Galaxy Note 8 is the latest Android phone to go on sale at Microsoft’s stores

The fallback position from Windows phones: running Microsoft apps on Android.

Enlarge (credit: Samsung)

Samsung's Galaxy Note 8 has joined a handful of other phones at, of all places, the Microsoft Store. Both the online store and brick-and-mortar locations have the handsets, both unlocked and carrier-branded; today, they're $780, with a regular price of $930.

The Note 8 joins the Galaxy 8 and 8+ as well as Razer smartphone; Microsoft is selling all four Android handsets, alongside three Windows Phone devices (including the HP Elite x3, newly available to Verizon). Why is Microsoft selling Android handsets? Well, the company says, you can run Microsoft Launcher, a home screen/app launcher replacement for Android, along with all of Microsoft's other Android apps, such as Office, Cortana, and Skype.

This represents Microsoft's fallback position in the smartphone market. If people won't buy phones with Microsoft's operating system, the company will at least try to get people running Microsoft's apps on their phone. Redmond is also trying to use these apps to improve the Windows 10 user experience. If you use the full range of Microsoft software, you get some convenient extra capabilities, such as the ability to open a webpage on the PC from your phone, with much deeper integration promised soon.

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Amazon launches browser-based tool for making VR and AR apps

Built on AWS, the toolkit works in any browser that supports WebGL or WebVR.

Enlarge (credit: Amazon)

Amazon has announced a browser-based toolkit called Sumerian that the company hopes will make VR and AR development accessible to people without advanced coding or 3D rendering skills. Currently in preview, Sumerian allows creation of VR and AR scenes that target platforms like the HTC Vive, Oculus Rift, and Google Daydream, and it works with several other Amazon products.

Built on Amazon Web Services, the toolkit is intended to help with building experiences like "training simulations, virtual concierge services, enhanced online shopping experiences, [and] virtual house or land tours." Of course, it can be used to make games, too. In any case, users of the toolkit can create animated characters that interact with the player or customer verbally. That's thanks to Amazon's existing speech recognition and natural language-processing tech—Lex and Polly, respectively.

These images from Amazon's blog post announcing the toolkit show some of the basics:

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Amazon launches browser-based tool for making VR and AR apps

Built on AWS, the toolkit works in any browser that supports WebGL or WebVR.

Enlarge (credit: Amazon)

Amazon has announced a browser-based toolkit called Sumerian that the company hopes will make VR and AR development accessible to people without advanced coding or 3D rendering skills. Currently in preview, Sumerian allows creation of VR and AR scenes that target platforms like the HTC Vive, Oculus Rift, and Google Daydream, and it works with several other Amazon products.

Built on Amazon Web Services, the toolkit is intended to help with building experiences like "training simulations, virtual concierge services, enhanced online shopping experiences, [and] virtual house or land tours." Of course, it can be used to make games, too. In any case, users of the toolkit can create animated characters that interact with the player or customer verbally. That's thanks to Amazon's existing speech recognition and natural language-processing tech—Lex and Polly, respectively.

These images from Amazon's blog post announcing the toolkit show some of the basics:

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Google releases Android 8.1 Developer Preview 2

Google plans to release Android 8.1 to the world next month, but folks have been testing an early build of the operating system since Google released the first developer preview about a month ago. Now Google has released Android 8.1 Developer Preview 2…

Google plans to release Android 8.1 to the world next month, but folks have been testing an early build of the operating system since Google released the first developer preview about a month ago. Now Google has released Android 8.1 Developer Preview 2. Among other things, it enables developer access to the Pixel Visual Core […]

Google releases Android 8.1 Developer Preview 2 is a post from: Liliputing

Android 8.1 Preview 2 arrives on Google devices and enables that custom SoC

This release should turn on Google’s custom SoC after a false start with Preview 1.

Enlarge

Google has posted the second developer preview of Android 8.1. This release brings a "near final" build of Android 8.1 to the Pixel 2 and 2 XL, the Pixel 1 and 1 XL, the Pixel C tablet, and the Nexus 6P and 5X.

The first Android 8.1 Preview, which launched last month, was a bit of a mess. Google's incremental update files didn't work, and then the company had to take them down. The full system images couldn't be flashed on the Pixel 2 for a few days due to needing a new version of the Android Developer Tools that wasn't yet posted. When we did get the files finally flashed, we found out that the headline feature—enabling Google's custom SoC, the Pixel Visual Core—didn't actually work. After a bit of a back and forth with Google, the company confirmed that the the Visual Core would be enabled in the second preview.

Barring any unforeseen hiccups, this second preview should finally enable the Pixel Visual Core. The custom, Google-designed SoC has been dormant in the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL. The eight core chip will supposedly accelerate Google's HDR processing and enable hardware acceleration for other machine learning tasks. Google apparently envisions all Android phones having special hardware like this, since the Visual Core is the first implementation of Android 8.1's new "Neural Networks API" (NNAPI). The new API allows app developers to write code for special neural net co-processors like the Pixel Visual Core (and to provide a software backup for phones without the special hardware).

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Radioactive land around Chernobyl to sprout solar investments

A one-megawatt installation is planned; gigawatt installations could follow it.

Enlarge / In this aerial view electricity pylons stand near the new enclosure built over reactor number four at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant on August 19, 2017 near Chernobyl, Ukraine. (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images) (credit: Getty Images)

A mere 100 meters (328 feet) from the damaged reactor at Chernobyl in Ukraine, a one-megawatt, $1.2 million solar panel installation will likely be commissioned next month, according to Bloomberg. Back in summer 2016, the Ukrainian government said it was eager to get solar projects on the 1,000 square miles of radioactive land, and Ukrainian engineering firm Rodina Energy Group appears set to be an early arrival on the scene.

A solar installation makes sense in the shadow of the nuclear energy plant whose reactor exploded in 1986. The land is too radioactive for farming, or hunting, or forestry, and transmission lines that were intended to send electricity from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant to the rest of Ukraine are already in place. Rodina and its partner Enerparc AG, a German financing company, plan to spend up to €100 million (or $119 million) to build renewable energy in Chernobyl’s exclusion zone.

Rodina isn’t the only company looking to take up the Ukrainian government’s offer of cheap land. A year ago, two Chinese companies announced a plan to build a huge 1 GW solar farm in Chernobyl's exclusion zone, although the companies seem to have made little movement on that plan thus far. In July of this year, French energy company Energie SA also announced plans to conduct a pre-feasibility study for a billion-euro solar plant near Chernobyl. Ukraine’s minister of ecology told Bloomberg at the time that more than 60 companies had expressed interest in building renewable energy in the vicinity of Chernobyl.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Fan analysis forces Bungie to confirm screwy XP math in Destiny 2

After confirming a hidden “XP scaling” system, Bungie made XP grinds even slower.

Enlarge / When you boot Destiny 2, you'll see various vignette shots that detail past adventures, depending on whether you played the original series. (credit: Bungie/Activision)

Over the Thanksgiving weekend, the largest Destiny-related Reddit community exploded with data that seemed to confirm an unadvertised limitation in the game Destiny 2. According to fan analysis, players of the always-online shooting game suffered from drops in "experience point" (XP) gain depending on what modes they played and for how long... without any in-game notice.

This was promptly followed by the game's developer, Bungie, confirming the discovery as accurate and promising a fix. Trouble is, this "fix" was coupled with another unannounced change—a flat, across-the-board reduction in XP gains for all Destiny 2 activities. Bungie only confirmed this decision after fans pointed it out.

Math schmath

Destiny 2, like its predecessor, depends largely on an open-ended "end game" system. Once you beat the game's primary "quest" content, you can return to previously covered ground to find random, remixed, and upgraded battles, meant to be played ad nauseam alone or with friends. To encourage such replay, Bungie dangles a carrot of XP gain, which works more slowly than during the campaign stages. Players can apply the earned XP to unlock higher-powered weapons, rare cosmetics, and the like. Everything you do in the game, from killing a weak bad guy to completing a major raid-related milestone, is supposed to reward you a fixed XP amount.

Read 8 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Expensify sent images with personal data to Mechanical Turkers, calls it a feature

Expensify announces “private” transcription on Mechanical Turk as “Turkers” report seeing sensitive data.

Enlarge / Would you let this guy handle your benefit and business expenses?

The "machine learning" behind that application you've been using to scan your receipts for business expenses and company benefit filings may not have been entirely machine-based—and that could have some privacy implications, despite what the company has advertised. Expensify, the paperless business expense management service with over 4.5 million users, has been using humans to transcribe at least some of the expense and benefit documents the company's software processes—and over the past few months, some of those humans were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk service.

Until last week, Expensify was using the Mechanical Turk "worker marketplace" to assign "Human Intelligence Tasks" (HITs) to handle receipt scans that the company's SmartScan technology wasn't up to deciphering, based on posts on a Mechanical Turk worker board by an Expensify employee and comments by others. One HIT request has since been withdrawn, but others may still be active.

On November 25, Expensify's founder and CEO David Barrett announced a new "feature" the company was working on, called Private SmartScan, in which customers would be offered the option of recruiting their own backup transcription workforce through Mechanical Turk. "I had hoped to keep this feature quiet until next year," Barrett wrote, "but it seems some enterprising sleuthers have beaten us to the punch. Alas! So with the cat out of the bag, let me proudly announce a new privacy-enhancing feature we’ve been focused on for some time: Private SmartScan! This puts you in control of exactly which humans step in when technology alone is insufficient."

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Comcast hints at plan for paid fast lanes after net neutrality repeal

Comcast still won’t block or throttle—but paid prioritization may be on the way.

Enlarge (credit: S Lowe)

For years, Comcast has been promising that it won't violate the principles of net neutrality, regardless of whether the government imposes any net neutrality rules. That meant that Comcast wouldn't block or throttle lawful Internet traffic and that it wouldn't create fast lanes in order to collect tolls from Web companies that want priority access over the Comcast network.

This was one of the ways in which Comcast argued that the Federal Communications Commission should not reclassify broadband providers as common carriers, a designation that forces ISPs to treat customers fairly in other ways. The Title II common carrier classification that makes net neutrality rules enforceable isn't necessary because ISPs won't violate net neutrality principles anyway, Comcast and other ISPs have claimed.

But with Republican Ajit Pai now in charge at the Federal Communications Commission, Comcast's stance has changed. While the company still says it won't block or throttle Internet content, it has dropped its promise about not instituting paid prioritization.

Read 19 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Mashup Site Hit With Domain Suspension Following IFPI Copyright Complaint

A Canada-based site dedicated to mashups lost use of its main domain last week following a copyright complaint from the IFPI. The music industry group contacted UK-based registrar Domainbox, citing copyright infringement on Sowndhaus.com. The registrar then removed the site’s DNS entries. Sowndhaus insists that under Canadian law, it acts entirely legally.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN discounts, offers and coupons

Mashups are musical compositions, usually made up of two or more tracks seamlessly blended together, which bring something fresh and new to the listener.

There are hundreds of stunning examples online, many created in hobbyist circles, with dedicated communities sharing their often brilliant work.

However, the majority of mashups have something in common – they’re created without any permission from the copyright holders’ of the original tracks. As such they remain controversial, as mashup platform Sowndhaus has just discovered.

This Canada-based platform allows users to upload, share and network with other like-minded mashup enthusiasts. It has an inbuilt player, somewhat like Soundcloud, through which people can play a wide range of user-created mashups. However, sometime last Tuesday, Sowndhaus’ main domain, Sowndhaus.com, became unreachable.

Sowndhaus: High-quality mashups

The site’s operators say that they initially believed there was some kind of configuration issue. Later, however, they discovered that their domain had been “purposefully de-listed” from its DNS servers by its registrar.

“DomainBox had received a DMCA notification from the IFPI (International Federation of the Phonographic Industry) and immediately suspended our .com domain,” Sowndhaus’ operators report.

At this point it’s worth noting that while Sowndhaus is based and hosted in Canada, DomainBox is owned by UK-based Mesh Digital Limited, which is in turn owned by GoDaddy. IFPI, however, reportedly sent a US-focused DMCA notice to the registrar which noted that the music group had “a good faith belief” that activity on Sowndhaus “is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.”

While mashups have always proved controversial, Sowndhaus believe that they operate well within Canadian law.

“We have a good faith belief that the audio files allegedly ‘infringing copyright’ in the DMCA notification are clearly transformative works and meet all criteria for ‘Non-commercial User-generated Content’ under Section 29.21 of the Copyright Act (Canada), and as such are authorized by the law,” the site says.

“Our service, servers, and files are located in Canada which has a ‘Notice and Notice regime’ and where DMCA (a US law) has no jurisdiction. However, the jurisdiction for our .com domain is within the US/EU and thus subject to its laws.”

Despite a belief that the site operates lawfully, Sowndhaus took a decision to not only take down the files listed in IFPI’s complaint but also to ditch its .com domain completely. While this convinced DomainBox to give control of the domain back to the mashup platform, Sowndhaus has now moved to a completely new domain (sowndhaus.audio), to avoid further issues.

“We neither admit nor accept that any unlawful activity or copyright infringement with respect to the DMCA claim had taken place, or has ever been permitted on our servers, or that it was necessary to remove the files or service under Section 29.21 of the Copyright Act (Canada) with which we have always been, and continue to be, in full compliance,” the site notes.

“The use of copyright material as Non-commercial User-generated Content is authorized by law in Canada, where our service resides. We believe that the IFPI are well aware of this, are aware of the jurisdiction of our service, and therefore that their DMCA notification is a misrepresentation of copyright.”

Aside from what appears to have been a rapid suspension of Sowndhaus’ .com domain, the site says that it is being held to a higher standard of copyright protection that others operating under the DMCA.

Unlike YouTube, for example, Sowndhaus says it pro-actively removes files found to infringe copyright. It also bans users who use the site to commit piracy, as per its Terms of Service.

“This is a much stronger regime than would be required under the DMCA guidelines where users generally receive warnings and strikes before being banned, and where websites complying with the DMCA and seeking to avoid legal liability do not actively seek out cases of infringement, leading to some cases of genuine piracy remaining undetected on their services,” the site says.

However, the site remains defiant in respect of the content it hosts, noting that mashups are transformative works that use copyright content “in new and creative ways to form new works of art” and as such are legal for non-commercial purposes.

That hasn’t stopped it from being targeted by copyright holders in the past, however.

This year three music-based organizations (IFPI, RIAA, and France’s SCPP) have sent complaints to Google about the platform, targeting close to 200 URLs. However, at least for more recent complaints, Google hasn’t been removing the URLs from its indexes.

Complaints sent to Google about Sowndhaus in 2017<

Noting that corporations are using their powers “to hinder, stifle, and silence protected new forms of artistic expression with no repercussions”, Sowndhaus says that it is still prepared to work with copyright holders but wishes they would “reconsider their current policies and accept non-commercial transformative works as legitimate art forms with legal protections and/or exemptions in all jurisdictions.”

While Sowndhaus is now operating from a new domain, the switch is not without its inconveniences. All URLs with links to files on sowndhaus.com are broken but can be fixed by changing the .com to .audio.

DomainBox did not respond to TorrentFreak’s request for comment.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN discounts, offers and coupons