Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke will appeal “Blurred Lines” copyright ruling

Jury ruled that the 2013 hit was too much like Marvin Gaye’s “Got to Give it up.”

Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke, and T.I. in the video for "Blurred Lines."

The copyright dispute between “Blurred Lines” song creators Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke, and the family of Marvin Gaye, will continue on to a higher court.

Earlier this year, Gaye’s family said in court that Williams and Thicke stole critical elements from Gaye's 1977 song “Got To Give It Up” for their 2013 hit “Blurred Lines." A jury agreed with Gaye’s family and awarded them $7.4 million, which was later reduced to $5.3 million. Now, Williams and Thicke are looking to appeal (PDF) that decision in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The case was unusual because in a pre-trial hearing, the judge ruled that the applicable 1909 copyright law only covered sheet music, not the song’s actual sound. The judge later reversed his decision, ordering Williams and Thicke’s lawyers to produce an audio recording of “Got To Give It Up” that only included a bass line and keyboard chords underneath some vocals from Gaye. This was the only version of “Got To Give It Up” that the jury was permitted to hear to compare with “Blurred Lines."

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Cortana now out for Android and iOS, with bonus features for Cyanogen

Cyanogen users will get a few more of the features that Windows users already get.

Microsoft promised to bring its Cortana digital personal assistant to iOS and Android in May this year, and public beta for Android came out in July, with a private iOS beta following a few months later. Now both versions have been released, with Cortana available in the App Store and in the Google Play Store, at least for US users.

We looked at the Android preview when it first came out. The version shipping today isn't hugely different from what we saw in July. The Cortana app looks essentially the same whether on Windows 10, Windows 10 Mobile, iOS, and Android; search box at the bottom, hamburger menu on the top left, and information cards. Those cards can show appointments, track packages, give you weather information or the latest sports scores, and so on. Cortana requires a Microsoft Account to use, and will sync your various interests and settings between all Cortana-enabled devices.

There are some differences in capabilities due to the API availability of the respective platforms. Neither iOS nor Android supports opening apps or changing settings from within Cortana. On Android, "Hey Cortana" voice activation is supported on the Android home screen, but not system-wide. On iOS there's no hands-free voice activation at all. Missed call notifications are similarly Android- and Windows 10 Mobile-specific: miss a call on your Cortana phone, and your Cortana Windows 10 PC will tell you. You can write an SMS to reply to the caller on your PC, and through the power of Internet syncing, the SMS will get sent to the caller from your phone.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

FBI Director: Silicon Valley’s encryption is a “business model problem”

“Makers of phones that today can’t be unlocked—a year ago they could be.”

FBI Director James Comey. (credit: C-SPAN)

Leaders in both major political parties have increasingly been calling on tech companies to give law enforcement encryption backdoors in the wake of recent terror attacks in Paris and California.

Today, FBI director James Comey has suggested that Silicon Valley isn't faced with a serious technical problem, but rather a "business model problem," according to a report on his comments in The Intercept, based on C-SPAN video of the hearing.

On the face of it, Comey's statement would seem to back away from earlier suggestions that tech companies can and should find a way to allow access to data when law enforcement wanted it, but provide otherwise secure services. Critics have pointed out that any encryption backdoors that can be used by the "good guys" also lead to widespread insecurity, since they can also be exploited by not-so-good guys.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Microsoft releases Open Live Writer: open source port of a discontinued blogging tool

Microsoft releases Open Live Writer: open source port of a discontinued blogging tool

Windows Live Writer is a blogging tool designed to make it easy to compose and publish posts on websites using WordPress, Blogger, Typepad, Sharepoint, or several other popular blogging platforms. But the last time Microsoft released a major update for Windows Live Writer was in 2012, and the company has no plans of continuing to […]

Microsoft releases Open Live Writer: open source port of a discontinued blogging tool is a post from: Liliputing

Microsoft releases Open Live Writer: open source port of a discontinued blogging tool

Windows Live Writer is a blogging tool designed to make it easy to compose and publish posts on websites using WordPress, Blogger, Typepad, Sharepoint, or several other popular blogging platforms. But the last time Microsoft released a major update for Windows Live Writer was in 2012, and the company has no plans of continuing to […]

Microsoft releases Open Live Writer: open source port of a discontinued blogging tool is a post from: Liliputing

Google Pixel C team confirms multi-window is coming to Android

Google Pixel C team confirms multi-window is coming to Android

Google’s Pixel C tablet and keyboard dock launched this week to mixed reviews. And I don’t mean some reviewers liked it while others didn’t. I mean almost all reviews I’ve seen have the same mixed opinion about the tablet: The hardware is great. The software can’t really take advantage of it. Fortunately it’s a lot […]

Google Pixel C team confirms multi-window is coming to Android is a post from: Liliputing

Google Pixel C team confirms multi-window is coming to Android

Google’s Pixel C tablet and keyboard dock launched this week to mixed reviews. And I don’t mean some reviewers liked it while others didn’t. I mean almost all reviews I’ve seen have the same mixed opinion about the tablet: The hardware is great. The software can’t really take advantage of it. Fortunately it’s a lot […]

Google Pixel C team confirms multi-window is coming to Android is a post from: Liliputing

Dallas Buyers Club Still Pursuing Aussie Pirates For Cash

The company behind the movie Dallas Buyers Club is determined to convince an Australian judge that alleged pirates should pay for their sins. After facing serious stumbling blocks thus far, DBC today packaged up its claims in a new way. Inevitably, however, all roads lead to demands for large sums of cash.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Earlier this year the company behind the movie Dallas Buyers Club was granted permission to obtain the personal details of 4,726 Australia-based BitTorrent users alleged to have shared the movie online without permission.

However, DBC’s reputation for so-called “speculative invoicing” had traveled quickly, leading Justice Nye Perram to express concerns over the company’s plans for Australia. And after learning that DBC wanted to interrogate alleged infringers with the aim of extracting large payments from them, the Judge began narrowing the company’s options.

Justice Perram told DBC that it could claim for the price of the film and a proportion of the amount spent on tracking down an alleged infringer, but no more. On top, he ordered the film outfit to pay a AUS$600,000 bond before any subscriber information could be released.

In response, DBC tried a new direction. It asked for the personal details of 10% of the original 4,726 subscribers as a test run of sorts. In return, it asked for the bond to be reduced from AUS$600,000 to AUS$60,000.

Previously Justice Perram had rejected the company’s punitive compensation formula, ruling that DBC could only ask for the cost of the movie (perhaps AUS$20) and the costs it had incurred obtaining their identities from ISPs.

But today DBC were back in court and trying once again to convince the Judge to let them continue pursuing alleged pirates. Presenting a new formula, DBC said it would stop looking at each case individually on its merits and instead present the same settlement offer to all.

Dropping its controversial plan to formulate damages based partly on how many copies of OTHER copyrighted works had been downloaded by each alleged infringer, DBC hung on to its demands that each account holder should pay the cost of the movie. In addition DBC said it would demand a rental charge, a license fee for illegally distributing its copyright work, plus a payment towards its costs.

ITNews reports that DBC’s license calculations were based on a case in which a single unlicensed reprint of a stock photo resulted in a $12,500 damages award. DBC said that its claim was “modest by comparison”.

However, Justice Perram disagreed, describing a figure already presented by DBC in a confidential submission as “not modest”. Furthermore, since DBC had not provided evidence of its licensing arrangements, the Judge could not come to a conclusion on what a reasonable amount might be.

As a result DBC asked for an adjournment so that it could gather and present more evidence, but Justice Perram flat-out refused. Nevertheless, DBC did appear to make some ground today.

Last month the company said it intended to fight for additional damages, despite the Judge indicating that he did not wish to revisit the issue. Today, Justice Perram reluctantly admitted that he may have “misconstrued” the earlier additional damages claim.

“I’ve written four judgments about this case, and I must say, the love is gone … why must I keep deciding this case over and over again?” he said.

All eyes now turn to next week when Perram will decide whether DBC will be allowed to access the details of 10% of the original 4,726 subscribers and if the company will be given permission to appeal the earlier decision to limit claims for damages.

It’s not over yet but DBC still has its eyes glued to the big prize – thousands of dollars in settlements from thousands of Aussie Internet subscribers. And, if they’re successful, more of the same in future.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Latest Nextbook Flexx 2-in-1 Windows tablets priced at $100 and up

Latest Nextbook Flexx 2-in-1 Windows tablets priced at $100 and up

E Fun’s Nextbook line of tablets have never exactly been expensive… but they seem to be getting cheaper all the time. About a month ago the company launched an 8.9 inch 2-in-1 tablet with Windows 10 software for just $139. Now E Fun has dropped the price of at model to $100. If you’re willing to […]

Latest Nextbook Flexx 2-in-1 Windows tablets priced at $100 and up is a post from: Liliputing

Latest Nextbook Flexx 2-in-1 Windows tablets priced at $100 and up

E Fun’s Nextbook line of tablets have never exactly been expensive… but they seem to be getting cheaper all the time. About a month ago the company launched an 8.9 inch 2-in-1 tablet with Windows 10 software for just $139. Now E Fun has dropped the price of at model to $100. If you’re willing to […]

Latest Nextbook Flexx 2-in-1 Windows tablets priced at $100 and up is a post from: Liliputing

Copyright case over “Happy Birthday” is done, trial canceled

Settlement details aren’t yet public, but Warner/Chappell isn’t happy.

With less than a week to go before a trial, a class-action lawsuit over the copyright status of "Happy Birthday" has been resolved. Details of the settlement, including what kind of uses will be allowed going forward, are not clear.

A short order (PDF) filed yesterday by US Chief District Court Judge George King says that all parties have agreed to a settlement, and it vacates a trial which was scheduled to start on December 15. The key turning point came in September, when King ruled that Warner/Chappell's copyright transfer was invalid because there was no proof it was ever properly transferred from the Hill sisters, who claimed to have written the song.

The trial would have addressed damages issues. Also looming was a late copyright claim by Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI), a children's' charity affiliated with the Hill sisters. ACEI came forward in November to say that if Warner/Chappell didn't own the song, it did. The settlement revealed yesterday resolves all claims by the plaintiffs, Warner/Chappell, and ACEI.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Portabook XMC10 is an 8 inch laptop with a 12 inch keyboard

Portabook XMC10 is an 8 inch laptop with a 12 inch keyboard

Want a laptop that doesn’t take up a lot of space, but which has a keyboard that’s large enough for comfortable touch-typing? Japanese company King Jim has a solution. The company’s Portabook XMC10 is a laptop with an 8 inch display. But it’s got a keyboard that measures about 12 inches wide. You can fold […]

Portabook XMC10 is an 8 inch laptop with a 12 inch keyboard is a post from: Liliputing

Portabook XMC10 is an 8 inch laptop with a 12 inch keyboard

Want a laptop that doesn’t take up a lot of space, but which has a keyboard that’s large enough for comfortable touch-typing? Japanese company King Jim has a solution. The company’s Portabook XMC10 is a laptop with an 8 inch display. But it’s got a keyboard that measures about 12 inches wide. You can fold […]

Portabook XMC10 is an 8 inch laptop with a 12 inch keyboard is a post from: Liliputing

Senate Science Committee hearing challenges “dogma” of climate science

Usual suspects accept Sen. Cruz’s invitation to declare the science unsettled.

Senator Ted Cruz opens the hearing.

While the eyes of the world are on Paris, where nations are hammering out an agreement to do something about the reality of climate change, the Senate Subcommittee on Space, Science, and Competitiveness once again held a hearing on Tuesday to debate whether climate change is for real. Subcommittee Chairman Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), who is running for his party’s presidential nomination, convened the hearing titled “Data or dogma? Promoting open inquiry in the debate over the magnitude of human impact on Earth’s climate.”

Senator Cruz brought in four witnesses to testify, mostly chosen from the usual suspects that have participated in similar hearings in the past. There were two of the very small handful of climate scientists who express doubts about human responsibility for climate change—Georgia Tech professor and blogger Judith Curry and John Christy from the University of Alabama in Huntsville. William Happer, a retired Princeton physicist and chairman of the George C. Marshall Institute, a conservative think-tank, was also invited to speak. The fourth person brought in to talk climate science was conservative radio host and columnist Mark Steyn. (The last two were keynote speakers at this year’s Heartland Institute conference for climate “skeptics.”)

Senator Cruz opened the hearing with some ironic remarks. “This is a hearing on the science behind the claims of global warming. Now, this is the Science Subcommittee of the Senate Commerce Committee, and we’re hearing from distinguished scientists, sharing their views, their interpretations, their analysis of the data and the evidence. Now, I am the son of two mathematicians—two computer programmers and scientists—and I believe that public policy should follow the actual science, and the actual data and evidence, and not political and partisan claims that run contrary to the science and data and evidence.”

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments