Deals of the Day (12-02-2015)

Deals of the Day (12-02-2015)

The Asus Transformer Book T200TA is an 11.6 inch Windows tablet with an Intel Atom Bay Trail processor and a detachable keyboard dock that transforms the system into a notebook (that’s why it’s called a Transformer. It’s basically the big sibling to the popular 10 inch Transformer Book T100, and while this 11.6 inch model has […]

Deals of the Day (12-02-2015) is a post from: Liliputing

Deals of the Day (12-02-2015)

The Asus Transformer Book T200TA is an 11.6 inch Windows tablet with an Intel Atom Bay Trail processor and a detachable keyboard dock that transforms the system into a notebook (that’s why it’s called a Transformer. It’s basically the big sibling to the popular 10 inch Transformer Book T100, and while this 11.6 inch model has […]

Deals of the Day (12-02-2015) is a post from: Liliputing

Dell Foundation Services: Dell-Fix macht alles noch schlimmer

Eigentlich sollte sie eine Sicherheitslücke schließen: Mit der neuen Version der Dell Foundation Services können über das Netz Informationen über die Hardware, laufende Prozesse, Metadaten von Dateien und vieles mehr ausgelesen werden. (Dell, Notebook)

Eigentlich sollte sie eine Sicherheitslücke schließen: Mit der neuen Version der Dell Foundation Services können über das Netz Informationen über die Hardware, laufende Prozesse, Metadaten von Dateien und vieles mehr ausgelesen werden. (Dell, Notebook)

Report: China hacked Australia’s weather service

“Massive” breach may have exposed network connections to Defence, other agencies

The forecast: hot, with a chance of severe data breaches.

According to a government official quoted by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, China is responsible for a breach at the Bureau of Meteorology, which may have allowed attackers to gain access to sensitive national security data. The Australian weather bureau hosts a high-performance computing center used by multiple government agencies and has network connections to Australia's Department of Defence.

The breach was described as "massive" by the unnamed government official, who told ABC News that he was certain "it was China" that breached the systems. He added that fixing the Bureau of Meteorology's network to close the holes used to gain access would cost millions of dollars.

There has been no official statement on the breach. Australia's Federal Police would not comment on the ABC report, and the government has made it a policy not to speak about specific computer security events. A spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry has said the report contains "groundless accusations."

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Samsung Galaxy A smartphones gain fingerprint sensors, optical image stabilization

Samsung Galaxy A smartphones gain fingerprint sensors, optical image stabilization

Samsung’s Galaxy A line of smartphones are upper mid-range phones that offer premium design elements, but which generally have features that aren’t quite competitive with the company’s more expensive Galaxy S phones. But some premium features are starting to trickle down to Samsung’s mid-range phones. Samsung has unveiled three new Galaxy A phones which will launch […]

Samsung Galaxy A smartphones gain fingerprint sensors, optical image stabilization is a post from: Liliputing

Samsung Galaxy A smartphones gain fingerprint sensors, optical image stabilization

Samsung’s Galaxy A line of smartphones are upper mid-range phones that offer premium design elements, but which generally have features that aren’t quite competitive with the company’s more expensive Galaxy S phones. But some premium features are starting to trickle down to Samsung’s mid-range phones. Samsung has unveiled three new Galaxy A phones which will launch […]

Samsung Galaxy A smartphones gain fingerprint sensors, optical image stabilization is a post from: Liliputing

Court: Cox Willingly Failed to Disconnect Pirating Subscribers

District Court Judge Liam O’Grady has just issued a detailed memorandum explaining why Cox isn’t entitled to a safe harbor defense. He ruled that Cox willingly failed to disconnect repeat or flagrant ‘pirate’ subscribers, a decision that could have an enormous impact on all U.S. Internet providers.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

cox-logoToday marks the start of a crucial trial that may define how U.S. Internet providers deal with pirating subscribers in the future.

Internet provider Cox Communications is facing a lawsuit from BMG Rights Management which accuses the ISP of failing to terminate the accounts of subscribers who frequently pirate content.

BMG claimed that Cox gave up its DMCA safe harbor protections due to this inaction, something District Court Judge Liam O’Grady agreed on last week in a summary judgment.

This order puts the Internet provider at a severe disadvantage while facing millions of dollars in damages. In a memorandum published a few hours ago Judge Liam O’Grady justified his decision.

According to the court there is enough evidence to conclude that Cox did not terminate the access of repeat infringers under appropriate circumstances.

“The record conclusively establishes that before the fall of 2012 Cox did not implement its repeat infringer policy. Instead, Cox publicly purported to comply with its policy, while privately disparaging and intentionally circumventing the DMCA’s requirements,” the memorandum (pdf) reads.

Judge O’Grady notes that Cox had a policy in place to deal with repeat infringers, but that in reality these users would simply be reconnected upon request. They would then start over with a clean slate.

“Cox employees followed an unwritten policy put in place by senior members of Cox’s abuse group by which accounts used to repeatedly infringe copyrights would be nominally terminated, only to be reactivated upon request.”

“Once these accounts were reactivated, customers were given clean slates, meaning the next notice of infringement Cox received linked to those accounts would be considered the first in Cox’s graduate response procedure,” O’Grady adds.

The Judge cites several emails and other communication from Jason Zabek, Cox’s Manager of Customer Abuse Operations, who instructs employees not to be too harsh. Keeping customers on board appears to be a prime motivation.

Below is a snippet from an email Zabek sent to a group of employees:

“After termination of DMCA, if you do suspend someone for another DMCA violation, you are not wrong. However, if the customer has a cox.net email we would like to start the warning cycle over, hold for more, etc. A clean slate if you will. This way, we can collect a few extra weeks of payments for their account. ;-)”

abusegroup

In other emails asking about whether repeat infringers should be reconnected Zabek replied with statements such as “It is fine. We need the customers,” “DMCA = reactivate,” and “You can make him wait a day or so if you want. ;-).”

In 2012 Cox abandoned this unofficial reactivation policy but that didn’t have a positive impact on the number of account terminations, on the contrary in fact.

The record shows that the number of disconnections dropped significantly, to less than one per month on average. In addition, emails show instances where Cox prefers to keep frequently pirating customers on board as they provide a significant revenue stream.

“BMG has identified specific instances in which Cox knew accounts were being used repeatedly for infringing activity yet failed to terminate,” Judge O’Grady writes.

“Cox does not seriously challenge these examples. Labeling them as ‘nothing more than conjecture and hyperbole,’ Cox argues that these snippets of conversations do not show what actions call centers actually took against accounts,” he adds.

For its part, Cox argued that it’s up to a court to decide that the appropriate response to infringement is the termination of the account of a subscriber, noting that copyright holder complaints may not always be accurate.

But Judge O’Grady disagrees and notes that when an ISP has actual knowledge that an account holder is a persistent pirate, his or her account should be terminated.

“Appropriate circumstances arise when an account holder is repeatedly or flagrantly infringing copyrights. Thus, when Cox had actual knowledge of particular account holders who blatantly or repeatedly infringed, the responsibility shifted to Cox to terminate their accounts,” he writes.

While BMG also submitted several other arguments, Judge O’Grady found the above sufficient to rule that Cox is not entitled to DMCA safe harbor protection.

The ruling means that it will be more difficult for Cox to defend itself against BMG’s copyright infringement claims. However, it will also raise alarm bells at various other U.S. Internet providers. At the moment it’s rare for ISPs to disconnect pirating users and this case has the potential to alter the landscape.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Yahoo considers sale of Internet business, but it isn’t worth much

Stake in Alibaba is worth more than Yahoo’s core business.

Would you like to buy this historic website?

Web pioneer Yahoo may sell its core business, as the company's latest turnaround efforts continue to stall, The Wall Street Journal reported last night.

Sources familiar with the plans say the board is meeting today through Friday "to consider selling off the company’s flagging Internet businesses and how to make the most of its valuable stake in Chinese e-commerce powerhouse Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.," the Journal wrote. "Directors are likely to discuss whether to proceed with a plan to spin off its investment in Alibaba, currently worth more than $30 billion, find a buyer for Yahoo’s gaggle of Web properties, or both."

A Yahoo spokesperson declined to comment on the report when contacted by Ars this morning.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Report: Microsoft’s “Surface Phone” could be 6-12 months away

Report: Microsoft’s “Surface Phone” could be 6-12 months away

Microsoft has released plenty of smartphones under its own brand since acquiring Nokia’s phone business in 2014. Up until now most of those phones have been devices designed by the team that used to be part of Nokia. But there have been rumors that the team responsible for Microsoft’s Surface tablets and Surface Book are […]

Report: Microsoft’s “Surface Phone” could be 6-12 months away is a post from: Liliputing

Report: Microsoft’s “Surface Phone” could be 6-12 months away

Microsoft has released plenty of smartphones under its own brand since acquiring Nokia’s phone business in 2014. Up until now most of those phones have been devices designed by the team that used to be part of Nokia. But there have been rumors that the team responsible for Microsoft’s Surface tablets and Surface Book are […]

Report: Microsoft’s “Surface Phone” could be 6-12 months away is a post from: Liliputing

During its next flight, SpaceX wants to try returning booster to land

After two seaborne attempts, company hopes to stick a land-based return.

SpaceX didn't quite stick the landing of its Falcon 9 rocket in April, 2015. Now it wants to try doing so on land. (credit: SpaceX)

SpaceX’s ambitions are nothing if not oversized. Not content with just trying to come back from the June failure of its Falcon 9 rocket, SpaceX will also try to return that booster to land for the first time later this month. The rocket company twice tried to land its Falcon 9 booster, without success, on a seaborne platform.

The company has not confirmed its intent, but NASA officials said that SpaceX will try to return the booster of its next rocket launch at a Cape Canaveral location it has designated Landing Complex 1. “Their plan is to try to land (the next booster) out here on the Cape-side,” Carol Scott of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program told Florida Today. The landing attempt is contingent upon SpaceX obtaining regulatory clearance from the US Air Force, which manages Cape Canaveral.

SpaceX officials have described the company’s two water landing attempts on an autonomous drone ship as “practice” for land-based return efforts. The company hopes to eventually make its Falcon 9 boosters reusable, a step that could slash its launch costs by more than half as most of the expense in any launch is in the hardware rather than fuel.

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

FirePro W4300: AMD hat die schnellste Profi-Karte im Low-Profile-Format

Viel Leistung für besonders kompakte Workstations: AMDs neue FirePro W4300 ist eine Profi-Grafikkarte, etwa für CAD-Rendering. Dank flacher Low-Profile-Bauweise nimmt sie wenig Platz ein. (Grafikhardware, AMD)

Viel Leistung für besonders kompakte Workstations: AMDs neue FirePro W4300 ist eine Profi-Grafikkarte, etwa für CAD-Rendering. Dank flacher Low-Profile-Bauweise nimmt sie wenig Platz ein. (Grafikhardware, AMD)

Patent trolls filed hundreds of lawsuits to beat Dec. 1 deadline

More than 200 cases were filed Monday, mostly by “patent trolls” in East Texas.

Patent lawsuits filed by month. (credit: Lex Machina)

New patent lawsuits hit an all-time high in November, with many plaintiffs likely hoping to avoid new pleading rules that came into effect yesterday. A whopping 790 lawsuits were filed last month, with at least 212 filed on a single day: Monday, November 30.

For those who watch the patent landscape, it will come as no surprise that most of the lawsuits filed last month come courtesy of "patent trolls"—oddly named LLCs with no business other than litigation. Also no surprise: a big majority of the cases were filed in Eastern Texas.

The huge jump, and in particular the November 30 spike, is likely tied to significant changes in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for patent cases, which took effect on December 1. The changes by the Judicial Conference of the United States will require patent plaintiffs to provide more information in their lawsuits to survive a motion to dismiss. In particular, the lenient "Form 18" has been eliminated in patent cases. That form allowed patent lawsuits to be filed without naming which specific claims were infringed, or naming a specific product accused of infringing.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments