Brandgefahr: Amazon nimmt gefährliche Hoverboards aus dem Sortiment

Amazon und andere Onlinehändler nehmen elektrische Hoverboards aus dem Handel, weil sich Brände und Unfälle mit den zweirädrigen angetriebenen Scootern häufen. Einige Fluggesellschaften nehmen die E-Boards nicht mehr mit. (Hoverboard, Amazon)

Amazon und andere Onlinehändler nehmen elektrische Hoverboards aus dem Handel, weil sich Brände und Unfälle mit den zweirädrigen angetriebenen Scootern häufen. Einige Fluggesellschaften nehmen die E-Boards nicht mehr mit. (Hoverboard, Amazon)

North Carolina citizenry defeat pernicious Big Solar plan to suck up the Sun

Town council votes to deny zoning permit that would allow solar farm development.

We looked for solar panel farms in Woodland, N.C., but didn't find any. (credit: Google Maps)

The citizens of Woodland, N.C. have spoken loud and clear: They don't want none of them highfalutin solar panels in their good town. They scare off the kids. "All the young people are going to move out," warned Bobby Mann, a local resident concerned about the future of his burg. Worse, Mann said, the solar panels would suck up all the energy from the Sun.

Another resident—a retired science teacher, no less—expressed concern that a proposed solar farm would block photosynthesis, and prevent nearby plants from growing. Jane Mann then went on to add that there seemed to have been a lot of cancer deaths in the area, and that no one could tell her solar panels didn't cause cancer. “I want information," Mann said. "Enough is enough."

These comments were reported not in The Onion, but rather by the Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald. They came during a Woodland Town Council meeting in which Strata Solar Company sought to rezone an area northeast of the town, off of US Highway 258, to build a solar farm. The council not only rejected the proposal, it went a step further, voting for a complete moratorium on solar farms.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

How Fargo’s midwestern UFOs became pop culture’s “realest” alien depiction

We have no idea what extraterrestrial life is like, and Fargo doesn’t pretend to.

Streetlights in Minnesota are just captivating. (credit: FX)

Warning: this piece contains minor spoilers to several episodes of the show. 

By now everyone knows Fargo's famous disclaimer—"This is a true story." The Coen Brothers' 1996 classic starts the same way each episode of the TV series it inspired on FX does, but just because something is true doesn't mean it can't get a little fuzzy or downright weird. And the currently-in-progress-season two is playing with pop culture's favorite oddity—aliens. UFOs, technically.

Then again, were there UFOs in this season's penultimate episode last Monday? The cop (Lou Solverson, played by Patrick Wilson), the villain (Angus Sampson as Bear Gerhardt), and everyone in-between sure seemed to stop mid-firefight to stare at something, but only the in-over-her-head beautician (Kirsten Dunst as Peggy Blumquist) said anything: "It's just a flying saucer, hon." This is the same person who hallucinated a Lifespring coach in her basement one week earlier.

Fargo, obviously, is not a true story. The people are made up, the intercity travel times fudged, the Midwest accents exaggerated. But among other things making its current season an all-time great is that its brand of aliens feels different. Rather than having any scientific or nefarious purposes or creature-like appearances, Fargo's aliens are... a mystery. That's what makes this season the most realistic pop culture depiction of extraterrestrial life to date.

Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Bad reviews for Taser documentary on Amazon, iTunes seem to come from Taser employees

Reviewers didn’t feel it necessary to disclose their affiliation, or even watch the film.

(credit: Nick Berardini)

One of the best bits of the modern world is the way that anything you buy online inevitably comes with a bunch of user reviews telling you why your purchase does or doesn't suck. Sometimes the compulsion to leave such a review can strike even in situations that most of us would probably feel are a little inappropriate, with employees of Taser International, maker of the occasionally lethal stun guns, apparently the latest to leave reviews without the kind of disclosure that professional reviews might be expected to contain.

Some one-star reviews posted on Amazon and iTunes for Killing Them Safely, a documentary film looking at the Taser stun guns and the safety issues around them, appear to have been posted by Taser International employees, using their own names. The dangers of Tasers are contested by the manufacturer and law enforcement agencies deploying the weapons, and the employees seem to be taking to the user reviews to express their dissatisfaction with the film.

The film's director, Nick Berardini, spotted one dubious review on iTunes, purporting to come from one Uriel Halioua. The review complains that the film is "poorly narrated"—in true user review form, Halioua appears not to have even watched the film, as Berardini says it has no narration—and concludes that it's "swill." The name Uriel Halioua is an uncommon one, but one person who does appear to be blessed with it just happens to work as a pre-sales systems engineer at Taser International. Peculiarly, that review seems now to have been deleted and reposted by a different user, "BobRossRocks."

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Launch Mode: Tesla S mit Software für kontrollierte Kavalierstarts

Elektroautos haben prinzipbedingt eine gute Anfangsbeschleunigung und hängen die meisten Fahrzeuge mit Verbrennungsmotoren an der Ampel ab. Tesla Motors hat für das Model S ein Softwareupdate vorgestellt, damit diese Ampelstarts nicht im Straßengraben enden. (Elektroauto, GreenIT)

Elektroautos haben prinzipbedingt eine gute Anfangsbeschleunigung und hängen die meisten Fahrzeuge mit Verbrennungsmotoren an der Ampel ab. Tesla Motors hat für das Model S ein Softwareupdate vorgestellt, damit diese Ampelstarts nicht im Straßengraben enden. (Elektroauto, GreenIT)

WebTorrent Brings BitTorrent to the Web, Impresses Netflix

BitTorrent currently transfers petabytes of data across the Internet every month, but with the shift to online streaming it’s losing prominence. Stanford University graduate Feross Aboukhadijeh is bridging this gap with WebTorrent and has already piqued the interest of Netflix, other tech companies, and many enthusiastic developers.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

webtorrent1When BitTorrent was first launched in 2002 it was a breakthrough technology.

At the time it was virtually impossible to share large files with millions of people over the Internet, something BitTorrent can do very effectively.

Today, the standard BitTorrent clients have lost most of their shine. While it’s still one of the best ways to transfer data from A to B, they became somewhat old-fashioned with the rise of video streaming sites and services.

But what if there was a technology that could combine the two? Smooth and instant streaming in the browser powered by BitTorrent’s core technology. That’s in short what WebTorrent does.

WebTorrent is a project launched by Feross Aboukhadijeh, a Stanford University graduate who has already booked quite a few successes in his career. After graduating he founded PeerCDN, a P2P-assisted content delivery network, which was sold to Yahoo at the end of 2013.

Feross then focused on WebTorrent, convinced that it could revolutionize how the web works today.

“I felt that the idea of ‘people-powered websites’ – websites that are hosted by the visitors who use them – was too revolutionary to keep locked up as proprietary software, and I wanted to do more to push the idea forward,” he tells TF.

“Imagine a video site like YouTube, where visitors help to host the site’s content. The more people that use a WebTorrent-powered website, the faster and more resilient it becomes.”

Simply put, WebTorrent is a BitTorrent client for the web. Instead of using standalone applications it allows people to share files directly from their browser, without having to configure or install anything.

WebTorrent

webt

This opens up BitTorrent technology to virtually any website that deals with a lot of data, and expands the userbase by hundreds of millions of people who already have compatible browsers such as Chrome or Firefox installed.

“WebTorrent is the first torrent client built for the web. It’s written completely in JavaScript – the language of the web – and uses WebRTC for true peer-to-peer transport. No browser plugin, extension, or installation is required,” Feross tells TF.

Over the past two years WebTorrent has matured into a project that’s slowly starting to win over several major tech companies.

Netflix, for example, contacted Feross to discuss his technology which they may use to stream their videos. A few months ago Netflix specifically mentioned WebTorrent in a job application, which shows that the video giant is serious about P2P-assisted delivery.

Feross believes that companies such as Netflix could benefit greatly from WebTorrent. Currently, streaming performance goes down during peak hours but with WebTorrent this shouldn’t be a problem.

“If Netflix uses WebTorrent, customers would see higher video quality during peak hours. WebTorrent would allow customers with the same ISP to share video pieces with each other without leaving the ISP’s network,” Feross says.

“This ensures the best quality, even during peak Netflix usage hours when the network link between the ISP and Netflix is fully saturated,” he adds.

Netflix aside, there are already various noteworthy implementations of WebTorrent. The project’s homepage, for example, shows how easily it can stream video and βTorrent offers a fully functioning torrent client UI.

Other examples include File.pizza, which uses WebTorrent to share files in the browser. The same technology is used for server-less websites by PeerCloud and Webtorrentapp, while GitTorrent uses it to decentralize source control.

In addition to the examples above, the Internet Archive is also looking into the technology for its video distribution, and another major tech company is considering adding WebTorrent support to their web browser.

It’s not all roses though and there are still several challenges to overcome. Not all browsers support WebRTC yet, most notably, Internet Explorer. In addition, WebTorrent can’t talk to traditional torrent clients which use UDP and TCP instead of WebRTC.

BitTorrent – WebTorrent

bittorrent-webtorrent

There are several hybrid clients such as Playback, but ideally WebTorrent should be more tightly integrated into the standard BitTorrent protocol, which is something Feross is currently working on.

It’s clear that WebTorrent has a lot of potential and it will be interesting to see how it develops over the years to come. If it’s up to Feross, it will play a major role in the future of the web.

“I like to think of WebTorrent as core Internet infrastructure. It’s an efficient way to transfer files between users on a website, and I expect we’ll continue to see many more creative uses for the protocol,” he says.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

YouTube in 2015: Stanky legs, Liam Neeson, and a 6ft man in a water balloon

Annual top video lists give amusing (maybe scary) insight into the year’s cultural trends.

As insights into the cultural trends of 2015 go, YouTube's annual list of its most popular videos is perhaps the most interesting. After all, falling down the YouTube rabbit hole in a spiral of viral videos, epic lolz, and squandered afternoons is an occupational hazard for anyone that spends their days sat in front of a computer.

While last year's list (excluding music videos) was topped by the frankly terrifying "Mutant Giant Spider Dog," this year the slightly more palatable Heaven King dance crew performing choreography to Silento's "Watch Me" took the top spot for the biggest "trending" video of 2015. That's based a combination of views, shares, comments, and likes, rather than just straight up view counts. Those with children will no doubt have suffered this video and others on repeat ad nauseum throughout the year. And for those that don't, count yourself lucky you don't know what a "stanky leg" is.

Perhaps more surprising is what's at number two: the live-action Clash of Clans Revenge Super Bowl commercial featuring Liam Neeson. For those that don't know, Clash of Clans is a freemium mobile MMO strategy game developed and published by Supercell that's one of the most profitable and popular mobile games of all time. Liam Neeson is famous for speaking gruffly into a telephone and threatening to kill people. Combine the two and, well, you've got over 83 million views and pure YouTube gold. That also makes the Clash of Clans ad the most popular gaming video for year,too.

Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

USA: Immer mehr Menschen bestellen wegen Streaming Kabel-TV ab

In einigen Jahren sollen laut einer Studie 23 Prozent der Haushalte in den USA kein Kabelfernsehen mehr haben. Immer mehr Menschen kündigen, weil Streaming von Netflix, Amazon Video oder Hulu für sie attraktiver ist. (Streaming, Studie)

In einigen Jahren sollen laut einer Studie 23 Prozent der Haushalte in den USA kein Kabelfernsehen mehr haben. Immer mehr Menschen kündigen, weil Streaming von Netflix, Amazon Video oder Hulu für sie attraktiver ist. (Streaming, Studie)

UK Movie Pirates Facing Shocking Prison Sentences

Five men are facing the prospect of many years behind bars when they stand off against Hollywood in court tomorrow. TorrentFreak has learned that an aggressive private prosecution by the Federation Against Copyright Theft will allege that the men’s actions placed more than £52,000,000 in studio revenues “at risk”.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

jailOn February 1 2013, the UK’s Federation Against Copyright Theft revealed they had joined police officers from the Economic Crime Unit to carry out raids at several addresses in central England.

As Hollywood’s enforcement arm in the UK, FACT were searching for five individuals believed to be behind several prolific and interrelated movie release groups. After a three year investigation, they finally had their men.

Graeme Reid, 40, from Chesterfield, Scott Hemming, 25, and Reece Baker, 22, both from Birmingham, Sahil Rafiq, 24, of Wolverhampton and Ben Cooper, 33, of Willenhall, were all arrested and questioned at length.

By January 2015 all had broadly pleaded guilty to charges of Conspiracy to Defraud. However, the extent of the infringement claimed by FACT in their private criminal prosecution was far in excess of that accepted by the accused.

As a result a so-called ‘Newton hearing’ will take place in a West Midlands court tomorrow, during which both sides will present their evidence to a judge who will try to work out which side is more credible. Information obtained by TorrentFreak reveals that the stakes could hardly be higher.

The numbers behind the prosecution

In order to come to a figure on losses, FACT appear to be relying on data presented publicly by ExtraTorrent, one of the world’s leading torrent sites. According to FACT the defendants were jointly responsible for around 4.2 million illegal downloads on ExtraTorrent alone.

The anti-piracy group will then take the average price of attending a cinema in the UK or buying a DVD or Blu-ray disc. Arriving at a figure convenient for all options, FACT will presume that the defendants’ actions “put at risk” at least £52,000,000 in studio revenues on ExtraTorrent alone.

However, taking into consideration that not every download is a lost sale, FACT is expected to disregard infringement carried out on all other torrent sites and settle on an overall “actual loss” of £4,200,000. Let’s see how this affects each defendant.

Graeme Reid

FACT will allege that Reid was the founder and leader of ‘RemixHD’, a release group that specialized in DVD and Blu-ray rips. The anti-piracy group will also state that Reid had connections with another famous group known as ‘UNiQUE’.

FACT will accuse Reid of causing more than 1.1 million illegal downloads, although the anti-piracy group insists this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Value of property “put at risk” – £11m
Actual loss claimed – £1.1m

Reece Baker

FACT will allege that Baker used several online identities and was initially a member of a release group known as DTRG. Baker left DTRG to found a new group called HOPE which was later named to RESISTANCE. FACT claim that Baker also operated DEYA and was involved in sourcing, encoding and uploading movies.

It is understood that Baker will be accused of causing more than 226,000 illegal downloads on ExtraTorrent but was also involved in distributing other content alleged to be worth £15m.

Value of property “put at risk” – £17m
Actual loss claimed – £1.7m

Sahil Rafiq

According to FACT, Rafiq was also a member of DTRG who went on to become the brains behind release group 26K. He stands accused of collaborating with the other defendants in sourcing, encoding and uploading movies to torrent sites.

Our information suggests that Rafiq is being accused of infringement to the tune of 1.5 million illegal downloads.

Value of property “put at risk” – £15m
Actual loss claimed – £1.5m

Ben Cooper

It is believed that FACT will allege that Cooper founded two release groups known as ANALOG and TCM. It’s also claimed that he participated in HOPE alongside Reece Baker.

FACT will allege that Cooper is to blame for more than 150,500 illegal downloads.

Value of property “put at risk” – £1.5m
Actual loss claimed – £150,000

Scott Hemming

TorrentFreak has been unable to ascertain which groups Hemming belonged to. However, he is being accused of torrenting around 800 movies which together were downloaded a minimum of 2.6 million times.

Value of property “put at risk” – £26m
Actual loss claimed – £2.6m

The implications

As the figures above suggest, the stakes are extremely high for these five men. To find out just how high we have to turn to the sentencing guidelines for Conspiracy to Defraud which detail the sentences that can be applied given the amount defrauded.

– Less than £17,500 – up to 21 months imprisonment
– £17,500 to £100,000 – 2-3 years imprisonment
– £100,000 to £250,000 – 3-4 years imprisonment
– £250,000 to £1 million – 5-9 years imprisonment
– £1 million or more – 10 years + imprisonment

If the court accepts FACT’s version of events, all but one could be looking at a sentence of more than 10 years. To put that into perspective, firearm offenses, poisoning and cruelty to children carry the same maximum punishment.

That being said, the defendants are believed to have entered early guilty pleas which normally have the potential to reduce their sentences. However, TorrentFreak understands that since some defendants have taken their case to the Newton hearing (where evidence is disputed), it may mean that ‘credits’ for an early guilty plea may not be fully applied.

To view the defendants’ predicament from another angle, what they did online could easily be categorized as copyright infringement. However, punishment for online copyright infringement maxes out at just two years in the UK, which is why FACT rejected infringement charges in favor of Conspiracy to Defraud.

Only making matters worse is that FACT is expected to admit that none of the defendants made a penny from their actions.

It is not yet clear when the court will be in a position to carry out sentencing but the early indications suggest that after one of the most aggressive private prosecutions FACT has ever carried out, there’s a real possibility of the toughest punishments Internet pirates have ever seen.

Source: TorrentFreak, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.