Stylus 3: LG stellt neues Stift-Smartphone vor

LG geht mit seiner Stift-Smartphone-Serie Stylus in die dritte Runde: Das Stylus 3 kommt mit einer eigenartigen Mischung aus guter und weniger guter Hardware sowie einem verbesserten Stift. Zusätzlich will LG auf der CES 2017 vier neue K-Serien-Smartphones präsentieren. (CES 2017, Smartphone)

LG geht mit seiner Stift-Smartphone-Serie Stylus in die dritte Runde: Das Stylus 3 kommt mit einer eigenartigen Mischung aus guter und weniger guter Hardware sowie einem verbesserten Stift. Zusätzlich will LG auf der CES 2017 vier neue K-Serien-Smartphones präsentieren. (CES 2017, Smartphone)

Blizzard: Serverbrowser und neue Helden für Overwatch geplant

Einen Serverbrowser für Custom Games, Verbesserungen für E-Sport-Matches und natürlich neue Helden und Maps: Chefentwickler Jeff Kaplan hat über die Pläne gesprochen, die Blizzard im Jahr 2017 für Overwatch hat. (Overwatch, Blizzard)

Einen Serverbrowser für Custom Games, Verbesserungen für E-Sport-Matches und natürlich neue Helden und Maps: Chefentwickler Jeff Kaplan hat über die Pläne gesprochen, die Blizzard im Jahr 2017 für Overwatch hat. (Overwatch, Blizzard)

Australian Govt Advisory Body Digs in Over Fair Use & Geo-Unblocking

A final inquiry report published by the Australian government’s Productivity Commission is steadfastly maintaining the position that citizens should have the right to use VPNs to access geo-restricted content. The advisory body is also unmoved when it comes to delivering fair use exceptions, stating that rightsholder objections are based on flawed and “self-interested” assumptions.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

copyright-bloodEarlier this year, Australia’s Productivity Commission released a draft report covering various aspects of the country’s intellectual property system.

Among the Commission’s recommendations was advice to the government that it should allow citizens to access geo-blocked content in order for them to obtain the best deals on international content.

“Geoblocking results in Australians paying higher prices (often for a lesser or later service) than consumers overseas,” the draft read.

The report also urged the introduction of fair use provisions into local copyright law instead of the current “fair dealing” arrangement.

“Australia’s copyright system has expanded over time, often with no transparent, evidence-based policy analysis demonstrating the need for, or quantum of, new rights. A new system of user rights, including the introduction of a broad, principles-based fair use exception, is needed to help address this imbalance,” the report said.

During the summer, copyright holders fought back, claiming that fair use would have a negative effect on creation. Music group IFPI, for example, warned that fair use would threaten innovation and disadvantage creators while creating legal uncertainty.

“Licensing, not exceptions to copyright, drives innovation. Innovation is best achieved through licensing agreements between content owners and users, including technological innovators,” IFPI said. In December, similar arguments were presented in a new campaign championed by local celebrities.

But in a final inquiry report sent to the government in September and published this week, the Commission’s position remains unmoved.

“Rights holders have argued against the adoption of fair use in Australia. They claim that by design, fair use is imprecise and would create significant legal uncertainty for both rightsholders and users. Initial uncertainty is not a compelling reason to eschew a fair use exception, especially if it serves to preserve poor policy outcomes,” the Commission writes.

“Australia’s current exceptions are themselves subject to legal uncertainty, and evidence suggests that fair use cases, as shown in the US, are more predictable than rights holders argue. Moreover, courts routinely apply principles-based law to new cases, such as in consumer and employment law, updating case law when the circumstances warrant doing so.”

The Commission says that over time, both rightsholders and users will become “increasingly comfortable” when making judgments over what is and is not fair use. In the event that Courts are called on to decide, four factors should be considered.

• the purpose and character of the use
• the nature of the copyright material
• the amount and substantiality of the part used
• the effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyright material.

“Rights holders also argued fair use would significantly reduce their incentives to create and invest in new works, holding up Canada as an example. Some have proclaimed that fair use will equate with ‘free use’, particularly by the education sector. But these concerns are ill-founded and premised on flawed (and self-interested) assumptions,” the Commission writes.

“Indeed, rather than ignore the interests of rights holders, under fair use the effect on the rights holder is one of the factors to be considered. Where a use of copyright material harms a rights holder, the use is less likely to be considered fair. In the US, where fair use is long established, creative industries thrive.”

Fair Use recommedation from the Commissionrecco-51

And when it comes to allowing Australians unfettered access to legitimate content, the Commission remains equally unmoved. It notes that prompt access to reasonably priced content is vital in the fight against piracy and the government should change the law to make it clear to consumers that they have the right to obtain content from overseas, should that mean getting a better deal.

“Research consistently demonstrates that timely and cost effective access to
copyright-protected works is the best way for industry to reduce online copyright
infringement. Therefore, in addition to implementing a new exception for fair use, the Commission is recommending making it easier for users to access legitimate copyright-protected content,” the inquiry report reads.

“Studies show Australian consumers systematically pay higher prices for professional software, music, games and e-books than consumers in comparable overseas markets. While some digital savvy consumers are able to avoid these costs (such as through the use of proxy servers and Virtual Private Networks), most pay inflated prices for lower standard services and some will ultimately infringe.

“The Australian Government should make clear that it is not an infringement of Australia’s copyright system for consumers to circumvent geoblocking technology and should avoid international obligations that would preclude such practices,” it adds.

Anti-Geoblocking recommendation from the Commissionrecco-52

The Intellectual Property Arrangements final inquiry report is available here.

Note: An earlier version of this article referred to the Productivity Commission as an “agency”. That has been corrected to “advisory body”.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Telefonanlagen: 8,2-Milliarden-Dollar-Buyout von Avaya gescheitert

Zwei Investmentfirmen haben sich beim Kauf von Avaya verspekuliert. Jetzt könnten Silver Lake Partners und Texas Pacific Group über 8 Milliarden US-Dollar verlieren – und 11.000 Beschäftigte ihren Job bei dem Telefonanlagenhersteller. Tenovis gehört zu Avaya. (Telefonanlage, VoIP)

Zwei Investmentfirmen haben sich beim Kauf von Avaya verspekuliert. Jetzt könnten Silver Lake Partners und Texas Pacific Group über 8 Milliarden US-Dollar verlieren - und 11.000 Beschäftigte ihren Job bei dem Telefonanlagenhersteller. Tenovis gehört zu Avaya. (Telefonanlage, VoIP)

E-Bikes: Ein neues Rad für Amerika

Anders als in Europa und Asien sind Elektrofahrräder in den USA noch kein Verkaufsschlager. Dabei könnten sie durchaus eine Alternative für den schlechten ÖPNV und aggressive Taxidienste wie Uber sein. (E-Bike, Technologie)

Anders als in Europa und Asien sind Elektrofahrräder in den USA noch kein Verkaufsschlager. Dabei könnten sie durchaus eine Alternative für den schlechten ÖPNV und aggressive Taxidienste wie Uber sein. (E-Bike, Technologie)

Schutzrechte: Nokia verklagt Apple wegen Patentverletzungen

Nokia hat Apple in den USA und Deutschland verklagt und behauptet, das Unternehmen habe zahlreiche Patente verletzt und zahle dafür nicht. 2011 gab es bereits ein Patentabkommen, doch das soll die jetzt infrage stehenden Schutzrechte nicht betreffen. (Patent, Apple)

Nokia hat Apple in den USA und Deutschland verklagt und behauptet, das Unternehmen habe zahlreiche Patente verletzt und zahle dafür nicht. 2011 gab es bereits ein Patentabkommen, doch das soll die jetzt infrage stehenden Schutzrechte nicht betreffen. (Patent, Apple)

Blockade in Ägypten: Kryptomessenger Signal kann die Zensur umgehen

Weil der Kryptomessenger Signal in Ägypten blockiert wird, hat das Team um Moxie Marlinspike einen Mechanismus entwickelt, der die Nutzung der App wieder möglich machen soll. Künftig soll das automatisch für alle Nutzer gelten – egal ob sie Android oder iOS nutzen. (Signal, Instant Messenger)

Weil der Kryptomessenger Signal in Ägypten blockiert wird, hat das Team um Moxie Marlinspike einen Mechanismus entwickelt, der die Nutzung der App wieder möglich machen soll. Künftig soll das automatisch für alle Nutzer gelten - egal ob sie Android oder iOS nutzen. (Signal, Instant Messenger)

Gesetzentwurf: Bundesregierung will Carsharing mehr Rechte einräumen

Mit Sonderrechten für die Fahrzeuge will die Bundesregierung Carsharing für Autofahrer attraktiver machen. Sie hat einen Gesetzentwurf abgesegnet, der es Gemeinden erlaubt, Parkflächen für Carsharing-Autos auszuweisen, kostenfreie Parkplätze anzubieten und die Busspur zu öffnen. (Carsharing, Technologie)

Mit Sonderrechten für die Fahrzeuge will die Bundesregierung Carsharing für Autofahrer attraktiver machen. Sie hat einen Gesetzentwurf abgesegnet, der es Gemeinden erlaubt, Parkflächen für Carsharing-Autos auszuweisen, kostenfreie Parkplätze anzubieten und die Busspur zu öffnen. (Carsharing, Technologie)

After Uber defied California’s DMV, the DMV revoked Uber’s registrations

Uber said it remains “100 percent committed to California” but will test elsewhere.

If these people are in California, this is not a self-driving Uber with an engineer up front. (credit: UberPop)

On Wednesday night, the California DMV issued a statement saying it would revoke the registrations of 16 cars owned by Uber, which the company had been using to test its self-driving system. The DMV said that “the registrations were improperly issued for these vehicles because they were not properly marked as test vehicles.”

The move from the California DMV comes after a contentious public battle last week, when Uber suddenly announced the launch of its pilot program in San Francisco (the same program had been running in Pittsburgh for a few months already). But Bloomberg noted that the ride-hailing company still hadn’t registered with the state’s DMV, which requires that companies looking to test self-driving cars apply for a special permit to do so on public roads.

Uber countered that its system wasn’t very advanced yet and was indistinguishable from a mere Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS), which do not require special permits. Uber cited Tesla’s autopilot software, which drivers currently use without adhering to the DMV's autonomous vehicle rules. Tesla, however, has registered with the state’s motor department to test autonomous vehicles.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments