Warner Bros. says a talent agency effectively ran its own pirate site when it ripped DVD screeners and streamed them to associates via Google servers. In a lawsuit filed Monday, Innovative Artists stands accused of copyright infringement and breaching the DMCA after screeners under its control leaked to torrent sites.
Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.
When so-called DVD screeners of the latest movies leak to pirate sites, studios are among the first to highlight the damaging effects. Often the copies are of excellent quality, a gift to millions of file-sharers worldwide but a potential headache for subsequent official distribution efforts.
While studios have had the means to track screeners back to their sources for a long time, when compared to the number of leaks it is relatively rare for industry insiders to face civil legal action. That changed yesterday when Warner Bros. Entertainment sued talent agency Innovative Artists.
In a lawsuit filed in a California federal court, Warner accuses the agency of effectively setting up its own pirate site, stocked with rips of DVD screeners that should have been kept secure.
“Beginning in late 2015, Innovative Artists set up and operated an illegal digital distribution platform that copied movies and then distributed copies and streamed public performances of those movies to numerous people inside and outside of the agency,” the complaint (pdf) reads.
“Innovative Artists stocked its platform with copies of Plaintiff’s works, including copies that Innovative Artists made by ripping awards consideration ‘screener’ DVDs that Plaintiff sent to the agency to deliver to one of its clients.”
Given its position in the industry, Innovative Artists should have known better than to upload content, Warner’s lawyers write.
“The actions Plaintiff complains of are blatantly illegal. That illegality would be obvious to anyone, but especially to Innovative Artists, a talent agency that claims to promote the interests of actors, writers, directors and others whose livelihoods depend critically on respect for copyright,” the complaint adds.
Only making matters worse is the fact that some of the DVD screeners ripped by the agency leaked out beyond its platform, which was actually a shared folder on its Google Drive account.
According to the complaint, Warner Bros. discovered something was amiss when content security company Deluxe Entertainment Services advised that screener copies of Creed and In the Heart of the Sea had appeared on file-sharing sites.
Both movies were made available by Hive-CM8, a release outfit responsible for many leaks during December 2015. Crucially, both contained watermarks that enabled them to be tracked back to the source.
“Because the screeners were ‘watermarked’ — embedded with markers that identified their intended recipients — Plaintiff traced the copies to screeners that Plaintiff had sent to an Innovative Artists client, in care of the agency,” the complaint notes.
“Instead of forwarding the screeners directly to its client, Innovative Artists used illegal ripping software to bypass the technical measures that prevent access to and copying of the content on DVDs. Innovative Artists then copied the movies to its digital distribution platform, where those copies became available for immediate downloading and streaming along with infringing copies of many other copyrighted movies.”
While the allegations are damaging enough already, they don’t stop there. The complaint alleges that the agency also gave others access to the screeners stored on Google Drive in return for access to other titles not yet in its possession.
“Innovative Artists traded access to some of its unauthorized digital copies of movies in exchange for unauthorized copies of content possessed by third parties. For example, in one case, Innovative Artists granted an assistant at another company access to the digital distribution platform because the assistant had provided a screener to Innovative Artists for a title that was not already on the platform,” Warner writes.
For copyright infringement, Warner Bros. seeks actual or statutory damages, up to the maximum of $150,000 for willful infringement, attorneys’ fees, and an injunction. For the breaches of anti-circumvention provisions when Innovative ripped the DVDs, the studio claims the maximum statutory damages as permitted by the DMCA.
Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.
Google soll an einem Stand-alone-Headset arbeiten, das seinem Träger Augmented-Reality-Elemente anzeigt. Anders als bei den neuen Daydream-Betrachtern soll kein Smartphone für die Nutzung nötig sein. (
Mozillas Firefox-Browser wird keine TLS-Zertifikate der beiden skandalträchtigen Certificate Authorities mehr akzeptieren. Wie dies genau umgesetzt wird, hat die Stiftung nun erläutert. (
Die Hersteller vernetzter Geräte für das IoT sollen nach Ansicht des BSI höhere Sicherheitsstandards einhalten. Bei der Entwicklung dürfe nicht nur auf den Preis geachtet werden. (
Das Mi Mix von Xiaomi hat einen großen 6,4-Zoll-Bildschirm, auf das Gehäuse wirkt sich diese Größe aber nicht aus - einen Rand um den Bildschirm gibt es nämlich nur noch unten. Das Smartphone steckt voller innovativer Technik und kostet in China umgerechnet ab 475 Euro. (
Neues von den Entwicklern von Fruit Ninja und Jetpack Joyride: Mit dem Mobilgame Dan the Man veröffentlicht Halfbrick einen Mix aus Jump-and-Run und Prügelspiel, der Retrocharme mit toller Spielbarkeit verbindet. (
Mit Hilfe der 13 Millionen Vielflieger des Onlinedienstes Tripit will die Apex Fluggesellschaften möglichst neutral bewerten. Ist der Sitzplatz zu eng, der WLAN-Zugang schnell, oder gibt es Probleme mit dem Catering? All das soll transparenter werden. (
Nach dem Wegfall des Routerzwangs bringt AVM ein weiteres Kabelmodem in den Handel. Zudem sollen die Fritzboxen demnächst natives Dual-Stack mit IPv6 unterstützen. (
You must be logged in to post a comment.