Meet the ‘Pirate’ Journalist Hunted By the Music Labels

In 2012, TorrentFreak obtained an IFPI presentation which revealed how the labels had tracked down a music journalist who they claim had been leaking pre-release music. This week we spoke to ‘ALEKO’ who told us that Sony Music simply left the front door open and he just looked inside. And boy, what did he find….

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Three and a half years ago TF stumbled across a little goldmine. For reasons best known to IFPI their Latin America intranet had started spewing private anti-piracy related documents onto a public facing webpage.

We published several reports on the information IFPI had inadvertently revealed to the world, which included an interesting presentation on how pre-release music piracy could be reduced.

One of the slides alleged that a South American blogger called “ALEKO” had been observed by the labels posting pre-release music online. IFPI went on to say that they’d identified ALEKO as a music journalist and in an effort to stop his activities had sent a local investigator to track him down.

According to IFPI, ALEKO told their investigator that he’d been obtaining music from hackers while also confessing to blackmailing producers. So what happened to ALEKO and the investigation into his activities?

This week ALEKO contacted TorrentFreak and subsequently agreed to tell us more about his experiences with the IFPI. Had he really been leaking pre-release music online? Did he know hackers? Had he blackmailed anyone? Is he really a journalist from South America?

“Yes, I’m from Venezuela. That’s true. Right now I’m here just visiting, but I live in Bogotá, Colombia,” ALEKO told TF.

“I’m 27-years-old and well, I’ve done a little bit of everything after the music thing. I used to work at LaPatilla.com, Venezuela’s biggest news website.”

As the sixth most popular site in the country, LaPatilla.com is definitely influential. ALEKO said he was interested in the perks of the job there, such as gaining access to concerts and press interviews and, of course, experiencing pre-release music.

But while ALEKO did get to hear music early, how did he get copies of tracks up front? Well, it turns out that much like when the IFPI accidentally published their anti-piracy reports to the public, a huge record label had no idea how to properly secure its servers.

“I got the pre-release material from Sony Music’s servers. They had a BIG bug on internal ecards but it wasn’t like hacking,” ALEKO explains.

According to the former journalist Sony would provide him with a URL, much like the one shown below.

hXXps://ecard.mds.sonymusic.com/ecard/retrieveContent.action?getAsset=&authenticationKeyCode=2A3F08CC-6092-B042-33FB-80E874EA95DF&assetId=365400

However, the only thing that changed with each item of content was the ‘assetId’ at the end of the URL. Amending this would provide access to endless material.

“The only thing you needed to do was change the number at the end of that link (like for example changing 365400 to 365401). Each number was a different file such as PDFs, MP3s, WAVs, ZIPs, RARs, internal files like budgets, demos, instrumentals, acapellas, etc.”

But one item in particular remains particularly close to ALEKO’s heart.

“I think the most treasured thing we found on that server was an unreleased music video by Michael Jackson. I never liked him, but this was like gold. I know [some other people] sold it illegally to a few fans,” ALEKO reveals.

But interestingly enough, ALEKO insists that he never leaked full tracks online.

“I posted a few clips on my old Twitter account but that was it, I never leaked full songs or stuff. I knew that what I was doing was kind of illegal, that’s why I never got money benefits from my job at LaPatilla. For me it was enough getting into free concerts and press interviews,” he says.

As an artist and former remixer, ALEKO says that he was really interested in the recording sessions he found on Sony’s servers, particularly acapellas. Obtaining these before anyone else enabled him to quickly get his own remixes to A&R agents. But despite the head start, he had limited mainstream success.

“My mixes never got signed by Sony Music, Universal or a big label because my music wasn’t ‘commercial enough for radio’. I never wanted to make music for radio pop shit, I wanted to give a pop song a club rave feel, so my music would be played in clubs by real DJs,” he says.

But according to the 27-year-old it was his love of remixing and his desire to obtain acapellas by almost any means that eventually led IFPI to his door.

“The only reason IFPI tracked me was because I threatened a producer that I was going to leak a LOT of his recent unfinished stuff if he didn’t send me a couple of acapellas I wanted. I didn’t use my VPN to do that,” he recalls.

“I knew they were somehow watching me because I got a few emails before they appeared at my place. But it wasn’t until I emailed some producers to ask for some stuff that they got my real address. Of course I used fake emails, locations and a paid VPN to secure myself. But that time I think I was stupid enough to forget logging into the VPN.”

A few weeks later, in the first couple of months of 2012, IFPI got personal.

“[Their investigators] came to my place in Caracas, Venezuela, and told me they were the FBI, which is pretty stupid. They called into my apartment intercom and asked for my real name. I went down and they started threatening me and talking about jail,” ALEKO says.

“They make me sign a piece of paper that said something like ‘I, [real name redacted] am not going to leak any pre-release music anymore’ or face getting sued by them. I was of course scared because I wasn’t in a place that allowed me to pay for a good defense like [The Pirate Bay’s] Gottfrid Svartholm or Peter Sunde had. They made me feel like shit, called my job and of course I got fired.”

After his run in with IFPI, ALEKO stopped making remixes and of course no longer had a job as a journalist. While he’s since begun remixing again and still loves music, he could never see himself working for a label.

“Of course, the money would be great but that freedom they take away from the artist isn’t worth it. Its like selling your soul to the devil, you know?” he concludes.

Now, about that Michael Jackson video……

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Dear Kanye: Please, Please, Please Sue The Pirate Bay

This week it was reported that following the leak and subsequent widespread downloading of his latest album, Kanye West is now considering legal action against The Pirate Bay. Please, please, please Kanye, let this happen. The free marketing for The Pirate Bay is much needed and after all, what could possibly go wrong?

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

yeezusIs Kanye West a genius, a lunatic, a megalomaniac, an egomanic, or an amalgamation of all four? That’s just one of the puzzles on the table this week following the launch of the new album by the self-styled “greatest artist of all time.”

For those just who’ve just returned to civilization following a week long trek to the Amazon basin, West launched his new album last Saturday. Then, following the genius decision to limit its availability only to those subscribing to Tidal, Life of Pablo was illegally downloaded, uploaded, torrented, streamed, swapped and exchanged all over the Internet, all week long, without West getting a cent.

Stop the press – did anyone really think that it wouldn’t?

Restricting the availability of the album reviewed by West himself as “one of the greatest” of all time was a move that probably made commercial sense somewhere along the line. After all, these industry people know what they’re doing, right? But isn’t artificial restriction and man-made shortages what caused piracy to boom in the first place?

What’s perhaps most frustrating about this entire episode is that the pirating masses had just begun to understand that music can be obtained legally, conveniently and at a reasonable price via services such as Spotify. Signing up for a fair monthly fee would rid of them of their piracy habits while rewarding creators, customers were told.

Then along came West, waving his self-important “exclusive” flag while shitting all over fans’ $10 and £10 per month subscriptions. Like a rich and perverted Oliver Twist (and without a billion forthcoming from Zuckerberg), West still wants more.

Look, West is a popular guy, no doubt about that. Even his most ridiculous of tweets (and there are plenty of them) get tens of thousands of positive reactions. Millions love his music too, that can’t be taken away from him. But apparently he’s now surprised and angry that his music is being pirated to heaven and back. Is he really that self-absorbed that he didn’t see this coming?

pablo-sq

With further Twitter rants now appearing tantalizingly on the horizon and about to put yet more icing on this considerably over-baked cake, Jesus West is now reportedly thinking of kicking some pirate ass by taking on the people behind The Pirate Bay.

“He’s going to talk to his lawyers and see where he stands, and hopefully Tidal will partner up with him in any legal proceedings because it was supposed to be an exclusive release,” a source revealed this week.

From a selfish perspective this is the best news, almost ever. The prospect of Kanye West spouting daily anti-Pirate Bay rhetoric on Twitter and in the media guarantees we’ll never be short of something to write. And if he can rope Kim in to say something controversial too, that would be beyond brilliant.

But most of all we should be pleased for The Pirate Bay. Since the raid in late 2014 things haven’t quite been the same on the PR front for the notorious site. There hasn’t been a lot in the way of provocative comments (certainly nothing involving retractable batons) and as a result they’ve been losing ground to a surging KickassTorrents who are now grabbing the limelight.

To be frank, an expensive lawsuit initiated by someone like Kanye West is just what The Pirate Bay needs. Then, every day when he says something dumb on Twitter, the millions of West fans who haven’t yet heard of The Pirate Bay can be introduced to the site, learn all about torrents, and tell Tidal to shove their subscriptions where the sun don’t shine.

Sadly, some will also use their new-found knowledge to tell Spotify to screw themselves too.

The point here is that this needless posturing over a single album has the potential to considerably damage people’s trust in legal services. Sure, Tidal will have benefited short term, but what West has done is shown fans that subscribing to just one service is not enough and that any point any ‘star’ can flick a switch and require them to pay out more money.

The uncomfortable truth here is that The Pirate Bay has never done that. Sure, the site gives nothing to creators and that will understandably sit poorly with some, but people know where they stand with the site. It is there, week in and week out, and it always costs nothing to use. There’s a reason it has tens of millions of users and West’s exclusive just gave the site yet more recruits. It’s insane.

What Kanye needs to know is that despite the mock begging in the title, suing The Pirate Bay would be the most stupid thing in the world. It didn’t work for Prince, it didn’t work for Michael Jackson. It even managed to make the Village People look like fools.

Kanye, the way you deal with The Pirate Bay is to stop giving fans a reason to go there. The notion of online exclusivity is so old fashioned it’s mind-bending. Easy access to all music for everyone at a fair price is what you should be aiming for – rant about that in a tweet when you get a minute.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

‘Pirate’ Site Targeted By Aussie Blockade Refutes Studio Claims

Entertainment industry companies have gone to court to have sites including The Pirate Bay, Torrentz, isoHunt and SolarMovie blocked in Australia. The operator of the latter informs TF that he’s surprised by the attention, always responds to copyright takedown requests, and never allows sex ads on his site.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

News that rightsholders have taken legal action to have several prominent ‘pirate’ sites blocked at the ISP level in Australia did not come as a surprise.

Following changes to the law last year it was always presumed that local TV and Hollywood-affiliated studios would take full advantage of the legislation in order to reduce the number of Internet subscribers being able to access unauthorized content.

Village Roadshow and Hollywood vs SolarMovie

This morning further details became available on two separate actions. The first was filed by entertainment outfit Village Roadshow supported by Disney, 20th Century Fox, Paramount, Columbia, Universal and Warner Bros.

The action names Telstra and 49 other local Internet service providers as respondents and contains demands for them to block a streaming portal called Solarmovie plus several of its domains including SolarMovie.ph, .is, .com and .eu.

Also listed are four IP addresses currently used by the site but the application indicates that the studios want to be able to block additional IPs and domains should the site begin to move around. The studios have requested both DNS and IP address blocking “plus any alternative technical means” as agreed in writing with the ISPs.

Future potential visitors to SolarMovie will be greeted with a special landing page which informs Internet subscribers that the page has been blocked following a court order. The page will be hosted by the studios will enable them to track the number of visitors to the site and even their IP addresses.

The application also states that should ISPs become aware that any URL or IP address is no longer being used for infringement, they will no longer be required to block it. Furthermore, if ISPs temporarily fail to block SolarMovie due to technical issues, they will not be in breach of the order.

Also of interest is a clause which allows SolarMovie to file an application to have the blockade lifted. There’s no sign yet of that happening but TorrentFreak has spoken with the site’s operator who says he’s surprised at all the attention.

“I’m actually surprised that Solarmovie has gained so much attention,” he informs TF.

In comments yesterday Graham Burke, the co-chief executive of Village Roadshow, described SolarMovie as “a particularly vicious bunch of thieves” but its operator rejects that assertion.

“It’s definitely not the biggest linking site available [SolarMovie is ranked #1,500 by Alexa] and it strictly follows the DMCA at least,” he says.

Burke also said the site was “making illicit millions” with “disgusting advertising”, adding that there were “sexual ads” on the platform. SolarMovie rejects that too.

“No sexual ads are allowed on the site for sure. Furthermore, logged in users don’t see any ads at all,” the site’s operator says.

Foxtel vs The Pirate Bay, Torrentz, TorrentHound and IsoHunt

The application filed by Foxtel is largely the same as the one filed by the studios and targets the sites listed above. The respondents are 17 local ISPs including iiNet, Telstra and Optus, and requires that each company’s subsidiaries also carry out blocking.

In common with the Village Roadshow application, DNS and IP address blocking is requested for The Pirate Bay, Torrentz, TorrentHound and IsoHunt but expands significantly with the addition of many alternative domains, mirrors, clones and proxies.

For The Pirate Bay alone the TV outfit demands a blockade of 37 separate domains and even more IP addresses. For Torrentz there are 11 domains and almost four times as many IP addresses listed, with TorrentHound and isoHunt weighing in at eight and five domains respectively.

Again, visitors to the sites will be redirected to a landing page and there are no penalties should ISPs have to temporarily suspend blocking due to technical issues. The application as it stands does not request that site operators should have the right of appeal.

Conclusion

Since the text of both applications has been negotiated with the ISPs, it’s expected that they will pass largely unamended and rubber-stamped by the court. The applications will then essentially become a template for future actions of which there will be many in the months and years to come.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Aussie Site Blocking Imminent But Three Strikes Abandoned

Today brings mixed news concerning Australia’s approach to online piracy. While Hollywood studios and local TV giant Foxtel have confirmed they are filing applications with the Federal Court to have several sites blocked, the controversial “three strikes” warning scheme against end users has been abandoned, for now.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

ausThe issue of online piracy is a political hot-potato in dozens of regions around the world but few developed countries have received as much attention as Australia.

Historically treated as second-class citizens when it comes to official content availability and pricing, Australians have frequently been labeled some of the world’s worst pirates, a stigma that has attracted much attention from United States entertainment companies.

To that end Australia has faced a huge effort to introduce two key anti-piracy mechanisms. On the one hand Hollywood studios, led by local entertainment outfit Village Roadshow, have campaigned for the introduction of web blockades against the likes of The Pirate Bay and other unauthorized media distribution sites.

On the other, entertainment companies of all flavors have lobbied hard for a so-called “three strikes” warning scheme that would see regular Internet users monitored by anti-piracy companies and then sent escalating warning notices by their respective Internet service providers.

Today there is news on both fronts and for Aussie file-sharers there is cause for both disappointment and cautious celebration.

Site blocking

Site blocking, which has been gaining traction in numerous other countries, is moving ahead at pace. Village Roadshow and local TV giant Foxtel have confirmed separate actions in the Federal Court to block several pirate sites.

Village Roadshow and partners Warner Bros, Universal, Paramount, Sony, Disney and 21st Century Fox are teaming up to target streaming portal Solarmovie, a site which is already blocked in the UK and has just been the subject of legal action in Singapore.

Foxtel’s complaint targets four other sites including (no surprises) The Pirate Bay.

“These websites already have a lot of malware and other dangers associated with them and as the big ones like solarmovie.ph are knocked own it will be hard for them to get back up again quickly,” says Village Roadshow co-chief executive Graham Burke.

If their applications to the Federal Court are successful, local Internet service providers will be required to block the sites so that their subscribers are unable to access them by regular means.

According to ABC, rightsholders and four or five of the country’s largest ISPs have been in negotiations for some time over how blockades will be implemented.

DNS blocking / cache poisoning is reportedly being requested by rights holders. Since it is also the method preferred by the Communications Alliance which represents most of the country’s Internet service providers, it’s likely blocking will move forward on that basis.

That could mean, however, that users of DNS systems not involved in the blocking system will be able to circumvent blockades in much they same way they currently avoid geo-restrictions put in place by Netflix. Furthermore, DNS blocking is entirely defeated by use of a decent VPN.

Three strikes

While many Aussies will be disappointed that their favorite sites are likely to be picked off and blocked in the coming months, there is something for individual file-sharers to cautiously celebrate.

After years of negotiations it looked almost inevitable that a so-called “three strikes” scheme would be implemented Down Under. The system would involve pirates being monitored and notified of their behavior via escalating warning notices, with legal action being the final step.

However, in somewhat of a surprise announcement Village Roadshow’s Graham Burke has informed CNET that the plans have been shelved.

“We reached the conclusion after having an independent audit firm evaluate the cost of sending out the notices, and we concluded that it was too much of an imposition to ask the ISPs, and also from our own point of view, the amount it would cost. So we decided not to push it forward,” he said.

Given the years of negotiations, government involvement, not to mention the trauma caused by the ill-fated iiNet legal action that came to a close in 2012, the turnaround is nothing short of spectacular. However, that the basis for the back-tracking is cost-based is no surprise whatsoever.

“At the moment, [the warning system] is manual,” Burke said. “And it’s just so labor intense, that it’s somewhere in the vicinity of $16 to $20 per notice, which is prohibitive. You might as well give people a DVD.”

But while costs are too high at the moment, it appears a more cost-effective automated system is somewhere on the horizon. Burke won’t say when it will appear, but he predicts that when it’s firing on all cylinders it would bring the costs of notices down to a few cents each.

While rightsholders should be expected to have another bite of the cherry in the not too distant future on the warning front, in the meantime Aussie pirates will have relative freedom to go about their business. The Dallas Buyers Club case has also collapsed, so it could be sometime before trolls raise their heads in the region. That leaves companies like Village Roadshow appealing to the public’s better nature.

“We are going to be mounting a massive campaign to reinforce the fact (to the public) that piracy is not a victimless crime and we have to continue to provide content in a timely way and at affordable prices,” Burke said.

Whether the studios manage to achieve both ‘timely’ and ‘affordable’ will be for the public to decide in the months to come. Most are not convinced thus far.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

KickassTorrents User Ordered to Stop Pirating or Face Fines

A prolific uploader to KickassTorrents has been told by a court that he faces fines of up to 2,000 euros a day if he continues his activities on the torrent site. The warning is a result of legal action taken by Dutch anti-piracy outfit BREIN, who previously promised they would target more and more large-scale pirates in 2016.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN has been a thorn in the side of Internet pirates for many years, largely targeting sites and services to reduce content availability.

BREIN claims to have taken down more than 340 sites in 2015, including 96 streaming platforms and 63 torrent indexes. However, for 2016 the anti-piracy outfit has committed to a strategy that makes things a little more personal for downloaders.

In recent months BREIN has made several announcements relating to its pursuit of individual file-sharers, particularly those at the more serious end of the scale. Think those that upload a lot of content to torrent sites, rather than more casual downloaders (although BREIN isn’t ruling that out).

Today BREIN announced its latest target, a prolific uploader to KickassTorrents (KAT), the world’s largest torrent site. Instead of tackling the individual head on, BREIN headed to court to obtain an order that would forbid him from continuing his sharing activities.

Known online by the alias “Reinrox“, the individual allegedly uploaded around 105 torrents to KAT, half of which were popular music videos from the likes of Adele, Robin Schulz and Meghan Trainor. The remainder included songs from the Top 40, several films (including Rocky 1 to 5) and complete TV series such as CSI:Miami.

In court papers BREIN identified Reinrox by his real name and explained that overall he had been responsible for infringing the copyrights of “many hundreds” of titles, many of which belong to BREIN’s clients.

Stressing the damage being caused by the Kickass user’s activities, BREIN asked the court for action to bring the infringement to an end.

“Given the scale of infringement….BREIN has well-founded fear that the respondent will continue his conduct, whether or not through another website or under another alias,” the anti-piracy group said.

BREIN indicated that an order issued by the court for Reinrox to cease and desist under threat of a large fine would hopefully bring an end to the matter. Interestingly, BREIN said that in its experience an ex parte order yields better compliance than issuing a summons to an alleged infringer.

“An ex parte court order reinforced with a penalty gives those whose rights have been violated the greatest possible assurance that this will not happen again,” BREIN told the court, adding that an early decision would put an end to Reinrox’s activities which “continue unabated every day without the rights holders being compensated in any way.”

BREIN said that as long as the uploaded torrents remained live on KickassTorrents its clients would continue to suffer “substantial and irreparable damage”. This, alongside the threat of Reinrox uploading more content, justified a swift solution.

“The nature, severity and repetitive nature of the infringements committed by the respondent justify this order being granted immediately given without the respondent being heard,” BREIN said.

The court agreed, granting BREIN the order it required and ordering Reinrox to cease and desist within 24 hours of being notified of the decision. As can be seen from the image below, that had an immediate effect on his KickassTorrents account which was deleted two weeks ago.

brein-delete

While it appears Reinrox intends to comply with the ruling from the court (BREIN says that an agreement has been signed), the Dutchman faces significant penalties should he change his mind. Court documents (pdf) indicate a fine of 2,000 euros per day for any breach, up to a maximum of 50,000 euros.

The ruling is almost identical to one handed down last November against another KickassTorrents user said so have uploaded around 750 torrents and the signs suggest it won’t be the last.

BREIN previously indicated that this kind of legal action would become a feature of its activities in 2016 after deploying special software to help with the task.

“The system is registered with the Dutch data protection authority (CBP) which has issued a certified statement after examination the legality for the processing of personal data in this system by BREIN,” the group said.

Those caught by BREIN will be required to sign a cease and desist agreement and pay a contribution towards costs and damages, which currently amount to around 12,500 euros.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Kids’ ‘Frozen’ Show Canceled After Disney Refuses Music License

The hit show ‘Frozen’ has delighted children around the world since 2013 but there will be no ice-based fun in the UK this holiday week. Following a licensing mix up and threats from Disney, a tribute show planned to begin tomorrow has been canceled, leaving around 1,000 kids with melting dreams.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

After hearing songs from the hit show Frozen on a continuous loop since its release in 2013, millions of parents must long for the day when their kids find something else to take its place.

But while adults wish that their offspring would just let it go, it’s still preferable to hearing kids crying and/or complaining during this week’s half term break in the UK. But that’s exactly what a couple of thousand adults have to look forward to thanks to a licensing screw up and the inflexible folks at Disney.

Tomorrow night at the Heywood Civic Centre in Manchester, the Frozen tribute show ‘Freezing – An Icy Adventure’ was set to entertain kids from all over the region but a dispute over copyright means that the show has been completely canceled.

freezing-big

Disney’s lawyers contacted the venue to inform the production that they hadn’t obtained the correct licensing, something which came as a shock.

Promoter Carl Tebbutt told the MEN that the production believed it was covered under the licensing agreement they have with the PRS (Performing Rights Society) under whose control creators get paid for public performances.

It’s a reasonable assumption as PRS cover the vast majority of licensing in the UK. However, Disney bosses told the production that their content is not handled by PRS.

It took TF a while to find the relevant paperwork (pdf) but sure enough, Disney is one of a handful of notable exclusions.

prs-exclusions

So considering the combination of a genuine mix up, the huge resources that have gone into the production and thousands of disappointed kids, Disney were prepared to grant the production a temporary license, right? Not a chance.


“It’s all one big misunderstanding,” Tebbutt told MEN.

“We thought that we were covered for use of the songs by the usual PRS payment but after being approached by the Disney legal representatives this appears to be not the case.

“Rather than risk legal action we regrettably have had to cancel the shows.”

Although directed more at the United States, Disney has a website dedicated to providing information on how to obtain a performance license for its content and the company has the entire thing on lockdown. Anyone intending to perform even a small element of a show needs to have a license for the whole thing, even if they don’t intend to charge admission.

And those thinking of adding a little artistic re-interpretation can think again. Any deviance from Disney’s provided script, music and lyrics is banned and those that ignore the rules can have their licenses withdrawn.

“In the event that changes are made, your license may be revoked and you will lose the rights to perform the show at all. Please remember that when you acquire a license, you are agreeing to use your artistic vision to bring the show to life as the authors originally conceived it,” the site reads.

Parents wanting to record their kids’ performances must pay up front too.

“A school or organization must obtain a video license from [Disney licensing] before any individual records the production. Otherwise, video recording under all circumstances is prohibited,” Disney explains.

In fact, Disney is so precious over every piece of its content that even ‘right-click’ and ‘copy’ is disabled on its website. That’s easily circumvented by choosing ‘copy’ from the browser menu instead but there will be no such short-cuts for the children of Manchester tomorrow night. And they Were So Close too.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Singapore Court Orders Country’s First Pirate Site Blockade

Solarmovie.ph will become the first piracy website to be blocked on copyright grounds by Internet service providers in Singapore. Legislation targeting pirate sites was introduced in 2014 but progress to lock off the first domain has been slow. The MPA praised the move as positive for creators and helpful in preventing the spread of malware.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

solarmovieBlocking websites with the assistance of Internet service providers has emerged as one of the preferred methods of rightsholders seeking to reduce online infringement.

The practice is endorsed by both the music industry and Hollywood, with MPAA chief Chris Dodd giving the practice his personal blessing.

In the summer of 2014, Singapore passed amendments to its Copyright Act and later that year they became law, allowing the country to join the growing list of countries prepared to block sites at the ISP level.

It was expected that sites would be blocked fairly quickly but progress has been slow, with no sites blocked in 2015. However, according to a report in local media, that will soon change.

Last Thursday, Singapore’s High Court ordered local ISPs including Singtel, StarHub and M1 to disable access to SolarMovie.ph, a website offering links to mainly pirate movies. According to Alexa, SolarMovie has a world traffic rank of 1,500.

The move was welcomed by Mike Ellis, the MPA’s Asia-Pacific president and managing director.

“It is important that the creative industries are able to work via Singapore’s High Court to take a reasonable step forward to limit content theft,” Ellis said.

“Piracy websites not only stifle the growth of legal online platforms for movies and television shows, they may also pose a risk of malware infection.”

It was originally believed that The Pirate Bay would be the first site to be blocked by Singapore but that site may be in a batch of domains being dealt with separately by IFPI.

In January 2015 the music group suggested it would collect evidence against The Pirate Bay with a view to getting it blocked, but at the time the site was still down following the December 2014 raid that took the site offline for two months.

IFPI previously said it would initially target three to five sites in Singapore, so expect developments on that front in the weeks and months to come.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Kodi Announces Legal Action to Smash Piracy Links

The group behind the Kodi media player used by millions to watch movies, TV shows and live sports say they are sick of being linked to piracy. Those using the Kodi name to promote infringing activity in future face action for trademark abuse but it won’t be a battle easily won.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Over the past several years the Kodi media player has grown to become one of the most-used pieces of software through which people can stream, download and otherwise obtain copyright infringing content.

While millions have heard of BitTorrent, living rooms around the world are now more likely to have a device running Kodi, largely due to how easily the software is run on smart-enabled TVs.

Interestingly, the companies behind both BitTorrent and Kodi have a similar problem. Through the actions of their users, both sets of developers are up to their necks in piracy-related news and both would prefer not to be since neither has done anything illegal.

BitTorrent Inc. has made huge efforts on the PR front to try and educate the masses, with limited effect. Now Team Kodi say they will do the same but if the early signs are a prediction of the future, this will be a tough challenge.

The problem in a nutshell

Kodi is just a media player, it carries no content. However, Kodi has the ability to run third party plugins that in many instances make infringing content available to the user. So, when people load Kodi with plugins recommended by a friend and then see the latest movies listed, they believe that Kodi – and the people behind Kodi – are the ones providing them with the movies.

Needless to say, for Team Kodi this is a huge problem. Not only are they already wrongly associated with huge amounts of infringing activity, the installed addons often break or do not function as advertised. When users get problems they head off to the Kodi forums and vent – to entirely the wrong people.

kodi-piracy

“Every day a new user shows up on the Kodi forum, totally unaware that the free movies they’re watching have been pirated and surprised to discover that Kodi itself isn’t providing those movies,” says XBMC Foundation President and Kodi Product Manager Nathan Betzen.

But while those who install Kodi on their own machines and obtain the addons themselves probably understand that Team Kodi isn’t to blame for their piracy, there are countless thousands – maybe millions – of people out there who are entirely clueless.

That’s because they are buying hardware devices from places such as eBay and Amazon with Kodi ready set-up with potentially infringing third party addons.

More often than not, these products are advertised as “fully loaded” and less subtly as “Powered by Kodi”. The latter infuriates Team Kodi, especially when the devices fail to operate as promised.

kodi-piracy1

“There have been a wave of sellers who decided to make a quick buck modifying Kodi, installing broken piracy add-ons, advertising that Kodi let’s you watch free movies and TV, and then vanishing when the user buys the box and finds out that the add-on they were sold on was a crummy, constantly breaking mess,” Betzen explains.

“These sellers are dragging users into the world of piracy without their knowledge and at the same time convincing new users that Kodi is a buggy mess, because they never differentiate Kodi from 3rd party add-ons.”

By now there are millions of Kodi users and although its difficult if not impossible to put numbers on them, it’s probably fair to assume that the majority are using the software for piracy. So what can the Kodi team possibly do?

Bring out the trademark banhammer

Well, the team has a plan which involves dissociating the Kodi name from infringing acts. The XBMC Foundation owns the ‘Kodi’ trademark and is legally entitled to chase down people who use it without permission.

kodi-trademark

They announced an intention to do so in 2014 but it appears things have gotten so bad since that core Kodi developers have threatened to quit unless something more aggressive is done.

“This means we will issue trademark takedown notices anywhere we think the likelihood for confusion is high. If you are selling a box on your website designed to trick users into thinking broken add-ons come from us and work perfectly, so you can make a buck, we’re going to do everything we can to stop you,” Betzen warns.

“If you are making a video in which you claim to be a Kodi developer or Kodi team member or you are just using the Kodi name while assuring users that some pirate add-on is totally legal and isn’t going to break next week, we will do everything we can to take you down.”

That’s right. Team Kodi aren’t just going to target sellers of piracy-configured boxes, but even people putting up YouTube videos that use the Kodi trademark without permission.

“Most of all, we are tired of a thousand different salesmen and Youtubers making money off ruining our name. And there are even more people out there seeking to make a quick buck by selling ads on videos about getting free movies and TV while using Kodi in their channel name to make their content seem official, as if those videos are coming from us.”

There has already been vigorous debate in the Kodi forums over how far the team will be prepared to go, with suggestions that even people monetizing “Kodi tips” could become a target.

kodi-piracy2

Only time will tell how this will play out, but the Kodi team are under no illusions that this is a huge task. To that end they’re enrolling supporters to help them with their trademark offensive against both sellers and YouTubers.

“If you see somebody selling a box that’s ‘fully loaded’ or comes with the phrase ‘Free movies and TV with Kodi,’ please, ask them to stop. And let us know. It’s OK to sell a vanilla Kodi box. It’s OK to sell a fully loaded box that doesn’t have Kodi installed or fully rebrands Kodi to something else entirely. It is not OK to sell a fully loaded Kodi box,” the team clarify.

“If you see a Youtuber using the Kodi logo as part of his channel, constantly marketing Kodi as a source of free movies, ask him to stop pretending to be us and dragging our name through the muck. And, of course, let us know. Who knows, maybe the Youtuber has no idea that he or she is causing so many problems and a conversation might solve them.”

Interestingly, while Team Kodi are clearly sick of being connected to piracy, they aren’t actually condemning what the user does.

“Team Kodi maintains an officially neutral stance on what users do with their own software. Kodi is open source software, and as long as the GPL is followed, you are welcome to do with it as you like,” Betzen explains.

“So while we don’t love this use of Kodi, as long as you know what illegal and potentially dangerous things you are getting yourself into and accept the fact that the Team will not be providing you with any support, then you are welcome to do what you like.”

There’s no doubt that the Kodi team has a mountain to climb and at this point it seems unlikely they will ever truly get to the top. That being said, it will be interesting to see them try as this is a unique situation that few have ever faced before.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

$38 Script Spawns Dozens of Free Spotify-Like Sites

Last month we were alerted to a beautiful site that merged the smart looks and playlists of Spotify with the music of YouTube to make a very decent free streaming service. Little did we know that almost anyone can put together a similar platform in minutes, all for an initial outlay of just $38.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

youtubify-smallWhen an Argentinian news site tipped us off about a new streaming platform last month, first impressions were good.

Wefre (now defunct) was beautifully presented and managed to provide the user with a Spotify-like streaming service for free.

Admittedly lots of other sites try to do similar things but with all the artwork, albums, playlist features and embedded videos in one place, Wefre seemed pretty unique. However, following a tip from a reader it soon became evident that nothing could be further from the truth.

Instant music site

Although our tipster didn’t name it, TF was informed that Wefre was the product of a new script so we set about tracking it down. We eventually found it for sale on the CodeCanyon marketplace where it made its debut in November.

Called YouTubify (YouTube/Spotify combined), the script allows almost anyone to set up a free Spotify-like service with a minimum of fuss.


YouTubify – YouTube/Spotify Mashup Script

youtubify

“Youtubify allows you to create your own music streaming website in minutes with no coding knowledge,” the sales pitch reads.

“It has an impressive feature set that rivals and even surpasses other biggest streaming services on the market.”

According to figures presented on CodeCanyon, YouTubify has been sold 310 times on that platform alone, which raises the possibility of there being hundreds of YouTubify ‘clone’ sites on the Internet today, Wefre being just one of them.

Indeed, further investigation revealed dozens of similar sites, all with their own style of presentation and color schemes and little addons here and there. But the fact remains that every single one was borne from exactly the same script costing just $38.00.

Aside from the fact that the script makes streaming site ownership so easy (potential legal issues aside, of course), for casual users there’s also the opportunity to look behind the scenes.

CodeCanyon provides a live demo of the platform in action and those logging in with the username: ‘admin@admin.com’ and the password: ‘admin’ can check out what it’s like to operate one of these sites from the inside.

While the admin panel could do with some tidying up, it looks very straightforward to use and even provides the user with an opportunity to monetize their site by injecting ads. However, there’s no getting away from the fact that this is the ‘coding’ equivalent of painting by numbers and is unlikely to bring any long-term reward for the experienced site operator.

But if instant music site ownership isn’t your thing, there other options too. The author of YouTubify also has some other products up his sleeve, a few of which are clearly aimed at the file-sharing market.

There’s BeDrive – a script while allows users to create their own file-sharing and cloud storage site “in minutes with no coding knowledge.”

Also available is MTDb, a similar script which in conjunction with another plug-in allows the creation of a “fully functional” movies and TV show streaming site. We haven’t tested it but that sounds like a pretty big claim. (demo here).

These products do appear interesting at first view but whether they will encourage innovation will remain to be seen. It has to be noted though that most private trackers started off life as a pre-made script but were then developed by their owners into something unique and in many cases extremely powerful.

This doesn’t feel like that kind of scenario to be honest, but stranger things have happened.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

Court Orders Web-Blocking Monitoring Site To Be Blocked

A human rights organization that monitors web-censorship and pirate site blockades in Russia has been ordered to be blocked by a local court. After a legal challenge failed to convince prosecutors, RuBlacklist was advised this week that it has just three days left before local Internet service providers block the site .

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.

When it comes to blocking websites, Russia is becoming somewhat of a world leader. Although not in the same league as China, the country blocks thousands of websites on grounds ranging from copyright infringement to the publication of extremist material, suicide discussion and the promotion of illegal drugs.

The scale of the censorship is closely monitored by local website Roscomsvoboda. More commonly recognized by its Western-friendly URL RuBlacklist.net, the project advocates freedom on the Internet, monitors and publishes data on blockades, and provides assistance to Internet users and site operators who are wrongfully subjected to restrictions.

Sadly, however, the website’s work has now become the source of its own problems. By this weekend and like thousands of other sites before it, RuBlacklist will become blocked by the very government mechanism it aims to expose.

The imminent blocking became apparent on Wednesday when RuBlacklist’s webhost was advised by government telecoms watchdog Roskomnadzor that a URL on the monitoring group’s website had been placed on Russia’s banned websites register.

The URL in question, rublacklist.net/bypass/, offers advice and information on how Russian citizens can use VPNs, proxies, TOR and The Pirate Bay’s Pirate Browser to circumvent blockades.

This advice appears to have irked authorities, prompting a court process against the site that began in the first half of 2015. However, while the courts want the circumvention advice URL banned, it is standard practice in Russia to block URLs and IP addresses, meaning that RuBlocklist will be blocked in its entirety.

Nevertheless, RuBlocklist are not giving up. Last year the group filed an appeal with the Krasnodar Regional Court which did discuss the case but notably without representatives from the site being present. That effort failed so now the site will push forward again, all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary.

“We have collected a number of expert opinions, including from representatives of government agencies and industry organizations, which explain that the information we distribute on [the URL in question] cannot be banned in Russia and does not violate the current legislation of our country,” the site explains.

RuBlacklist says they’re convinced that the information they disseminate via their resource is not only in compliance with the laws of Russia, but also in the public interest.

“All the information that we publish is socially important. We conduct an open monitoring of the legislation regulating the sphere of the Internet, information technology, media, and the media, follow the practice of its enforcement and publish relevant news. We also publish analytical, statistical and expert materials into the public domain for free distribution,” RuBlacklist continues.

“In addition, our team provides legal assistance to Internet users, website owners, bloggers and journalists, who believe that their rights have been violated in the Internet space.”

While RuBlacklist being blocked is somewhat ironic in itself, their situation is drawing attention to the very issues at the core of the site’s mission. According to the site around 96% of the sites currently blocked in Russia are victims of blanket IP address blocking, something the site itself will now be subjected to.

“Perhaps [the blocking of RuBlacklist] is even a good thing, if we are able through the higher courts to confirm the right of any Internet resource to inform Internet users of the methods they can use to restore their constitutional rights in the network space,” the site says.

“However, this will only happen if the court makes a fair decision based on the laws of the Russian Federation, and not the private opinion of the local prosecutor, who we would advise to take a closer look at the relevant regulations governing the online space.”

Only time will tell whether RuBlacklist will be able to continue its mission as before but in the meantime the project’s cause will receive much-needed attention, even if the site itself will only be available via proxy.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and ANONYMOUS VPN services.