency motion requiring the CDN provider to block new domain names of MP3Skull, if the site resurfaces.

“Plaintiffs may request in such an amendment a specific direction to Cloudflare to cease providing services to websites at specified domains without needing to show that Cloudflare is in active concert or participation with the Defendants with respect to such services,” the order reads.

The RIAA must inform Cloudflare in advance if it plans to file such a request, which then has the option to respond. If there are no objections, the CDN provider is required to take action within 24 hours, or a full business day, whichever is longer.

This is essentially what the RIAA was after, but Cloudflare was sure to make it clear that the ruling does not mean that they are seen as operating “in active concert or participation” with the pirate site.

“For the sake of clarity, the Court’s direction to Cloudflare […] is not a finding that Cloudflare is ‘in active concert or participation’ with Defendants as provided in Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” it reads.

This means that the order, as with the previous injunction, leaves many options open and questions unanswered. It is specifically tailored to one site, without setting in stone how similar cases will be dealt with in the future.

But considering the recent pressure from rightsholders on Cloudflare, it wouldn’t be a surprise if this battle is renewed in a new arena in the future.

Meanwhile, MP3Skull, the site which got this all started, hasn’t been seen online for over a year.

A copy of US District Court Judge Marcia Cooke’s order is available here (pdf).

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN reviews, discounts, offers and coupons.

Amazon Prime members can get monthly box of kids’ books with new subscription

Charging $22.99 for boxes that include either two or four books.

Enlarge (credit: Amazon)

On the heels of announcing the new Echo Dot Kids Edition, Amazon has a new offering tailored to parents who want more convenient, kid-friendly content for their family. The company now offers Prime Book Box, a curated box of two or four children's books available for Prime members for $22.99.

If you've dabbled in subscription boxes before, you'll know how the Prime Book Box works. Prime members who sign up for the new offering will get a box of books shipped to their home every one, two, or three months. Parents indicate the age range of their children to get books that best suit their reading levels—infants and kids up to two years old get four board books, while all other kids from ages three to 12 get two hardcover titles.

The Prime Book Box doesn't follow rules as strict as some other book subscription boxes. In addition to choosing the frequency of the box, parents can also skip a box whenever they want and choose from a selection of four alternative books if they don't want one of the books that Amazon selects for their box by default. Amazon curates everything, including the alternative book options, so parents can't get any book they want, but that's still a good option to have in case they already own a selected title.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Mark Zuckerberg announces Facebook Dating

“Totally opt-in” but apparently has rich ties to default profile data.

During an announcement-loaded F8 Developer Conference keynote speech, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a new product coming soon to the company's mobile app: Facebook Dating.

Facebook

Zuckerberg described the service as "totally opt-in" and "not for hook-ups," and he stressed that the service will, among other things, consciously not connect people who are already connected on the site as "friends."

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Oculus Go standalone VR headset ships today for $199

Facebook’s first standalone VR headset is now shipping. The Oculus Go is a $199 headset that doesn’t need to be tethered to a PC like an Oculus Rift, and which doesn’t rely on a phone for its display and processing power, like a Google Daydream View. T…

Facebook’s first standalone VR headset is now shipping. The Oculus Go is a $199 headset that doesn’t need to be tethered to a PC like an Oculus Rift, and which doesn’t rely on a phone for its display and processing power, like a Google Daydream View. The company unveiled the Oculus Go last year, and […]

The post Oculus Go standalone VR headset ships today for $199 appeared first on Liliputing.

T-Mobile and Sprint don’t need to merge for 5G—they said so two months ago

AT&T made the same claims—about 4G—when it tried to buy T-Mobile in 2011.

Enlarge / T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray details T-Mobile's plans to build a nationwide 5G network. (credit: T-Mobile USA)

One of the US' most successful mobile broadband providers is acquiring a struggling, smaller competitor, but it needs government approval of the merger. To make their case, the merging companies tell regulators that they can't fully upgrade to the next generation of wireless technology as standalone firms. They must join forces, or US wireless consumers won't benefit from an upgraded network, the companies say.

That description applies equally well to AT&T's attempted takeover of T-Mobile USA in 2011 and to T-Mobile's just-announced plan to buy Sprint. Obama administration regulators rejected the AT&T/T-Mobile claims in 2011 and forced the companies to continue operating separately. Each one thrived on its own.

Trump administration regulators might see similarities between the network upgrade claims of AT&T in 2011 and T-Mobile today. They could even look at statements made by T-Mobile and Sprint just a couple of months ago, when each company said it was on track for a huge 5G deployment—without any mention of needing a merger. But the Federal Communications Commission's new Republican leadership is far more friendly to telecoms than Democrats were, and it could approve the T-Mobile/Sprint combination without much fuss.

Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Iran blocks Telegram, pushes replacement with “Death to America” emoji

Citing use by “pornographers and terrorists,” Iran makes block permanent.

Enlarge / Alaeddin Boroujerdi, chairman of Iran's Parliament Committee of National Security and Foreign Policy. (credit: KHALED DESOUKI/AFP/Getty Images)

On Monday, Iranian law enforcement authorities ordered Internet service providers to block traffic from the Telegram anonymous chat application, four days after Iran’s Telcommunications Infrastructure Company rescinded Telegram’s license to operate in the country. Tehran’s chief prosecutor claimed that the service is used by pornographers and terrorists and ordered that the ban be enforced in a way that would prevent users from bypassing it via a virtual private network.

Iran had previously tied Telegram to the ISIS attacks in Tehran in July of 2017. And the Iranian government had previously blocked Telegram temporarily in January during nation-wide demonstrations for what officials claimed were national security reasons. But according to Iranian press agency MNA, Iran's Parliament Committee of National Security and Foreign Policy Chairman Alaeddin Boroujerdi said in an April 1 radio interview that the service would be permanently banned and replaced with a domestically developed alternative.

Iran’s move mirrors that of the Russian government, which continues its efforts to block Telegram after the application’s developers refused to provide encryption keys to access users’ messages. Efforts to block Telegram in Russia have led to Russian ISPs blocking large swaths of Internet addresses at cloud providers, including Google and Amazon, as Telegram users began to employ proxy services and VPNs set up in the cloud. Protests continue in Russia over the government’s move, including a protest on Monday in which thousands of people threw paper planes representing Telegram’s logo.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Oculus Go review: The wireless-VR future begins today for only $199

Low-priced VR limits can’t be ignored, but the great absolutely outweighs the bad.

Enlarge / Facebook just announced the immediate retail availability of Oculus Go—and we've already had a week to test it. (credit: Sam Machkovech)

Surprise! Oculus released a new virtual reality headset today. The Oculus Go standalone headset is now for sale at Amazon, Newegg, and Best Buy starting at $199—yes, $199, with no other hardware required—following a retail-launch unveil at Facebook's annual F8 conference.

What's more, Oculus sent us a working headset last week for the sake of a review—and I have no shortage of thoughts about what Oculus has gotten right with its first "budget" VR product. Before I break down performance, software, features, and limitations, I want to set the scene by rewinding to another era in which a "futuristic" gadget sector began plummeting in price.

Let's travel back to the very beginnings of the portable MP3 player market.

Read 73 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Oculus Go im Test: Facebooks 220-Euro-Headset ist ein wichtiger Schritt

Mit dem Oculus Go veröffentlicht Facebook ein drahtloses sowie vergleichsweise günstiges VR-Headset. Es funktioniert ohne Highend-Smartphone, zudem gefällt uns die Display-Qualität gut. Wir vermissen aber einfach Positional Tracking für Headset und Con…

Mit dem Oculus Go veröffentlicht Facebook ein drahtloses sowie vergleichsweise günstiges VR-Headset. Es funktioniert ohne Highend-Smartphone, zudem gefällt uns die Display-Qualität gut. Wir vermissen aber einfach Positional Tracking für Headset und Controller. Ein Test von Marc Sauter (Head-Mounted Display, OLED)