Top 10 Most Pirated Movies of The Week – 11/30/15

The top 10 most downloaded movies on BitTorrent are in again. ‘Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials.’ tops the chart this week, followed by ‘Ant Man’ ‘Another World’ completes the top three.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

mazeThis week we have two newcomers in our chart.

Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials is the most downloaded movie for the second week in a row.

The data for our weekly download chart is estimated by TorrentFreak, and is for informational and educational reference only. All the movies in the list are BD/DVDrips unless stated otherwise.

RSS feed for the weekly movie download chart.

Ranking (last week) Movie IMDb Rating / Trailer
torrentfreak.com
1 (1) Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials 6.8 / trailer
2 (2) Ant-Man 7.7 / trailer
3 (3) Another World (Web-DL) 5.3 / trailer
4 (8) Criminal Activities (Web-DL) 5.8 / trailer
5 (7) The Man from U.N.C.L.E. 7.5 / trailer
6 (4) Ronaldo 6.7 / trailer
7 (10) The 33 (Web-DL) 7.0 / trailer
8 (…) Hotel Transylvania 2 (Webrip) 7.0 / trailer
9 (9) Inside Out 8.4 / trailer
10 (…) Talvar 8.6 / trailer

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Google-Patent: So sollen autonome Autos mit Fußgängern kommunizieren

Autonome Autos sollen laut einem Patent Googles künftig über Displays an den Außenseiten des Fahrzeugs mit Fußgängern und anderen Verkehrsteilnehmern kommunizieren. Das wirft neue Fragen auf. (Autonomes Fahren, Google)

Autonome Autos sollen laut einem Patent Googles künftig über Displays an den Außenseiten des Fahrzeugs mit Fußgängern und anderen Verkehrsteilnehmern kommunizieren. Das wirft neue Fragen auf. (Autonomes Fahren, Google)

SoundCloud Flags ‘Silence’ As Copyright Infringement

SoundCloud’s controversial automated copyright system has flagged a completely silent track as having “copyrighted content”.Facing ever serious threats from rights-holders, SoundCloud has implemented an automated copyright take-down system designed to …



SoundCloud's controversial automated copyright system has flagged a completely silent track as having "copyrighted content".

Facing ever serious threats from rights-holders, SoundCloud has implemented an automated copyright take-down system designed to detect potential copyrighted works and to remove them automatically. But unlike the more sophisticated system employed by the likes of YouTube to police similar copyright offences, SoundCloud's system is far more controversial as it appears to be much less accurate, and much more stringent than YouTube's ContentID.

And with SoundCloud's content library being remix heavy, and the very definition of a remix suggesting some part of an original, copyright work is present, SoundCloud's new copyright policy has not been popularly received. And among SoundCloud's loudest, and potentially funniest opponents is DJ Detweiler, producer of the infamous 'Ciley Myrus - Wrecking Ball' remix (the recorder-fueled remix is one of DJ Detweiler's many tracks that was removed by SoundCloud).

In an attempt to protest and troll SoundCloud's automated copyright take-down system, DJ Detweiler uploaded a "remix" of John Cage's 4'33. A completely silent, blank remix (which technically is still a remix), and one that should not fall foul of SoundCloud's system. But it did.
Soundcloud DJ Detweiler Take-down Notice
SoundCloud's take-down notice (via Your EDM)


Apparently, SoundCloud's copyright scanning consists merely of looking at the title of the track, with little or no effort in actually scanning the content of the track for actual copyright infringement. A flaw in the system that DJ Detweiler had wanted to expose in the first place.

With most of his tracks falling victim of SoundCloud's copyright system, DJ Detweiler has recently replaced all of his remixes with parodies of the infamous "message from SoundCloud" message that plays in lieu of removed copyrighted tracks.

Prime Air: Amazons neue Lieferdrohne verwandelt sich in ein Flugzeug

Amazons neue Lieferdrohne startet und landet wie ein Helikopter, beim Geradeausflug wird der Heckpropeller aktiviert. In einem Video zeigt Jeremy Clarkson, ehemals Moderator bei Top Gear, wie Amazon Prime Air künftig funktionieren könnte. (Prime-Air, Amazon)

Amazons neue Lieferdrohne startet und landet wie ein Helikopter, beim Geradeausflug wird der Heckpropeller aktiviert. In einem Video zeigt Jeremy Clarkson, ehemals Moderator bei Top Gear, wie Amazon Prime Air künftig funktionieren könnte. (Prime-Air, Amazon)

Copyright Industry Still Doesn’t Understand This Fight Isn’t About Money, But Liberty

With a lot of people streaming music and video from services such as Spotify, Pandora and Netflix, torrenting is less of a visible conflict than ten years ago. But similar fights continue in the shape of net neutrality and privacy, with the same values: it was never about the money.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

copyright-brandedIn 2010, I got a prize from the Swedish IT Industry as “IT person of the year”, the year after I had led the Swedish and first Pirate Party into the European Parliament.

Their motivation for the prize was that I had finally, and through hard work, brought important IT issues to front row and center of the political establishment.

What we said then are the same things we say now. The Internet is the most important piece of infrastructure we have. More important than telco, than cable TV, than roads, than power, than… well, with the possible exception of tap water and sanitation infrastructure, I’ll allow the jury to confer a bit more on that one.

We were saying, and are saying, that it’s insane, asinine, repulsive and revolting to allow a cartoon industry (the copyright industry – mostly led by Disney in this regard) to regulate the infrastructure of infrastructures. To allow a cartoon industry to dismantle anonymity, the right to private correspondence and many more fundamental liberties just because they were worried about their profits.

There was some success in pushing back the worst. We didn’t get to go on the offense, but we did safeguard the most important of liberty.

Then, something very odd and unexpected happened. Spotify came on stage, praised The Pirate Bay for raising the bar for consumer expectations of what good service means, and swept the floor with consumption patterns of music. As did Pandora in the US. Pirates tend to be early adopters and Pandora was no exception: I am paying subscriber #110 there out of today’s tens of millions. As was always noted, the fight for liberty was never a fight about money.

More people shifted toward streaming video as well with Netflix and similar services, again showing it was never about the money, but always about freedom.

After that, something even more unexpected happened. Pirates started fighting with the copyright industry, against the internet service providers, in the halls of policymaking. More specifically, pirates were siding with Microsoft against lots of old telco dinosaurs. Even more specifically, people were fighting for Net Neutrality – something that Microsoft was also fighting for, as the owner of Skype – against the mobile divisions of telco dinosaurs, who wanted to lock out competitors from their imaginary walled garden.

Of course, this is only unexpected if you thought it was about money in the first place. If you knew that it was always about liberty, about defending the infrastructure of infrastructures, about protecting the right to innovate and the freedom of speech, this comes as a no-brainer.

We care for permissionless innovation, we care for private correspondence, we care for sharing and the legacy of knowledge and culture. We do not care in the slightest for obsolete and outdated pre-internet distribution monopolies, nor do we care for pipes that want to be privileged, and we become outright hostile when the industries that benefit from old monopolies (not stakeholders, but beneficiaries!) assert a right to dismantle the liberties that our ancestors fought, bled, and died to give to us today.

“How will the authors get paid?” is an utterly uninteresting question in a market economy. The answer is equally utterly simple: “by making a sale”. There is no other way, and there should not be any other way. A much more relevant question today is “how do we protect the infrastructure of liberty against corporate encroachment and imaginary privileges of pre-internet monopolies”.

Oh, and the Swedish IT Industry Association also gives a prize to the IT Company of the year, not just the IT person of the year. The company to get that prize in the same year as me? Spotify.

About The Author

Rick Falkvinge is a regular columnist on TorrentFreak, sharing his thoughts every other week. He is the founder of the Swedish and first Pirate Party, a whisky aficionado, and a low-altitude motorcycle pilot. His blog at falkvinge.net focuses on information policy.

Book Falkvinge as speaker?

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Cox Can’t Describe Rightscorp As “Extortionists” and “Trolls” During Trial

Internet provider Cox Communications is not allowed to use derogatory terms to describe Rightscorp during their upcoming trial. Terms such as “copyright troll,” “blackmailer,” and “extortionist” are off-limits and the same is true for Rightscorp’s dire financial position.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

trollsignNext week marks the start of a crucial trial that may define how U.S. Internet providers deal with pirating subscribers in the future.

Internet provider Cox Communications is facing a lawsuit from BMG Rights Management and Round Hill Music, who accuse the company of failing to terminate the accounts of subscribers who frequently pirate content.

This week the court ruled on several requests and concerns about the upcoming trial. Several of these motions relate to Rightscorp, the company which sends out infringement notices with settlement demands for the rightsholders.

In previous filings Cox described Rightscorp as a copyright-trolling outfit that uses extortion and blackmail-like practices to pressure alleged pirates into settling. This language concerned the music companies, who asked the court to exclude it from trial.

This week Judge O’Grady agreed, ordering that Cox is prohibited from introducing irrelevant information about Rightscorp (pdf).

Among other things, the proposed order specifies that the Internet provider can’t reference Rightscorp’s business practices after 2011, including evidence from phone scripts or call recordings.

Rightscorp’s precarious financial position is also off-limits, as well as any allegations that the company violates debt collection or private investigation laws.

Finally, the aforementioned extortion and troll references are banned during trial as well.

“Defendants are prohibited from using derogatory terms such as ‘troll,’ ‘blackmailer,’ and ‘extortionist’ in reference to Rightscorp or Plaintiffs and are prohibited from using terms like ‘extortion’ or ‘blackmail’ to describe the companies’ communications or business practices,’ the order reads.

In addition to this order, Cox faced another setback.

The ISP previously asked the court to prevent the copyright holders from using any material claiming that BitTorrent equals piracy. According to Cox, BitTorrent has plenty of legitimate uses, but the motion was denied by Judge O’Grady.

On the upside, the court agreed with Cox that Rightscorp destroyed crucial evidence by deleting older versions of its piracy tracking code.

While this is not enough to dismiss the entire case, sanctions are appropriate and Cox is allowed to reference the destroyed evidence during its opening statement (pdf).

These new developments, as well as the earlier order declaring that Cox is not entitled to DMCA safe-harbor protections, show how much is at stake for both sides. The trial is expected to start in a few days and will be closely followed by other copyright holders and Internet providers.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Technische Störung: Paypal am 1. Advent teilweise ausgefallen

Die nächsten Wochen sind die umsatzstärksten im Onlinehandel. Umso ärgerlicher, wenn der Zahlungsdienst Paypal am 1. Advent teilweise ausfällt. Die Probleme sollen jetzt wieder behoben sein, teilte Paypal mit. (Paypal, eBay)

Die nächsten Wochen sind die umsatzstärksten im Onlinehandel. Umso ärgerlicher, wenn der Zahlungsdienst Paypal am 1. Advent teilweise ausfällt. Die Probleme sollen jetzt wieder behoben sein, teilte Paypal mit. (Paypal, eBay)

Sennheiser Orpheus: So klingt ein 50.000-Euro-Kopfhörer

Der laut Hersteller beste Kopfhörer der Welt heißt erneut Orpheus: Das neue Modell wird in Deutschland handgefertigt und mit einem passenden Röhrenverstärker ausgeliefert. Ersten Probehörern zufolge soll der Kopfhörer eine faszinierende Klangwelt darstellen. (Kopfhörer, Sound-Hardware)

Der laut Hersteller beste Kopfhörer der Welt heißt erneut Orpheus: Das neue Modell wird in Deutschland handgefertigt und mit einem passenden Röhrenverstärker ausgeliefert. Ersten Probehörern zufolge soll der Kopfhörer eine faszinierende Klangwelt darstellen. (Kopfhörer, Sound-Hardware)

Skylake: CPU-Kühler können Mainboard oder Prozessor beschädigen

Das dünnere Trägermaterial soll Schuld sein: Skylake-Prozessoren und dazugehörige Sockel-1151-Mainboards können durch den Anpressdruck des CPU-Kühlers in Mitleidenschaft gezogen werden. Erste Hersteller haben reagiert und verwenden andere Schraubensätze. (Kühlung, Prozessor)

Das dünnere Trägermaterial soll Schuld sein: Skylake-Prozessoren und dazugehörige Sockel-1151-Mainboards können durch den Anpressdruck des CPU-Kühlers in Mitleidenschaft gezogen werden. Erste Hersteller haben reagiert und verwenden andere Schraubensätze. (Kühlung, Prozessor)

No Copyright Trolls, Your Evidence Isn’t Flawless

If you get a letter through the post accusing you of Internet piracy, you must be guilty. That’s the message from most copyright trolls and infuriatingly, even some ‘neutral’ lawyers commenting on these cases. But while it might seem daunting, putting up a fight is not only the right thing to do, but can also cause claimants to back off.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

xmastrollEarlier this month TF broke the news that Sky Broadband in the UK were sending letters out to some of their customers, warning them they’re about to be accused of downloading and sharing movies without permission.

When they arrive the threats will come from Golden Eye International (GEIL), the company behind the ‘Ben Dover’ porn brand that has already targeted hundreds of people with allegations of Internet piracy.

“It’s likely that Golden Eye International will contact you directly and may ask you to pay them compensation,” the ISP warned.

In fact, GEIL will definitely ask for money, largely based on their insistence that the evidence they hold is absolutely irrefutable. It’s the same tune they’ve been singing for years now, without ever venturing to back up their claims in court. Sadly, other legal professionals are happy to sing along with them.

“Don’t do anything illegal and you won’t get a letter,” intellectual property specialist Iain Connor told The Guardian last week.

“Golden Eye will only have gotten details of people that they can prove downloaded content and so whether the ‘invoice’ demand is reasonable will depend on how much they downloaded that infringed copyright material.”

Quite aside from the fact that none of these cases are about downloading copyrighted material (they’re about uploading), one has to presume that Connor isn’t personally familiar with details of these cases otherwise he would’ve declared that interest. Secondly, he is absolutely wrong.

Companies like GEIL sometimes get it wrong, the anti-piracy trackers they use get things wrong, and ISPs get things wrong too. An IP address is NOT a person but innocent parties have to go to huge lengths to prove that. IT worker Harri Salminen did just that and this week finally managed to publicly clear his family’s name.

It started two years ago when his wife – the Internet account payer – was accused by an anti-piracy outfit (unconnected to GEIL) of pirating on a massive scale.

“They claimed that thousands of music tracks had been illegally distributed from our Internet connection,” Salminen told local media.

“The letter came addressed to my wife and she became very anxious, since she didn’t understand what this was all about. According to the letter, the matter was going to the court and we were advised to make contact to agree on compensation.”

Sound familiar? Read on.

The Salminen family has two children so took time to ensure they hadn’t uploaded anything illegally. Harri Salminen, who works in the IT industry, established that they had not, so began to conduct his own investigation. Faced with similar “irrefutable” IP address-based evidence to that presented in all of these ‘troll’ cases, what could’ve possibly gone wrong?

Attached to the letter of claim was a page from Salminen’s ISP which detailed the name of his wife, the IP address from where the piracy took place, and a date of infringement. This kind of attachment is common in such cases and allows trolls to imply that their evidence is somehow endorsed by their target’s ISP.

Then Salminen struck gold. On the day that the alleged infringement took place the IT worker was operating from home while logged into his company’s computer systems. Knowing that his company keeps logs of the IP addresses accessing the system, Salminen knew he could prove which IP address he’d been using on the day.

“I looked into my employer’s system logs for IP-addresses over several weeks and I was able to show that our home connection’s IP address at the time of the alleged act was quite different from the IP address mentioned in the letter,” he explained.

So what caused Salminen’s household to be wrongly identified? Well, showing how things can go wrong at any point, it appears that there was some kind of screw-up between the anti-piracy company and Salminen’s ISP.

Instead of identifying the people who had the IP address at the time of the actual offense, the ISP looked up the people using the address when the inquiry came in.

“The person under employment of the ISP inputs a date, time, and IP-address to the system based on a court order,” anti-piracy group TTVK now explains.

“And of course, when a human is doing something, there is always a possibility for an error. But even one error is too much.”

Saliminen says that it was only his expertise in IT that saved him from having to battle it out in court, even though his family was entirely innocent. Sadly, those about to be accused by Golden Eye probably won’t have access to similar resources.

“We have only written to those account holders for whom we have evidence of copyright infringement,” Golden Eye’s Julian Becker said confidently last week.

Trouble is, Golden Eye only has an IP address and the name of the account holder. They have no evidence that person is the actual infringer, even presuming there hasn’t been a screw-up like the one detailed above.

“We have written to account holders accusing them of copyright infringement, even though it’s entirely possible they personally did nothing wrong and shouldn’t have to pay us a penny,” is perhaps what he should’ve said.

But that’s not only way too frank but a sure-fire way of punching a huge hole in GEIL’s bottom line. And for a troll like GEIL, that would be a disaster.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.