Livestream ‘Piracy Fest’ on Facebook Shut Down by Foxtel

This weekend hundreds of thousands of people watched unauthorized Facebook livestreams of a highly anticipated rematch between two Aussie boxers. Pay TV channel Foxtel was prepared for the mass piracy fest and did everything in its power to disconnect the streams. The company eventually cut off feeds of several offenders and is now threatening legal action against those who dared to stream it.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

boxingstreamOn Friday evening millions of Australians were tuning into to the long awaited rematch between the Australian boxers Anthony Mundine and Danny Green.

Those who wanted to watch it live couldn’t do so cheaply, as it was streamed exclusively by the pay TV provider Foxtel for AUS$59.95.

However, the Internet wouldn’t be the Internet if people didn’t try to find ways around this expensive ‘roadblock.’ And indeed, as soon as the broadcast started tens of thousands of people tuned into unauthorized live streams, including several homebrew re-broadcasts through Facebook.

While it’s not uncommon for unauthorized sports streams to appear on social media, the boxing match triggered a true piracy fest. At one point more than 150,000 fans streamed a feed that was shown from the account of Facebook user Darren Sharpe, who gained instant fame.

Unfortunately for him, this didn’t go unnoticed to the rightsholders. Foxtel was quick to track down Mr. Sharpe and rang him up during the match, a call the Facebook streamer recorded and later shared on YouTube.


“Sorry mate, I just had to chuck that on mute. So you want me to turn off my Foxtel because I can’t stream it?” Darren asked the Foxtel representative.

“No. I want you to stop streaming it on Facebook. Just keep watching the fight at home, there’s no dramas with that. Just don’t stream it on Facebook,” the Foxtel rep replied.

“Mate, I’ve got 78,000 viewers here that aren’t going to be happy with you. I just don’t see why it’s [not] legal. I’m not doing anything wrong, mate. What can you do to me?” Darren said in response.

“It’s a criminal offence against the copyright act, mate. We’ve got technical protection methods inside the box so exactly this thing can’t happen,” the representative replied.


Mr. Sharpe didn’t seem to be very impressed by the allegations, but Foxtel soon showed how serious it was. Since Facebook didn’t turn off the infringing streams right away, the pay TV provider decided to display the customer’s account numbers on the video streams, so they could disable the associated feeds.

According to Foxtel CEO Peter Tonagh, the streamers in question will soon face legal action. This means that the “free” streaming bonanza could turn out to be quite expensive after all.

ABC reports that Brett Hevers, another Facebook user whose unauthorized broadcast reached more than 150,000 people at its peak, believes he has done nothing wrong.

“I streamed the Mundine and Green fight mainly just so a few mates could watch it. A few people couldn’t afford the fee or didn’t have Foxtel so I just thought I’d put it up for them,” Hevers said.

“All of a sudden 153,000 people I think at the peak were watching it,” he adds.

Anticipating significant legal bills, fellow Facebook streamer Darren Sharpe has already decided to start a GoFundMe campaign to cover the cost. At the time of writing, the campaign has already reached over a quarter of the $10,000 goal.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Prof: “Can you sue the President based on his tweets? We’re about to find out”

Lawsuit joins at least 15 other cases challenging the president’s executive order.

Enlarge (credit: Aude Guerrucci - Pool/Getty Images)

The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California has also sued the Trump Administration over its recent executive order, which restricts entry into the country for people who hail from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

The new ACLU lawsuit (Al-Mowafak et al v. Trump et al), joins an ever-growing list of cases filed in various federal courts around the country that challenge the legality of the executive order.

However, the ACLU proposed class action lawsuit, which was filed on Thursday on behalf of a number of California students affected by the order, makes creative use of President Donald Trump’s tweets against him—pointing out specific instances where the president has described the action as a "ban" on Muslims.

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Per Ultraschall: Ubeam führt drahtloses Laden vor

Und es gibt es doch: Dem US-Startup Ubeam ist bereits mehrfach vorgeworfen worden, sein drahtloses Übertragen von Strom per Ultraschall sei ein Schwindel. Auf einer Konferenz in Los Angeles hat Chefin Meredith Perry es vorgeführt. (WCT, Smartphone)

Und es gibt es doch: Dem US-Startup Ubeam ist bereits mehrfach vorgeworfen worden, sein drahtloses Übertragen von Strom per Ultraschall sei ein Schwindel. Auf einer Konferenz in Los Angeles hat Chefin Meredith Perry es vorgeführt. (WCT, Smartphone)

Sky Will Request Persistent Pirates to Remove File-Sharing Software

After years of negotiations UK ISPs are ready to send piracy warnings to subscribers whose accounts are used to share copyright-infringing material. While the associated “Get it Right” campaign stresses that the emails will be of an educational nature, Sky states that repeat infringers will be asked to remove file-sharing software from their devices.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

skylogoWith help from copyright holders, ISPs will send email notifications to subscribers whose connections are allegedly used to pirate content.

These “alerts” are meant to educate copyright infringers about legal alternatives in the hope of decreasing piracy rates over time.

In recent weeks the parties involved have put everything in place to get going. Following BT, TalkTalk, Virgin Media and Sky have all now posted advisories on their respective websites.

A question that repeatedly returns is whether people are at risk of losing their broadband access. The answer for all parties is a clear NO. Sky, however, isn’t letting its customers continue on their merry way without any repercussions.

“Your broadband service won’t be affected as a result of receiving this email alert,” Sky assures its subscribers, but it doesn’t stop there.

“However, if you continue to share content illegally using your broadband connection, Sky will request that you take immediate steps to remove or disable any file sharing software that is being used to share copyrighted content illegally,” Sky writes.

In other words, repeat infringers can expect follow-up communication from the ISP, asking them to remove all BitTorrent clients that are used to share infringing material. That’s quite a strong message.

This promise also raises a new question. What will happen if the users in question refuse to remove the file-sharing software, or get caught again? Will that lead to more severe repercussions?

The FAQ section doesn’t go into detail on this hypothetical situation. That said, many ISPs reserve the rights to terminate accounts of users who are persistent copyright infringers.

TorrentFreak also reviewed the advisories of the other ISPs, but none of these refer to such follow-up requests.

TalkTalk does stress that they won’t report customers to the police though, and Virgin mentions that they won’t share any personal details with copyright holders, unless they receive a valid court order.

In a way, it’s not really surprising that Sky has a more aggressive approach. The company is a major copyright holder itself and has invested “billions of pounds” in entertainment.

Whether their emails will help cut these losses has yet to be seen…

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Die Woche im Video: Milliarden-Gewinne hui, Einreiseverbot pfui

Die großen Internet-Konzerne streifen hohe Gewinne ein, fürchten durch Trumps Einreiseverbot jedoch um ihre Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Elon Musk schaut dabei in die Röhre. Sieben Tage und viele Meldungen im Überblick. (Golem-Wochenrückblick, Internet)

Die großen Internet-Konzerne streifen hohe Gewinne ein, fürchten durch Trumps Einreiseverbot jedoch um ihre Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Elon Musk schaut dabei in die Röhre. Sieben Tage und viele Meldungen im Überblick. (Golem-Wochenrückblick, Internet)

Judge rules against DOJ in Amazon, Expedia case against Trump travel ban

Washington AG: “No one is above the law—not even the president.”

Enlarge (credit: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images))

A federal judge in Washington has joined several of his counterparts across the country in ruling against the federal government’s executive order that restricts citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.

In the suit, which was filed by the State of Washington earlier in the week, officials from Expedia and Amazon filed formal legal declarations saying that their employees are directly affected by the President Donald Trump’s policy. Expedia further explained that its business interests would be negatively impacted if the executive order was allowed to stand.

On Friday afternoon, US District Judge James L. Robart, who was nominated to the court by President George W. Bush in 2003, ruled against the government and granted a temporary restraining order, effective nationwide. This restraining order can still be overturned or altered later.

Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Google Now Launcher to be pulled from the Play Store in Q1 2017

Google kills the older of its two launchers—will the Pixel Launcher replace it?

Enlarge / The Google Now Launcher. (credit: Google)

The Google Now Launcher has been the go-to choice for Android users looking for a simple, stock home screen since its general availability in 2014. If you had a skinned phone and wanted something that looked a little more like "Google's Android," you could hop down to the Play Store, install the app, and get a home screen with Google's predictive Google Now cards integrated.

Sadly, the Google Now Launcher will probably be gone soon. According to Android Police, Google is sending out letters to OEM partners declaring that the Google Now Launcher will be retired in Q1 2017. Devices that have the launcher installed will be able to continue using it, but the app will no longer show up on the Play Store.

Google actually has two home screen apps on the Play Store, the Google Now Launcher—which is widely available and the stock launcher on the Nexus phones—and the Pixel Launcher, which is exclusive to the Pixel and Pixel XL. Neither app actually contains the code for the home screen; they are just small "enabler" apps.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

FCC makes it harder for poor people to get subsidized broadband

Some might pay $9.25 more as ISPs lose ability to sell low-cost Internet plans.

(credit: Aurich Lawson / Thinkstock)

The Federal Communications Commission has told nine companies that they can no longer provide broadband using a federal assistance program. The program gives low-income people a $9.25 monthly household subsidy to purchase home Internet or mobile broadband service.

These nine companies were the first to gain a new designation made possible by the Lifeline phone subsidy program's expansion into broadband service. Until today, the companies could sell broadband-only plans in many states to people who were eligible for the monthly subsidy. The FCC decision released today acknowledged that some poor people "will see their monthly bills increase by no more than $9.25" as a result of the decision.

This is one of several decisions made by the commission's former Democratic leadership that were rolled back today by newly appointed Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican. "These last-minute actions, which did not enjoy the support of the majority of commissioners at the time they were taken, should not bind us going forward," Pai said.

Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Cash, random chance almost ruin Nintendo’s first smartphone Fire Emblem

Slick presentation, solid gameplay—but, geez, enough with the timers, Nintendo.

Enlarge (credit: Nintendo)

Fire Emblem Heroes sees Nintendo entering new game-design territory. Sure, Nintendo has previously toyed with free-to-play games on both 3DS and iOS, and it has experimented with radically altering beloved series to fit on a phone in Super Mario Run (unlike Mario, Fire Emblem is launching simultaneously on both iOS and Android). This time around, though, Nintendo is diving head-first into the "gacha" mold, wrapping its turn-based strategy/RPG series around randomized, pay-per-pull hero collection.

The results are odd, but Nintendo may have an obnoxious hit on its hands. Fire Emblem's core gameplay is free to try here, and it's still eminently satisfying on the phone—so long as you know what to expect regarding exactly when Nintendo will (and won't) nag you to pay up, that is.

Turn-based tactics meet microtransactions

Read 17 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Op-ed: Windows 10 0day exploit goes wild, and so do Microsoft marketers

Customers want objective threat guidance, not cheap shots at Microsoft rivals.

(credit: Johannes Hemmerlein)

There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that exploits a key file-sharing protocol in all supported versions of Windows. That includes Windows 10, the latest and most secure version of the Microsoft operating system. The exploit is probably not worth worrying about, but you'd never know that based on the statement Microsoft officials issued on Thursday when asked what kind of threat the exploit poses:

"Windows is the only platform with a customer commitment to investigate reported security issues and proactively update impacted devices as soon as possible," an unnamed spokesperson replied. "We recommend customers use Windows 10 and the Microsoft Edge browser for the best protection."

An employee at Microsoft's outside PR firm, WE Communications, wouldn't explain why the statement advised customers to use Windows 10 and Edge when the exploit works on all versions of Windows and doesn't require that targets use a browser. Ars reminded the employee that an advisory issued hours earlier by the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University warned that the vulnerability might leave users of all supported versions of Windows open to code-execution attacks.

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments