Two-wheeled domination: Yamaha’s YZF-R1 MotoAmerica racing bike

We take a look at what makes the road-derived R1 such a fearsome package.

2015 MotoAmerica Superbike champion Cameron Beaubier testing at the Circuit of the Americas in Austin, Texas. (credit: Brian J. Nelson)

It's not just car manufacturers that take their products racing—motorbike makers do it too. MotoGP is perhaps analogous to Formula 1. It's bikes are purpose-built for the racetrack, highly specialized to the task at hand, and not at all street-legal. Superbikes, on the other hand, can be thought of more like touring car or sports car racing. Yes, the machines are adapted for track use, but they start life as motorbikes that you or I could ride on the street. Currently, Yamaha's YZF-R1 is king of the hill in Superbike racing. With the first MotoAmerica race of 2016 just around the corner (April 8-10 at the Circuit of the Americas in Texas), we decided to take a closer look at what goes into a championship winning machine.

Yamaha has dominated Superbike racing for some time now. The previous-generation R1 managed to win the championship for five consecutive seasons between 2009 and 2014. And its successor proved just as capable in 2015—the Monster Energy/Graves Yamaha team won every single race, with Cameron Beaubier taking the championship over his teammate Josh Hayes.

MotoAmerica's rulebook for Superbikes requires teams to start off with a production road bike with a 1.0L engine. In this case, that's a Yamaha YZF-R1, a two-wheeled rocket that in some ways blurs the line between road bikes and those ultra-specialized MotoGP machines. Keith McCarty, racing division manager for Yamaha Motorsports, told us that there actually aren't that many changes required to take the R1 racing. "The standard bikes are so good with regards to horsepower, handling, braking, electronics that it's tough to make big improvements. We focus on detail improvement."

Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

The science behind the insane popularity of “react” videos on YouTube

Controversial theory may explain why we love watching people experience stuff.

The video that got me hooked on Five Nights at Freddy's. | Source: YouTube, REACT

Recently I've fallen in love with a horror game I've never even played. It's called Five Nights at Freddy's, and I discovered it through a series of YouTube videos. I watched as four to five players sat down at their PCs and started from the same point in the game. All I could see were their faces. Their brows furrowed, their faces wrinkled as they winced at false jump-scares, their hands flew over their mouths when some terrifying animatronic popped out and killed them—and I did all the same things along with them. I could feel the anxiety showing on their faces. I felt the weird excitement and exhilaration they got from being scared, even though I never saw a single frame of Five Nights. The videos were so much fun that I wanted more. But I didn't download the game. Instead, I searched for more videos of people reacting to things.

Videos of people reacting to games—or commercials, or the deaths of legendary pop stars, or old-school computer software—are incredibly popular online. Lots of people make them, but the reigning champs are comedy duo Fine Brothers. Their various YouTube channels have over 20 million subscribers, and their channel devoted to nothing but reaction videos—simply titled "React"—has over 903 million views.

Recently the Fine Bros got into hot water when they tried to trademark the word "react". It was part of their React World project, in which people pay the duo to create reaction videos. The backlash was swift and loud, and the Fine Bros backed off. Too many people are invested in making their own react videos to allow just one pair of creators to own the idea. React videos have tapped into some part of our nature that relishes watching other people experience stuff.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Error 0401: Golem.de-Leser machen Faxen

Das Fax-Abo von Golem.de ist bei den Lesern auf viel Zustimmung gestoßen. Doch der Aprilscherz zeigt: In Zeiten von E-Mail und VoIP ist die Faxtechnik eine ziemliche Spaßbremse. (Golem.de, VoIP)

Das Fax-Abo von Golem.de ist bei den Lesern auf viel Zustimmung gestoßen. Doch der Aprilscherz zeigt: In Zeiten von E-Mail und VoIP ist die Faxtechnik eine ziemliche Spaßbremse. (Golem.de, VoIP)

A spiritual successor to Aaron Swartz is angering publishers all over again

Meet accused hacker and copyright infringer Alexandra Elbakyan.

Aaron Swartz would be proud of Alexandra Elbakyan. The 27-year-old is at the center of a lawsuit brought by a leading science publisher that is labeling her a hacker and infringer. (credit: Courtesy of Alexandra Elbakyan)

Stop us if you’ve heard this before: a young academic with coding savvy has become frustrated with the incarceration of information. Some of the world's best research continues to be trapped behind subscriptions and paywalls. This academic turns activist, and this activist then plots and executes the plan. It's time to free information from its chains—to give it to the masses free of charge. Along the way, this research Robin Hood is accused of being an illicit, criminal hacker.

This, of course, describes the tale of the late Aaron Swartz. His situation captured the Internet’s collective attention as the data crusader attacked research paywalls. Swartz was notoriously charged as a hacker for trying to free millions of articles from popular academic hub JSTOR. At age 26, he tragically committed suicide just ahead of his federal trial in 2013.

But suddenly in 2016, the tale has new life. The Washington Post decries it as academic research's Napster moment, and it all stems from a 27-year-old bioengineer turned Web programmer from Kazakhstan (who's living in Russia). Just as Swartz did, this hacker is freeing tens of millions of research articles from paywalls, metaphorically hoisting a middle finger to the academic publishing industry, which, by the way, has again reacted with labels like "hacker" and "criminal."

Read 30 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Lenovo Yoga Book convertible notebook leaked (again)

Lenovo Yoga Book convertible notebook leaked (again)

The Lenovo Yoga Book is a small convertible notebook that measures  about 0.38 inches thick, features a 360 degree hinge that lets you fold the touchscreen display back for use in tablet mode, and a battery that Lenovo says is good for up to 15 hours of run time. Lenovo hasn’t officially announced the Yoga […]

Lenovo Yoga Book convertible notebook leaked (again) is a post from: Liliputing

Lenovo Yoga Book convertible notebook leaked (again)

The Lenovo Yoga Book is a small convertible notebook that measures  about 0.38 inches thick, features a 360 degree hinge that lets you fold the touchscreen display back for use in tablet mode, and a battery that Lenovo says is good for up to 15 hours of run time. Lenovo hasn’t officially announced the Yoga […]

Lenovo Yoga Book convertible notebook leaked (again) is a post from: Liliputing

Copyright Troll Partner Threatens to Report Blogger to the Police

A company assisting US-based copyright troll outfit TCYK LLC has just threatened to report a blogger to the police. Joe Hickster, an anti-troll activist who has helped dozens of wrongfully accused individuals avoid paying settlement fees, was threatened after describing troll services company Hatton and Berkeley as being involved in a smoke-and-mirrors operation.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

trollsignOne might think that if a copyright holder would like to chase down alleged pirates in the UK it would be a relatively simple affair. Track their IP addresses and obtain their identities from ISPs, hire a lawfirm, send out the letters, and wait for the cash.

However, that’s been tried before and it has universally ended in tears for the lawfirms involved. As a result, copyright trolls are now deploying the new tactic of sending the letters via a limited company.

This is a pretty good idea. Not only do these companies avoid the scrutiny of the Solicitors Regulatory Authority but if it all goes wrong in a messy court battle, for example, the limited company can simply cease trading. It’s happened before.

The tactic is being employed by at least two sets of trolls and their partners in the UK. Golden Eye International, for example, is the front company acting for a number of porn copyright holders. By troll standards their operation seems relatively straightforward, but the same cannot be said of TCYK.

TCYK stands for The Company You Keep, a Robert Redford film that’s being used as a money generator by TCYK LLC, a US-based outfit attempting to turn piracy into profit. They’ve just accused an 82-year-old woman of being a movie pirate, which prompted intervention from her “disgusted” local MP.

However, instead of setting up in the UK themselves to chase alleged pirates themselves, TCYK employ the services of a company called Hatton and Berkeley. This is where things get messy.

According to the UK government’s Companies House database, the sole director of Hatton and Berkeley is a man called Paul Carter yet according to his various claims in the media and on his website, Robert Croucher says he is both managing director and owner.

In fact, according to public records Robert Croucher has never been listed as any kind of director of the company nor listed as having had any kind of shareholding. Croucher also claims to be personally based at 43, Berkeley Square in London while dozens of companies share the same address. It appears to be a virtual office.

Only complicating matters is that when alleged pirates receive ‘pay-up-or-else’ letters from Hatton and Berkeley on behalf of TCYK LLC, they aren’t told to pay either.

Instead they are told to send money to a third company called Ranger Bay Ltd, a company operated by a Marcus Auton. A former Bank of America employee and experienced accountant, Auton makes no mention of his copyright troll links on his Linkedin profile but TF has confirmed that his company is receiving money from suspected pirates.

Underlying the TCYK/Hatton and Berkeley/Ranger Bay operation are links with notorious copyright troll Patrick Achache, who is up to his neck in copyright litigation in the United States and elsewhere. Robert Croucher has made no secret of his affiliations with Achache, even posing with him for pictures while announcing a copyright troll invasion of the UK last October.

There can be no doubt that these kinds operations are set up in a complex manner, with some believing the tiered structure is deployed as a defensive mechanism in case everything goes wrong via a failed court action, for example. Of course, that is denied by those involved but not everyone is so keen to accept that at face value.

One of the most persistent troll-watchers in the UK is known as Joe Hickster. He runs the ACS Bore blog (Twitter) which was set up to undermine the activities of the now-defunct ACS:Law but has since expanded to cover any and all copyright troll-affiliated companies operating in the UK.

There’s no denying that Hickster is both persistent and at times abrasive, but he’s a man on a mission who feels it is his duty to help people wrongly accused by trolls. Indeed, Hickster is responsible for at least dozens (he doesn’t keep count) of people not paying companies like ACS:Law, GoldenEye and now Hatton and Berkeley/TCYK/Ranger Bay many tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of pounds.

Now, however, things are getting messy. It began last year when Robert Croucher weighed in on a four year old discussion on phone number database site WhoCallsMe about a company called Westone Business Services Ltd.

Westone (which has Hatton and Berkeley’s current director Paul Carter also listed as a former director) were being called out by reviewers as “scammers” who apparently took their money for business services and ran. Croucher stepped in with his opening lines.

“To whom it may concern, I am Robert Croucher. I have no affiliation to Mr Paul Carter,” he said.

As previous highlighted, Companies House begs to differ. In fact, the government database indicates the pair having been involved in several companies together – here, here, here and here.

All of this information came to the attention of Joe Hickster who stepped into the discussion on March 22 to add his opinion.

“Seems that CMI Business Group (t/a Hatton & Berkeley) are really a Speculative Invoicing outfit, in association with the notorious Patrick Achache, who assisted ACS:LAW and Tilly Baily Irvine, in their actions in sending thousands of letters to people in the UK demanding money for Pornography or other films and threatening to go to Court if they were not paid,” he said.

From there things went quickly downhill. People can read the full exchange here but in summary Hickster accused Croucher of being involved in a “smoke and mirrors” operation, Croucher took offense, and the gloves came off.

“Your previous accusations that Paul Carter is the owner and director of Hatton & Berkeley is flawed, I would advise scrutiny over any of your research from hereon,” Croucher said.

Again, Companies House lists Paul Carter as Hatton and Berkeley’s sole director. Nevertheless, Croucher continued.

“Due to the nature of your defamatory and unsubstantiated remarks above, I shall be seeking legal action against you should this continue,” he said.

The exchanges continued and then Croucher dropped the bombshell.

“You and others have been sending false and defamatory Tweets to myself and worryingly the more junior female members of my staff, this is being reported to the MET Police as it is continued harassment (see Malicious Communications Act 1988),” he told Hickster.

“I will be seeking that charges be brought against you should you not cease and desist from contacting myself, members of my staff or other officers of any of my operating companies. This is being taken very seriously and I believe you are underestimating the impact of your actions.

“To summarise; Please stop contacting me, any of my staff and certainly any of my clients, should you continue I will ensure that you are put to maximum task with respect to issuing legal proceedings against you for ongoing harassment and defamation,” he warned.

TorrentFreak caught up with Joe Hickster who denied harassment.

“I would not DREAM of harassing, ANY innocent person, whether they are young woman or men or pensioners. I would obviously leave that in [Croucher’s] more than capable hands, he has more experience at doing that than I,” he said.

While it’s not unusual for anti-troll activists to hold their battles in public, it’s quite extraordinary for their targets to duke it out on the Internet. Where this will go from here is anyone’s guess, but one thing is for certain. Robert Croucher’s business affairs (and those of the companies he’s involved with) seem far from straightforward and one way or another, with or without Joe Hickster, anti-troll activists in the UK remain intent on exposing them.

Robert Croucher did not immediately respond to TorrentFreak’s request for comment

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Geheimdienste: Regierung und Verfassungsschutz gegen EU-Terrorabwehrzentrum

Datenaustausch: ja – gemeinsames Terrorabwehrzentrum: nein. Die europäischen Geheimdienste trauen sich offenbar nicht genug gegenseitig, um zusammen effektiv den Terrorismus zu bekämpfen. Das belegen neue Enthüllungen zum BND. (Datenschutz, Internet)

Datenaustausch: ja - gemeinsames Terrorabwehrzentrum: nein. Die europäischen Geheimdienste trauen sich offenbar nicht genug gegenseitig, um zusammen effektiv den Terrorismus zu bekämpfen. Das belegen neue Enthüllungen zum BND. (Datenschutz, Internet)

Oculus SDK v1.3: Erste Steam-Spiele unterstützen das Rift CV1

Wer möchte, kann mittlerweile Steam-Spiele wie Project Cars oder Time Machine VR mit dem Oculus Rift CV1 nutzen. Auch Applikationen wie Player laufen. Allerdings startet die Oculus-Software immer mit. (Oculus Rift, Steam)

Wer möchte, kann mittlerweile Steam-Spiele wie Project Cars oder Time Machine VR mit dem Oculus Rift CV1 nutzen. Auch Applikationen wie Player laufen. Allerdings startet die Oculus-Software immer mit. (Oculus Rift, Steam)

Senator: let’s fix “third-party doctrine” that enabled NSA mass snooping

Q&A: Ars sits down with Oregon’s outspoken advocate of strong crypto, Sen. Ron Wyden.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) gave the keynote address on Wednesday at RightsCon in San Francisco. (credit: Cyrus Farivar)

SAN FRANCISCO—This past week hundreds of lawyers, technologists, journalists, activists, and others from around the globe descended upon a university conference center to try to figure out the state of digital rights in 2016. The conference, appropriately dubbed "RightsCon," featured many notable speakers, including Edward Snowden via video-conference, but relatively few from those inside government.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), however, was an exception. On the first day of the conference, he gave an in-person speech, in which he argued for a "New Compact for Security and Liberty."

The Oregon senator is likely familiar to Ars readers: he’s been one of the most consistently critical voices of the expansion of government surveillance in recent years. We last spoke with him in October 2014 when he made the case that expanded active spying hurts the American economy. In December 2014, Wyden introduced the "Secure Data Act" in the United States Senate, which aims to shut down government-ordered backdoors into digital systems. However, that bill hasn’t even made it to committee yet, over a year later.

Read 26 remaining paragraphs | Comments