First came the Breathalyzer, now meet the roadside police “textalyzer”

Drivers in accidents could risk losing license for refusing to submit phone to testing.

(credit: Cellebrite)

We're all familiar with the Breathalyzer, the brand name for a roadside device that measures a suspected drunken driver's blood-alcohol level. It has been in use for decades. Now there's a so-called "textalyzer" device to help the authorities determine whether someone involved in a motor vehicle accident was unlawfully driving while distracted.

The roadside technology is being developed by Cellebrite, the Israeli firm that many believe assisted the Federal Bureau of Investigation in cracking the iPhone at the center of a heated decryption battle with Apple.

Under the first-of-its-kind legislation proposed in New York, drivers involved in accidents would have to submit their phone to roadside testing from a textalyzer to determine whether the driver was using a mobile phone ahead of a crash. In a bid to get around the Fourth Amendment right to privacy, the textalyzer allegedly would keep conversations, contacts, numbers, photos, and application data private. It will solely say whether the phone was in use prior to a motor-vehicle mishap. Further analysis, which might require a warrant, could be necessary to determine whether such usage was via hands-free dashboard technology and to confirm the original finding.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

GOP lawmakers try to limit FCC’s ability to help consumers

Republicans in Congress push rate regulation ban and cuts to low-income program.

(credit: Aurich Lawson / Thinkstock)

Republican lawmakers are working on two proposals that would hinder Federal Communications Commission efforts to help consumers.

The House of Representatives may vote as soon as this week on a measure that could disrupt net neutrality rules by stripping the FCC of rate regulation authority, The Hill reported. Separately, the House Subcommittee on Communications and Technology on Wednesday will hold a hearing on a bill that would limit the amount of money the FCC's Lifeline program could spend helping poor people purchase Internet service.

The rate regulation bill, approved by the Energy and Commerce Committee over objections from Democrats last month, would strip the FCC of authority to set broadband rates or review whether a rate is reasonable. Although the FCC has no plans to tell broadband providers exactly what they can charge, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler argued last month that the bill's broad language could prevent the FCC from enforcing net neutrality rules against blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization. The bill could also prevent the FCC from taking action against zero-rating schemes in which ISPs favor content by exempting it from data caps, and it would "cast doubt on the ability of the Commission to ensure that broadband providers receiving universal service subsidies do not overcharge their consumers," he argued.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Appeals court: Google will have to deal with Mississippi AG investigation

What would Jim Hood do? The appeals court doesn’t want to guess.

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood.

An appeals court has ruled that Google will have to deal with an investigation into its business practices by Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood. The court also noted the search company can still challenge the investigation at a later time.

It's a reversal of a big win by Google last year when a federal judge halted the Mississippi investigation, which sought information about how Google deals with links related to counterfeit goods, illegal drug sales, copyright violations, and other matters. Google sued to stop the investigation while litigation was underway, saying that Hood's goal was to "punish" Google while he pursued his goal of a "pre-filtered Internet"—a power denied him by both Congress and the Constitution, Google lawyers argued.

Hood's investigation had been egged on by lobbyists from the Motion Picture Association of America, and in some cases demand letters that came from Hood's office were actually written by MPAA lawyers.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Pitch black: Ford’s autonomous cars don’t care whether it’s day or night

Night testing in the desert goes surprisingly well, the company says.

(credit: Ford)

As we reported on Sunday, some car makers are unhappy with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's push for coherent nationwide self-driving car regulations. This is partially because optical sensors can't always cope with adverse weather. But lest we forget, the intent—both of regulators and the OEMs that driving this technology—is to save many of the 33,000 lives lost on US roads each year. One of those companies, Ford, has just released the results of recent night testing that it says proves the effectiveness of the company's approach to autonomous driving.

The semi-autonomous cars we've been driving recently from Audi, Tesla, and Volvo all depend mainly on optical sensors to detect their environment. And the critics are correct—these sensors can't always read the lines on the road and can be susceptible to poor weather. Like Google, Ford uses lidar as the car's primary sensor. And after testing in the desert at night, Ford says that the tech far surpasses anything a human could do.

Wayne Williams—who we talked to at CES in January—was one of Ford's researchers who went for a nighttime ride in the autonomous Fusions. “Inside the car, I could feel it moving, but when I looked out the window, I only saw darkness. As I rode in the back seat, I was following the car’s progression in real time using computer monitoring. Sure enough, it stayed precisely on track along those winding roads,” he said.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Deals of the Day (4-11-2016)

Deals of the Day (4-11-2016)

The LG Gram line of notebooks have screen sizes ranging from 13.3 to 15.6 inches. But there’s one thing these notebooks have in common: they’re ridiculously light, weighing in at around 2.2 pounds. While you usually have to pay a premium price to get a 2.2 pounds notebook with a Core i5 chip, a full […]

Deals of the Day (4-11-2016) is a post from: Liliputing

Deals of the Day (4-11-2016)

The LG Gram line of notebooks have screen sizes ranging from 13.3 to 15.6 inches. But there’s one thing these notebooks have in common: they’re ridiculously light, weighing in at around 2.2 pounds. While you usually have to pay a premium price to get a 2.2 pounds notebook with a Core i5 chip, a full […]

Deals of the Day (4-11-2016) is a post from: Liliputing

Kepler exits emergency mode, re-establishes full communication

Controllers now get to try to figure out what went wrong.

(credit: NASA)

Late last week, NASA's Kepler planet-hunting spacecraft experienced some sort of problem that caused it to enter what's called emergency mode. This should only occur when the spacecraft experiences a serious problem, as it limits its activity and burns through the probe's limited fuel supply at an accelerated pace. This incident marked the first time since Kepler was launched in 2009 that it entered emergency mode.

Today, NASA announced that it had re-established normal communication with Kepler, allowing the spacecraft to exit emergency mode. The telescope's communication hardware is once again pointed directly at Earth. This has allowed controllers to put Kepler in an operational mode where it consumes far less fuel, which will extend its usable life.

But first, the controllers must figure out why Kepler entered emergency mode in the first place. Full communications will allow them to download telemetry and operational data, which will hopefully allow them to identify the underlying problem. Until they do, however, planned observations of the Milky Way's galactic core have been put on hold. The window for observing the core from Kepler's current location closes on July first. Its previous observation work ended in late March, and all data from that work has already been transferred to Earth.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Making transistors with dissolved nanocrystals

Solution-based processing of a field-effect transistor from inorganic nanocrystals.

A diagram of a typical field effect transistor. (credit: Wikimedia commons)

Semiconductors are integral to modern electronics. Currently, they're made by etching features into silicon, but researchers are constantly exploring new fabrication approaches that balance cost, energy efficiency, electronic capabilities, and mechanical properties.

Recently, scientists have demonstrated the ability to design and fabricate flexible, high-performance semiconductors out of colloidal nanocrystals. The approach allowed them to lay out the circuitry using simple solution processing, in which the components are put in place while suspended in a liquid. Solution processing is generally cheap and convenient, and it can be used to cover large areas at once.

Field effects

The specific type of device the researchers designed is called a field-effect transistor. In general, transistors are semiconductor devices used to amplify or switch electrical signals and power. Field-effect transistors use an electric field in a device called a gate to influence the conductivity of a nearby semiconductor.

Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

More big-name sites hit by rash of malicious ads that attack end users

Some of country’s top sites ran ads that redirected to the Angler exploit kit.

Some of the Netherland' most popular websites have fallen victim to a malvertising campaign that managed to compromise a widely used ad platform, security researchers reported on Monday.

The malicious ads were served over at least 11 sites including marktplaats.nl, the Netherlands equivalent to eBay and the country's seventh most visited website, according to a blog post published by security firm Fox IT. Other affected sites included news site nu.nl (which is ranked No. 14), weather site buienradar.nl (54), and startpagina.nl (67). Other widely visited sites were operated by commercial TV stations and magazines.

According to the blog post:

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Skurrile Belästigungen: Von IP-Adressen, Kloschüsseln und einer abgelegenen Farm

Kansas ist das Herz des Cybercrime – zumindest wenn man einer Anwendung glauben schenkt, die IP-Adressen auf einer Karte verortet. Tatsächlich leben dort unschuldige Menschen, die nun viele wütende Anrufe und Kloschüsseln bekommen. (Spam, Internet)

Kansas ist das Herz des Cybercrime - zumindest wenn man einer Anwendung glauben schenkt, die IP-Adressen auf einer Karte verortet. Tatsächlich leben dort unschuldige Menschen, die nun viele wütende Anrufe und Kloschüsseln bekommen. (Spam, Internet)

U.S. ISPs Refuse to Disconnect Persistent Pirates

The U.S. broadband association USTelecom, a trade association representing many ISPs, is taking a stand against abusive takedown notices and a recent push to terminate the accounts of repeat infringers. They argue that ISPs are not required to pass on takedown notices and stress that their subscribers shouldn’t lose Internet access based solely on copyright holder complaints.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

ustelecoSigned into law nearly two decades ago, the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) aimed to ready copyright law for the digital age.

The law introduced a safe harbor for Internet providers, meaning that they can’t be held liable for their pirating users as long as they ‘deal’ with repeat infringers.

Generally speaking, ISPs are not very eager to disconnect accounts of frequent copyright infringers. While the law allows for account terminations, it stipulates that this should happen under “appropriate” circumstances.

Some copyright holders have argued that three infringement notices are enough to warrant a disconnection, but most Internet providers don’t want to go this far.

In a recent recommendation to the Copyright Office the U.S. broadband association USTelecom points out that DMCA’s safe harbor provisions are generally working as intended, shielding Internet intermediaries from liability for copyright infringements carried out by their users.

However, the group stresses that in most cases ISPs act as mere conduits who pass on digital information. These type of services are not subject to takedown notices as they fall under section 512(a) of the DMCA, so all takedown notices are by definition invalid.

“It is inappropriate and contrary to the DMCA to suggest that ISPs should somehow be responsible for policing copyright rights when those service providers are acting as mere conduits for digital communications,” USTelecom writes.

Nonetheless, every month ISPs are bombarded with millions of takedown notices, triggered by allegedly pirating customers.

“Despite this well-established precedent, ISPs are receiving millions of invalid notices relating to conduit services. These notices frequently include improper ‘settlement’ demands that rights holders pressure ISPs to forward to unrepresented consumers.”

USTelecom stresses that ISPs have no obligation to process takedown notices under the DMCA, as they merely pass on traffic. While most forward this information as a courtesy, they are not required to do so.

Not all copyright holders agree with this stance. In fact, USTelecom points out that in recent years they have been pushing for tougher actions against Internet subscribers who receive multiple notices.

“In some cases, the senders of these notices even want the ISPs to terminate Internet access based on these allegations – which, again, the ISPs as mere conduits could not evaluate even if they were obligated to do so under the DMCA.”

“These actions constitute an abuse of the DMCA notice process, and should be acknowledged as such by the Copyright Office,” USTelecom adds.

Even if ISPs were required to forward DMCA notices, they believe that terminating Internet connections goes too far. The group points out that the notices are not always sent to the right person, for example, and add that the senders do not always represent the copyright holder.

It should be up to a court to decide if a person loses his or her Internet access, not the Internet provider acting solely on claims of alleged copyright infringements.

“Any allegations intended to justify the termination or long-term suspension of Internet access connections should be subject to some form of judicial review before depriving subscribers of all access to the Internet,” USTelecom writes.

“Internet access is essential to modern life, including economic life and exercise of other fundamental rights. It is simply unthinkable, that a consumer should be able to lose access to such a fundamental and crucial tool absent some form of formal adjudication.”

USTelecom’s response to the DMCA consultation of the Copyright Office comes at an interesting time. Just a few months ago, Cox Communication was ordered to pay $25 million because it failed to disconnect subscribers whose connections were repeatedly used to pirate content.

The telecom group clearly disagrees with this verdict, which is currently under appeal, and hopes to have the U.S. Government on its side.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.