Pirate Site Op Wants Shueisha to File a U.S. Lawsuit in 180 Days or Restore their Privacy

The former operator of defunct piracy giant Mangajikan continues to fight against their identity being revealed to Shueisha’s team in Japan. After a failed attempt to quash a DMCA subpoena, a California federal court ruled that Cloudflare must hand over the information it holds. However, the parties vehemently disagree on the scope of the protective order.

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

one piece logoWith an impressive 185 million visitors in May this year, Mangajikan was one of the largest piracy sites on the Internet.

The site’s popularity did not go unnoticed by manga publisher Shueisha, which took legal action at a California federal court this summer to uncover the operator’s identity.

Shueisha filed a request for a DMCA subpoena, directed at Cloudflare, hoping to expose the operator. This appeared to yield results right away, as mangajikan.com and the related domain alammanga.com were voluntarily taken down soon after.

Motion to Quash / Protect

While Shueisha must have been pleased with the quick result, the publisher was still eager to identify the culprit. The operator, in turn, filed a motion to quash, hoping to protect their identity.

In court, the parties disagreed on whether Cloudflare is a proper recipient for DMCA subpoenas. In October, the California federal court eventually ruled that Cloudflare’s caching made it a valid subpoena target.

As a result, Cloudflare is required to share all information it holds on the pirate site operator. However, before any information was handed over, the court instructed the pirate site operator and Shueisha to agree on the terms of a protective order. That’s easier said than done.

Recently, the parties failed to reach an agreement on what Shueisha is allowed to do with the operator’s identifying information. To resolve this new dispute, they are now back in court, seeking a breakthrough.

Pirate Site Operator Seeks Privacy Fortress

Seeking maximum privacy, the pirate site operator wants the information handed over by Cloudflare classified as “Attorneys’-Eyes-Only”.

This restriction effectively means that the operator’s identity would only be revealed to Shueisha’s external U.S. lawyers. The information would be explicitly hidden from Shueisha’s own employees, in-house lawyers, and executives in Japan.

The proposed protective order would forbid Shueisha’s lawyers from sharing the identifying information with anyone else, including other copyright holders, who may have had their pirated content appear on the site.

Importantly, Mangajikan’s operator proposes a 180-day ultimatum to use the obtained details to file a U.S. copyright lawsuit. If Shueisha’s lawyers don’t take action within this timeframe, they must destroy all copies of the identifying information.

limit 180

Shueisha Wants Broad and Global Action

In its submission, Shueisha fiercely opposes these strict limitations. The company argues that an extreme protective order rewards concealment efforts and obstructs enforcement. Their proposal is the polar opposite, and aims to facilitate a global enforcement strategy.

Specifically, Shueisha is demanding the right to share the name of the operator internally, including with its employees in Japan. This ‘confidential’ information may also be used for legal action abroad, not just in the United States.

In addition, Shueisha should be able to share the name with law enforcement and other affected parties when that’s appropriate.

“Shueisha must be free to use identifying information to pursue claims wherever appropriate, coordinate with law enforcement, seek additional subpoenas if the identifying information in the production is insufficient, or notify others whose works were infringed,” they note.

The Court Decides

Since the parties failed to reach a compromise, the terms of the protective order will be determined by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

This isn’t just a procedural squabble. The judge’s ruling will set a precedent for how much power a DMCA subpoena can truly hold. Are they only designed to help U.S. legal efforts, or can information be used globally?

Needless to say, other rightsholders will monitor the outcome of this battle with great interest. The same holds for pirates who may want to put up a similar defense in the future.

A copy of the Joint Discovery Letter, where both parties explain their respective positions to the court, is available here (pdf). The associated proposed protective orders can be found here (operator) and here (Shueisha)

From: TF, for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

(g+) Don’t Repeat Yourself auf dem Prüfstand: Das gefährlichste Architekturpattern und du!

Design- und Architekturpattern haben sich seit der berühmten Gang of Four stark verändert. Warum DRY heute nicht mehr das Maß aller Dinge sein darf. Ein IMHO von Rene Koch (Softwareentwicklung, Server)

Design- und Architekturpattern haben sich seit der berühmten Gang of Four stark verändert. Warum DRY heute nicht mehr das Maß aller Dinge sein darf. Ein IMHO von Rene Koch (Softwareentwicklung, Server)

I’ve already been using a “Steam Machine” for months, and I think it’s great

With a little know-how, you can get yourself a Steam Machine right this minute.

Valve’s second big foray into first-party PC hardware isn’t a sequel to the much-imitated Steam Deck portable, but rather a desktop computer called the Steam Machine. And while it could go on your desk, Valve clearly intends for it to fit in an entertainment center under a TV—next to, or perhaps even instead of, a game console like the Xbox or PlayStation 5.

I am pretty sure this idea could work, and it’s because I’ve already been experimenting with what is essentially a “Steam Machine” underneath my own TV for months, starting in May when Valve began making it possible to install SteamOS on certain kinds of generic PC hardware.

Depending on what it costs—and we can only guess what it will cost—the Steam Machine could be a good fit for people who just want to plug a more powerful version of the Steam Deck experience into their TVs. But for people who like tinkering or who, like me, have been messing with miniature TV-connecting gaming PCs for years and are simply tired of trying to make Windows workable, the future promised by the Steam Machine is already here.

Read full article

Comments

Mazda 6e im Praxistest: Wie viel darf ein Auto für 46.900 Euro können?

Der Mazda 6e sieht innen und außen gut aus, kommt mit allerlei technischen Extras und kostet unter 47.000 Euro. Gibt es auch Nachteile? Ein Test von Tobias Költzsch (Mazda, Elektroauto)

Der Mazda 6e sieht innen und außen gut aus, kommt mit allerlei technischen Extras und kostet unter 47.000 Euro. Gibt es auch Nachteile? Ein Test von Tobias Költzsch (Mazda, Elektroauto)